Commits
-------
cd7835d [Form] Cached the form type hierarchy in order to improve performance
2ca753b [Form] Fixed choice list hashing in DoctrineType
2bf4d6c [Form] Fixed FormFactory not to set "data" option if not explicitely given
7149d26 [Form] Removed invalid PHPDoc text
Discussion
----------
[Form] WIP Improved performance of form building
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: **Update the Silex extension**
This PR is work in progress and up for discussion. It increases the performance of FormFactory::createForm() on a specific, heavy-weight form from **0.848** to **0.580** seconds.
Before, the FormFactory had to traverse the hierarchy and calculate the default options of each FormType everytime a form was created of that type.
Now, FormTypes are wrapped within instances of a new class `ResolvedFormType`, which caches the parent type, the type's extensions and its default options.
The updated responsibilities: `FormFactory` is a registry and proxy for `ResolvedFormType` objects, `FormType` specifies how a form can be built on a specific layer of the type hierarchy (e.g. "form", or "date", etc.) and `ResolvedFormType` *does the actual building* across all layers of the hierarchy (by delegating to the parent type, which delegates to its parent type etc.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-07-12T18:25:40Z
Maybe ResolvedFormType
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmather at 2012-07-13T02:56:38Z
I really like ResolvedFormType. That's the naming method I took for my tag parser that handes the same conceptual issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by axelarge at 2012-07-13T05:25:00Z
ResolvedFormType sounds very clear.
This change is great and I desperately hope to see more of this kind
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Baachi at 2012-07-13T06:41:26Z
Yes `ResolvedFormType` sounds good :) 👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-13T07:11:33Z
I like `ResolvedFormType` as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-07-13T07:46:48Z
👍 `ResolvedFormType` :shipit:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-13T18:01:51Z
This looks good to me
By default, the UniqueEntityValidator maps the violation on the first
field of the UniqueEntity constraint. The new option allows to control
this behavior if a better mapping is suited.
Commits
-------
c1e4166 moved create of default form label to view layer
Discussion
----------
move create of default form label to view layer
A small optimization if you provide custom labels in the view layer (i.e. `{{ form_label(form.name, 'Your name') }}`
```
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: ~
Todo: ~
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: ~
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-24T14:45:17Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1694310) (merged 37f0b774 into 0d4b02e4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-24T15:03:44Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1694418) (merged c1e4166e into 0d4b02e4).
Commits
-------
23bad29 Added translation to placeholder and title attributes
Discussion
----------
Added translation to placeholder and title attributes
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-05-03T13:52:38Z
Better translate it where it is defined.
Dynamic translations are usually not desirable as they cannot be automatically extracted, and thus require more work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ruimarinho at 2012-05-03T13:57:30Z
@schmittjoh but isn't that the same case as with labels for instance? I don't think injecting the translator service into the form type would require less work than what this PR suggests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-05-03T14:02:02Z
Yeah, same thing.
There might be some cases where it's fine, but in general, we should try to not translate dynamic vars.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ruimarinho at 2012-05-03T14:17:44Z
@schmittjoh I think that's one of those cases, since these attributes in particular (title and placeholder) are intended to aid the user with a brief description. I understand (and agree) with your concern regarding dynamic vars, but in my opinion this is a use case where it is worth it. Just my two cents :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-05-03T18:07:01Z
@schmittjoh the issue is that translating the label before the template would require injecting the translator in the form types (as the form label can be set there) and would force the user to duplicate the translation process if they pass the label explicitly in the template.
Commits
-------
a2b3d3c added cache service definition
Discussion
----------
[Doctrine Bridge] Added a method to load a cache definition
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
Following this discussion (https://github.com/doctrine/DoctrineBundle/pull/62), this will let DoctrineBundle, MongodbBundle and CouchdbBundle share the same code for cache definitions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dlsniper at 2012-04-30T06:56:49Z
+1 for this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-30T06:57:58Z
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-30T15:41:05Z
Can you add a note abou this change in the CHANGELOG?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-30T15:46:48Z
does it really need to be in the changelog ? End-users don't know about this at all. The only guys affected by this change are the maintainers of the different Doctrine bundles as they can remove some code now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-30T16:41:21Z
@stof: right
@bamarni: Can you squash your commits?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bamarni at 2012-04-30T17:03:38Z
@fabpot : done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dlsniper at 2012-04-30T17:22:07Z
@bamarni can you also do a patch for the docs after this gets merged so that people know about this change and know how to use it?
Thank you!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bamarni at 2012-04-30T17:29:05Z
@dlsniper : no problem ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-30T18:29:03Z
ping @beberlei
Commits
-------
246c885 [Form] Fixed: Default value of 'error_bubbling' is now determined by the 'single_control' option
d3bb4d0 [Form] Renamed option 'primitive' to 'single_control'
167e64f [Form] Fixed: Field attributes are not rendered in the label anymore. Label attributes are now passed in "label_attr"
68018a1 [Form] Dropped useless test that is guaranteed by OptionsParser tests and that needs to be adapted very often
649752c [Form] Fixed: CSRF token was not displayed on empty complex forms
c623fcf [Form] Fixed: CSRF protection did not run if token was missing
eb75ab1 [Form] Fixed results of the FieldType+FormType merge.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed errors introduced in the FieldType+FormType merge
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3994, #4000, #2294, #4118
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-22T15:39:20Z
`primitive` is a pretty abstract option name. It depends on the person what he considers primitive. Maybe more explicit naming or better documentation what it means.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-22T15:47:29Z
Better suggestions?
The distinction here is between primitive and complex forms, where primitive forms are such forms that can be represented by a single HTML tag. This obviously needs to be documented.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-22T15:49:45Z
Maybe `single_widget` or something like that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-23T13:09:43Z
@Tobion @bschussek would `elementary` be better than `primitive` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-23T13:17:04Z
and `compound \ composite` better than `complex` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-23T14:08:33Z
@vicb I fail to see how elementary/compound is easier to understand than primitive/complex. Maybe single_widget, but what's the opposite of this case? multi_widget?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-23T14:15:09Z
Actually I am fine with anything... as long as it is documented.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-23T14:22:31Z
Still I think that this unveals a more profound naming problem. How do we (also in the documentation) name forms with children (formerly "forms") and forms without children (formerly "fields")?
Should we refer to them as
* forms and fields?
* complex and primitive forms?
* ...
We must first answer this question before we can find an intuitive option name. If the documentation always switches between different terminologies, neither will it be understandable nor will this option be easy to remember.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-23T15:10:32Z
> Still I think that this unveals a more profound naming problem. How do we (also in the documentation) name forms with children (formerly "forms") and forms without children (formerly "fields")?
To make it clear, I would rather say forms that **can have** children and forms that **can not have** children (i.e. Empty collections have no children but they can have and this is reason why you have to introduce those options, right ? - that could be a good example for the doc).
It will probably be better to refer to "complex" / "primitive" forms in the doc (and use the "form" / "field" terms to explain them).
Note: I think @Tobion concern is that "primitive" / "complex" could be pejorative terms (this is why I have proposed "elementary" / "compound").
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-23T16:00:54Z
1. primitive/complex is subjective (and could be pejorative too)
2. elementary/compound is more explicit so probably better than primitive/complex
3. I dislike this option in general. Does it make sense to change this option from a user perspective? I guess it's always the same as long as the widget structure stays the same. So it should be resolved at a higher level dynamically from the widget structure and not exposed to any configuration.
4. In documentation I would use the terms forms and fields. Because all people with HTML knowledge will understand that fields cannot have sub-fields whereas forms can. But since this distinction is not findable in code, it should be mentioned that all these are implemented as a form hierarchy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2012-04-23T16:02:00Z
how about simple and complex?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-23T16:06:33Z
@Tobion It does not make sense to change this option from the user perspective, still the overloading type has to propagate to FormType whether it is a form or a field, so that the default behaviour is correct.
A second option how to implement this is to add a method `isField` to FormTypeInterface that can be overloaded and receives the options. I don't really like to introduce new methods here unless absolutely required.
What about renaming the option "primitive" to "is_field"? The blocks in the template would then be named "form_widget_field" and "form_widget_form".
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by tristanbes at 2012-04-25T14:01:06Z
Oh, I should've seen this before, i thought I was doing something wrong. (empty collections gets an input field bug)
Please big :UP: on this. When will it be merged ? @bschussek
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-25T15:30:28Z
+1 for "is_field" and "form_widget_field" but I would rather use "form_widget_compound" instead of "form_widget_form" which is quite strange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-26T16:34:04Z
@Tobion "simple" and "compound" then?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-26T16:49:58Z
no "field" and "compound"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-26T17:17:02Z
I don't like "field" for a simple reason: Consider the "date" type. We are typically speaking of the "date" field there. But technically, the "date" field is a compound field. So?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-26T21:17:37Z
I don't understand the open question. You proposed "is_field" and "form_widget_field" yourself. So calling the template block "form_widget_field" is a comprehensible consequence of "is_field". I wouldn't call the date type with multiple inputs a field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by tristanbes at 2012-04-26T21:52:39Z
We should take a decision cause right here i got all my forms that are broken because of the empty collection rendering as input field :-).
I guess we are many in that situation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-27T08:28:16Z
I renamed "primitive" to "single_control" now to match with the HTML specification which names all input elements (input, select etc.) "controls". The opposite is now "compound".
Meanwhile, I added a fix for #4118.
@fabpot This is ready for merge now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-27T10:22:49Z
Hm, I know naming things is hard and sometimes not really important. But since users need to know which block to override, it is essential to make it clear. I think there is still one issue.
The block is named `form_widget_single_control` in order, as you said, to abstract away if it's an input, select etc. But in fact it can only render `input` and nothing else. So this is misleading.
So you could also simply name it `form_widget_input`.
Apart from that I agree with everything.
The WebProcessor can now be registered as a kernel.request listener to
get the request instead of passing it as a constructor argument, which
was broken as the request is not yet available when the logger is
instantiated.
Commits
-------
e344609 [DependencyInjection] Fixed composer.json
1aa0786 [FrameworkBundle] Fixed composer.json
3601f61 [DoctrineBridge] Fixed composer.json
Discussion
----------
Fix composer json
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-04-22T14:22:24Z
`suggest` no longer requires a version constraint. While you're at it, maybe you could change those to more meaningful strings explaining what each optional dependency provides.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-04-22T14:24:27Z
I know, but the version is fine. It's more up to @fabpot to add description in each `suggest` entries.
Anyway, this is not the purpose of this PR. If you want to contribute on that, feel free :)
Commits
-------
01ca0ad [Propel1] Added security layer
Discussion
----------
[Propel1] Added security layer
Fixed the security layer for Propel 1.6, and Symfony2 2.1.
The PropelBundle is ready to go: https://github.com/propelorm/PropelBundle/pull/139
Unit tests are part of the PropelBundle at the moment, as it requires to setup a quick builder.
Commits
-------
6e4ed9e [Form] Fixed regression: bind(null) was not converted to an empty string anymore
fcb2227 [Form] Deprecated FieldType, which has been merged into FormType
bfa7ef2 [Form] Removed obsolete exceptions
2a49449 [Form] Simplified CSRF mechanism and removed "csrf" type
Discussion
----------
[Form] Merged FieldType into FormType
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3878
Todo: update the documentation on theming
This PR is a preparatory PR for #3879. See also #3878.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by juliendidier at 2012-04-13T14:25:19Z
What's the benefit ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-04-13T14:26:40Z
why `input_widget` ? and not just `widget`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Burgov at 2012-04-13T14:27:49Z
@juliendidier dynamic inheritance is now obsolete which fixes some other issues
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2012-04-13T14:37:26Z
What about __not__ breaking API so *badly* and leaving `FieldType` which will be simple like (with marking as deprecated):
```php
<?php
class FieldType extends AbstractType
{
public function getParent(array $options)
{
return 'form';
}
public function getName()
{
return 'field';
}
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-13T14:43:41Z
@stloyd That's a very good idea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2012-04-13T17:41:21Z
IMHO what @stloyd proposed sounds like a good idea, but removing FieldType class, if #3903 will come into life might ensure that more forms will broke and people will check them thoroughly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by r1pp3rj4ck at 2012-04-13T18:46:08Z
@bschussek looks great, but I'm concerned about how quickly will the third-party bundles adapt to this BC break. I hope really quick, because if they don't the whole stuff will be useless :S of course it's not your problem to solve.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-13T18:50:32Z
@r1pp3rj4ck there is already another BC break requiring to update custom types for Symfony master. So third party bundles already have to do some work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by r1pp3rj4ck at 2012-04-13T18:59:37Z
@stof which one? I've looked into @bschussek 's RFC about these [foo].bar stuff, but it's not yet implemented. Are you refering to this or another one I've missed?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-13T19:04:06Z
@r1pp3rj4ck the change regarding default options
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by r1pp3rj4ck at 2012-04-13T19:06:10Z
@stof oh, I forgot that one. Weird thing is that I've already changed my default options today and still forgetting these stuff :D
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-14T08:58:29Z
I restored and deprecated FieldType now. I'd appreciate further reviews.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2012-04-14T09:02:32Z
Maybe we should try to avoid this BC in templates ? What do you think about similar move like with `FieldType` ? (hold old, but inside just render new)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-14T09:07:22Z
@stloyd You mean for those cases where people explicitely render the block "field_*"? We can do that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2012-04-14T09:09:45Z
@bschussek Yes I mean this case =) Sorry for not being explicit, I need some coffee I think =)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-17T14:45:35Z
I added the field_* blocks again for BC. Could someone please review again? Otherwise this can be merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Burgov at 2012-04-17T15:11:16Z
@bschussek I'm not sure what has changed to cause this, but if I try out your branch on our forms, if I leave the value of an input empty, eventually the reverseTransform method receives a null value, rather than a '' (empty string) value, as on the current symfony master.
