Commits
-------
f4c7333 Fix populating seconds when option "with_seconds" is set to false
Discussion
----------
[Form][DateTimeType] Fix invalid data when "with_seconds" = false
Fix populating seconds when option `with_seconds` is set to `false`.
Commits
-------
4e3406d Sync with master and clean up
ad5d2c1 Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to DateType option) (issue #1205) Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
Discussion
----------
[Form][TimeType] Added possibility to render form as "single_text"
Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to `DateType` option) (issue #1205)
Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ouardisoft at 2011/06/17 03:41:18 -0700
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/21 01:05:51 -0700
@fabpot Any decision about this one ? I'm asking because I also have similar fix for #1323 but it requires this one ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 23:32:08 -0700
@stloyd: Can you rebase to master?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/23 05:03:44 -0700
@fabpot Done.
Commits
-------
7db0b95 [HttpKernel] Removed unnecessary strtoupper
0891c57 [HttpKernel] Added test
1350645 [HttpKernel] Uppercased a few http methods
05c9906 [HttpKernel] Suppress response content for 304 responses out of the cache
Discussion
----------
HttpCache changes for 304 responses
Fixes#1413
Commits
-------
2d29a82 New test for Process, testing stdout and stderr at different stream sizes
Discussion
----------
Make run() fully non-blocking and fix potential other problems
Multiple changes:
1) make writing to process non-blocking too - otherwise there might be increased possibility for buffer deadlock
given big enough input data. Also now it's guaranteed that all stdin data will be written.
2) get rid of fgets() - fgets() isn't really good function to use in case of non-blocking sockets. Data loss possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 07:11:55 -0700
Does it make https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1365 obsolete?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/06/22 14:08:14 -0700
@fabpot: After reading, I really don't know. Let's hope. But ...
I now improved Process tests a bit to test stdout, stderr with different stream sizes and different
behaviours of child processes. Added it to non-blocking-process branch, commit 2d29a82412.
In my case, nothing fails, but maybe this helps other people. Or Windows people - I myself cannot test on Windows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 22:59:55 -0700
These tests pass on my Linux box but fail on my Mac.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 23:05:14 -0700
Actually, on the Mac, the tests behave correctly but the exit code is `-1` instead of `0`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/06/23 01:23:51 -0700
Could you check if the $this->status['running'] (after call to proc_get_status()) is true in the case you get -1.
On my linux I got it -1 couple of times. 99% of time it doesn't happen. I theorized it's because sometimes the child
process isn't finished enough and finally I got confirmation too that in case of -1 the process is still running (stats['running'] === true).
But it's really almost unreproducible on my Linux. So if you have this value every time it might be easier for you to find solution.
What comes into my mind:
1) maybe we should poll, let's say if process is still running we usleep(1000) and the try proc_get_status() again until not running. Maybe up to a 1 sec.
2) maybe, if the process is still running we can trust the return value subsequently given by proc_close()?
Or maybe there's some other problem on Mac.
Commits
-------
d49e306 [DomCrawler] Fixed handling of relative query strings as links
a4451b4 [DomCrawler] Added tests for links starting with ?foo
Discussion
----------
[DomCrawler] Fixed handling of relative query strings as links
The link object concatenates links containing only a query string to the current URI. This shouldn't happen if the current URI already contains a query string.
This PR fixes the incorrect behavior (tests included).
Commits
-------
7783a05 Removed unused code from DateType Additional tests for ChoiceType and DateType based code
cdd39ac Added ability to set "empty_value" for `DateTimeType`, `DateType` and `TimeType` Additional tests covering added code
af4a7d7 More tests and more compatible code, with some suggestions from @helmer
527b738 Test covered version of fix for issue #1336
Discussion
----------
[Form] Added ability to set "empty_value" for choice list
Hey,
This PR is similar to #1336, but this one is fully test covered and have few change in behavior:
- if choice field is not set as non-required, `empty_value` is not added automaticly,
- also `empty_value` is not set if field have option `multiple` or `expanded`,
- `empty_value` for `DateType` and `TimeType` can be set "global" or per field, i.e.:
```
$builder->add('date', 'choice', array('required' => false, 'empty_value' => array('day' => 'Choose day')));
```
- `DateType` and `TimeType` code was cleaned a bit,
- added missing option to set up choice list as required when using PHP templates
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/20 04:55:45 -0700
@fabpot I'm just not sure is that change with removing "auto-adding" of `empty_value` is good (probably BC)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/06/20 05:24:02 -0700
Now this is a really nice way to hijack work done by others. Really encourages newcomers. Gratz!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/20 05:57:40 -0700
@lenar: if the code in this PR is yours (at least partly), I'm not going to merge it. @stloyd, can you clarify this issue with @lenar? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/06/20 06:21:11 -0700
It's @helmer's mostly, not mine, but the issue stays.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/20 06:26:15 -0700
No matter who the code belongs to, Git allows us to keep track of all contributors. So, we need to do our best to not loose any code ownership.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/06/20 06:58:03 -0700
I do not care much for ownership, just that this kind of cooperation (or lack thereof) is kind of exhausting. Closed#1336.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/20 07:47:53 -0700
@fabpot, @lenar: This PR is inspired by #1336, made by @helmer, but after looking at his code and talking with him, we cant (IMO) get an consensus. So I wrote this PR as an another way to fix issue described in #1336.
