* 2.1: (24 commits)
forced Travis to use source to workaround their not-up-to-date Composer on PHP 5.3.3
[Routing] removed irrelevant string cast in Route
Fixed typo
Make YamlFileLoader and XmlFileLoader file loading extensible
[HttpKernel] fix typo
Fixed singularization of "prices"
[Form] Removed an exception that prevented valid formats from being passed, e.g. "h" for the hour, "L" for the month etc.
[HttpKernel] fixed Client when using StreamedResponses (closes#5370)
fixed PDO session handler for Oracle (closes#5829)
[HttpFoundation] fixed PDO session handler for Oracle (closes#5829)
[Locale] removed a check that is done too early (and it is done twice anyways)
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.fa.xlf
Adding new localized strings for farsi validation.
[HttpFoundation] moved the HTTP protocol check from StreamedResponse to Response (closes#5937)
[Form] Fixed forms not to be marked invalid if their children are already marked invalid
[Form] Excluded some tests in NumberToLocalizedStringTransformerTest which fail on ICU 4.4, but work on ICU 4.8
added missing tests from previous merge
[Form] Fixed NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer to accept both comma and dot as decimal separator, if possible
Fix export-ignore on Windows
Show correct class name InputArgument in error message
...
Conflicts:
.travis.yml
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/DataTransformer/NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer.php
we don't need the logic to merge numeric keys, as we don't have them. I could also improve the genrated code by PhpMatcherDumper a little by saving a function call.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#5904).
Commits
-------
84adcb1 [2.2][Routing] Added support for default attributes with default values of method params
Discussion
----------
[2.2][Routing] Added support for default attributes with default values of method params
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
With this patch, you can configure your default values likes this:
``` php
/**
* @Route("/hi/{name}", name="hi")
*/
public function hiAction($name = "Bob")
{
return new Response($name);
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-03T23:15:32Z
I'm unsure. How does one know if that param defines a default value or a requirement? It's too vague.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-03T23:35:27Z
It's only a default value, not a requirement.
It's just a shortcut to avoid `defaults={"name"="bob"}`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-03T23:43:51Z
Yes, but its not clear. It could also be a shortcut to `requirements={"name"="bob"}`, which has totally different meaning. So it's not self-explanatory.
-1 for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-03T23:48:21Z
it is the default php behavior. It's a default value for a variable...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-04T00:22:58Z
@Tobion using the default value of the method to set a requirement does not make any sense. I don't see why someone would expect this behavior
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-06T10:12:05Z
@lyrixx Can you add some unit tests?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-06T10:28:42Z
Oh I misunderstood the PR. I thought this makes the `name` param default to `hi`. `@Route("/hi/{name}", name="hi")`. But it's just the name of the route. Your example was easy to misinterpret as you used `name` everywhere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-10T08:33:13Z
@lyrixx Can you finish this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-10T13:16:34Z
@fabpot Yes i will as soon as possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-10T18:34:07Z
I rebase and amend my commit. (I changed doc in commit message to be less confusing)
I will try to add tests.
But for now, `AnnotationClassLoader::load` is not really tested, and `AnnotationClassLoader::addRoute` is absolutely not tested. So I think I should add tests for these methods ? And then add tests for my patch.
I will try tomorrow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-11T18:23:41Z
@fabpot I added new tests. I tried to made very atomic commits.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
c7a8f7a [Routing] fixed possible parameters conflict in apache url matcher
Discussion
----------
[Routing] fixed possible parameters conflict in apache url matcher
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no (as long as rewrite rules are generated after upgrading)
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
- This fixes a conflict in route parameters:
The rewrite rules currently pass route informations through environment variables:
`_ROUTING_DEFAULT_x`: passes the default value of parameter x
`_ROUTING__allow_x`: passes the information that method x was allowed for this route
`_ROUTING_x`: passes the value of parameter x
The problem is that naming a route parameter `DEFAULT_*` or `_allow_*` would not behave as expected.
I fixed this by namespacing all environment variables; e.g. parameters are in `_ROUTING_param_*`, defaults in `_ROUTING_default_*`, etc.
- The PR fixes a second issue: sometimes the variables are prefixed with multiple REDIRECT_. This PR handles this case by ignoring them all.
- This also improves performance a little:
Matching a route with two parameters and two default parameters 100K times: (`$_SERVER` was copied from a real request, so with many non `_ROUTING_` variables)
master: 6.6s
this branch: 4.7s
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-27T13:37:24Z
Any news on this PR? Is it mergeable?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-27T14:50:08Z
There is an issue with default parameter values, I can't find how to fix that in a simple way. Before this PR, default values are never used (if a parameter is an optional not present in the url, the parameter's value is the empty string); after this PR, when a parameter is present and empty (e.g. a requirement like `.*`), its value is set to its default value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-29T01:36:08Z
The problem is, it's not consistent with the default php matcher. So one cannot safely exchange it with the apache matcher because it behaves differently under some (special) circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-05T08:05:54Z
We need to move forward as I want to merge the hostname support in the routing ASAP to have plenty of time for feedback before the 2.2 release.
Does it sound reasonable to merge this PR as is an open a ticket about the remaining issue (which should not occur that often anyways)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-11-05T09:22:02Z
@fabpot it sounds reasonable to me. Also, I've the hostname support branch is currently rebased so that it can be merged without this one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-11T21:50:20Z
Btw, does the ApacheMatcherDumper handle the _scheme requirement? It doesn't look like it. This would be another bug.
Anyway, we can probably merge this PR and open new issues for the remaining bugs.
* 2.1:
[ClassLoader] fixed unbracketed namespaces (closes#5747)
slight refactoring in UrlMatcher
[Form] Created test for DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser see #5790
[Form] Fixed DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser to guess the "required" option for to-one associations