DateTimeToLocalizedStringTransformer, for example, will throw an Exception if the value is not a string
```php
if (!is_string($value)) {
throw new UnexpectedTypeException($value, 'string');
}
```
Other than that, all forms render just the same as they do on symfony master
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-17T15:30:29Z
@Burgov Fixed.
Commits
-------
5208bbe [Validator] Fixed typo, updated CHANGELOG and UPGRADE
dc059ab [Validator] Added default validate() implementation to ConstraintValidator for BC
6336d93 [Validator] Renamed ConstraintValidatorInterface::isValid() to validate() because of the lack of a return value
46f0393 [Validator] Removed return value from ConstraintValidatorInterface::isValid()
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Renamed ConstraintValidatorInterface::isValid() to validate() and removed return value
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: **YES**
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: update the documentation
Before I begin, this PR is up for discussion.
I removed the return value of ConstraintValidator::isValid() because it wasn't used anymore within the framework. Removing it also means a simplification for userland implementations. Already now the validation component only depended on violation errors being present for deciding whether the validation was considered failed or not.
Because the name `isValid` does not make a lot of sense without a return value, I changed it to `validate`. Note that this affects an interface (ConstraintValidatorInterface) previously marked with `@api` by us!
What do you think about this change?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-09T17:51:38Z
@bschussek IIRC, the Validator component was part of the components that are not considered as stable for 2.0 (there is 4 of them IIRC, including Config, Security and Form) so changing the interface should not be an issue here
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-02-09T17:54:55Z
No it was .. form wasn't:
http://symfony.com/doc/2.0/book/stable_api.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by rdohms at 2012-02-10T13:23:32Z
I fail to see the value of the BC in this case.
Just because the framework does not use given functionality anymore is not reason to drop it, since all of this was clearly proposed as a "component" to be used in other projects. Other implementations of validator in other projects might actually depend on this.
Is it possible to just add a new value and have both functionalities available?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-10T13:25:12Z
@rdohms the point is that the return value is confusing. Someone may return ``false`` by thinking it will mark the field as invalid (which is implied by the name ``isValid``) whereas it is not the case at all
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-10T13:30:13Z
Exactly. UniqueEntityValidator for example always returned `true` and nobody ever noticed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2012-02-10T13:53:03Z
@bschussek but its not a bug, setting the execution context failure is enough. returning false would lead to a second error message being evicted. This is the weird problem of the API imho
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-10T13:54:49Z
@beberlei This has already been fixed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-10T13:59:59Z
@beberlei in the master branch, errors are not duplicated anymore as the return value is simply ignored.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-02-10T14:29:03Z
I'm +1. If people are concerned about this strong BC break we could maybe add a fallback for the majority.
Most people propably have extended the ConstraintValidator and not used the interface directly. So we can change the Interface and at the same time provide a default proxy method in ConstraintValidator for validate. I.e.
public function validate($value, Constraint $constraint)
{
$this->isValid($value, $constraint);
}
Thus all people who have extended ConstraintValidator won't notice a BC break.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hades200082 at 2012-02-10T16:10:31Z
Could you not have both validate and isValid as separate methods with distinct purposes?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-10T16:55:12Z
@hades200082 which distinct purposes ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hades200082 at 2012-02-10T17:02:57Z
One should actually validate. The other should return whether it is valid or not as a bool.
Even if isValid calls validate to determine this surely they are distinct purposes? doing it this way would not require a break to BC but the existing components in the framework could be switched to use validate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-10T17:10:50Z
@hades200082 Validators are stateless. They don't "remember" whether they validated successfully or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hades200082 at 2012-02-10T17:13:25Z
Maybe they should? Would save revalidating every time
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-10T17:16:10Z
@hades200082 how could they be stateless ? you can use the same instance to validate several values. For instance, the UniqueEntityValidator is a service and so will be reused.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-11T23:40:09Z
I would really like that we do not break BC in this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-11T23:59:02Z
@fabpot there is also a BC break in the previous changes: the return value has no meaning at all now (it is not even considered by the GraphWalker.
Most 2.0 validator will continue working because of the new implementation of setMessage but I can provide the 2 broken cases:
```php
<?php
/**
* This validator always set the message, even when it is valid to keep things simple.
* This works fine in 2.0.x (as the return value is what makes the decision) but will
* add a violation in 2.1 (setMessage adds the violation to keep things working for
* cases setting the message only for invalid values, like the core used to do).
*/
public function isValid($value, Constraint $constraint)
{
$this->setMessage($constraint->message);
return true;
}
/**
* This validator never set the message, failing with an empty message.
* This works fine in 2.0.x (as the return value is what makes the decision) but will
* not add the violation in 2.1.
*/
public function isValid($value, Constraint $constraint)
{
return false;
}
```
The second one is clearly an edge case as it would absolutely not be user-friendly but the first one makes totally sense when using the 2.0.x API (with a boolean expression using the value of course)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-12T00:11:19Z
I agree with you; I should probably have refused to merge the previous PR. And I think we need to reconsider this change. If not, why are we even bothering tagging stuff with the @api tag?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-12T10:15:55Z
@stof I disagree with you. Setting an error message but not letting the validation fail is not how the API is supposed to work. Also the opposite was not meant to work, as it results in empty error messages. The third example is that a validator *had* to return true if it called `addViolation` directly. These cases show that the previous implementation was clearly buggy and needed to be fixed.
This PR is only a consequence that cleans the API up.
@fabpot IMHO validator was too young and not tried enough to be marked as stable. But as we can't change this anymore, I think the decision we have to make is
* BC/reliance on `@api` marks vs.
* API usability (also considering the coming LTR)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-12T10:18:12Z
BTW @Tobion's suggestion could definitely make a transition easier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-15T10:26:10Z
@bschussek +1 for @Tobion's suggestion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Brouznouf at 2012-02-15T16:06:12Z
Could be nice to comment function as deprecated and/or trigger a E_USER_DEPRECATED error when using this method to prevent user calling this method.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-15T16:09:37Z
trigger E_USER_DEPRECATED would be wrong as the kernel set the error reporting to ``-1`` and registers an error handler tuning all reported errors to exception in debug mode, so it would be a BC break.
Commenting the function as deprecated in indeed possible
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by rdohms at 2012-02-29T11:15:01Z
Went back to working on validators and it really makes me disagree with these changes a little more. Let me explain.
In the isValid method, i like to work with return early checks, so straight up i check some stuff and return early either true/false.
From the frameworks perspective true/false does not make a difference, but from a reader's perspective it adds a lot of value:
if ($object->getId() === null) {
return true;
}
versus
if ($object->getId() === null) {
return;
}
having the return true make it clear that in this case the object is valid for anyone who is reading my validator. i think this is a good practice to push forward.
Anyway, my 2 cents on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-04T00:05:09Z
@fabpot what do you think about this ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-05T16:37:38Z
@rdohms: Still, how do you want to deal with the fact that the return value is ignored anyway?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by rdohms at 2012-04-06T06:51:07Z
@bschussek Nobody has to know? I would keep it as it is, i have noticed that returning false without any error messages does not get me the expected results, so it seems there is no harm in keeping the parctice of true/false even if it is misleading.
Other then that.. i would alter the code to self create a error message if false is returned, thus making true/false still work, but i'm guessing that's not what your vision says, even if i find it les readable and understandable. So yeah, just my opinioin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-06T07:02:53Z
@rdohms: Your opinion is appreciated. Self-creation of error messages is what we did before, unfortunately it's very hacky then to suppress the self-creation if you want to return false and add (potentially more than one) error messages yourself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-17T14:58:07Z
I added @Tobion's suggestion now. Can you please review again? Otherwise this is ready for merge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-17T15:05:16Z
Statement in changelog and upgrade is missing, or?
Commits
-------
8329087 [Form] Moved calculation of ChoiceType options to closures
5adec19 [Form] Fixed typos
cb87ccb [Form] Failing test for empty_data option BC break
b733045 [Form] Fixed option support in Form component
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed option support in Form component
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3354, #3512, #3685, #3694
Todo: -
This PR also introduces a new helper `DefaultOptions` for solving option graphs. It accepts default options to be defined on various layers of your class hierarchy. These options can then be merged with the options passed by the user. This is called *resolving*.
The important feature of this utility is that it lets you define *lazy options*. Lazy options are specified using closures that are evaluated when resolving and thus have access to the resolved values of other (potentially lazy) options. The class detects cyclic option dependencies and fails with an exception in this case.
For more information, check the inline documentation of the `DefaultOptions` class and the UPGRADE file.
@fabpot: Might this be worth a separate component? (in total the utility consists of five classes with two associated tests)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2012-04-05T08:54:10Z
"The important feature of this utility is that it lets you define lazy options. Lazy options are specified using closures"
What about options that are closures? are those differentiated?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-05T08:57:35Z
@beberlei Yes. Closures for lazy options receive a Symfony\Component\Form\Options instance as first argument. All other closures are interpreted as normal values.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-05T11:09:49Z
I'm wondering if these classes should go in the Config component. My issue with it is that it would add a required dependency to the Config component and that the Config component mixes many different things in it already (the loader part, the resource part, the definition part...)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-04-06T13:36:36Z
Sharing the Options class would be great, and its more then one class so why not give it its own Component folder?
Filesystem is just one class, and that has its own folder.
Great job on the class bschussek 👏
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-10T12:32:34Z
@fabpot Any input?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-10T13:54:13Z
@fabpot Apart from the decision about the final location of DefaultOptions et al., could you merge this soon? This would make my work a bit easier since this one is a blocker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-10T18:08:18Z
@bschussek: Can you rebase on master? I will merge afterwards. Thanks.
Commits
-------
f9a486e [Validator] Added support for pluralization of the SizeLengthValidator
c0715f1 [FrameworkBundle], [TwigBundle] added support for form error message pluralization
7a6376e [Form] added support for error message pluralization
345981f [Validator] added support for plural messages
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Added support for plural error messages
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Todo: create translations for en and update others (FrameworkBundle)
[](http://travis-ci.org/hason/symfony)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011-05-14T20:41:01Z
@bschussek: What's your opinion?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-09-04T13:14:29Z
@hason could you rebase your branch on top of master and update the PR ?
You also need to change the messages in the constraint that uses the pluralization to a pluralized format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-10-16T18:06:22Z
@hason ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-11-11T14:58:19Z
@hason ping again
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-12-12T20:39:10Z
@hason ping again. Can you update your PR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2011-12-12T21:29:14Z
@stof I hope that I will update PR this week.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-15T19:07:32Z
Looks good to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-02-02T17:28:54Z
@hason can you update this PR and squash commits, it conflicts with current master
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-02-09T07:21:41Z
@stof, @canni Rebased.
What is the best solution for the translation of messages?