__Summary__: I don't think this one is better than fix at #1336, it's more like another approach to fix that issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/06/20 08:15:59 -0700
@stloyd: I actually think your variant is better, so good job there, thanks.
It just ain't nice to:
1) Comment on my changes being useless due to lack of tests
2) Writing brand new testsuite from your perspective that "proves" my approach is "wrong" (while ignoring my answers, why I did something precisely like I did, which I did in sync with @fabpot comments on his first attempt to improve the issue)
3) Saying my PR is broken because your new tests against it fail
4) Changing functionality to "fix" something that was not really broken
Other than that, I wanted to contribute a few lines to improve something relatively simple, and it ended up in a huge mess with more lost hours than I planned to spend on it.
On the bright side, we ended up with something good (:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/20 08:32:30 -0700
@helmer: 1) & 2) Sorry for that "bad language", but you get me wrong a bit. Tests was written for code in master (there was no problem to change them to work with your POV). 3) Same as before, you can adopt tests easily, but never mind. Maybe later we could cooperate better ;-)
About 4) I mentioned it in description of this PR and that was point I was disagreeing with you (also about how "default" options are adopted in fields) :-)
Commits
-------
5d46e63 [Form] Add the FormHelper configuration
a43fad4 [Form] Improve unit tests for rendering
1cb2129 [FrameworkBundle][Form] Adding a cache to FormHelper::lookupTemplate()
f39ce67 [Form][FrameworkBundle] PHP theming
Discussion
----------
[2.1] RFC [Form] Php theming
This PR implements theming support for the php engine.
It works similarly as the twig theming with themes being folders and blocks being individual files.
There are probably a few things to tune before this can get merged:
### Theme naming
The current format is "\<Bundle\>:\<Controller\>" i.e. "FrameworkBundle:Form".
Is this ok or could you imagine something better ?
### Div and Table theme folders
Currently "FrameworkBundle\\Resources\\views\\Form" and "FrameworkBundle\\Resources\\views\\FormTable"
Is this ok or anything better ?
### Form helper configuration
I am not sure if the configuration is at the best possible location:
```
framework:
templating:
form:
resources: [themeA, themeB]
```
Any better idea ?
There is a [thread on the ml](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/9b3f131fe116b511)
Commits
-------
7af003b [HttpFoundation] Allow stringable objects and numbers in response body + added tests
8126fb7 [HttpFoundation] Ensure response body is string, fixes#1378
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Ensure response body is string, fixes#1378
The issue in #1378 is clearly just a misuse of the class due but the error it triggers is confusing. This hopes to fix that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/06/21 04:08:40 -0700
Added tests and support for __toString + numbers (kinda pointless but well..)
This change removes the need for the {_locale} hack.
Now, all paths in the Security component can be:
* An absolute path (/login)
* An absolute URL (http://symfony.com/login)
* A route name (login)
So, if you want to use a path that includes a global parameter (like _locale),
use a route instead of a path.
Commits
-------
2c1108c [Form] Revert the ability to override anything else than the text of the label while rendering a row
da467a6 [Form] Fix the exception message when no block is found while rendering
8670995 [Form] Optimize rendering when the block to render is known
41e07c9 [Form] Optimize rendering
ee5d975 [Form] Remove a test which is no more relevant (after recent FileType refactoring)
f729c6b [Form] Add the ability to override label & widget options when rendering a row
e09ae3f [Form][FrameworkBundle] Make FormHelper::renderSection() recursively callable, introduce FormHelper::renderBlock()
e43fb98 [Form][TwigBridge] Make FormExtension::render() recursively callable to ease theming
Discussion
----------
[Form] Some refactoring of the rendering
# First two commits
## FormExtension::render() can now be called recursively.
The main use case is theming support in for collections. Let's consider that you have a collection of `CustomType`, the type hierarchy while rendering the proto would be `field < form < custom < prototype`. Before this change any theme applied to your custom type (i.e. a `custom_row` block) would not have been taken into account while rendering the prototype because of the structure of the `prototype_row` block:
```html
{% block prototype_row %}
{% spaceless %}
<script type="text/html" id="{{ proto_id }}">{{ block('field_row') }}</script>
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock prototype_row %}
```
which skip the `custom_row` block rendering to fallback to the `field_row` block rendering.
