As explained in #6775, this has been done for the following reasons:
1. It's also Request::getHost()
2. The term hostname has been obsoleted in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#appendix-D.2 and uses the host only
3. hostname in the RFC was defined as the registered domain name, but we
probably also want to match IP-Adresses with the pattern which is the
host = IP-literal / IPv4address / reg-name for.
* 2.1:
[Yaml] fixed default value
Added Yaml\Dumper::setIndentation() method to allow a custom indentation level of nested nodes.
added a way to enable/disable object support when parsing/dumping
added a way to enable/disable PHP support when parsing a YAML input via Yaml::parse()
fixed CS
[Process] Fix docblocks, remove `return` from `PhpProcess#start()` as parent returns nothing, cleaned up `ExecutableFinder`
fixes a bug when output/error output contains a % character
[Console] fixed input bug when the value of an option is empty (closes#6649, closes#6689)
[Profiler] [Redis] Fix sort of profiler rows.
Fix version_compare() calls for PHP 5.5.
Removed underscores from test method names to be consistent with other components.
[Process] In edge cases `getcwd()` can return `false`, then `proc_open()` should get `null` to use default value (the working dir of the current PHP process)
Fix version_compare() calls for PHP 5.5.
Handle the deprecation of IntlDateFormatter::setTimeZoneId() in PHP 5.5.
removed the .gitattributes files (closes#6605, reverts #5674)
[HttpKernel] Clarify misleading comment in ExceptionListener
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bundle/WebProfilerBundle/Resources/views/Profiler/toolbar_style.html.twig
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Tests/Extension/Core/Type/DateTimeTypeTest.php
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Tests/Extension/Core/Type/TimeTypeTest.php
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Tests/Util/PropertyPathTest.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Profiler/RedisProfilerStorage.php
src/Symfony/Component/Process/Process.php
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
9fc7def added the UPGRADE file for Symfony 3.0
e84cad2 [Routing] updated CHANGELOG
65eca8a [Routing] added new schemes and methods options to the annotation loader
5082994 [Routing] renamed pattern to path
b357caf [Routing] renamed hostname pattern to just hostname
e803f46 made schemes and methods available in XmlFileLoader
d374e70 made schemes and methods available in YamlFileLoader
2834e7e added scheme and method setter in RouteCollection
10183de make scheme and method requirements first-class citizen in Route
Discussion
----------
Routing options
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | yes
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #5989, #5990, #6049
| License | MIT
In #5989, it has unanimously been decided to renamed `hostname_pattern` to `hostname` and `pattern` to `path`. That makes a lot of sense and I would like to do the renaming now as `hostname_pattern` is new in Symfony 2.2, so I'd like to avoid breaking BC just after the release. As we are modifying the route options, I've also included changes introduced by @Tobion in #6049 which were discussed in #5990.
As everything is BC, I think it's wise to include that in 2.2. What do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2013-01-14T18:25:53Z
I agree it should be done in 2.2. Thanks for working on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-14T23:11:12Z
@fabpot "Everything is BC" until it breaks BC in 3.0, that's why I'd like to see [deprecations in PR summary](https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs/pull/2116) what do you think ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-14T23:16:40Z
it would also be great to update the CHANGELOG with deprecations (it could also help people answering your question)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-15T07:07:03Z
@vicb: I've just updated the CHANGELOG and created the UPGRADE file for 3.0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-15T07:15:32Z
@fabpot thanks.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
67d7423 Remove use of deprecated HttpKernel LoggerInterface
dca4528 [HttpKernel] Extend psr/log's NullLogger class
1e5a890 [Monolog] Mark old non-PSR3 methods as deprecated
91a86f8 [HttpKernel][Monolog] Add PSR-3 support to the LoggerInterface
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel][MonologBridge] PSR-3 support
This enables PSR-3 support and monolog 1.3+. The first commit is the main part. The rest deals with deprecation of short-hand methods (warn/err/crit/emerg) that are fully expanded in PSR-3 (warning/error/critical/emergency).
The downside of deprecating them is that for bundles it's a bit harder to support older and newer versions. If that is too much of a hassle you can drop that for now and cherry pick the first commit.
The upside is that it forces people to move towards PSR-3 compatible stuff, which means eventually we could completely drop the LoggerInterface from the framework. In any case I think the documentation should only mention the `Psr\Log\LoggerInterface` and people should start hinting against that. The change should be done in core as well I suppose.
Anyway I wanted to throw this out there as it is to get feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-09T09:15:15Z
@Seldaek I also think you should change the typehint to use the PSR LoggerInterface in all classes using the logger
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-09T09:54:55Z
OK updated according to all the feedback. I tested it in an app and it still seems to work so there shouldn't be any major issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-09T09:59:55Z
@fabpot if you merge please merge also the bundle PR, otherwise it won't be possible to update without conflict.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T14:59:20Z
I'm trying to understand why a `composer update` of a Symfony 2.1.* resulted in a fatal error. Shouldn't a stable version don't break like this?
As @olaurendeau points, why Symfony depends 1.* instead of 1.2.*? Or why Monolog 1.3 breaks its public interface (EDIT: I'm not sure about it)? Or why isn't this PR being merged (into branch 2.1) at the same time Monolog 1.3 is released?
