Grading System employed

Effective Grading

Either pass or fail.

Qualitative Grading

Grade	Definition
31337	Outstanding
1337	Very Good
42	Competent
0	Failed

Method

Graded every month, the ceiled average is the final.

No Quantitative Grading system will be used.

The contributions will be evaluated according to the following directives:

Autonomy with which the work was done

Low (was unable to progress autonomously);
Competent (some autonomy but with blocking situations that required the
intervention of the mentor);
Very Good (very good ability to solve problems independently in useful time
with the mentor mostly focused on defining the next steps of the work);
Outstanding (is sometimes able to suggest surprising and valid alternatives to what was originally planned by the mentor).

Objectives satisfaction

Low (haven't reached to the minimum objectives admissible for the proposed work);
Competent (the objectives were reached though not entirely);
Very Good (reached up fully);
Outstanding (exceeded up the objectives set).

Intrinsic difficulty level of their work

Low (relatively easy work, both from a scientific or technical point of view,
based on widespread knowledge);
Competent (work with some high complexity of details requiring more advanced
knowledge/expertise, either technical or scientific);
Very Good (relatively complex work, requiring a substantial knowledge and
technical skills, or resulting in some innovative contribution);
Outstanding (InSaNe).

Grade formula per month

                                Autonomy level
Satisfaction of objectives |    Low     Competent       Very Good       Outstanding
                -----------+-------------------------------------------------------
                Low        |    0       0               0               0
                Competent  |    42      42              42              1337
                Very Good  |    42      1337            1337            31337
                Outstanding|    42      1337            1337            31337

                        Grade from matrix above
Difficulty level   |    0       42              1337    31337
        -----------+-----------------------------------------
        Low        |    0       0               42      1337
        Competent  |    0       42              1337    1337
        Very Good  |    0      1337             1337    1337
        Outstanding|    0      1337             1337    31337

Modules

N.B.: The following are the minimum averages in GNU social's Summer of Code, we will come up with a custom "transcript" for any interested student.

Web Technologies

Amount of time allocated to each module unit

Designation	Time (hours)
Autonomous study	80
Mentorship	20
Project work	46
Total	146

Assessment Components

Designation	Weight (%)
Proposal	80
Proof of Competence	20

Proposed Credits

1 Carnegie Unit
5 ECTS

Proposal Rating Guidelines

Internship | Training

Amount of time allocated to each module unit

Designation	Time (hours)
Internship	276.5
Autonomous Study	93.5
Final Report	24
Mentorship	44
Total	438

Assessment Components

Designation	Weight (%)
Practical or project work	100

Proposed Credits

4 Carnegie Unit
18 Austria, Italy, and Spain ECTS
16 Finland, The Netherlands, Portugal, and Russia ECTS
15 Germany, Belgium, Romania, and Hungary ECTS