With this PR `prototype_row` recursively calls `FormExtension::render()`
```html
{% block prototype_row %}
{% spaceless %}
<script type="text/html" id="{{ proto_id }}">{{ form_row(form) }}</script>
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock prototype_row %}
```
this has for effect to render the block for the parent type (i.e. `custom_row`)
## FormHelper
The `FormHelper` has been updated to more closely match the `FormExtension` architecture and the templates have been modified accordingly. `echo $view['form']->renderBlock(<block name>)` is the php equivalent of `{{ block(<block name>) }}`.
The attributes are now rendered using a template rather than by the `FormHelper::attributes()` method.
Several templates have been fixed.
# Third commit
The `$varStack` property was used to forward options to the label and the widget when rendering a row. The implementation was not working as expected. The proposed way to override label and widget options is to pass these options in the `label` and `widget` keys while callinf `render_row`.
That would be:
`{{ form_row(form.field, {"attr": {<row attributes>}, "label" : {"label": <text>, "attr": {<label attr>}}, "widget" : { "attr" : {<widget attributes}} } }}`
So there is now the ability to set attributes for the row (`<div>` or `<tr>`).
This has been discussed on [the mailing list](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/17754128ba480545). **I would like to find a compromise with @Seldaek before this gets merged**
The `$varStack` property is now only used when recursively calling `FormExtension::render()`
# Notes
I have preferred to submit several commits in order to ease review and to keep some history.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/06/20 05:20:56 -0700
@vicb On a side note, do you think it would be possible to support form theming in PHP templates too ? Currently, the only way to customize the rendering of forms when using PHP templates is to overwrite the FrameworkBundle's templates, and this impacts all forms. This makes the PHP rendering far less powerful than the Twig one.
I don't know the Form rendering and the PHPEngine well enough to know if it is feasible for 2.1 or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/20 05:35:11 -0700
@stof I hope to make it possible but I need a little bit more thinking to find the best possible solution which should not look like a hack.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 01:13:10 -0700
This should not be merged yet, it might have some issue with the variable stack. I am working on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 01:41:11 -0700
Sorted out the issue, it was linked to some local _optimization_, the code of this PR is ok.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 02:01:24 -0700
I have pushed a [POC of php theming based on this PR](https://github.com/vicb/symfony/commits/form%2Fphp-theme) to my repo - it is lacking a configuration and cache layer.
I have open [a thread on the ml](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/9b3f131fe116b511) to discuss this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 23:40:21 -0700
@fabpot fixed in the last commit.
Commits
-------
159fc0e [Validator] Added symbols to IDNs validation
c827faf [Validator] Add support for IDNs and custom TLDs
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Add support for IDNs and custom TLDs
Minor changes to allow for IDNs and [custom TLDs](http://news.softpedia.com/news/ICANN-Approves-New-Custom-Generic-Top-Level-Domains-Like-google-bank-206977.shtml). This is the only sane way to support everything in a timeless manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/06/20 04:32:09 -0700
maybe it should be check the host with idn_to_ascii (if function exists, maybe it's should recreate un punycode en/decoder in the stub)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/06/20 04:40:10 -0700
/me :faceslap.
Haven't seen the link in PR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/06/20 04:40:40 -0700
@mvrhov: Yup, that's what pushed me to reconsider adding this.
@stealth35: I'm not sure if this is needed. I don't want this to be too strict, with another validator or with an extra option I think we can make a check that the domain actually exists, or do a GET / on it or something, but this just checks validity of the syntax.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/06/20 04:48:05 -0700
I understand :)
what about funny IDN like : [☎.com] (http://xn--y3h.com/) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/06/20 04:53:19 -0700
@stealth35: Fixed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/06/20 04:56:18 -0700
it's seem great,for acceptable chars [RFC] (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3490.html) said (with UseSTD3ASCIIRules option) :
(a) Verify the absence of non-LDH ASCII code points; that is, the
absence of 0..2C, 2E..2F, 3A..40, 5B..60, and 7B..7F.