Please, understand I'm not looking for who to blame, it's just I want to know if this situation is unexpected or if otherwise a `composer update` on a stable branch is not as innocent as it seems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T15:06:51Z
@frosas it cannot be merged into 2.1 as it is a BC break. The 2.1 branch has been updated to forbid Monolog 1.3 already
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T15:11:58Z
@frosas you can blame me for releasing as 1.3.0 and not 2.0, but technically for monolog this isn't really a BC break, I just added an interface. The problem is due to the way it's used in symfony, it ended up as a fatal error. In any case the situation is now sorted out I think.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T15:26:43Z
@stof now I see this `>=1.0,<1.3-dev` change in the 2.1 branch. Now, shouldn't a new (2.1.7) version be released for all of us not in the dev minimum-stability?
@Seldaek then do you see feasible to rely only in X.Y.* versions to avoid this kind of errors?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T15:45:22Z
@frosas relying on X.Y.* is painful because you always need to wait until someone updates the constraint to get the new version. Of course using ~1.3 like in this PR means if I fuck up and break BC people will update to it, but that's a less likely occurrence than the alternative I think, so I would rather not use X.Y.*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T15:50:50Z
@Seldaek you are right about this, but I was thinking more in changing it only for the stable versions. EDIT: I mean, how often do you need a new feature in a branch you only apply fixes to?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T15:57:32Z
@frosas Monolog and Symfony have separate release cycles. Foorcing Symfony users to use an old version of Monolog until they update to a new version of Symfony whereas the newer Monolog is compatible is a bad idea. Thus, as Monolog keeps BC, it does not maintain bugfix releases for all older versions (just like Twig does too). So it would also forbid you to get the fixes done in newer Monolog versions.
The incompatibility between Symfony 2.1 LoggerInterface and PSR-3 (whereas they expect exactly the same behavior and signature for methods with the same name) is unfortunate and is the reason why we get some issues here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T16:21:06Z
@stof I appreciate you prefer to allow newer versions at the price of having to be constantly monitoring its changes to avoid breaks.
Another similar but safer strategy would be to stick to X.Y.* versions and upgrade to X.Y+1.* once the new version integration is tested, but I understand this is discutible in projects as close to Symfony as Monolog.
Returning to the issue, what do you say to release this 2.1.7 version? Or is it only me who is having issues here?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T16:26:20Z
@frosas a minor release should not break BC when following smeantic versionning (Symfony warned about the fact it is not strictly followed for the first releases of 2.x). But as far as monolog is concerned, 1.3 is BC with 1.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T16:49:55Z
@frosas sorry I didn't get you still had the problem. I tagged a 2.1.7 of monologbundle which hopefully fixes your issue.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
6703fb5 added changelog entries
1997e2e fix phpdoc of UrlGeneratorInterface that missed some exceptions and improve language of exception message
f0415ed [Routing] made reference type fully BC and improved phpdoc considerably
7db07d9 [Routing] added tests for generating relative paths and network paths
75f59eb [Routing] add support for path-relative and scheme-relative URL generation
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Routing] add support for path-relative URL generation
Tests pass: yes
Feature addition: yes
BC break: <del>tiny (see below)</del> NO
deprecations: NO
At the moment the Routing component only supports absolute and domain-relative URLs, e.g.
`http://example.org/user-slug/article-slug/comments` and
`/user-slug/article-slug/comments`.
But there are two link types missing: schema-relative URLs and path-relative URLs.
schema-relative: e.g. `//example.org/user-slug/article-slug/comments`
path-relative: e.g. `comments`.
Both of them would now be possible with this PR. I think it closes a huge gap in the Routing component.
Use cases are pretty common. Schema-relative URLs are for example used when you want to include assets (scripts, images etc) in a secured website with HTTPS. Path-relative URLs are the only option when you want to generate static files (e.g. documentation) that can be downloaded as an HTML archive. Such use-cases are currently not possible with symfony.
The calculation of the relative path based on the request path and target path is hightly unit tested. So it is really equivalent. I found several implemenations on the internet but none of them worked in all cases. Mine is pretty short and works.
I also added an optional parameter to the twig `path` function, so this feature can also be used in twig templates.
Ref: This implements path-relative URLs as suggested in #3908.
<del>[BC BREAK] The signature of UrlGeneratorInterface::generate changed to support scheme-relative and path-relative URLs. The core UrlGenerator is BC and does not break anything, but users who implemented their own UrlGenerator need to be aware of this change. See UrlGenerator::convertReferenceType.</del>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-04-16T09:56:56Z
@Tobion For completeness, you should add the option to the `url` and `asset` twig functions/template helpers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-16T10:46:06Z
@jalliot adding the option to ``url`` does not make any sense. The difference between ``path`` and ``url`` is that ``path`` generates a path and ``url`` generates an absolute url (thus including the scheme and the hostname)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-16T12:27:49Z
@stof I guess jalliot meant we could then generate scheme-relative URLs with `url`. Otherwise this would have no equivalent in twig.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-04-16T12:34:08Z
@stof Yep I meant what @Tobion said :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T11:57:04Z
The $relative parameter I added besides the existing $absolute parameter of the `->generate` method was not clear enough. So I merged those into a different parameter `referenceType`. I adjusted all parts of symfony to use the new signature. And also made the default `UrlGenerator` implementation BC with the old style. So almost nobody will recognize a change. The only BC break would be for somebody who implemented his own `UrlGenerator` and did not call the parent default generator.
