Commits
-------
5e4b7cb Renamed Propel Bridge: Propel => Propel1
cdad7ab Introducing the Propel Bridge
Discussion
----------
Introducing the Propel Bridge
Basic bridge with stable components for Propel.
This should not affect anything except the need to maintain this code (even if the most part is safe thanks to `@api` tag). As Propel future is linked to Symfony2, to maintain this bridge should not be a problem.
Don't flame me for this proposal, I do that "knowingly".
Regards,
William.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/15 12:22:12 -0700
IMO, it would be better to put this code in a repo owned by the Propel organization than in the core.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Richtermeister at 2011/09/15 15:33:02 -0700
Yay, great to see this, very much looking forward to using Propel again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by GromNaN at 2011/09/16 01:37:53 -0700
+1 for @stof proposition.The Silex Core should stay lightweight.
Silex definitely need a site or at least a page in the doc to list all the community extensions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by odino at 2011/09/16 01:39:40 -0700
Silex? :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by GromNaN at 2011/09/16 01:43:20 -0700
Oups, I was looking at Silex PR and got this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/08 01:01:56 -0700
@willdurand we should maybe make this a topic for the next IRC meeting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/10/09 10:26:22 -0700
Agreed :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/03 14:18:02 -0700
Good to go ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/04 03:34:37 -0700
Just removed the `Query` class. /cc @Stof
Anything else?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/05 08:45:34 -0700
@fabpot : good to merge ?
The PropelBundle has a `bridge` branch. I'm ready, I'm just waiting you merge this PR to tag the PropelBundle for Symfony 2.0, and after that I'll merge the `bridge` branch into the `master`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 22:32:42 -0800
What about renaming the directory from `Propel` to `Propel1`? That way, we will be able to have a `Propel` bridge for Propel 2.0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/16 23:18:56 -0800
It won't be consistent with the PropelBundle but I guess we don't have any other choice.. So I'm +1 for that.
If it's ok, I'll update this PR, just tell me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/17 07:09:58 -0800
yes, +1 for renaming
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/17 07:11:45 -0800
Why rename it to ``Propel1``? I think its enough to eventually add a ``Propel2``.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:14:05 -0800
`Propel1` is for BC.
`Propel` will be the Propel's future :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/11/17 07:17:02 -0800
sounds like a bad idea .. and what happens when you come out with ``Propel3`` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 07:17:31 -0800
@willdurand Maybe the bundle should renamed the same way, for consistency and to let ``PropelBundle`` for the Propel 2 one ? (but this should probably be discussed in another issue tracker)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:30:21 -0800
That way we'll be able to handle both Propel 1 & 2 without BC break. You may want to upgrade Symfony2 but not Propel nor PropelBundle. Propel1 bridge has a limited lifetime.
@stof : the PropelBundle will be tagged and a branch will probably appear for Propel1 compatibility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 07:34:10 -0800
@willdurand if Symfony provides a Propel bridge using the same namespace for Propel2 and then Propel3, this means that the Sf2 update changing the bridge to use the Propel3 code will make Sf2 incompatible with Propel2 even if you have a tag for Propel2 in the PropelBundle (as you will need to downgrade Symfony to the older tag too). As long as bridges are in the main Symfony repo, they are upgraded the same time Symfony is upgraded and they can bump the requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:37:13 -0800
Yes but Propel 1 is frozen, almost dead as we won't add any new features.
Propel2 is the future and there is no plan for a Propel3 which will break BC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/11/17 07:57:05 -0800
Updated!
Commits
-------
c89d45b Fix cs
Discussion
----------
Fix cs
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by rouffj at 2011/11/17 23:30:29 -0800
lsmith77: ok, so i revert my change only on RequestMatcher file ?
Commits
-------
6d7e6a8 [DoctrineBundle] Enhance error reporting during mapping validation when nested exceptions occur.
Discussion
----------
Doctrine info mapping exception
Better error handling when nested exceptions occur (which is commonly possible with reflection errors).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 02:10:13 -0800
It should probably be done on the 2.0 branch, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/11/18 02:11:06 -0800
Its not necessarily a bugfix but an enhancement.
Commits
-------
d2195cc Fixed phpdoc and updated the changelog
9e41ff4 [SecurityBundle] Added a validation rule
b107a3f [SecurityBundle] Refactored the configuration
633f0e9 [DoctrineBundle] Moved the entity provider service to DoctrineBundle
74732dc [SecurityBundle] Added a way to extend the providers section of the config
Discussion
----------
[WIP][SecurityBundle] Added a way to extend the providers section of the config
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
BC break: <del>no (for now)</del> yes
Tests pass: yes
This adds a way to extend the ``providers`` section of the security config so that other bundles can hook their stuff into it. An example is available in DoctrineBundle which is now responsible to handle the entity provider (<del>needs some cleanup as the service definition is still in SecurityBundle currently</del>). This will allow PropelBundle to provide a ``propel:`` provider for instance.
In order to keep BC with the existing configuration for the in-memory and the chain providers, I had to allow using a prototyped node instead of forcing using an array node with childrens. This introduces some issues:
- impossible to validate easily that a provider uses only one setup as prototyped node always have a default value (the empty array)
- the ``getFixableKey`` method is needed in the interface to support the XML format by pluralizing the name.
Here is my non-BC proposal for the configuration to clean this:
```yaml
security:
providers:
first:
memory: # BC break here by adding a level before the users
users:
joe: { password: foobar, roles: ROLE_USER }
john: { password: foobarbaz, roles: ROLE_USER }
second:
entity: # this one is BC
class: Acme\DemoBundle\Entity\User
third:
id: my_custom_provider # also BC
fourth:
chain: # BC break by adding a level before the providers
providers: [first, second, third]
```
What do you think about it ? Do we need to keep the BC in the config of the bundle or no ?
