This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[3.4] Small update in our internal terminology
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
The part of #37128 that applies to 3.4.
Commits
-------
c143aacd81 [3.4] Small update in our internal terminology
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Form] switch the context when validating nested forms
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#37072
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Commits
-------
38135de549 switch the context when validating nested forms
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel] Fix regression where Store does not return response body correctly
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#37174
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Since #36833, the `Store` no longer uses or trusts the `X-Content-Digest` header present on a response, since that may come (in the case of using `CachingHttpClient`) from upstream HTTP sources. Instead, the `X-Content-Digest` is re-computed every time a response is written by the `Store`.
Additionally, the `Store` is implemented in a way that when restoring responses, it does _not_ actually load the response body, but just keeps the file path to the content on disk in another internal header called `X-Body-File`. It is up to others (`HttpCache`, for example) to actually load the content from there. For reasons I could not determine, the file path is also set as the response body.
When the `HttpCache` performs revalidations, it may happen that it wants the `Store` to persist a previously restored response. In that case, the `Store` fails to honor its own `X-Body-File` header. Instead, it would compute (since #36833) the `X-Content-Digest`, which now is a hash of the cache file path.
So, we end up with a response that still carries `X-Body-File` for the original, correct response. Since the `HttpCache` honors this value, we don't immediately notice that. But inside the `Store`, the request is now associated with the _new_ (bogus) content entry.
It takes another round of looking up the content in the `Store` to now get a response where the `X-Body-File` _also_ points to the wrong content entry.
Although I feel a bit uncomfortable with trusting headers that seemingly need to be evaluated in different classes and may come from elsewhere, my suggestion is to skip the write inside `Store` if `X-Body-File` and `X-Content-Digest` are both present and consistent with each other.
Additionally, a `file_exists` check could be added to provide additional assertions, at the cost of accessing the filesystem.
Commits
-------
176e769e5f [HttpKernel] Fix regression where Store does not return response body correctly
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Form] rework form validator tests
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
This will allow writing tests for #37103.
Commits
-------
f062e08f4d rework form validator tests
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] Set NullLogger for functional tests
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/36962
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
Commits
-------
0b9519975d [WebProfilerBundle] Set NullLogger for functional tests
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[PhpUnitBridge] Fix undefined index when output of "composer show" cannot be parsed
…nnot be parsed
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#37086
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
Commits
-------
d3f9b7f833 [PhpUnitBridge] Fix undefined index when output of "composer show" cannot be parsed
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[PhpUnitBridge] fix undefined var on version 3.4
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
Commits
-------
bd6a06a8b3 [PhpUnitBridge] fix undefined var on version 3.4
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
Fix abstract method name in PHP doc block
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Commits
-------
d6966c3147 Fix abstract method name in PHP doc block
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] never directly validate Existence (Required/Optional) constraints
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#36637#36723
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Using `Optional` or `Required` like "regular" constraints does not make any sense, but doing so didn't break before #36365. I suggest to ignore them for now and deprecate using them outside the `Collection` constraint in 5.2.
Commits
-------
d333aae187 never directly validate Existence (Required/Optional) constraints
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Console] Fix QuestionHelper::disableStty()
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no>
| Tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
We broke it when adding `Terminal::hasSttyAvailable()`.
Let's fix it on 3.4 and move it to terminal on master, as suggested in #36977
Commits
-------
5d93b61278 [Console] Fix QuestionHelper::disableStty()
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[PropertyAccess] Fix TypeError parsing again
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | #36872
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | N/A
Apparently, the format of `TypeError`s has changed again in php8. While investigating, I noticed our error message parsing is not handling anonymous classes well, so I've added some test cases for them.
I chose a fuzzier regular expression to parse the expected return type from the error message. Additionally, I'm checking the stack trace if the caught `TypeError` is really caused by the accessor call.
Commits
-------
03b4e98630 [PropertyAccess] Fix TypeError parsing again.
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Form] validate subforms in all validation groups
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#36852
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Commits
-------
b819d94d14 validate subforms in all validation groups