Using `referenceType` instead of a simple Boolean is much more flexible. It will for example allow a custom generator to support a new reference type like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CURIE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T13:34:58Z
ping @schmittjoh considering your https://github.com/schmittjoh/JMSI18nRoutingBundle/blob/master/Router/I18nRouter.php would need a tiny change
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-18T13:37:39Z
Can you elaborate the necessary change?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T13:51:10Z
This PR changes the signature of `generate` to be able to generate path-relative and scheme-relative URLs. So it needs to be
`public function generate($name, $parameters = array(), $referenceType = self::ABSOLUTE_PATH)` and your implementation would need to change `if ($absolute && $this->hostMap) {` to `if (self::ABSOLUTE_URL === $referenceType && $this->hostMap) {`
I can do a PR if this gets merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-18T13:52:14Z
If I understand correctly, the old parameter still works, no?
edit: Ah, ok I see what you mean now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T13:56:33Z
Yeah the old parameter still works but $absolute would also evaluate to true (a string) in your case for non-absolute URLs, i.e. paths.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-19T21:09:46Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-20T04:30:18Z
Let's discuss that feature for 2.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-20T10:40:59Z
What are your objections against it? It's already implemented, it works and it adds support for things that are part of a web standard. The BC break is tiny at the moment (almost nobody is affected) because the core UrlGenerator works as before. But if we waited for 2.2 it will be much harder to make the transition because 2.1 is LTS. So I think is makes sense to add it now. Furthermore it makes it much more future-proof as custom generators can more easiliy add support for other link types like CURIE. At the moment a Boolean for absolute URLs is simply too limited and also somehow inconsistent because $absolute = false stands for an absolute path. You see the awkwardness in this naming.
Btw, I added a note in the changelog. And I will add documentation of this feature in symfony-docs once this is merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-20T12:14:32Z
nobody has ever said that 2.1 would be LTS. Actually, I think we are going to wait for 2.3 for LTS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-20T12:27:18Z
Well what I meant is, the longer we wait with this, the harder to apply it.
In 04ac1fdba2 you modified `generate` signature for better extensibility that is not even made use of. I think changing `$abolute` param goes in the same direction and has direct use.
I'd like to know your reason to wait for 2.2. Not enough time to review it, or afraid of breaking something, or marketing for 2.2?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-20T16:28:27Z
@Tobion the issue is that merging new features forces to postpone the release so that it is tested by enough devs first to be sure there is no blocking bug in it. Big changes cannot be merged when we are hunting the remaining bugs to be able to release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-20T16:42:11Z
Considering the changes that have been made to the Form component, and are still being made, I think this is in comparison to that a fairly minor change.
Maybe a clearer guideline on the release process, or the direction would help, and avoid confusion, or wrong expectations on contributors' part.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-05T13:52:11Z
@fabpot this is ready. So if you agree with it, I would create a documentation PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-10-13T16:09:47Z
@fabpot what do you think about this PR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-01T16:05:01Z
This feels like it's overloading the generate() method to do double duty: One, make a URl based on a route. Two, make a URI based on a URI snippet. Those are two separate operations. Why not just add a second method that does the second operation and avoid the conditionals? (We're likely to do that in Drupal for our own generator as well.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-01T16:38:39Z
@crell: No, you must have misunderstood something. The generate method still only generates a URI based on a route. The returned URI reference can now also be a relative path and a network path. Thats all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-13T18:30:28Z
@fabpot this is ready. It is fully BC! I also improved phpdoc considerably.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-14T20:51:38Z
@fabpot Do you want me to write documentation for it? I would also be interested to write about the new features of the routing component in general. I wanted to do that anyway and it would probably be a good fit for your "new in symfony" articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-14T20:58:16Z
Im' going to review this PR in the next coming days. And to answer your second question, more documentation or better documentation is always a good thing, so go for it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2013-01-02T21:50:20Z
@fabpot ping. I added changelog entries.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6491).
Commits
-------
5d264ce [Routing] made RouteCompilerInterface::compile static
Discussion
----------
[Routing] made RouteCompilerInterface::compile static
bc break: yes but probably nobody affected
It makes much more sense that the compile method is static because having instances of a compiler is strange. Also the compiler could not use DI or anything anyway as the `Route` class was instantiating compiler instances itself and was assuming there are no constructor arguments.
* 2.0:
updated license year
Update src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Response.php
[Console] fixed unitialized properties (closes#5935)
[Bundle] [FrameworkBundle] fixed typo in phpdoc of the SessionListener.