Btw note that the way to register the factories used by the firewall section should be refactored using the new way to provide extension points in the extensions (as done here) instead of relying on the end user to register factories, which would probably mean a BC break anyway.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/23 09:19:23 -0700
i don't think we should keep BC. the security config is complex as is .. having BC stuff in there will just make it even harder and confusing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2011/10/23 09:41:25 -0700
Is the security component tagged with `@api` ?
So basically, we just have to create a factory (`ModelFactory` for instance) and to register it in the `security` extension, right ? Seems quite simple to extend and much better than the hardcoded version…
Why did you call the method to pluralize a key `getFixableKey` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/10/23 14:48:26 -0700
Changing security config will introduce risk for users. We should avoid that
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/23 15:34:47 -0700
@beberlei as the config is validated, it will simply give them an exception during the loading of the config if they don't update their config.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/24 01:01:42 -0700
@schmittjoh @fabpot Could you give your mind about it ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/31 17:08:12 -0700
@fabpot @schmittjoh ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/11 14:08:18 -0800
I updated the PR by implementing my proposal as the latest IRC meeting agreed that we don't need to keep the BC for this change. This allows to add the validation rule now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/16 11:16:06 -0800
@fabpot ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 22:29:05 -0800
@stof: Before merging, you must also add information about how to upgrade in the CHANGELOG-2.1.md file.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/17 00:01:23 -0800
@fabpot done
The Firewall is now executed after the Router. This was needed to have access
to the locale and other request attributes that are set by the Router. This
change implies that all Firewall specific URLs have proper (empty) routes like
`/login_check` and `/logout`.
Commits
-------
264a033 Fixed uncompatible closure declaraction in FileldTypeValidatorExtensionTest
Discussion
----------
[tests]Fix closure declaration in validation groups tests
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
This is just small fix for `Closure` declaration in `FieldTypeValidatorExtensionTest`, this is not bug, but if someone will look at this declaration in test, it may lead to misunderstanding.
Commits
-------
f9a65ba Redirect to default_target_path if use_referer is true and the referer is the login_path.
Discussion
----------
Login redirect
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Redirect to default_target_path if use_referer is true and the referer is the login_path.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/10/30 10:52:38 -0700
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/10/30 11:04:16 -0700
@snc BC break ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by snc at 2011/10/30 12:11:39 -0700
Well I'm sure it is never intended by a developer to be redirected to the login page after logging in but it could be possible that the controller which displays the login form handles this case, so my change would break it.
Commits
-------
79ae3fc [Form] fixed radio and checkbox when data is not bool
Discussion
----------
[Form] fixed checkbox view
The checkbox view was being built based on app data, not client data. This fixes it.
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/16 13:31:09 -0800
`RadioType` suffers from the same problem, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/11/16 13:32:50 -0800
Yeah, I'll fix that too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/11/16 13:43:29 -0800
Updated to include `RadioType`.
Commits
-------
86a8b9f Allow vendors checkout transport method to be overridden manually.
Discussion
----------
Allow vendors checkout transport method to be overridden manually.
In one particular environment I cannot checkout using vendors.php using the default http:// transport methods, but only git://
This patch gives complete freedom to override the default.
Side note: http:// as a transport method at github is deprecated as all http:// urls redirect to https://
My motivation for this patch is to allow continuous integration (previous phing patch closed which included this required change) since multiple regular checkouts to github via http protocol get blocked more but git based protocol transport don't. Without this, vendors.php may not always work and it's required to get the dependencies in order to be able to run the unit tests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/11/15 06:14:32 -0800
If `http` is deprecated why you put this in default ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/15 06:26:17 -0800
Since the current list of checkouts is using `http`, I just left it. I try to keep topic branches laser focused so it's clear what the change was about. If you would like, I can change it because it actually makes sense. By the way, I double checked with `curl -I http://github.com/symfony/symfony.git` and the only response is a redirect to `https`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/15 18:40:16 -0800
Reopening on `master`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/15 21:32:09 -0800
Ok I've rebased this branch and force updated the branch so it's against 2.0 and has the changes discussed.
Commits
-------
4fbcc20 UPDATE.md: trivial markdown syntax fix
Discussion
----------
UPDATE.md: trivial markdown syntax fix
Sorry if this is so trivial it's annoying. I just fix 'em as I find 'em, and I keep commits small.
Commits
-------
8399574 Fixes a small php doc issue of Symfony\Component\Console\Command\Command::setDefinition()
Discussion
----------
Fixes a small php doc issue of Symfony\Component\Console\Command\Command::setDefinition()
Have setDefinition() accept InputDefinition instead of Definition.
Commits
-------
58c2276 Skipped tests when PDO is not available
Discussion
----------
Skipped tests when PDO is not available
Some tests are failing with an exception when PDO SQLite is not available. This skips them instead.
Commits
-------
f83ef1e [DoctrineBundle] Fix tests - incorrect class names (copy paste error most probably)
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBundle] Fix tests - incorrect class names
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Some classes are incorrectly named resulting in failed tests for DoctrineBundle, looks like a copy paste error.
Commits
-------
470f872 [FrameworkBundle] fixed formatting of farsi translation file
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] fixed formatting of farsi translation file
It now matches the other languages translation files.
Commits
-------
67d91f0 fixed typo in exception message
Discussion
----------
Fixed typo in exception message
Fixed a small typo in the exception message which was added in d67fbe9e
