Commits
-------
e6577de Added a 'post validation' event to the form component.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Add post-validate event
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: n/a
Fixes the following tickets: n/a
Todo: n/a
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-02T20:34:18Z
ping @bschussek
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-04T09:19:53Z
I think this is a good idea (It was something missing to properly handle PersistentFile i.e. you should not persist invalid files)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-09T22:35:26Z
@jankramer please remove the second commit from this PR (see http://symfony.com/doc/current/contributing/code/patches.html) in order to make this mergeable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jankramer at 2012-03-10T09:26:04Z
@vicb done, sorry about that commit: overlooked the fact that it was on the same branch...
Commits
-------
5fa1c70 [json-response] Add a JsonResponse class for convenient JSON encoding
Discussion
----------
[json-response] Add a JsonResponse class for convenient JSON encoding
Usage example:
$data = array(user => $user->toArray());
return new JsonResponse($data);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-02-16T11:51:11Z
@fabpot - maybe we could benefit with a bit more sub-namespacing in this component. One for Response for example and probably one for Request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-02-16T15:07:31Z
@drak Please no. Moving the session was already a pain IMO since it was type-hinted in a few places (lack of interface, and interface doesn't include flash stuff still). Creating BC breaks just for fun like that is annoying for interop of bundles. It doesn't matter whether we have 10 or 15 classes in one directory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-02-17T08:33:46Z
@francodacosta The most optimal place is `__toString()`.
@Saldaek It just looks like the whole namespace is getting more cluttered. I suggest it because things like Request/Response objects are surely only going to grow over time. There is always the possibility to make BC for moved and renamed classes so there doesn't have to be any extra complications for making things look cleaner. Anyway, just a thought :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-17T14:47:40Z
@drak Changing the namespace of a class is a BC break. The request and the response are used in many more places than the Session so it would be a real pain to update this. And the component is tagged with ``@api`` so BC breaks are forbidden without a good reason. The session refactoring was one as it was really an issue in the implementation, but simply renaming the class is not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-05T15:03:53Z
I'm -1 for adding this to the core. It does not add much value and why add a special response for JSON and not other formats?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-03-05T18:38:05Z
I think it's useful because it's a class we need in almost every project, and I don't think we're alone. It's super simple but makes me wonder every time why I have to recreate it. I don't want an additional bundle just for 3lines of code. Similarly I would say a JsonpResponse would be great, or maybe just an optional $callback arg to the json response to enable jsonp mode.
I just had someone ask me on irc how to do JSONP so while I think it's obvious and I'm sure you'd think that too, it obviously isn't to newcomers. The Response stuff is hidden behind those render methods & such and people don't realize they can simply subclass. If a few examples were in core it would be both helpful for learning and useful on a day to day basis.
As for other formats, well JSON is typically used nowadays, except when you want more fancy XML APIs, but for that the JMSSerializerBundle + FOSRestBundle are superior and we can't achieve such things in a few lines of code. I could also see a BinaryResponse or DownloadResponse or such that has proper "force-download" headers and accepts any binary stream, but that's another debate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dragoonis at 2012-03-05T19:43:05Z
I'm +1 for the concept but not commenting on how it should be implemented I'll leave that to other people.
Typically when you want to force a download you have to do ``content-disposition: attachment; filename="filehere.pdf"``
Modifying some response headers and the likes automatically for the user by returning a DownloadResponse object would be very handy..