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.21-DEV
updated VERSION for 2.0.21
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.21
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bundle/SwiftmailerBundle/LICENSE
src/Symfony/Component/Filesystem/LICENSE
src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Response.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
237bbd0 fixed and refactored YamlFileLoader in the same sense as the XmlFileLoader
392d785 removed covers annotation from loader tests and unneeded use statements
45987eb added tests for the previous XmlFileLoader fixes
b20d6a7 ensure id, pattern and resource are specified
8361b5a refactor the XMlFileLoader
83fc5ff fix namespace handling in xml loader; it could not handle prefixes
1a60a3c make resource and key attributes required in xsd
02e01b9 improve exception messages in xml loader
51fbffe remove unneeded cast
358e9c4 fix some phpdoc
Discussion
----------
[Routing] improve loaders
BC break: no
Main points:
- fixed Xml loader that could not handle namespace prefixes but is valid xml
- fixed Yaml loader where some nonsesense configs were not validated correctly like an imported resource with a pattern key.
Added tests for all. Some refactoring + a few tweaks like better exception messages and more consistency between Xml loader and yaml loader. See also commits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-07T18:16:08Z
@fabpot this is ready
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-11T17:30:10Z
@fabpot rebased. Please don't squash to one big commit where one does not see what changed why.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-11T17:32:40Z
I only squash when most commits are CS fixes and feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-11T17:37:49Z
Well, you squashed #6022 so it's not possible to revert a specific deprecation.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6022).
Commits
-------
8c7a169 [Routing] clean up of RouteCollection API
Discussion
----------
[Routing] clean up of RouteCollection API
BC break: only the internal behavior of addPrefix()
Deprecations:
- some params of addCollection and addPrefix that still work but should not be used anymore
- getPrefix (you cannot rely on it how my added test shows that failed previously but was fixed with https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/6120/files#L5L109
and it's also useless since we dont have a tree anymore)
Reasoning see commits and changelog.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-06T19:15:53Z
@fabpot this is finished and rebased. I switched from `addConfigs` to addDefaults(), addRequirements(), and addOptions() as you suggested. I also deprecated getPrefix(). Reasoning see above and in the changelog.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
51223c0 added upgrade instructions
50e6259 adjusted tests
98f3ca8 [Routing] removed tree structure from RouteCollection
Discussion
----------
[Routing] removed tree structure from RouteCollection
BC break: yes (see below)
Deprecations: RouteCollection::getParent(); RouteCollection::getRoot()
tests pass: yes
The reason for this is so quite simple. The RouteCollection has been designed as a tree structure, but it cannot at all be used as one. There is no getter for a sub-collection at all. So you cannot access a sub-collection after you added it to the tree with `addCollection(new RouteCollection())`. In contrast to the form component, e.g. `$form->get('child')->get('grandchild')`.
So you can see the RouteCollection cannot be used as a tree and it should not, as the same can be achieved with a flat array!
Using a flat array removes all the need for recursive traversal and makes the code much faster, much lighter, less memory (big problem in CMS with many routes) and less error-prone.
BC break: there is only a BC break if somebody used the PHP API for defining RouteCollection and also added a Route to a collection after it has been added to another collection.
So
```
$rootCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection = new RouteCollection();
$rootCollection->addCollection($subCollection);
$subCollection->add('foo', new Route('/foo'));
```
must be updated to the following (otherwise the 'foo' Route is not imported to the rootCollection)
```
$rootCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection->add('foo', new Route('/foo'));
$rootCollection->addCollection($subCollection);
```
Also one must call addCollection from the bottom to the top. So the correct sequence is the following (and not the reverse)
```
$childCollection->->addCollection($grandchildCollection);
$rootCollection->addCollection($childCollection);
```
Remeber, this is only needed when using PHP for defining routes and calling methods in a special order. There is no change required when using XML or YAML for definitions. Also, I'm pretty sure that neither the CMF, nor Drupal routing, nor Silex is relying on the tree stuff. So they should also still work.
cc @fabpot @crell @dbu
One more thing: RouteCollection wasn't an appropriate name for a tree anyway as a collection of routes (that it now is) is definitely not a tree.
Yet another point: The XML declaration of routes uses the `<import>` element, which is excatly what the new implementation of addCollection without the need of a tree does. So this is now also more analogous.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-26T17:34:15Z
What benefit of this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-26T17:56:53Z
@Koc Why did you not simply wait for the description? ^^
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-26T18:33:09Z
i love PR that remove more code than they add whithout removing functionality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-26T18:49:52Z
There's an issue somewhere in Drupal where we're trying to use addCollection() as a shorthand for iterating over one collection and calling add() on the other for each item. We can't do that, however, because the subcollections are not flattened properly when reading back and our current dumper can't cope with that. So this change would not harm Drupal at all, and would mean I don't have fix a bug in our dumper. :-) I cannot speak for any other projects, of course.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-27T19:06:34Z
Ok, this is ready.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6100).
Commits
-------
0e3671b [WiP] Split urlmatcher for easier overriding
Discussion
----------
[WiP] Split urlmatcher for easier overriding
Based on discussion in https://github.com/symfony-cmf/Routing/pull/30, this PR splits the matchCollection() method of UrlMatcher into two methods. The reason is to allow Symfony CMF and Drupal to override just one of them, while leaving the actual meat of the class intact.
Additionally, it switches $routes from private to protected for the same reason: It makes it possible for us to extend the class cleanly.