1. Change messages in the classes and all xliff files?
2. Keep messages in the classes and change all xliff files?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-09T08:19:41Z
The constraints contain the en message so you will need to modify them to update the message
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-02-09T08:55:55Z
I prefer second option. The Validator component should be decoupled from the Translation component. The constraints contain the en message which is also the key for Translation component. We should create validators.en.xlf in the FrameworkBundle for en message. I think that this is better solution. What do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-04T02:22:02Z
@hason Please rebase your branch. It conflicts with master because of the move of the tests
@fabpot ping
Commits
-------
65aa387 [Form] Fixed index generation in EntityChoiceList if ID is not an integer
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed index generation in EntityChoiceList if ID is not an integer
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3635
Todo: -
Commits
-------
a430f3d [#3446] [Form] Fix getChoicesForValues of EntityChoiceList on empty values
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fix reverseTransform on multiple entity form type
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3446, #3727
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-03T23:05:55Z
@bschussek ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-03T23:06:45Z
This is an alternate implementation for #3727
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by chmielot at 2012-04-04T13:47:27Z
OK, this is another possibility to fix this issue with working tests. What do you think about this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by chmielot at 2012-04-04T13:51:27Z
OK, just done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-04T13:51:39Z
@beberlei @bschussek ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-06T18:50:37Z
@fabpot 👍
This TwigEngine implements the interface available in the component.
the TwigBridge in TwigBundle now extends this class and provides only
the additional methods for the FrameworkBundle interface.
Commits
-------
dd4d46a add limit to logger explosion
Discussion
----------
add limit to logger explosion
This limit is required to display complete query with e.g. "array" type in it.
ping @willdurand
Commits
-------
9ef5e95 Add connection name in the propel data collector
Discussion
----------
Add connection name in the propel data collector
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes, This will allow to explain a propel query on a specific connection
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
- Require PR propelorm/Propel#315
- Related to PR propelorm/PropelBundle#129
cc @willdurand
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-03-16T18:17:26Z
@fabpot please, let me merge Propel related PRs before that one, thanks!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-03-26T08:38:36Z
@fabpot good to go from my point of view
Commits
-------
10947cb [DoctrineBridge][Security] Fixes bug that prevents repository's refreshUser from being called
Discussion
----------
[Security][DoctrineBridge] Fixes bug that prevents repository's refreshUser from being called
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marcw at 2012-02-21T08:46:09Z
Updated. What do you guys think about this patch ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-02-21T08:57:47Z
Isnt this a bit dangerous, the custom repository implementing refreshUser should always be called first right? You wouldnt specify the $property property if your class has custom implementations would you?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marcw at 2012-02-21T09:05:08Z
@henrikbjorn At this time, the refreshUser method is never called from the custom repository, even if you don't specify the "property" property. This patch fixes this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marcw at 2012-02-21T09:44:06Z
Updated & Squashed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-21T10:03:33Z
@marcw please move the retrieval of the id in the ``else`` block, like in my comment as it is useless to do this logic for the case where the userProviderInterface is implemented (and it will answer to @vicb by making it impossible to write it with elseif)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marcw at 2012-02-21T10:19:06Z
I'm not sure about this, but Isn't the check of the id essential here to ensure that the entity is a persisted one ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-21T10:21:55Z
@marcw if the interface is used, it means that the user wants to do the work himself. So you should really let him do the way he wants. If he does not use the id to refresh the user, he could choose not to include it in the serialized data.
Retrieving the id is needed for the ``find()`` call because we pass the id as argument and so we fail when the serialized data don't contain it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marcw at 2012-02-21T10:33:30Z
@stof Roger that. I'll do the fix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marcw at 2012-02-21T10:41:58Z
Updated & Squashed, again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-21T11:00:44Z
btw, to answer to your previous question, the exception when retrieving the id does not check if the object is persisted (you need to reach teh DB for this, which is what find() does) but that the id is part of the serialized data to give a better error reporting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-07T19:39:33Z
ready to be merged now?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-03-08T07:21:37Z
would say so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dlsniper at 2012-03-25T11:58:34Z
Hi, can this be merged now or not?
Commits
-------
0c83c5d [Form] Alternate syntax for form_theme
Discussion
----------
[RFC][Form] Alternate syntax for form_theme
before
`{% form_theme form _self "::base.html.twig" %}`
after
`{% form_theme form with "::base.html.twig" %}`
`{% form_theme form with varTheme %}`
`{% form_theme form with [_self, "::base.html.twig"] %}`
_the former syntax is still supported_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-12T15:42:32Z
do you really need ``with`` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-12T15:50:41Z
it's not needed but I find it more clear (It can be drop if a consensus is reached)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-12T17:05:46Z
+1 for `with`. Documentation for master should be updated as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-03-13T02:26:22Z
+1 for `with`, but the syntax without array like `{% form_theme form with "::base.html.twig" %}` should also be supported
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-13T07:16:55Z
`[]` are nice as they clearly indicate the ability to use multiple themes (which I think is yet to be documented). We'll pick the most popular syntax only.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-13T08:16:40Z
@vicb supporting a string instead of an array should be possible when you need only one element. supporting several ones and turning it into an array is the mistake we made for 2.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hhamon at 2012-03-13T08:16:45Z
+1 for the new syntax
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-13T08:29:45Z
@stof @Tobion what about using the former syntax then ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Baachi at 2012-03-13T08:32:09Z
+1 for new syntax. But it should be possible to use strings instead of arrays.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-13T08:33:07Z
@vicb Having one wyntax using ``with`` and the other without will confuse users IMO. this is why I suggested allowing to pass a Twig array without adding an extra word
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-13T08:40:02Z
@Baachi not stringS as it is precisely what we are trying to solve :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Baachi at 2012-03-13T08:42:03Z
Oh sry. I mean __string__. :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-13T11:16:30Z
+1 for supporting a string or an array with the new syntax as using only one element is probably the most common use case. But then, why not supporting any valid Twig expression?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-13T11:54:51Z
Something like the latest commit ? (Tests have to be updated).
@fabpot What is the best place to handle array / non-array ? This is currenlty handled in the node but the parser might be a better place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-13T13:23:08Z
@vicb: I would just remove the special array case in the node as it's not needed anymore.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-13T13:24:15Z
... and update FormExtension::setTheme() to also accept a string in which case we convert it to an array there.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-03-13T14:26:17Z
I'd prefer a named argument instead of an ubiquitous "with" keyword which does not really tell me what's coming next.
Something like ``{% form_theme _form templates=[a, b, c] %}``. This is pretty nicely done for the assetic tags "javascripts", and "stylesheets".
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-03-13T16:04:26Z
@schmittjoh it would only make sense if there are multiple named arguments. With only one available it seems redundant.
Also `{% form_theme _form templates="template.html.twig" %}` is bad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-14T07:59:08Z
I tend to agree with @Tobion but I'll have a closer look at assetic to see if we can make things more consistent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-03-14T10:36:15Z
This would be more consistent with assetic, but assetic isn't really consistent with anything else in twig, although I see the benefits in that particular case for swapping and omitting parameters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-03-14T15:49:37Z
My goal was not really consistency, but I simply find it more obvious,
self-explanatory and easier to understand if you name things explicitly. We
are using the "with" keyword in several places and each time something
different is expected.
To me explicit naming is superior, but just my 2c
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Jordi Boggiano <
reply@reply.github.com
> wrote:
> This would be more consistent with assetic, but assetic isn't really
> consistent with anything else in twig, although I see the benefits in that
> particular case for swapping and omitting parameters.
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3576#issuecomment-4495732
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-03-14T16:48:01Z
When I first saw this tag I didn't understand the role of first parameter.
So if we use johannes suggestion it should rather be `{% form_theme form=myForm templates=[a, b, c] %}`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2012-03-14T18:09:09Z
Before we complicate this any further can I add another thing here.
Moving to dedicated issue: Inflexible form theming #3598
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-14T18:20:54Z
@mvrhov that is not the good place to discuss this (both this particular issue and GH as this is a support request).
_Have you tried `{% form_theme form.subForm ... %}`_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-15T07:39:14Z
Where do you think we should go:
1. `{% form_theme form with [_self, "::base.html.twig"] %}`
2. `{% form_theme form=form src=[_self, "::base.html.twig"] %}`
Let's discuss the structure first & not the details (i.e. src vs templates).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Baachi at 2012-03-15T07:52:51Z
I tend to ```{% form_theme form with [_self, "::base.html.twig"] %}```, because its more consistent to the twig syntax.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-15T13:10:56Z
@vicb: I like 1) more than 2) as this how the built-in tags work.
To keep BC even further, can we just remove the `with` keyword? To make it BC, we just need to have a look at extra parameters and add it to an array if they exist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-03-15T13:19:52Z
For newcomers 2) is definitely easier to understand. But it would also only make sense if you can change the parameter order, so `{% form_theme form=form src=[_self, "::base.html.twig"] %}` == ` {% form_theme src=[_self, "::base.html.twig"] form=form %}`. At the same time it reduces consistency. So for experienced developers option 1) [without "with"] is less redundant and preferable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-15T13:53:49Z
@fabpot removing the `with` will make `Parser::parsePostfixException()` scream when providing an array of themes.
Commits
-------
265360d [DoctrineBridge] Simpler result checking in UniqueEntityValidator
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Simpler result checking in UniqueEntityValidator
In 928e352d09, support for MongoDB cursors was implemented by converting an Iterable, non-ArrayAccess object to an array. The ArrayAccess check didn't seem purposeful, since cursors are only Iterable and ORM returns real arrays. Since we only need to access the first element of the cursor (and only in cases where the count is exactly 1), we can simply use current() to handle Iterables and arrays.
@henrikbjorn: Any thoughts on this? I was testing @stof's work in doctrine/DoctrineMongoDBBundle#68 and our Symfony submodule was a bit old, so I fixed UniqueEntityValidator on my local machine before I realized you had come up with a solution a few weeks ago.
Commits
-------
71493a2 [DoctrineBridge] Compiler pass for registering event listeners/subscribers
f15dde6 [DoctrineBridge] ContainerAwareEventManager class
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] ContainerAwareEventManager class
```
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
```
[](http://travis-ci.org/jmikola/symfony)
This allows services to be registered (and lazily loaded) with Doctrine Common's EventManager.
It is ported from @schmittjoh's previous commits here: doctrine/DoctrineBundle#23. I'd like to integrate this with DoctrineMongoDBBundle, so the Bridge once again seemed like an ideal alternative to duplicating code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2012-02-23T20:37:51Z
Per conversation with @stof in doctrine/DoctrineBundle#23, I'm also going to integrate the compiler pass (an abstract version both bundles can use) into this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2012-02-23T21:56:47Z
Just realized there's an issue with the naming assumptions, since Doctrine ORM uses "doctrine" as its registry service ID but "doctrine.dbal" as its event manager prefix. Fixing.
Commits
-------
9c8a283 Some \SessionHandlerInterface related documentation updates
9b2de81 Fixed \SessionHandlerInterface in DbalSessionStorage
Discussion
----------
Some \SessionHandlerInterface related updates
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by snc at 2012-02-23T20:01:51Z
I checked the `Locale` stub in the documentation and it looks like the `\` is not prefixed, so I'll change this, too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-02-24T07:40:39Z
We really need some tests for the bridge classes, even if they stubs which cause the compiler to at least parse the class, would pick up refactorings like this.
In 928e352d09, support for MongoDB cursors was implemented by converting an Iterable, non-ArrayAccess object to an array. The ArrayAccess check didn't seem purposeful, since cursors are only Iterable and ORM returns real arrays. Since we only need to access the first element of the cursor (and only in cases where the count is exactly 1), we can simply use current() to handle Iterables and arrays.
This was imported from DoctrineBundle (see: doctrine/DoctrineBundle#23), since it can be used by other Doctrine bundles, too. It utilizes the ContainerAwareEventManager from f15dde6c59.
Commits
-------
c754f28 [DoctrineBridge] Rename data fixtures loader class
af84805 [DoctrineBridge] Suggest doctrine/data-fixtures dependency
e4243a1 [DoctrineBridge] Add common data fixtures loader
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Add common data fixtures loader
Symfony does not depend on doctrine/data-fixtures, but having this class in the bridge would enable DoctrineMongoDBBundle (and possibly others) to load fixtures without requiring DoctrineFixturesBundle to be installed.
Additionally, DoctrineFixturesBundle seems to only consist of this class and a command for loading ORM fixtures. With this in the bridge, we can possibly eliminate DoctrineFixturesBundle altogether by merging its command into DoctrineBundle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-11T19:40:17Z
The reason to have a separate bundle for the ORM fixtures was that the ORM is released whereas the DataFixtures library is still in alpha versions. So we wanted to avoid having it in Symfony itself for the 2.0 release. It could maybe change now that we have the bundle in a separate repo.
The other solution could be to put all commands related to fixtures in DoctrineFixturesBundle but IIRC @beberlei rejected a PR trying to make the same command work for ORM and PHPCR.
