This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] never directly validate Existence (Required/Optional) constraints
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#36637#36723
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Using `Optional` or `Required` like "regular" constraints does not make any sense, but doing so didn't break before #36365. I suggest to ignore them for now and deprecate using them outside the `Collection` constraint in 5.2.
Commits
-------
d333aae187 never directly validate Existence (Required/Optional) constraints
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[DX] Show the ParseException message in all YAML file loaders
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
This PR synchronizes the exception message in the Routing, Validator and Translation YAML file loaders with the DependencyInjection YAML file loader behavior. Adding the ParseException message is a big DX gain because it highlights the problem directly instead of having to scroll down 7 previous exceptions.
I'm targetting 3.4 because DX can be considered as a bug fix AFAIK.
Commits
-------
fc6cf3d3c6 [DX] Show the ParseException message in YAML file loaders
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Fixed default group for nested composite constraints
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#33986
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | ~
Take a breath: when composite constraints are nested in a parent composite constraint without having non composite nested constraints (i.e empty), then the default group is not added, making the validator failing to validate in any group (including default), because there is no group at all, which should never happen.
Commits
-------
117ee34698 [Validator] Fixed default group for nested composite constraints
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Add missing Ukrainian and Russian translations
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | none
| License | MIT
Commits
-------
d43ef4ec92 [Validator] Add missing Ukrainian and Russian translations
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Assert Valid with many groups
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/36157
| License | MIT
Make a reference object get validated by each group when using the Valid constraint with many groups
Commits
-------
c9aa3a849a bug #36157 [Validator] Assert Valid with many groups
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Add missing vietnamese translations
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no <!-- please update src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| Deprecations? | no <!-- please update UPGRADE-*.md and src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| Tickets | - <!-- prefix each issue number with "Fix #", if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | - <!-- required for new features -->
<!--
Replace this notice by a short README for your feature/bugfix. This will help people
understand your PR and can be used as a start for the documentation.
Additionally (see https://symfony.com/releases):
- Always add tests and ensure they pass.
- Never break backward compatibility (see https://symfony.com/bc).
- Bug fixes must be submitted against the lowest maintained branch where they apply
(lowest branches are regularly merged to upper ones so they get the fixes too.)
- Features and deprecations must be submitted against branch master.
-->
Commits
-------
25fdc8e580 [Validator] Add missing vietnamese translations
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Remove commas in translations
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| License | MIT
These translations were originally modified in #21335.
Commits
-------
5688f97bad [Validator] Remove commas in translations
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
Add Spanish translation
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
@javiereguiluz I know it's not very significant, but in order to make distinction between `must be` and `should be`, shouldn't translation no. 94 be changed to `Este valor debería estar entre...`?
Commits
-------
9e67b57baa Add Spanish translation
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] add German translation
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Commits
-------
9d837ecb34 add German translation