Marking as WIP in case further discussion in CMF suggests other/different changes, but review and a conceptual go/no-go would be appreciated now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-25T12:57:46Z
i think this variant really just extracts part of the logic into a separate method whithout changing any behaviour or concept. it would help a lot for the cmf to have it this way so we can extend and tweak the logic. is this now good or anybody has more input?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-27T19:42:04Z
sorry for being pushy about this one, but we need to know if this change is ok or not, if we need to improve something. if there is some problem we did not think of, we have to find different solutions for the cmf/drupal matchers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-28T14:29:10Z
`PhpMatcherDumper` should probably also be updated to call the new `getAttributes()` method; but that won't be possible as the Route is not accessible when using this dumper. Adding a feature that can only be used by the standard `UrlMatcher` and not by the other matchers does not sound good to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-28T17:18:09Z
in the context of the cmf, our problem is that we have too many routes to hold in memory. i think the dumper is not of interest for that use case - @Crell correct me please if i am wrong. if we need any caching we would need to write our own dumper probably. but currently we just extend the UrlMatcher
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-30T05:47:39Z
Correct. In both the CMF case and Drupal case we have our own dumpers, because the current ones don't work for us anyway. (1000 routes and all that. :-) ) This isn't a new public method. It's just a small refactor of UrlMatcher itself to make it easier to extend. If you're using a dumped PhpMatcher, I don't know why you'd be using something like NestedMatcher in the first place.
* 2.1:
[TwigBundle] Moved the registration of the app global to the environment
needs to use simpleContent in xsd to allow empty elements
bumped Symfony version to 2.1.5-DEV
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.19-DEV
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
[HttpFoundation] added a small comment about the meaning of Request::hasSession() as this is a recurrent question (refs #4541)
updated VERSION for 2.1.4
updated CHANGELOG for 2.1.4
updated VERSION for 2.0.19
update CONTRIBUTORS for 2.0.19
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.19
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
src/Symfony/Component/Routing/Loader/schema/routing/routing-1.0.xsd
* 2.0:
[TwigBundle] Moved the registration of the app global to the environment
needs to use simpleContent in xsd to allow empty elements
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.19-DEV
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
updated VERSION for 2.0.19
update CONTRIBUTORS for 2.0.19
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.19
Conflicts:
CONTRIBUTORS.md
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/Resources/config/twig.xml
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/TwigEngine.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
57edf56 removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
Discussion
----------
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
mixed="true" means that the element could contain both text and other elements, e.g.
`<requirement key="_locale">text <subelement /></requirement>`
But this wrong and such a definition would not even validate against the scheme as the xsd does not define which elements would be expected inside.
mixed="true" means that the element could contain both text and other elements, e.g.
`<requirement key="_locale">text <subelement /></requirement>`
But this wrong and such a definition would not even validate against the scheme as the xsd does not define which elements would be expected inside.
They should normally be initialized anyway in the constructor. But when extending the Route (like in CMF) and using an ORM/ODM to persist them in the DB, the constructor is not called. Then a new property that is not saved like hostnamePattern stays null which in turn makes the RouteCompiler fails as it expects '' instead of null.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
824a0f3 [Routing] compatibility with older PCRE (pre 8)
Discussion
----------
[Routing] compatibility with older PCRE (pre 8)
#6062 for master
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
1daefa5 [Routing] made it compatible with older PCRE version (pre 8)
Discussion
----------
[Routing] compatibility with older PCRE version (pre 8)
fixes#4093
Ok I changed my mind about this issue.
1. I figured more people are affected than I thought and CentOS is stubborn.
2. Symfony still uses the old regex style `?P<param>` in several other components. So also doing so in the routing makes it more consistent.
3. Even if it's definitely not good to use an over 6 year old PCRE version with a recent PHP version, we can still try to provide the best experience. It doesn't mean we support outdated software stacks of custom PHP compilations as we won't and cannot specifically test against it.
@fabpot: I will do a seperate PR on master when you merged this because the code changed alot in master so it cannot easily be merged I guess. I will also convert the symfony requirement for PCRE in the requirements check to a recommendation.
* 2.1: (24 commits)
forced Travis to use source to workaround their not-up-to-date Composer on PHP 5.3.3
[Routing] removed irrelevant string cast in Route
Fixed typo
Make YamlFileLoader and XmlFileLoader file loading extensible
[HttpKernel] fix typo
Fixed singularization of "prices"
[Form] Removed an exception that prevented valid formats from being passed, e.g. "h" for the hour, "L" for the month etc.
[HttpKernel] fixed Client when using StreamedResponses (closes#5370)
fixed PDO session handler for Oracle (closes#5829)
[HttpFoundation] fixed PDO session handler for Oracle (closes#5829)
[Locale] removed a check that is done too early (and it is done twice anyways)
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.fa.xlf
Adding new localized strings for farsi validation.
[HttpFoundation] moved the HTTP protocol check from StreamedResponse to Response (closes#5937)
[Form] Fixed forms not to be marked invalid if their children are already marked invalid
[Form] Excluded some tests in NumberToLocalizedStringTransformerTest which fail on ICU 4.4, but work on ICU 4.8
added missing tests from previous merge
[Form] Fixed NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer to accept both comma and dot as decimal separator, if possible
Fix export-ignore on Windows
Show correct class name InputArgument in error message
...
Conflicts:
.travis.yml
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/DataTransformer/NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer.php
we don't need the logic to merge numeric keys, as we don't have them. I could also improve the genrated code by PhpMatcherDumper a little by saving a function call.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#5904).