@beberlei what do you think about these suggestions ? And what is missing in DataFixtures to release it ? It has not changed recently except for the addition of the typehint and an update of the PHPCR purger
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-14T23:30:23Z
The Symfony bridges provide integration between a third-party library and Symfony components. IIUC, this PR is only about Doctrine and as such it is not in the scope of the bridge. It should be done "somewhere" in the Doctrine namespace (what about common for instance?).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-14T23:34:19Z
@fabpot no it is not a Doctrine-only code. This extended loader is about integrating the Doctrine DataFixtures library with the DI component to allow fixtures to be container-aware (it does absolutely nothing else fancy btw). So this *is* in the scope of the bridge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2012-02-15T00:40:12Z
I second @stof's point here. This class is specifically for loading fixtures into application with a service container. Likewise, that is why the base class it inherits is in the common data-fixtures library.
Since this is common to both ORM and ODM, the most logical home for it would be DoctrineCommonBundle, and I believe that's what the bridge is :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-15T01:53:17Z
@jmikola not even a DoctrimeCommonBundle IMO. This is not about integrating things with the fullstack framework but with one component
Commits
-------
88b826d [Propel] Fixed typo, removed useless use statement, used getData() instead of casting a PropelCollection
46d28cd [Propel] Fixed the CollectionToArray transformer
1f20fb1 [Propel] Removed useless code
3910735 [Propel] Avoid to duplicate objects
d69144c [Propel] Refactored the CollectionToArray transformer
1706671 [Propel] Fixed naming to reflect Doctrine bridge
1f277df [Propel] Removed useless ModelToIdTransformer
Discussion
----------
Cleaned the propel bridge (+ fixes)
I've fixed the `ModelChoiceList` with `multiple=true`, and I removed useless code.
This PR will ensure everything works fine, but it requires the following fix for Propel: https://github.com/propelorm/Propel/pull/286.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-02-11T20:04:10Z
@cedriclombardot this PR will fix your issues with Sf2 + Propel in your admingen
@bschussek nevermind my comments on Twitter, it seems ok now
Commits
-------
22c8f80 [Form] Fixed issues mentioned in the PR comments
3b1b570 [Form] Fixed: The "date", "time" and "datetime" types can be initialized with \DateTime objects
88ef52d [Form] Improved FormType::getDefaultOptions() to see default options defined in parent types
b9facfc [Form] Removed undefined variables in exception constructor
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed: "date", "time" and "datetime" fields can be initialized with \DateTime objects
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: **yes**
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3288
Todo: -
Fixed exception that was thrown when doing:
$builder->add('createdAt', 'date', array('data' => new \DateTime()));
On a side note, the options passed to `FieldType::getDefaultOptions` now always also contain the default options of any parent types. This is necessary if you want to be independent of how `getDefaultOptions` is implemented in the parent type and still rely on the already defined values.
As a result, `FieldType::getParent` doesn't see default options anymore. This shouldn't be a big problem, because this method only relies on options in few cases. If it does, options now need to be checked for existence with `isset` before being used (BC break).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-09T16:14:46Z
@fabpot Ready to merge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-10T12:15:04Z
@fabpot Ready to merge
The listener is used by the Collection type as well as the Choice and Entity type (with multiple
selection). The effect is that you can have for example this model:
class Article
{
public function addTag($tag) { ... }
public function removeTag($tag) { ... }
public function getTags($tag) { ... }
}
You can create a form for the article with a field "tags" of either type "collection" or "choice"
(or "entity"). The field will correctly use the three methods of the model for displaying and
editing tags.
Commits
-------
2e4ebe4 [Validator] Renamed methods addViolationAtRelativePath() and getAbsolutePropertyPath() in ExecutionContext
9153f0e [Validator] Deprecated ConstraintValidator methods setMessage(), getMessageTemplate() and getMessageParameters()
0417282 [Validator] Fixed typos
a30a679 [Validator] Made ExecutionContext immutable and introduced new class GlobalExecutionContext
fe85bbd [Validator] Simplified ExecutionContext::addViolation(), added ExecutionContext::addViolationAt()
f77fd41 [Form] Fixed typos
1fc615c Fixed string access by curly brace to bracket
a103c28 [Validator] The Collection constraint adds "missing" and "extra" errors to the individual fields now
f904a9e [Validator] Fixed: GraphWalker does not add constraint violation if error message is empty
1dd302c [Validator] Fixed ConstraintViolationList::__toString() to not include dots in the output if the root is empty
1678a3d [Validator] Fixed: Validator::validateValue() propagates empty validation root instead of the provided value
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Improved "missing" and "extra" errors of Collection constraint
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2615
Todo: -
Instead of a single violation
Array:
The fields "foo", "bar" are missing
various violations are now generated.
Array[foo]:
This field is missing
Array[bar]:
This field is missing
Apart from that, the PR contains various minor fixes to the Validator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T09:14:52Z
@fabpot Ready for merge.
Commits
-------
de253dd [Form] read_only and disabled attributes
Discussion
----------
[Form] read_only and disabled attributes (closes#1974)
1. Removed ``readOnly`` property from ``Form``, as it is no longer required
2. Introduced ``disabled`` property to ``Form``, behaves exactly like ``readOnly`` used to
3. Added ``disabled`` property to fields, defaults to ``false``, renders as ``disabled="disabled"``
4. A field with positive ``read_only`` property now renders as ``readonly="readonly"``
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2012-01-26T17:46:17Z
I changed ``Form`` and ``FormBuilder`` property ``readOnly`` to ``disabled``. On second thought, this is perhaps not such good change - while readOnly somewhat implied the use-case, disabled no longer does.
Perhaps something else, like ``bindable`` (as not to confuse with read_only attribute of Fields)?
@bschussek, others, any thoughts?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-31T06:53:59Z
Please prefix commits with the affected component, if applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2012-01-31T08:41:03Z
@bschussek Prefixed. Please also see see to [this question](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3193#issuecomment-3673074)
A new ExecutionContext is now created everytime that GraphWalker::walkConstraint() is
launched. Because of this, a validator B launched from within a validator A can't break
A anymore by changing the context.
Because we have a new ExecutionContext for every constraint validation, there is no point
in modifying its state anymore. Because of this it is now immutable.
Commits
-------
8dc78bd [Form] Fixed YODA issues
600cec7 [Form] Added missing entries to CHANGELOG and UPGRADE
b154f7c [Form] Fixed docblock and unneeded use statement
399af27 [Form] Implemented checks to assert that values and indices generated in choice lists match their requirements
5f6f75c [Form] Fixed outstanding issues mentioned in the PR
7c70976 [Form] Fixed text in UPGRADE file
c26b47a [Form] Made query parameter name generated by ORMQueryBuilderLoader unique
18f92cd [Form] Fixed double choice fixing
f533ef0 [Form] Added ChoiceView class for passing choice-related data to the view
d72900e [Form] Incorporated changes suggested in PR comments
28d2f6d Removed duplicated lines from UPGRADE file
e1fc5a5 [Form] Restricted form names to specific characters to (1) fix generation of HTML IDs and to (2) avoid problems with property paths.
87b16e7 [Form] Greatly improved ChoiceListInterface and all of its implementations
Discussion
----------
[Form] Improved ChoiceList implementation and made form naming more restrictive
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: **yes**
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2869, #3021, #1919, #3153
Todo: adapt documentation
The changes in this PR are primarily motivated by the fact that invalid form/field names lead to various problems.
1. When a name contains any characters that are not permitted in HTML "id" attributes, these are invalid
2. When a name contains periods ("."), form validation is broken, because they confuse the property path resolution
3. Since choices in expanded choice fields are directly translated to field names, choices applying to either 1. or 2. lead to problems. But choices should be unrestricted.
4. Unless a choice field is not expanded and does not allow multiple selection, it is not possible to use empty strings as choices, which might be desirable in some occasions.
The solution to these problems is to
* Restrict form names to disallow unpermitted characters (solves 1. and 2.)
* Generate integer indices to be stored in the HTML "id" and "name" attributes and map them to the choices (solves 3.). Can be reverted to the old behaviour by setting the option "index_generation" to ChoiceList::COPY_CHOICE
* Generate integer values to be stored in the HTML "value" attribute and map them to the choices (solves 4.). Can be reverted to the old behaviour by setting the option "value_generation" to ChoiceList::COPY_CHOICE
Apart from these fixes, it is now possible to write more flexible choice lists. One of these is `ObjectChoiceList`, which allows to use objects as choices and is bundled in the core. `EntityChoiceList` has been made an extension of this class.
$form = $this->createFormBuilder()
->add('object', 'choice', array(
'choice_list' => new ObjectChoiceList(
array($obj1, $obj2, $obj3, $obj4),
// property path determining the choice label (optional)
'name',
// preferred choices (optional)
array($obj2, $obj3),
// property path for object grouping (optional)
'category',
// property path for value generation (optional)
'id',
// property path for index generation (optional)
'id'
)
))
->getForm()
;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-19T18:09:09Z
Rather than passing `choices` and a `choice_labels` arrays to the view would it make sense to introduce a `ChoiceView` class and pass one array of objects?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-01-22T15:32:36Z
@bschussek can you update your PR according to the feedback (and rebase it as it conflicts according to github) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-24T00:15:42Z
@kriswallsmith fixed
Fixed all outstanding issues. Would be glad if someone could review again, otherwise this PR is ready to merge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-01-25T15:17:59Z
Is it ready to be merged?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-25T15:35:50Z
Yes I think so. He said it's ready to be merged when reviewed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-26T02:30:36Z
Yes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-28T12:39:00Z
Fixed outstanding issues. Ready for merge.
Commits
-------
753c067 [FrameworkBundle] added $view['form']->csrfToken() helper
e1aced8 [Twig] added {{ csrf_token() }} helper
Discussion
----------
[Twig] [FrameworkBundle] added CSRF token helper
I've added a templating helper and Twig function for generating a CSRF token without the overhead of creating a form.
```html+jinja
<form action="{{ path('user_delete', { 'id': user.id }) }}" method="post">
<input type="hidden" name="_method" value="delete">
<input type="hidden" name="_token" value="{{ csrf_token('delete_user_' ~ user.id) }}">
<button type="submit">delete</button>
</form>
```
```php
<?php
class UserController extends Controller
{
public function delete(User $user, Request $request)
{
$csrfProvider = $this->get('form.csrf_provider');
if (!$csrfProvider->isCsrfTokenValid('delete_user_'.$user->getId(), $request->request->get('_token')) {
throw new RuntimeException('CSRF attack detected.');
}
// etc...
}
}
```
The test that is failing on Travis appears to be unrelated, but I may be wrong?
```
1) Symfony\Bundle\SecurityBundle\Tests\Functional\LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testLoginLogoutProcedure with data set #1 ('de')
RuntimeException: OUTPUT:
Catchable fatal error: Argument 3 passed to Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\TraceableControllerResolver::__construct() must be an instance of Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Debug\Stopwatch, instance of Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\ControllerNameParser given, called in /tmp/2.1.0-DEV/StandardFormLogin/cache/securitybundletest/appSecuritybundletestDebugProjectContainer.php on line 94 and defined in /home/vagrant/builds/kriswallsmith/symfony/src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Controller/TraceableControllerResolver.php on line 37
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pablodip at 2012-01-10T14:18:45Z
As you don't need forms to use the csrf provider, how about putting its service without the form prefix? It could even make sense to put the CsrfProvider as a component since you can use it standalone and in more cases than only forms. It would be a small component though.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T17:54:14Z
I think it would be more clear to generate the token in the controller. Doing so in the template will spread the CSRF intention across template and controller. So I don't think this extension is necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-10T17:58:14Z
@pablodip I'm open to the idea of a Csrf component. This would be a good place for some nonce classes as well.
@Tobion I disagree. One use case is for a list of users, each with a delete form. Iterating over the users in the controller and generating a token for each, just to iterate over them again in the view is a waste and adds complexity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T18:05:14Z
I see. But I don't understand why the intention needs to be different for each user to delete. Usually the intention is the same for each form type. I thought this is enough.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-10T18:06:13Z
Yes, a static intention would suffice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T18:07:08Z
Then your use case is not valid anymore.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T18:12:25Z
I would suggest to make a cookbook article out of it about how to create a simple form without the form component.
And include such things as validating the result using the validator component and checking the CSRF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-10T21:32:50Z
This helper makes it easier to use CSRF protection without a form and we should make it as easy as possible. Spreading the intention across controller and template is not concerning to me. Either way, a cookbook entry is a great idea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-01-10T21:47:12Z
Well, it's just one line more without this helper. So I disagree it makes it really easier when you know how to use the CsrfProvider which is a pre-condition anyway since you must still validate its correctness by hand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2012-01-13T13:24:15Z
Another use case is when rendering a page with a bunch of simple buttons with different intentions: delete user, delete comment, follow, unfollow... Creating all of these in the controller just leads to spaghetti.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jwage at 2012-01-17T21:55:53Z
👍 lots of use cases for something like this @OpenSky
* 2.0:
Updated Serbian translation.
fixed CS
[Locale][Testing] Fixed breaking tests if 'intl' extension is not installed (#3139)
[Bridge] [Twig] fixed typo in a comment of the Twig FormExtension extension.
