Receiving Share activity fixes
Forgot to translate 'self' to 'Ostatus_profile' etc.
This commit is contained in:
parent
dcfcceb6f2
commit
dc31a3d7d6
@ -98,34 +98,35 @@ class SharePlugin extends ActivityVerbHandlerPlugin
|
||||
throw new ClientException(_m('Shared activity does not have an id'));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// First check if we have the shared activity. This has to be done first, because
|
||||
// we can't use these functions to "ensureActivityObjectProfile" of a local user,
|
||||
// who might be the creator of the shared activity in question.
|
||||
$sharedNotice = Notice::getKV('uri', $sharedId);
|
||||
if (!$sharedNotice instanceof Notice) {
|
||||
$sharedNotice = Notice::getByUri($sharedUri);
|
||||
} catch (NoResultException $e) {
|
||||
// If no locally stored notice is found, process it!
|
||||
// TODO: Remember to check Deleted_notice!
|
||||
// TODO: If a post is shared that we can't retrieve - what to do?
|
||||
try {
|
||||
$other = self::ensureActivityObjectProfile($shared->actor);
|
||||
$sharedNotice = $other->processActivity($shared, $method);
|
||||
$other = Ostatus_profile::ensureActivityObjectProfile($shared->actor);
|
||||
$sharedNotice = $other->processActivity($shared, 'push'); // FIXME: push/salmon/what?
|
||||
if (!$sharedNotice instanceof Notice) {
|
||||
// And if we apparently can't get the shared notice, we'll abort the whole thing.
|
||||
// TRANS: Client exception thrown when saving an activity share fails.
|
||||
// TRANS: %s is a share ID.
|
||||
throw new ClientException(sprintf(_m('Failed to save activity %s.'), $sharedId));
|
||||
throw new ClientException(sprintf(_m('Failed to save activity %s.'), $sharedUri));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} catch (FeedSubException $e) {
|
||||
// Remote feed could not be found or verified, should we
|
||||
// transform this into an "RT @user Blah, blah, blah..."?
|
||||
common_log(LOG_INFO, __METHOD__ . ' got a ' . get_class($e) . ': ' . $e->getMessage());
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We don't have to save a repeat in a separate table, we can
|
||||
// find repeats by just looking at the notice.repeat_of field.
|
||||
|
||||
// By returning true here instead of something that evaluates
|
||||
// to false, we show that we have processed everything properly.
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user