Commits
-------
84adcb1 [2.2][Routing] Added support for default attributes with default values of method params
Discussion
----------
[2.2][Routing] Added support for default attributes with default values of method params
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
With this patch, you can configure your default values likes this:
``` php
/**
* @Route("/hi/{name}", name="hi")
*/
public function hiAction($name = "Bob")
{
return new Response($name);
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-03T23:15:32Z
I'm unsure. How does one know if that param defines a default value or a requirement? It's too vague.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-03T23:35:27Z
It's only a default value, not a requirement.
It's just a shortcut to avoid `defaults={"name"="bob"}`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-03T23:43:51Z
Yes, but its not clear. It could also be a shortcut to `requirements={"name"="bob"}`, which has totally different meaning. So it's not self-explanatory.
-1 for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-03T23:48:21Z
it is the default php behavior. It's a default value for a variable...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-04T00:22:58Z
@Tobion using the default value of the method to set a requirement does not make any sense. I don't see why someone would expect this behavior
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-06T10:12:05Z
@lyrixx Can you add some unit tests?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-06T10:28:42Z
Oh I misunderstood the PR. I thought this makes the `name` param default to `hi`. `@Route("/hi/{name}", name="hi")`. But it's just the name of the route. Your example was easy to misinterpret as you used `name` everywhere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-10T08:33:13Z
@lyrixx Can you finish this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-10T13:16:34Z
@fabpot Yes i will as soon as possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-10T18:34:07Z
I rebase and amend my commit. (I changed doc in commit message to be less confusing)
I will try to add tests.
But for now, `AnnotationClassLoader::load` is not really tested, and `AnnotationClassLoader::addRoute` is absolutely not tested. So I think I should add tests for these methods ? And then add tests for my patch.
I will try tomorrow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-11T18:23:41Z
@fabpot I added new tests. I tried to made very atomic commits.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
c7a8f7a [Routing] fixed possible parameters conflict in apache url matcher
Discussion
----------
[Routing] fixed possible parameters conflict in apache url matcher
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no (as long as rewrite rules are generated after upgrading)
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
- This fixes a conflict in route parameters:
The rewrite rules currently pass route informations through environment variables:
`_ROUTING_DEFAULT_x`: passes the default value of parameter x
`_ROUTING__allow_x`: passes the information that method x was allowed for this route
`_ROUTING_x`: passes the value of parameter x
The problem is that naming a route parameter `DEFAULT_*` or `_allow_*` would not behave as expected.
I fixed this by namespacing all environment variables; e.g. parameters are in `_ROUTING_param_*`, defaults in `_ROUTING_default_*`, etc.
- The PR fixes a second issue: sometimes the variables are prefixed with multiple REDIRECT_. This PR handles this case by ignoring them all.
- This also improves performance a little:
Matching a route with two parameters and two default parameters 100K times: (`$_SERVER` was copied from a real request, so with many non `_ROUTING_` variables)
master: 6.6s
this branch: 4.7s
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-27T13:37:24Z
Any news on this PR? Is it mergeable?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-27T14:50:08Z
There is an issue with default parameter values, I can't find how to fix that in a simple way. Before this PR, default values are never used (if a parameter is an optional not present in the url, the parameter's value is the empty string); after this PR, when a parameter is present and empty (e.g. a requirement like `.*`), its value is set to its default value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-29T01:36:08Z
The problem is, it's not consistent with the default php matcher. So one cannot safely exchange it with the apache matcher because it behaves differently under some (special) circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-05T08:05:54Z
We need to move forward as I want to merge the hostname support in the routing ASAP to have plenty of time for feedback before the 2.2 release.
Does it sound reasonable to merge this PR as is an open a ticket about the remaining issue (which should not occur that often anyways)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-11-05T09:22:02Z
@fabpot it sounds reasonable to me. Also, I've the hostname support branch is currently rebased so that it can be merged without this one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-11T21:50:20Z
Btw, does the ApacheMatcherDumper handle the _scheme requirement? It doesn't look like it. This would be another bug.
Anyway, we can probably merge this PR and open new issues for the remaining bugs.
* 2.1:
[ClassLoader] fixed unbracketed namespaces (closes#5747)
slight refactoring in UrlMatcher
[Form] Created test for DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser see #5790
[Form] Fixed DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser to guess the "required" option for to-one associations
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
e54d749 [Routing] Simplified php matcher dumper (and optimized generated matcher)
Discussion
----------
[Routing] Simplified php matcher dumper (and optimized generated matcher)
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Related: #3378
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
This simplifies the php matcher dumper by allowing the dumper to re-organize routes in the dumper's own structure.
As a result, dumping is made a little simpler. This is also helps much for my hostname-based routes PR #3378.
Reorganizing routes also allows to find more optimization opportunities:
Currently the dumper wraps some collections of routes in a `if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/someprefix')` if the collection has user-defined prefix, and if it contains more than one direct child Route. This can miss many optimization opportunities.
The PR changes this by building a prefix tree of routes based on the static prefix extracted from routes' patterns. Then every leave having a prefix and more than one child (route or collection) will be wrapped in a `if` statement.