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
This is cleanup after enabling empty form names, now form with empty name
will not render the default `id="form"` container attribute.
Developers can extend/override this behaviour by standard form theming methods.
Commits
-------
20f96bd Fix CS
2f47cca [Propel1] Add a PropelExtension
Discussion
----------
[Propel1] Add a PropelExtension
The propel extension allow to use propel specific type (ModelType) outside of
Symfony2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by rouffj at 2012/01/01 15:36:10 -0800
@Stof Fixed :).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012/01/02 07:38:22 -0800
👍
Commits
-------
79793e4 Coding standards and removing whitespace.
Discussion
----------
Coding standards and removing whitespace.
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Please note `2.0` cs passes, this is specifically for the `master` branch.
Commits
-------
373ab4c Fixed tests added from 2.0
9653be6 Moved the EntityFactory to the bridge
caa105f Removed useless use statement
24319bb [DoctrineBridge] Made it possible to change the manager used by the provider
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Made it possible to change the manager used by the provider
This improves the support of several entity managers by allowing using a non-default one for the provider.
It is BC for the user as the default value for the name is ``null`` which means using the default one.
I'm preparing the PR for DoctrineBundle too
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/19 14:16:38 -0800
I'm wondering if the EntityFactory used to integrate the bundles with SecurityBundle should be moved to the bridge or not. Moving it (making the key and the abstract service id configurable) would allow reusing it in all Doctrine bundles instead of copy-pasting it (see the CouchDBBundle pull request linked above).
The bridge was initially meant to integrate third party libraries with the components and this class is about the SecurityBundle, not the component. But on the other hand, we already share the abstract DI extension between the bundles using the bridge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/19 14:17:48 -0800
@fabpot @beberlei thoughts ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/21 04:43:50 -0800
@fabpot @beberlei what do you thing about moving the EntityFactory to the bridge ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/12/21 05:10:56 -0800
Missing mongodb bundle
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/21 05:52:06 -0800
@henrikbjorn I was planning to send the PR for mongodb too but the namespace change was not merged yet yesterday. And now, you want to wait for the answer to know if I need to copy-paste the factory to the mongodb bundle too or if I move it to the bridge
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/12/21 15:14:17 -0800
I think moving it to the Bridge makes sense if we can re-use across all the bundles then. Also it is really about integrating security with doctrine, so its a bridge topic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/22 08:39:52 -0800
I updated the PR to move the factory to the bridge. The DoctrineBundle and DoctrineCouchDBBundle PRs are updated too.
@fabpot the PR should be ready to be merged
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/22 08:53:02 -0800
Tests do not pass for me:
...E
Time: 0 seconds, Memory: 14.75Mb
There was 1 error:
1) Symfony\Tests\Bridge\Doctrine\Security\User\EntityUserProviderTest::testSupportProxy
Argument 1 passed to Symfony\Bridge\Doctrine\Security\User\EntityUserProvider::__construct() must implement interface Doctrine\Common\Persistence\ManagerRegistry, instance of Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager given, called in tests/Symfony/Tests/Bridge/Doctrine/Security/User/EntityUserProviderTest.php on line 89 and defined
src/Symfony/Bridge/Doctrine/Security/User/EntityUserProvider.php:35
tests/Symfony/Tests/Bridge/Doctrine/Security/User/EntityUserProviderTest.php:89
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/22 08:56:33 -0800
@fabpot I fixed it before your comment (thanks travis ^^). It was the test added in my other PR to 2.0 and so not updated in the original commit. I forgot it when rebasing
Commits
-------
f1199c0 [DoctrineBridge] Decoupled the EntityUserProvider from the ORM
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Decoupled the EntityUserProvider from the ORM
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
The entity provider can now be used by any Doctrine project implementing the interfaces from Doctrine Common 2.2.
Commits
-------
1e370d7 typo fix
93d8d44 added some more infos about Config
27efd59 added READMEs for the bridges
34fc866 cosmetic tweaks
d6af3f1 fixed README for Console
6a72b8c added basic README files for all components
Discussion
----------
added basic README files for all components and bridges
heavily based on http://fabien.potencier.org/article/49/what-is-symfony2 and the official Symfony2 documentation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2011/11/03 13:36:07 -0700
Great work. For syntax highlighting on the PHP snippets, you could add "php" after the three backticks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/03 13:41:29 -0700
done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/11/03 13:49:31 -0700
Nice job, but you also need to add `<?php`
ex :
``` php
<?php
use Symfony\Component\DomCrawler\Crawler;
$crawler = new Crawler();
$crawler->addContent('<html><body><p>Hello World!</p></body></html>');
print $crawler->filter('body > p')->text();
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/03 13:56:57 -0700
done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/11/03 19:57:57 -0700
@lsmith77 Well done! This makes consumption of individual components that much easier, *especially* now that `composer.json` files have been added.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/04 01:18:23 -0700
ok .. fixed the issues you mentioned @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/11 15:00:27 -0800
@fabpot anything else left? seems like an easy merge .. and imho there is considerable benefit for our efforts to spread the word about the components with this PR merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/11 18:54:13 -0800
You know, it might be a nice idea to put a link to the documentation for each component if there is some at symfony.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/12 00:59:14 -0800
i did that in some. but i might have missed a few places.
On 12.11.2011, at 03:54, Drak <reply@reply.github.com> wrote:
> You know, it might be a nice idea to put a link to the documentation for each component if there is some at symfony.com
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/2561#issuecomment-2715762
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by breerly at 2011/11/21 10:28:36 -0800
Pretty excited with this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2011/11/24 00:02:50 -0800
is there anything we can help with to make this ready to be merged?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/12/18 02:39:23 -0800
@fabpot: seriously .. if you are not going to deliver something "better" and don't provide a reason what is wrong with this .. then its beyond frustrating. i obviously do not claim that these README's are perfect (and certainly still no replacement for proper documentation), but I do claim that in their current form they are a radical step forward to potential users of the Symfony2 components.
Commits
-------
4d64d90 Allow empty result; change default *choices* value to **null** instead of **array()**. - added *testEmptyChoicesAreManaged* test - `null` as default value for choices. - is_array() used to test if choices are user-defined. - `null` as default value in __construct too. - `null` as default value for choices in EntityType.
Discussion
----------
[Doctrine][Bridge] EntityType: Allow empty result; default `choices` value changed to null
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
References the following tickets: #2504
- added *testEmptyChoicesAreManaged* test
- `null` as default value for choices.
- is_array() used to test if choices are user-defined.
- `null` as default value in __construct too.
- `null` as default value for choices in EntityType.
I squashed commits from PR #2504 as requested.
- added *testEmptyChoicesAreManaged* test
- `null` as default value for choices.
- is_array() used to test if choices are user-defined.
- `null` as default value in __construct too.
- `null` as default value for choices in EntityType.
Commits
-------
bb0d202 Switched sanitizeParameter() for existing varToString()-method; now always stores a string representation of each parameter
4fe4dfd Fixed vendor version mismatch in tests
28730e9 [DoctrineBridge] Added unit tests
4535abe [DoctrineBridge] Fixed attempt to serialize non-serializable values
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Fixed attempt to serialize non-serializable values
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no (99%)
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
The Doctrine DBAL type system does not pose any restrictions on the php-types of parameters in queries. Hence one could write a doctrine-type that uses a resource or an `\SplFileInfo` as its corresponding php-type. Parameters of these types are logged in the `DoctrineDataCollector` however, which is then serialized in the profiler. Since resources or `\SplFileInfo` variables cannot be serialized this throws an exception.
This PR fixes this problem (for known cases) by sanitizing the query parameters to only contain serializable types. The `isNotSerializable`-check surely is not complete yet, but more non-serializable classes can be added on a case-by-case basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/07 07:04:43 -0800
Tests do not pass for me.
Furthermore, let's reuse what we already have in the framework (see https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/HttpKernel.php#L187 -- yes you can just copy/paster the existing code).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by aboks at 2011/12/09 01:41:14 -0800
@fabpot I fixed the tests (seems I had the wrong vendor versions in my copy) and reused the `varToString()`-code. This introduces a tiny BC break in the rare case that someone writes his own templates for the web profiler (the parameters returned by the data collector are now always a string; could be any type before).
After merging this PR, merging 2.0 into master would give a merge conflict and failing tests (because of the changes related to the introduction of the `ManagerRegistry` interface). To prevent this, please merge #2820 into master directly after merging this PR (so before merging 2.0 into master). After that 2.0 can be cleanly merged into master.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/09 03:43:38 -0800
it is not a BC break. Using ``yaml_encode`` on a string will not break the template
Commits
-------
59397cf [DoctrineBridge] Generalize EntityValidator to work with any validation service and against any Common ClassMetadata provider
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Generalize EntityValidator to work with any validation ...
...service and against any Common ClassMetadata provider. Also decoupled the Bridge from its implicit dependency on the "doctrine.orm.vaildator.unique" service.
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: no
Commits
-------
7c1cbb9 [Config] Use LoaderResolverInterface for type-hinting
48b084e fixed typo
8ad94fb merged branch hhamon/doctrine_bridge_cs (PR #2775)
240796e [Bridge] [Doctrine] fixed coding conventions.
7cfc392 check for session before trying to authentication details
648fae7 merged branch proofek/domcrawlerform-radiodisabled (PR #2768)
3976b7a [DoctrineBridge] fixed CS
9a04783 merged branch beberlei/SecurityEntityRepositoryIdentifierFix (PR #2765)
3c83b89 [DoctrineBridge] Catch user-error when the identifier is not serialized with the User entity.
36c7d03 Fixed GH-2720 - Fix disabled atrribute handling for radio form elements
Discussion
----------
[Config] Use LoaderResolverInterface for type-hinting
```
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
```
I've listed this as a BC break because we're changing the argument type-hint, but I think it's unlikely to affect anyone.
Commits
-------
b6bf018 tweaked error handling for the forward compatibility
dd606b5 added note about the purpose of this class
c1426ba added locale handling forward compatibility
10eed30 added MessageDataCollector forward compatibility
Discussion
----------
Forward compat
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2522
Commits
-------
47ebf08 Fix some bugs
fad825e Add DoctrineValidationPass to DoctrineBundle#buildContainer
a064acd Implement feature to add validations based on the Manager-Type (ORM, MongoDB, CouchDB)
Discussion
----------
[WIP] Validation on a Doctrine Manager Basis
Hello,
we have had problems before with validation that is "persistence" related. Unique-validators or any other validation that is based on services that depend on persistence.
The problem is two-fold:
1. In annotations you cannot define validators for all persistence layers you support, because then users need them all installed.
2. In XML/YAML the same is true, since there is only one validation.xml or validation.yml file looked for.
Now one solution is to have three model classes that extend from a base class to get around this (like FOSUserBundle does) but that is cumbersome. This PR provides a new solution that is Doctrine specific (and takes the responsibility out of the Core).
Each Doctrine Bundle (ORM, CouchDB, MongoDB, PHPCR) can add this compiler pass with a manager type name:
$container->addCompilerPass(new DoctrineValidationPass('orm'));
This leads to the compiler pass searching for additional validation files "Resources/config/validation.orm.yml" and "Resources/configvalidation.orm.xml".
My first idea was to put this into the Resources/config/doctrine folder as well, but then it is detected as mapping file of course.
Regarding tests, this is not easily testable without a full fledged bundle setup, i tested this inside Acme Demo Bundle, however for a good unit-test we probably need a filesystem abstraction testing layer. Has anyone a good idea how to test this without having to setup another test-bundle? I can't use the one from DoctrineBundle since this code is in the Bridge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/13 23:12:06 -0800
@beberlei: Is it still WIP?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/11/15 10:47:49 -0800
@fabpot it is complete, but it has no tests, that was the WIP part. :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/11/15 23:56:11 -0800
I wanted to refactor how validation is managed today, so it could do one validation file per class, same as with Doctrine but @stof pointed me to this PR. I still find this a great idea as the validation is easier to find.