I'm +1 for @Seldaek's point about examples of sub-classing for specific use cases. It will help with demonstrating how to do custom stuff the right way rather than people coming up with their own contraptions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-05T20:14:39Z
btw, regarding the BinaryResponse, there is a pending PR about it: #2606
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by simensen at 2012-03-05T21:07:33Z
I'm +1 for providing reference implementations fo custom Response cases. I wanted to find best practices for handling JSONP requests/responses and couldn't find anything at all on the topic. I thought maybe extending Response might be useful but wasn't sure if that could be done safely or should be done at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-03-05T22:28:01Z
@stof i think @drak was suggesting moving the class, but leaving an empty class extending from the new class in the old location to maintain BC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-05T23:55:36Z
@lsmith77 This would force Symfony to use the BC class so that it does not break all typehints in existing code
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-03-06T00:22:15Z
BC hacks are never nice .. the goal would just be to eventually have all those classes and more importantly all new ones in a subnamespace. actually it might be easier to just leave all the classes in the old location and create new ones extending from the old ones. anyway .. personally i am also not such a big fan of these specialized responses .. but i guess i see FOSRestBundle as the alternative answer which makes me biased.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-03-06T07:57:36Z
I'm using FOSRestBundle when it's needed, but when you just have a small scale app that needs one or two json responses for specialized stuff it is slightly overkill. And again, newcomers probably won't know about it, and encouraging using it for simple use cases isn't exactly the best learning curve we can provide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by COil at 2012-03-06T23:12:15Z
+1 for this. I have implemented such a function in all my sf1 projects, it will be the same for sf2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-15T13:22:27Z
Closing this PR in favor of a cookbook that explains how a developer can override the default Response class (this JSON class being a good example). see symfony/symfony-docs#1159
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-03-15T13:25:08Z
Meh. Forcing people to copy paste code from the cookbook in every second project isn't exactly a step forward with regard to ease of use and user-friendliness.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-03-15T13:26:48Z
I mean following this logic, things like the X509 authentication should just be put in cookbooks too because almost nobody needs that. We have tons of code in the framework, I don't get the resistance with adding such a simple class which makes code more expressive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-15T13:53:07Z
because X509 authentication is not easy to get it right. Sending a JSON response is as simple as it can get:
new Response(json_encode($data), 200, array('Content-Type' => 'application/json'));
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marijn at 2012-03-15T13:54:25Z
Perhaps we need a `Symfony\Extensions\{Component}` namespace for things that don't necessarily belong in the core but are truly useful...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-03-15T14:03:40Z
I still fail to see why it doesn't belong in core.. There are tons of little helpers here and there, a base controller class made only of proxies, and then this gets turned down because it is simple to do it yourself? Sure it is simple, but it's repetitive and boring too. And while it's simple when you know your way around, some people aren't really sure how to do it.
The whole point of a framework is to avoid repetitive bullshit and be more productive. @fabpot do you have any real arguments against? I can see that you don't see a big use to it, fair enough, but do you see any downside at all?
Commits
-------
0e4f789 changed test config
a98d554 [SecurityBundle] Allow switching to the user that is already impersonated (fix#2554)
Discussion
----------
[Security] Disabled exception when switching to the user that is already impersonated
Bug fix: yes-ish
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2554
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-13T14:31:45Z
@meandmymonkey thank you for your work on this issue. Would you have time to add functional tests ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by meandmymonkey at 2012-03-13T14:49:52Z
Probably not today, but during the next few days, yes, of course.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by meandmymonkey at 2012-03-14T18:05:19Z
@vicb @schmittjoh Writing the tests I noticed switching to an non-existent user will not raise an exception. While it's not a security issue, it should raise an error for completeness sake, shouldn't it?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-14T20:28:52Z
I think it should (throw an `AuthenticationCredentialsNotFoundException`). _btw there is an extra `sprintf` in the original code that could be remove when attempting to exit_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by meandmymonkey at 2012-03-14T21:13:16Z
The problem with throwing an `AuthenticationCredentialsNotFoundException` (or any other security exception for that matter) is that it derives from `AuthenticationException`, which means it gets caught by the framework and redirects to the login form, which is not what we want in this case.
We need to throw something 500-ish at [L89](d40b3376ec/src/Symfony/Component/Security/Http/Firewall/SwitchUserListener.php (L89)), either a generic or a (new) custom Exception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by meandmymonkey at 2012-03-14T21:43:57Z
IMHO a `LogicException`would be fine, like the one used at [L117](d40b3376ec/src/Symfony/Component/Security/Http/Firewall/SwitchUserListener.php (L117)), as the error is not really about a failed authentication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-14T21:49:04Z
I agree and btw very good job on the tests !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by meandmymonkey at 2012-03-14T22:12:43Z
Thanks :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-15T08:01:13Z
Could you squash the commits, prefix the commit message with `[SecurityBundle]` and add `(fix#2554)` at the end ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by meandmymonkey at 2012-03-15T08:53:12Z
Done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-15T09:19:09Z
@fabpot this PR looks good to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-15T12:50:50Z
Tests do not pass when you run them all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by meandmymonkey at 2012-03-15T13:41:45Z
@fabpot @vicb With this config change, they pass when run together.