Example:
```
// No explicit prefix is specified
@Route("/cafe")
@Route("/cacao")
@Route("/coca")
```
is compiled like this:
```
if (url starts with /c) {
if (url starts with /ca) {
// test route "/cafe"
// test route "/cacao"
}
// test route "/coca"
}
```
Some tests have many white space changes, much more easier to review [here](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5734/files?w=1)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-13T02:27:54Z
I'm not sure if adding these specific classes just for dumping is the best implementation because they duplicate some logic and this optimization should also work out-of-the-box with the standard RouteCollection etc.
What I have in mind is a new method in RouteCollection like `RouteCollection::optimizeTree` that returns a new RouteCollection with the Routes that includes these optimization you do here. So there would probably be no need for the new classes.
It think it requires some changes in RouteCollection like the handling of prefix that must start with a slash currently, which is too restrictive. But it should be possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-13T12:52:32Z
@Tobion
> I'm not sure if adding these specific classes just for dumping is the best implementation because they duplicate some logic and this optimization should also work out-of-the-box with the standard RouteCollection etc.
I think RouteCollection and DumperCollection do not share the same concerns; and RouteCollection does things that don't allow to reorganize routes freely. For instance when adding a collection to a RouteCollection this changes all the child routes' prefix, requirements, options, etc. When setting a collection's prefix, this prepends the prefix to every child route's pattern, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-15T08:50:23Z
squashed the CS commits
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-15T13:50:16Z
@fabpot @Tobion this PR is ready to be merged if everyone agrees
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-16T18:10:36Z
When the above is fixed, I think it's good to be merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-17T08:40:20Z
Fixed; thanks @Tobion @stof for your reviews
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-19T03:30:10Z
@arnaud-lb could you please test whether your PR fixes#5780 as a side-effect?
I can image that it's fixed because you use `$route->compile()->getStaticPrefix();` for prefix optimization.
If it's fixed please add a test case. If not, that's fine, and we need to fix it in another PR.
* 2.1: (28 commits)
Delete use of CreationExeption
[Form] Fixed error message in PropertyPath to not advice to use a non-existing feature
[Form] Fixed creation of multiple money fields with different currencies
[Form] Fixed setting the "data" option to an object in "choice" and "entity" type
Fixed Serbian plural translations.
Fixed IPv6 Check in RequestMatcher
Fix typo
change what I think is a typo
[Console] Fix error when mode is not in PATH
[WebProfilerBundle] fixed macro usage (to be forward compatible with Twig 2.x)
Change monolog require-dev to use the branch alias instead of dev-master
[FrameworkBundle] partially reverted previous merge
[2.1] Added missing error return codes in commands
Made the router lazy when setting the context
[WebProfilerBundle] fixed typos
Fix incorrect variable in FileProfilerStorage
UnitTest fix
UnitTest fix
added a unit test
fixed#5384
...
Initializing the matcher and the generator to set the context does not make
sense as it is set anyway when building them. This avoids initializing
them in the RouterListener if you never actually use them (for instance
because you use the apache matcher).
* 2.1:
fixed CS
added doc comments
added doc comments
[Validator] Updated swedish translation
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.de.xlf
[2.1] Exclude tests from zips via gitattributes
[HttpKernel][Translator] Fixed type-hints
Updated lithuanian validation translation
[DomCrawler] Allows using multiselect through Form::setValues().
[Translation] forced the catalogue to be regenerated when a resource is added (closes symfony/Translation#1)
Unit test for patched method OptionsResolver::validateOptionValues().
validateOptionValues throw a notice if an allowed value is set and the corresponding option isn't.
[Form] Hardened code of ViolationMapper against errors
[HttpFoundation] Fixed#5611 - Request::splitHttpAcceptHeader incorrect result order.
[Form] Fixed negative index access in PropertyPathBuilder
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.ro.xlf
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Form.php
src/Symfony/Component/Process/Process.php
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
e22823b [Routing] context params should have higher priority than defaults
16c1b01 [Routing] fixed 4 bugs in the UrlGenerator
Discussion
----------
[Routing] UrlGenerator: fixed missing query param and some ignored requirements
reopened version of #5181 (cherry-picked)
On top of that I fixed#5437 in my code and added test case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T18:41:45Z
@fabpot ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-03T18:43:43Z
IIUC, #5437 is a regression in 2.1 and should be done in 2.1, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T18:46:42Z
It's not in 2.1 anymore as you reverted the PR. #5437 is not valid currently and can be closed.
So this can either be merged in master or 2.1 whatever you prefer.
My benchmarks showed a performance improvement of 20% when matching routes that make use of possesive quantifiers because it prevents backtracking when it's not needed
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
005a9a3 [Routing] fixed RouteCompiler for adjacent and nested placeholders
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Routing] fixed RouteCompiler for adjacent placeholders
Tests pass: yes
Feature addition: no
Fixes: #4215
BC break: no
- Nesting placeholders works now properly, e.g. `/{foo{bar}}`. Only `bar` is a variable, the rest is static text.
- Variables without separator work now correctly too, e.g. `/{w}{x}{y}{z}.{_format}`. All variables will have the correct default regex in the current manner, that is exclude the previous static char and the next static char (which means disregarding the placeholder in between that have no seperator).