```php
foreach ($container->getParameter('kernel.bundles') as $bundle) {
$reflection = new \ReflectionClass($bundle);
$bundleDir = dirname($reflection->getFilename());
//check for per class validation files
if (is_dir($dir = $bundleDir . '/Resources/config/validation')) {
$finder = new Finder();
$finder
->name('*'.$extension)
->in($dir);
foreach ($finder as $file) {
$files[] = realpath($file);
$container->addResource(new FileResource($file));
}
}
//global validation file?
if (is_file($file = $bundleDir . '/Resources/config/validation'.$extension)) {
$files[] = realpath($file);
$container->addResource(new FileResource($file));
}
}
```
Commits
-------
5e4b7cb Renamed Propel Bridge: Propel => Propel1
cdad7ab Introducing the Propel Bridge
Discussion
----------
Introducing the Propel Bridge
Basic bridge with stable components for Propel.
This should not affect anything except the need to maintain this code (even if the most part is safe thanks to `@api` tag). As Propel future is linked to Symfony2, to maintain this bridge should not be a problem.
Don't flame me for this proposal, I do that "knowingly".
Regards,
William.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/15 12:22:12 -0700
IMO, it would be better to put this code in a repo owned by the Propel organization than in the core.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Richtermeister at 2011/09/15 15:33:02 -0700
Yay, great to see this, very much looking forward to using Propel again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by GromNaN at 2011/09/16 01:37:53 -0700
+1 for @stof proposition.The Silex Core should stay lightweight.
Silex definitely need a site or at least a page in the doc to list all the community extensions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by odino at 2011/09/16 01:39:40 -0700
Silex? :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by GromNaN at 2011/09/16 01:43:20 -0700
Oups, I was looking at Silex PR and got this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/08 01:01:56 -0700
@willdurand we should maybe make this a topic for the next IRC meeting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/10/09 10:26:22 -0700
Agreed :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/03 14:18:02 -0700
Good to go ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/04 03:34:37 -0700
Just removed the `Query` class. /cc @Stof
Anything else?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/05 08:45:34 -0700
@fabpot : good to merge ?
The PropelBundle has a `bridge` branch. I'm ready, I'm just waiting you merge this PR to tag the PropelBundle for Symfony 2.0, and after that I'll merge the `bridge` branch into the `master`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 22:32:42 -0800
What about renaming the directory from `Propel` to `Propel1`? That way, we will be able to have a `Propel` bridge for Propel 2.0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/16 23:18:56 -0800
It won't be consistent with the PropelBundle but I guess we don't have any other choice.. So I'm +1 for that.
If it's ok, I'll update this PR, just tell me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/17 07:09:58 -0800
yes, +1 for renaming
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/17 07:11:45 -0800
Why rename it to ``Propel1``? I think its enough to eventually add a ``Propel2``.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:14:05 -0800
`Propel1` is for BC.
`Propel` will be the Propel's future :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/17 07:17:02 -0800
sounds like a bad idea .. and what happens when you come out with ``Propel3`` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 07:17:31 -0800
@willdurand Maybe the bundle should renamed the same way, for consistency and to let ``PropelBundle`` for the Propel 2 one ? (but this should probably be discussed in another issue tracker)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:30:21 -0800
That way we'll be able to handle both Propel 1 & 2 without BC break. You may want to upgrade Symfony2 but not Propel nor PropelBundle. Propel1 bridge has a limited lifetime.
@stof : the PropelBundle will be tagged and a branch will probably appear for Propel1 compatibility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 07:34:10 -0800
@willdurand if Symfony provides a Propel bridge using the same namespace for Propel2 and then Propel3, this means that the Sf2 update changing the bridge to use the Propel3 code will make Sf2 incompatible with Propel2 even if you have a tag for Propel2 in the PropelBundle (as you will need to downgrade Symfony to the older tag too). As long as bridges are in the main Symfony repo, they are upgraded the same time Symfony is upgraded and they can bump the requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:37:13 -0800
Yes but Propel 1 is frozen, almost dead as we won't add any new features.
Propel2 is the future and there is no plan for a Propel3 which will break BC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:57:05 -0800
Updated!
* 2.0:
[Form] fixed previous merge
[Form] simplified previous merge
Also identify FirePHP by the X-FirePHP-Version header
[TwigBundle] Extract output buffer cleaning to method
[TwigBundle] Do not clean output buffering below initial level
Fixed rendering of FileType (value is not a valid attribute for input[type=file])
Added tests for string fix in DateTimeToArrayTransformer (8351a11286).
Added check for array fields to be integers in reverseTransform method. This prevents checkdate from getting strings as arguments and throwing incorrect ErrorException when submitting form with malformed (string) data in, for example, Date field. #2609
[Translation] removed unneeded methods
[Translation] added detection for circular references when adding a fallback catalogue
[DomCrawler] trim URI in getURI
[Yaml][Tests] Fixed missing locale string for Windows platforms which caused test to fail
Commits
-------
e83e00a Fixed rendering of FileType (value is not a valid attribute for input[type=file])
Discussion
----------
Fixed rendering of FileType
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
According to the W3C validator, `value` is not a valid attribute for `input[type=file]`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/10 23:01:24 -0800
Instead of creating yet another block, what about modifying the `field_widget` to not render the `value` attribute if the value is empty? Also, the PHP template must be fixed too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2011/11/11 02:02:52 -0800
@fabpot Changed ;)
Commits
-------
6cb7acf CS - camelCase & curly braces
d9b7abb Added EntityChoiceList test for `group_by` and invalid, deep property paths
e6554d6 Removed Closure support from group_by (PropertyPath strings only)
037933a CS - (String) renamed to (string)
7ad0f05 Added group_by test for EntityType
882482a Added group_by tests for EntityChoiceList
040e988 `EntityChoiceList` now supports grouping of entities by property path or closure
b171a6a Added `group_by` to EntityType
Discussion
----------
[Doctrine] [Form] EntityType+EntityChoiceList supports grouping choices
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #1735
Per the discussion in #1735, `EntityType` does not immediately support grouping options, though I updated support for it in `EntityChoiceList` in fb9d951b1d.
This PR accomplishes the following:
* Adds optional `group_by` property to `EntityType` that supports either a `PropertyPath` or a `\Closure` that is evaluated on the entity choices
* Support for groups is added via the constructor in `EntityChoiceList`
* Groups are created prior to `EntityChoiceList#loadEntities` via a new `groupEntities` function
* Added tests for `EntityChoiceList`
* Added test for `EntityType` `group_by` support
*There is an alternative version that only modifies `EntityType`, but that requires the addition of `EntityType#buildView(...)`, which is messy, IMO: https://github.com/ericclemmons/symfony/compare/master...1735-entity_type_group_by*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/10/25 01:48:23 -0700
ping @beberlei
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/10/25 03:06:05 -0700
I didnt run the tests, but generally this looks very good and is a good extension.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/11/01 06:25:09 -0700
@fabpot i revewied this and it looks very good, tests all pass, i think this is a very nice addition.
Commits
-------
661421f [Doctrine] Remove AbstractDoctrineBundle and move code into Doctrine Bridge
Discussion
----------
[WIP] [Doctrine] Remove abtract doctrine bundle
Remove AbstractDoctrineBundle and move code into Doctrine Bridge. It is a BC break because all the "other" Doctrine Bundles MongoDB ODM, CouchDB ODM and PHPCR need to be updated to cope with this.
I will prepare PRs for them aswell and then remove the [WIP] here.
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2463
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/10/26 12:32:51 -0700
Here are all 3 PRs, can we coordinate on merging them somehow?
https://github.com/symfony/DoctrineMongoDBBundle/pull/50https://github.com/symfony-cmf/symfony-cmf/pull/118https://github.com/doctrine/DoctrineCouchDBBundle/pull/4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/10/26 12:33:38 -0700
Ping @lsmith77 @jwage
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/26 12:35:29 -0700
all good for me ..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/26 14:58:01 -0700
Well, this does not fix#2463. A change done in the bridge will still be able to break the service definitions of the other bundles or require tricky stuff to keep different versions of the logic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/10/26 22:49:39 -0700
@stof true, that is what https://github.com/doctrine/common/pull/71 will be about.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/10/26 23:51:25 -0700
Comment just for linking cross PRs and for watching ;-) doctrine/common#71
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/31 08:18:45 -0700
please add forward compatibly into symfony 2.0 as per #2522
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/11/01 05:11:34 -0700
This doesn't make sense imho, since the number of people using the doctrine extension is 4 and everybody also prepared their pull request for this.
The problem is really that we need a branch for the MongoDB Bundle
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/11/01 05:40:49 -0700
@fabpot i created a branch in MongoDBBundle for 2.0 so this is ready to be merged.
Commits
-------
0907111 session data needs to be encoded because it can contain non binary safe characters e.g null. Fixes#2067
Discussion
----------
session data needs to be encoded because it can contain non binary safe characters e.g null., part 2
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2067
I'm marking this as a compatibility break because session table should be cleared and even if not cleared all currently logged in users will be logged out.
This is the fix for a same issue in DBAL session storage made against master.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/10/12 02:44:19 -0700
If I understand this correctly, only the PgSqlPlatform is affected by this. What do you think about adding an ``ìnstanceof PgSqlPlatform`` check?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/10/12 03:47:52 -0700
It's the same for sqlite, it just happens that mysql escapes \0, so we can say it's driver dependent.
The Drupal guys had the same issue http://drupal.org/node/690746 , they changed to column type to bytea for pgsql and for mysql to blob, also in Drupal report you can find that storing this into a session hash_file('md5', 'CHANGELOG.txt', TRUE) will trigger the similar problem in mysql.
The other thing to consider is what I mentioned in original bugreport, e.g igbinary as default serializer for session data.
Commits
-------
9546ee6 Removed the IndexedReader
ea2cf73 Refactored the validator initializer
c6063ec [DoctrineBundle] Updated the code to use the new registry
a1784c2 [DoctrineBridge] Updated the code to use the new registry
Discussion
----------
Doctrine registry
This updates the Doctrine bridge and DoctrineBundle to use the new ManagerRegistry interface and its methods instead of using the old methods which are marked as deprecated.
The ORM now supports using a standard reader and does the needed logic
internally.
The IndexedReader is also available in Common for people needing it.
Commits
-------
41ab1f7 updated RegistryInterface for https://github.com/doctrine/common/pull/68
Discussion
----------
[Doctrine] updated RegistryInterface
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
We tweaked the ManagerRegistry interface in https://github.com/doctrine/common/pull/68
So this PR just fixes the RegistryInterface as the PR was merged
Commits
-------
dc5772d use ORM master
4364463 use doctrine-common master
55b572d fixed getting the alias for a namespace
2b89e15 use getObjectNamespace() in getEntityNamespace()
0217a0e updated base class name
e8f3c21 updated vendors to point to lsmith77's fork of doctrine-common until its merged
6e87d01 fix tests
13c2f33 added a default implementation of the ManagerRegistry integrating the container
Discussion
----------
[Doctrine] added a default implementation of the ManagerRegistry
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: yes (minor change in the interface see below)
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
added a default implementation of the ManagerRegistry integrating the container
attempted to maintain BC as good as possible, but RegistryInterface::getRepository() had to be dropped from RegistryInterface. Its still part of the ManagerRegistry, so its only a BC break for people using RegistryInterface to create their own implementation as I ran into https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=43200
all implementation (ORM/ODM) will need to match the changes to the ClassMetadataFactory interface
ORM, PHPCR, CouchDB have been upgraded already.
The Bundles also need to be updated. ORM is covered with this PR, I have a PR ready for PHPCR:
https://github.com/symfony-cmf/symfony-cmf/pull/108
also note that before merging the change to vendors.php needs to be fixed to point to the right repo again
For MongoDB it currently does not yet have a registry and I can take care of CouchDB once this is all merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/09/23 00:40:07 -0700
still a few failing tests and details still need to be discussed ..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/09/23 00:53:23 -0700
ok .. tests are passing now
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/11 10:27:52 -0700
ok Doctrine/ORM updates are done .. PR updated .. ready to be merged.