What is weird though is that the reason seems to be that the config for the profiler gets overwritten when running all tests together, while being used correctly when run alone. Any idea what can cause this? They should be isolated from each other.
The new config from 0e4f789 works, but enables the profiler for all SecurityBundle Tests... which is not strictly necessary.
Disabled exception when switching to the user that is already impersonated, exception is now only thrown when trying to switch to a new user.
Added an Excption exception when switching fails because target user does not exist.
Added funtional tests for switching users.
It does not make sense to try and store session ini directives since they can be changes outside
of the class as they are part of the global state.
Coding stan
Commits
-------
17c3482 fixed timezone bug in DateTimeToTimestampTransformer
Discussion
----------
[FIX]fixed timezone bug in DateTimeToTimestampTransformer
After several trials, I found out that the original code
```php
$dateTime = new \DateTime(sprintf("@%s %s", $value, $this->outputTimezone));
```
would create a DateTime object with timezone being '0000', even though $this->outputTimezone is set to my local timezone.
so I expanded the code a bit and it's working now.
PHP Test code,
```PHP
$d = new DateTime("@1234567890 Asia/Tokyo");
echo date_format($d, 'Y/m/d H:i:s')."\n";
echo $d->getTimezone()->getName()."\n";
$d = new DateTime("now Asia/Hong_Kong");
echo date_format($d, 'Y/m/d H:i:s')."\n";
echo $d->getTimezone()->getName()."\n";
```
The output is as followed:
2009/02/13 23:31:30
+00:00
2012/03/13 03:35:55
Asia/Hong_Kong
This could be a bug of PHP,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2012-03-13T15:54:31Z
👍
Commits
-------
1ec075d [ClassLoader] Fixed version compare
8fb529c [ClassLoader] Fixed ClassMapGenerator and added suport for traits
Discussion
----------
[ClassLoader] Fixed ClassMapGenerator and added suport for traits
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-03-08T10:49:53Z
@fabpot, @Seldaek ``PHP_VERSION_ID`` or ``version_compare``?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-03-08T11:42:20Z
Ultimately @fabpot can call it, but I'm pro version_compare because it's just typically used for those checks, which may not make it more readable but makes it less WTF since it's a common pattern.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2012-03-08T13:43:18Z
I prefer `version_compare()` with `phpversion()` as it's way more readable and obvious what it is.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-08T17:06:25Z
+1 for `version_compare()`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-03-09T07:19:10Z
@fabpot done
Commits
-------
99079ba Very small semantic changes improving understanding and readability.
Discussion
----------
Very small semantic changes improving understanding and readability.
The "may or may not" change may seem pedantic but it quantifies the use of the field; obviously a boolean is true or not but "may not be empty" made me wonder about it's intent so clarification seemed appropriate.
Change "return" to "returns" as the rest of the code in the class uses this syntax.
Change "contains" to "contain" in an exception message.
Commits
-------
919eee4 [Security] Regenerated the ACL SQL schema with the latest Doctrine version
Discussion
----------
[Security] Regenerated the ACL SQL schema with the latest Doctrine version
This regenerates the SQL schemas for all platforms supported by Doctrine as some changes were made in the DBAL code since the previous run of the script and a new platform has been added.
Commits
-------
ca70a35 [FrameworkBundle] Return Event
876cf96 [EventDispatcher] Add fluid interface on dispatch()
Discussion
----------
[2.1][EventDispatcher] Add fluid interface on dispatch()
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
This patch allows for code like the following:-
$response = $dispatcher->dispatch('foo', new FooEvent())->getResponse();
and
if ($dispatcher->dispatch('foo')->isStoppedPropagation()) {
// ...
}