As you can see, I have not modified any tests, only added some. So this change is BC. The compiler now works under all conditions and does not fail for such patterns.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-05-08T22:34:58Z
ready for review / merging
Thanks @snc for giving a helpful tip.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-06-12T23:22:54Z
fabpot told me, he doesn't like PRs that both fix and enhance stuff. So I reworked this PR so that it only contains the bug fixes.
The new PR #4563 contains the feature addition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-06-26T12:33:43Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-14T16:29:27Z
Why wait for 2.2? It's a bugfix only, without BC break.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-31T17:04:37Z
@fabpot I think this should go into 2.1
Commits
-------
02516de [Routing] fix variable with a requirement of '0'
1f5b793 [Routing] fix setting empty requirement in Route
Discussion
----------
[Routing] fix setting empty requirement
First commit: A requirement of "^$" was overlooked and wasn't recognized as empty after stripping it in Route.
Second commit: Fixes a requirement of '0' that was ignored by the Compiler.
Commits
-------
be28e56 [Routing] disallow numeric named variables in pattern
Discussion
----------
[Routing] compile check for numeric named variables in pattern
Because PHP raises an error for such subpatterns in PCRE and thus would break matching, e.g. this is not allowed as regex `(?<123>.+)`.
So add a compile time check for a non-working pattern like '/{123}'.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-09-06T08:31:42Z
Strangely enough Regex buddy gives no warning or error with the pattern.
Is the name all numeric invalid or just the beginning?
1e4 and 0xFF would be perfectly valid but returns true with is_nummeric()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-09-06T08:59:07Z
Any numeric is not valid. I guess this limitation is unique to PHP's binding to PCRE.
I think it's because the returned matches array of of preg_match contains both the subpattern as integer index and as named variable. So having a numeric named variable would conflict as `array['1'] === array[1]`.
Commits
-------
7c5cfeb [Routing] added test why #5238 is not that easy
Discussion
----------
[Routing] added test why #5238 is not that easy
This just adds a test that wasn't covered yet and shows why #5238 is not that easy as I thought at first.
Commits
-------
0706d18 [Routing] fixed 4 bugs in the UrlGenerator
Discussion
----------
[Routing] UrlGenerator: fixed missing query param and some ignored requirements
This was pretty hard to figure out. I could fix 4 bugs and refactor the code to safe 2 variables and several assignments. Sorry for doing this in one commit, but they were highly interdependent.
See the added tests for what was fixed. The most obvious bug was that a query param was ignored if it had by accident the same name as a default param (but wasn't used in the path).
In 3 cases it generated the wrong URL that wouldn't match this route. The generator wrongly ignored either the requirements or the passed parameter. I had to adjust one test that was asserting something wrong (see comments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-13T14:22:35Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-29T17:53:07Z
@fabpot I think it's important to merge this before 2.1 final.
* 2.0:
updated VERSION for 2.0.17
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.17
updated vendors for 2.0.17
fixed XML decoding attack vector through external entities
prevents injection of malicious doc types
disabled network access when loading XML documents
refined previous commit
prevents injection of malicious doc types
standardized the way we handle XML errors
Redirects are now absolute
Conflicts:
CHANGELOG-2.0.md
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoader.php
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Crawler.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Routing/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Serializer/Encoder/XmlEncoderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/XliffFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Validator/Mapping/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
vendors.php
Commits
-------
933e821 Add minimum-stability (dev) in each component
Discussion
----------
Add minimum-stability (dev) in each component
This fixes the ability to run the test suite in each component if a `composer install` is needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T13:57:14Z
If you really want to run the testsuite standalone, some dev requirements are missing (SecurityBundle needs the FrameworkBundle for its functional tests for instance). If you have some time to check the missing dev requirement, it would be great.
Anyway, 👍 for this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-08-22T13:59:15Z
Yes I already did that once. I'll try to fix more components later.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Christophe Coevoet <
notifications@github.com> wrote:
> If you really want to run the testsuite standalone, some dev requirements
> are missing (SecurityBundle needs the FrameworkBundle for its functional
> tests for instance). If you have some time to check the missing dev
> requirement, it would be great.
> Anyway, [image: 👍] for this
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5318#issuecomment-7934886>.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:02:23Z
Well, I think most components should be good now (as some work has been done on them). But the bridges and bundles may need some work (bundles were not having any dev requirements until yesterday when @guilhermeblanco added some on FrameworkBundle)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-22T14:14:00Z
what about having for each READ-ONLY repo his own .travis.yml and travisci hook activated ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-22T14:30:13Z
please, don't add more travis files. The main already tests everything, and that's all we need.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:33:46Z
@pborreli tests should not be different for subtree split repos as the code is the same and the tests are the same (except that more tests could be skipped because of missing deps).
Note that for the bundles, it is likely to be different currently as I think some skip tests are missing (just like dev requirements are). But fixing this does not require enablign travis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-22T14:42:30Z
ok, i was just thinking about a way to be sure each component is usable individually but yeah that would require to relaunch each tests and add a bunch of travis files + hook
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-08-24T13:12:04Z
@stof, @eriksencosta, @fabpot: Tests are different for Locale component, see #5235
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-24T13:35:07Z
@hason no. You also need to do it when running the tests of the Locale component as part of the full run.