Without this, the exception is eventually thrown in EntityChoiceList::getIdentifierValues() with a very a message that doesn't really suit the real error: "Entities passed to the choice field must be managed"
Commits
-------
3f8e8c9 fixes a session max lifetime handling
3abb7f3 fixed some conflicts with garbage collection
a1888b2 added a dbal session storage
Discussion
----------
Dbal session storage
Adds a session storage based on Doctrine DBAL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/09/14 13:39:28 -0700
guess it would be nice to then provide a service inside the DoctrineBundle that reuses a global DoctrineDBAL connection, guess the connection to use would then need to be configured via the doctrine app config.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/09/14 13:42:34 -0700
I haven't found a sane way to provide automatic configuration that's why I left this to the user to implement. It's also relatively easy:
```yml
services:
dbal_session_storage:
class: Symfony\Bridge\Doctrine\HttpFoundation\DbalSessionStorage
arguments: [@database_connection]
framework:
session: { storage_id: dbal_session_storage }
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/14 13:57:48 -0700
@lsmith77 There is an issue about reusing another DBAL connection: if the transaction is aborted by the ORM, the session could be aborted too as you cannot have 2 independent transactions AFAIK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/09/14 13:59:57 -0700
not sure how this is relevant. i mean why does the transaction need to be left open? just begin, write, commit ..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/14 14:02:39 -0700
and what if the transaction of the ORM is still opened (let's say you use SimpleThingsTransactionalBundle) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/09/14 14:06:12 -0700
well thats a bit of an edge case imho. also i wonder if SimpleThingsTransactionalBundle shouldn't make sure that its transaction is closed before the session is written.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/09/14 14:06:56 -0700
It closes them.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <
reply@reply.github.com>wrote:
> well thats a bit of an edge case imho. also i wonder if
> SimpleThingsTransactionalBundle shouldn't make sure that its transaction is
> closed before the session is written.
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/2182#issuecomment-2098100
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/14 14:15:02 -0700
@schmittjoh Does it close them **before** writing the session ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/09/14 14:44:15 -0700
I think either commit, or rollback is called, but @beberlei can probably answer that better.
Anyway, it is not really related to this PR because it is up to the user which connection is used.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/14 14:58:48 -0700
I know that one of them is called. But if they are called after the session is persisted to the DB, a rollback is an issue as it will rollback the session persistence as well.
The PR is indeed fine. What need to be changed is the doc about how to use it, to advocate using a separate connection instead of the default one (which is used in your example)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/09/15 02:57:34 -0700
There is no doc yet, but lets see what @fabpot thinks of all of this first.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/15 04:57:57 -0700
Any benefits over using the PDO session storage?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/09/15 05:00:50 -0700
cleaner code, potentially better support for niche RDBMS, centralized logging and finally afaik DoctrineDBAL has emulation for nested transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/09/15 05:11:00 -0700
The benefits (for me) are:
- logging queries
- better interoperability with existing build processes (migrations)
- better database interoperability
- re-using existing connection (I don't have the problem that Stof mentioned above)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/09/15 06:18:22 -0700
The nested transactions is the problem here as @stof already said. If you reuse the default connection and use nested transactions that fail then this will make your session not save. That is why the docs should recommend you create a second connection for a dbal based session storage, even if it is using the same database. The PDO session storage would be a second connection besides DBAL aswell.
I like the migrations/schema hook though to create the table automatically through schema commands.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/15 10:45:31 -0700
ok, looks good to me. Can you add some documentation about its usage (like the possible keys for options)? Is it possible to add some tests too?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jdreesen at 2011/09/22 06:34:11 -0700
why did you close this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/09/30 06:26:12 -0700
I can't put more time into this PR, however I'm using it for some time already, and there shouldn't be any major issues as it is basically copy/paste from the PDO session.
Commits
-------
731b28b [composer] add missing deps for FrameworkBundle
9c8f100 [composer] change ext/intl to the new ext-intl syntax
d535afe [composer] fix monolog-bridge composer.json, add more inter-component deps
9ade639 [composer] add composer.json
Discussion
----------
Composer
This PR adds a composer.json file for [composer](https://github.com/composer/composer) ([more info](packagist.org/about-composer)).
For discussion you can also go into #composer-dev on freenode and argue with naderman, seldaek and everzet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by naderman at 2011/09/26 15:51:51 -0700
You haven't entered any keywords, they might come in handy when searching for packages on packagist.
But really this is just a +1 ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/26 16:12:21 -0700
See my comments on your previous (non-rebased) commit: f1c0242b5a
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by igorw at 2011/09/27 00:04:36 -0700
Following dependencies do not have a composer.json yet: Twig, Doctrine (orm, dbal, common), swiftmailer.
Also missing from the standard edition: assetic, twig-extensions, jsm-metadata, SensioFrameworkExtraBundle, JMSSecurityExtraBundle, SensioDistributionBundle, SensioGeneratorBundle, AsseticBundle.
The point is, those can be added later on. Having the components composerized is already a leap forward. Also, doctrine depends on some symfony components, we've got to start somewhere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 00:36:41 -0700
Also, just for information, the plan is to have `symfony/framework-bundle` be the "framework", with all dependencies to doctrine etc, though we should really only have strict requirements in there, and then in symfony-standard we ship a composer.json that requires the framework-bundle, doctrine-orm and things like that that are not essential to core. Otherwise people don't have a choice about what they use anymore.
Just a comment btw, the json is invalid, all / should be escaped. However json_decode is nice enough to parse those without complaining, browsers do too, even Crockford's json2.js does, so I'm not sure if we should privilege readability over strictness, since it seems nobody really cares about this escaping.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by igorw at 2011/09/27 00:41:39 -0700
So, I've implemented all of @stof's suggestions, except (for reasons stated above):
* doctrine to DoctrineBundle
* swiftmailer to SwiftmailerBundle
* twig to TwigBundle
* doctrine-common to Validator
* FrameworkBundle (what exactly does it depend on?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/27 00:52:31 -0700
@igorw at least HttpKernel, Routing, Templating, EventDispatcher, Doctrine Common (annotations cannot be disabled), Translator, Form (optional), Validator (optional), Console (optional). See the service definitions to see the others
@Seldaek FrameworkBundle does not depend on Doctrine, except for Common
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/09/27 03:15:34 -0700
What does the symfony/ or ext/ prefix control in composer?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 03:33:52 -0700
symfony/ is just the (mandatory) vendor namespace. Also ext/ has been renamed to ext- now, so it's not in any vendor, and should avoid potential issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/09/27 05:07:03 -0700
@Seldaek Mandatory? So every package name is "vendor/package"? I like that because previously i thought package names are not namespaced, and thus clashes could occur between different communities easily.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 05:16:20 -0700
@beberlei: Mandatory. As of yesterday http://packagist.org/ will tell you you have an invalid package name if there's no slash in it. See 1306d1ca82 (diff-3)
* 2.0:
[Validator] added support for grapheme_strlen when mbstring is not installed but intl is installed
removed separator of choice widget when the separator is null
attempted to maintain BC as good as possible, but RegistryInterface::getRepository() had to be dropped from RegistryInterface. Its still part of the ManagerRegistry, so its only a BC break for people using RegistryInterface to create their own implementation
Commits
-------
a0a97c6 Removed executable bits from all php files
Discussion
----------
Removed executable bits from all PHP files
Some files had a file mode of 755 and this PR changes them to 644. The reason behind this is that git always thinks that those files are changed when accessing the repository via a samba share on windows (tested with PhpStorm).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/09 05:51:30 -0700
That was on my radar too. Can you do the same for the 2.0 branch?
-- add missing files
-- tweak translation command files
-- dumpers are now responsive for writting the files
-- moved the twig extractor the bridge
-- clear temp files after unit tests
-- check the presence of dumper in translation writer
-- General cleaning of the code
-- clean phpDoc
-- fix PHPDoc
-- fixing class name in configuration
-- add unit tests for extractors (php and twig)
-- moved test to correct location
-- polish the code
-- polish the code
Commits
-------
d19f1d7 [Doctrine] Fix UniqueEntityValidator reporting a false positive by ignoring multiple query results
Discussion
----------
[Doctrine] Fix UniqueEntityValidator reporting a false positive by ignoring multiple query results
An entity should only be considered unique if its search criteria returns no matches or a single, identical entity. Multiple results indicates that conflicting entities exist.
Note: the DoctrineMongoDBBundle's unique validator checks identifier values if the object strict-equality check is false. This may be a worthwhile improvement, as it would prevent reporting a validation error for an enttiy which is going to overwrite its conflicting counter-part in the database.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2011/09/01 14:23:27 -0700
This is the Doctrine bridge equivalent for my fix to DoctrineMongoDBBundle: https://github.com/symfony/DoctrineMongoDBBundle/pull/42
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/02 00:13:52 -0700
As this is a bug fix, can you base your PR on the symfony/2.0 branch? Thanks.
An entity should only be considered unique if its search criteria returns no matches or a single, identical entity. Multiple results indicates that conflicting entities exist.
Commits
-------
6bd1749 Fixed a bug when multiple expanded choices would render unchecked because of the Form Framework's strict type checking.
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Entities to array transformer
Fixed a bug when multiple expanded choices would render unchecked because of the Form Framework's strict type checking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/08/31 09:01:47 -0700
Looks good to me. Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
Commits
-------
c558b78 avoid rendering the `ChoiceType` separator if all `choices` are `preferred_choices`
Discussion
----------
avoid rendering the `ChoiceType` separator if all `choices` are `preferred_choices`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/24 00:51:21 -0700
The same change should be made to the PHP template.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/25 00:31:39 -0700
I forgot to ask you to add some unit tests too. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 10:23:34 -0700
Are you asking for PHPUnit tests? If so, unfortunately, I'm not able to add those because I haven't used PHPUnit yet. ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 12:47:51 -0700
I would prefer ```choises | length``` without spaces as everywhere else.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 12:50:32 -0700
@fabpot: Since <option disabled> is unclickable in browser (by HTML spec) this really doesn't change anything (something not there is as unclickable) except the the look when rendered. I have hard time to imagine what could become unit-testable here by this change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/25 13:03:47 -0700
@lenar unit testing is not about what the browser could do. What should be unit-tested is that an example will only preferred choices does not output the separator, which is exactly what this PR is about
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/25 13:04:03 -0700
@lenar unit testing is not about what the browser could do. What should be unit-tested is that an example will only preferred choices does not output the separator, which is exactly what this PR is about
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 13:08:33 -0700
@stof: ok, put this way you are definitely right.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 13:37:50 -0700
@lenar: You're right about the spaces. I'm using them in my projects but will remove them here for the sake of consistency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/25 13:40:40 -0700
@craue I will write today/tomorrow test to cover your code and send you PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 14:00:26 -0700
@stloyd: That would be nice. But I'm still not that familiar with Git(Hub). Is there anything I have to take care of?
Also, I'd like to squash my three commits into one ... if this is possible for an open PR and if I find out how to do that easily. :D
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/26 00:18:22 -0700
@craue: yes, you should squash your commits into one and use `--force` when you push (the PR will automatically be updated accordingly).
Commits
-------
85c0087 [TwigBridge] Made the locale configurable for the trans and transchoice tags
3ea31a0 [TwigBridge] Made the locale configurable for the trans and transchoice filters
Discussion
----------
Trans locale
This allows setting the locale when translating in a Twig template. This was already allowed in the Translator and in the PHP templates
Commits
-------
52fdd53 [Bridge/Twig] Add required class to labels that match required fields
Discussion
----------
[Bridge/Twig] Add required class to labels that match required fields
I have used this to simply style labels that are required with a red star behind them using this CSS:
``` css
label.required::after {
content: " *";
color: #c00;
}
```
The problem is that you can't use `input[required] + label::after` as a selector since the label is typically rendered before the input. There is no way to check for an element that is *followed by* another, only elements *following*.
Of course this CSS in particular won't work except in the latest browsers, but you could still use the `label.required` selector to add a background image and so on. I think this is a very common use case and therefore I think it'd benefit the core framework.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/05 01:27:49 -0700
Can you also update the PHP templates?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 01:43:33 -0700
How about namespacing these css classes, like for example "sf-form-required"?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/05 01:50:58 -0700
I would prefer an @schmittjoh naming, or even adding ability to setup it thought options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/05 01:54:36 -0700
Please, do not add more options. Prefix with `sf` is actually a good idea but people will argue that this is not a good idea because it gives too much information about the technology used to create the website (that's one of the things that came up pretty often in symfony1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 02:00:11 -0700
An option is not such a good idea imo since you likely want to have a uniform naming strategy across your entire site. How about adding a new service CssNamingStrategy?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/05 02:01:19 -0700
Then this can be some simpler one not giving such informations i.e.: `form-label-required`, `label-required`, `framework-form-required`, `form-required` or whatever else ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/05 02:16:41 -0700
It cannot be configurable as it would potentially break bundles that come with stylesheets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/05 02:21:10 -0700
IMO if we decide to add this one, we could add same to `inputs/selects/etc` with `required` option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 02:21:59 -0700
I think it can, consider an interface like this:
```php
interface CssNamingStrategyInterface
{
function getCssName($class);
}
```
This will give people a lot of flexibility, and it also does allow them to exclude classes which for example are provided by third-party bundles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/05 02:47:54 -0700
Wow guys, if this turns into a full blown class generator solution, I'm happy to close the PR.
"required" is not a name that's commonly used for main page elements, it's typically associated with forms, and therefore I don't see the need to make it unnecessary longer/namespaced. Similarly I don't see the need to add it to the input/select/.., because they already have an attribute, which you can very easily select as: `input[required]` in CSS. That works everywhere except IE6, but we can't build for the future on very old browsers. If you really want support for IE6, you can override the templates imo. But core should be looking forward, as it already is with HTML5, form markup, etc.
As for calling it form-label-required or label-required, again, I don't see the benefit, you can use `label.required` if you want to avoid conflicts with non-label elements having a required class, or a safer `form .required`. There are plenty of options in CSS itself, let's not make this overly complex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 02:52:17 -0700
see
http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/speed/page-speed/docs/rendering.html#UseEfficientCSSSelectors
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Seldaek <
reply@reply.github.com>wrote:
> Wow guys, if this turns into a full blown class generator solution, I'm
> happy to close the PR.
>
> "required" is not a name that's commonly used for main page elements, it's
> typically associated with forms, and therefore I don't see the need to make
> it unnecessary longer/namespaced. Similarly I don't see the need to add it
> to the input/select/.., because they already have an attribute, which you
> can very easily select as: `input[required]` in CSS. That works everywhere
> except IE6, but we can't build for the future on very old browsers. If you
> really want support for IE6, you can override the templates imo. But core
> should be looking forward, as it already is with HTML5, form markup, etc.
>
> As for calling it form-label-required or label-required, again, I don't see
> the benefit, you can use `label.required` if you want to avoid conflicts
> with non-label elements having a required class, or a safer `form
> .required`. There are plenty of options in CSS itself, let's not make this
> overly complex.
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1519#issuecomment-1502560
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/05 03:11:50 -0700
Really? Come on, we're talking about forms, it's not like you have billions of form/input tags per page that have to be parsed by the browser when you select that. Also you don't have to select the elements, if you want true performance just use no stylesheet, your users will thank you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 03:30:40 -0700
Your CSS selectors not only affect the performance of form elements, but of all elements that have a "required" class. Likewise, the same applies if we decide to add more classes.
Why close the door for people who care about performance? We can easily avoid this by making the css class more specific as suggested earlier. The idea with the renaming strategy is one step further and allows people to "obfuscate" which tool was used to generate the form, or do additional optimizations like shortening the css name.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/05 03:34:34 -0700
@Seldaek: Just for remark I've seen matrix forms spanning multiple screenfuls horizontally and vertically
containing tens of thousands inputs. Not pretty, but they do exist. Basically "poor" man's/company's excel
emulation or something.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/05 04:19:13 -0700
@schmittjoh, @lenar: We're catering to the most common use case, for which this will be more than fast enough. Small/medium scale websites don't have to optimize on CSS rules parsing, they usually have much bigger issues to deal with. If you really care about it, overriding the block to remove the class is just as easy as it was to for me to add it, but IMO this is the edge case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 05:37:19 -0700
IMO Symfony should follow best practices by encouraging to use class selectors, and not tag selectors for the reasons explained on the page I linked.
Anyway, I think everybody made his points. Time for @fabpot to make a decision :)
Commits
-------
1cc1027 added @Annotation to UniqueEntity
ee22c5d added a note to update file
efcb435 updated to doctrine changes
Discussion
----------
updated to doctrine changes
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by excelwebzone at 2011/06/30 06:29:23 -0700
Should also be implemented to the Route class and to all SensioFrameworkExtraBundle annotation classes
Commits
-------
4e3406d Sync with master and clean up
ad5d2c1 Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to DateType option) (issue #1205) Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
Discussion
----------
[Form][TimeType] Added possibility to render form as "single_text"
Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to `DateType` option) (issue #1205)
Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ouardisoft at 2011/06/17 03:41:18 -0700
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/21 01:05:51 -0700
@fabpot Any decision about this one ? I'm asking because I also have similar fix for #1323 but it requires this one ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 23:32:08 -0700
@stloyd: Can you rebase to master?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/23 05:03:44 -0700
@fabpot Done.
Commits
-------
2c1108c [Form] Revert the ability to override anything else than the text of the label while rendering a row
da467a6 [Form] Fix the exception message when no block is found while rendering
8670995 [Form] Optimize rendering when the block to render is known
41e07c9 [Form] Optimize rendering
ee5d975 [Form] Remove a test which is no more relevant (after recent FileType refactoring)
f729c6b [Form] Add the ability to override label & widget options when rendering a row
e09ae3f [Form][FrameworkBundle] Make FormHelper::renderSection() recursively callable, introduce FormHelper::renderBlock()
e43fb98 [Form][TwigBridge] Make FormExtension::render() recursively callable to ease theming
Discussion
----------
[Form] Some refactoring of the rendering
# First two commits
## FormExtension::render() can now be called recursively.
The main use case is theming support in for collections. Let's consider that you have a collection of `CustomType`, the type hierarchy while rendering the proto would be `field < form < custom < prototype`. Before this change any theme applied to your custom type (i.e. a `custom_row` block) would not have been taken into account while rendering the prototype because of the structure of the `prototype_row` block:
```html
{% block prototype_row %}
{% spaceless %}
<script type="text/html" id="{{ proto_id }}">{{ block('field_row') }}</script>
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock prototype_row %}
```
which skip the `custom_row` block rendering to fallback to the `field_row` block rendering.
With this PR `prototype_row` recursively calls `FormExtension::render()`
```html
{% block prototype_row %}
{% spaceless %}
<script type="text/html" id="{{ proto_id }}">{{ form_row(form) }}</script>
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock prototype_row %}
```
this has for effect to render the block for the parent type (i.e. `custom_row`)
## FormHelper
The `FormHelper` has been updated to more closely match the `FormExtension` architecture and the templates have been modified accordingly. `echo $view['form']->renderBlock(<block name>)` is the php equivalent of `{{ block(<block name>) }}`.
The attributes are now rendered using a template rather than by the `FormHelper::attributes()` method.
Several templates have been fixed.
# Third commit
The `$varStack` property was used to forward options to the label and the widget when rendering a row. The implementation was not working as expected. The proposed way to override label and widget options is to pass these options in the `label` and `widget` keys while callinf `render_row`.
That would be:
`{{ form_row(form.field, {"attr": {<row attributes>}, "label" : {"label": <text>, "attr": {<label attr>}}, "widget" : { "attr" : {<widget attributes}} } }}`
So there is now the ability to set attributes for the row (`<div>` or `<tr>`).
This has been discussed on [the mailing list](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/17754128ba480545). **I would like to find a compromise with @Seldaek before this gets merged**
The `$varStack` property is now only used when recursively calling `FormExtension::render()`
# Notes
I have preferred to submit several commits in order to ease review and to keep some history.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/06/20 05:20:56 -0700
@vicb On a side note, do you think it would be possible to support form theming in PHP templates too ? Currently, the only way to customize the rendering of forms when using PHP templates is to overwrite the FrameworkBundle's templates, and this impacts all forms. This makes the PHP rendering far less powerful than the Twig one.
I don't know the Form rendering and the PHPEngine well enough to know if it is feasible for 2.1 or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/20 05:35:11 -0700
@stof I hope to make it possible but I need a little bit more thinking to find the best possible solution which should not look like a hack.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 01:13:10 -0700
This should not be merged yet, it might have some issue with the variable stack. I am working on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 01:41:11 -0700
Sorted out the issue, it was linked to some local _optimization_, the code of this PR is ok.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 02:01:24 -0700
I have pushed a [POC of php theming based on this PR](https://github.com/vicb/symfony/commits/form%2Fphp-theme) to my repo - it is lacking a configuration and cache layer.
I have open [a thread on the ml](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/9b3f131fe116b511) to discuss this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 23:40:21 -0700
@fabpot fixed in the last commit.
Commits
-------
07fa82d [Form] Revert changes impacting perfomance and readability
b709551 [Order] Make Form::types and FormView::types use the same order (Parent > Child)
e56dad6 [Form] simplify the code
bdd755e [Form] Fix the exception message when no block is found
c68c511 [Form] Make theming form prototypes consistent (start by looking for a '_<id>_<section>' block)
9ec9960 [Form] Simplify the code
4e3e276 [Form] Make the prototype view child of the collection view
Discussion
----------
[Form] Make the prototype view child of the collection view
This PR should be a base for discussion.
The [current implementation](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1188) has some drawbacks because the prototype view is not a child of the collection view:
* The 'multipart' attribute is not propagated from the prototype to the collection,
* The prototype view do not use the theme from the collection.
Those 2 points are fixed by the proposed implementation and one more benefit is that the template markup might be easier to work with:
before:
```html
<div id="form_emails">
<div>
<label for="form_emails_0">0</label>
<input type="email" id="form_emails_0" name="form[emails][0]" value="a@b.com">
</div>
<script type="text/html" id="form_emails_prototype">
<div>
<label for="$$name$$">$$name$$</label>
<input type="email" id="$$name$$" name="$$name$$" value="" />
</div>
</script>
</div>
```
after:
```html
<div id="form_emails">
<div>
<label for="form_emails_0">0</label>
<input type="email" id="form_emails_0" name="form[emails][0]" value="a@b.com">
</div>
<script type="text/html" id="form_emails_prototype">
<div>
<label for="form_emails_$$name$$">$$name$$</label>
<input type="email" id="form_emails_$$name$$" name="form[emails][$$name$$]" value="" />
</div>
</script>
</div>
```
@kriswallsmith I'd like to get your feedback on this PR. thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/06/14 07:01:01 -0700
@fabpot any ETA about merging it ? Using the prototype currently is a pain to build the name. The change makes it far easier
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/14 07:09:46 -0700
The templates are much better but I'm a bit concerned that we need to add the logic into the Form class directly. That looks quite ugly. If there is no other way, I will merge it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 07:14:32 -0700
I have found no better way... I am testing some minor tweaks I want to submit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 07:34:25 -0700
I'm not happy with the code in Form.php either... would creating a PrototypeType accomplish the same thing?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 07:42:07 -0700
@kriswallsmith tried and dismissed, the id and name are bad & you have to go for `render_widget(form.get('proto'))` in the template. That should be fixeable but not any better.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 07:45:21 -0700
What do you mean the id and name are bad? If we have a distinct type for the prototype, can't we do whatever we want using buildView() and the template?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 07:53:31 -0700
@kriswallsmith the id would be smthg like `form_emails_$$name$$_prototype` but yes we should be able to do whatever we want but the code might end up being more complex.
I am done with the tweaks but still open to feedback on this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:08:21 -0700
Yes, that is the type of name I would expect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:08:33 -0700
Oops -- I mean id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:09:42 -0700
Maybe I'm confused what id you're referring to. I'll try to spend some time on this today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 08:23:56 -0700
That should be the id of the `<input>`, the id of the script would be `form_emails_$$name$$_prototype_prototype` (if prototype is the name of the nested node).
I am trying to setup a branch with my code (playing with git & netbeans local history)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 08:46:25 -0700
@kriswallsmith https://github.com/vicb/symfony/tree/kris/proto if that can help (there are still changes in Form.php)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:47:08 -0700
Thanks, I'll take a look.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/15 00:48:38 -0700
I would have expected it to be faster however `array_map` is about twice slower... reverted !
Rules are as follows:
* If multiple is true, then the empty_value is ignored
* If not, and if the field is not required, the empty_value is set to the empty string by default and displayed
* If the field is required, and if the user explicitely set the empty_value, then it is displayed
* kriswallsmith/form/collection-proto:
added script[type="text/html"] collection prototype to form themes
[Form] removed collection prototype from form tree
* vicb/form-render-fix:
[Form][TwigBridge] Improve the cache layer by caching blocks instead of templates
[Form][TwigBridge] Make the template cache more efficient
[Form][TwigBridge] Fix rendering
The current implementation is not ready for inclusion in 2.0. It has several
known problems (security, not possible to disable it, not "cloud-compatible",
...) and it's not a must have feature anyway.
Some references:
* Security issue in FileType: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1001
* Validation fails on file, still stored in TemporaryStorage: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/908
* Add a size argument & ability to configure TemporaryStorage: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/748
This feature should be reworked and discussed for inclusion in 2.1.
* yethee/doctrine_bridge:
[DoctrineBridge] Removed all options of the parent type
[DoctrineBridge] Removed unneeded use statement
[DoctrineBridge] Fixed typo
[DoctrineBridge] Removed duplicating options in EntityType
