This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[DX][FrameworkBundle] Show private aliases in debug:container
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/16388https://github.com/Haehnchen/idea-php-symfony2-plugin/issues/618
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
By building and compiling the container without `TYPE_REMOVING` passes, private aliases are available (shown when `--show-private` is passed). The ContainerBuilderDebugDumpPass now makes use of the ConfigCache component, removing the need for clearing the cache to get the debug:container output up to date (in sync with latest config).
Config
-------
```yaml
services:
AppBundle\Foo:
public: false
foo_consumer1:
class: AppBundle\Foo
arguments: [ '@AppBundle\Foo' ]
foo_consumer2:
class: AppBundle\Foo
arguments: [ '@AppBundle\Foo' ]
foo_alias:
alias: AppBundle\Foo
foo_private_alias:
public: false
alias: AppBundle\Foo
```
Before
-------
After
------
Commits
-------
883723ef53 Show private aliases in debug:container
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Restore 3.2-like behavior for FormPass, to help BC with Sonata
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.3
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
I tried updating a Sonata project to 3.3, and found it broken.
The issue is that Sonata uses the constructor arguments of the `form.extension` to create its own `form.extension` service - but borrows its first args from the Symfony one.
Here is the form pass doing that:
https://github.com/sonata-project/SonataCoreBundle/blob/3.x/DependencyInjection/Compiler/FormFactoryCompilerPass.php
And the implementation of the form extension:
https://github.com/sonata-project/SonataCoreBundle/blob/3.x/DependencyInjection/SonataCoreExtension.php
Question: is this covered by the BC policy? It shouldn't to me, because that would prevent *any* service reconfiguration.
Thus, I'm proposing the attached patch, which basically reverts the deprecated `FormPass` in FrameworkBundle to its 3.2 state.
I added a check to the new `FormPass` in the Form component so that it doesn't overwrite such compatibility configurations.
See for corresponding fix on https://github.com/sonata-project/SonataCoreBundle/pull/399
Commits
-------
c97b08e6c0 [FrameworkBundle] Restore 3.2-like behavior for FormPass, to help BC with Sonata
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.3-dev branch (closes#22234).
Discussion
----------
[DI] Introducing autoconfigure: automatic _instanceof configuration
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes (mostly, a continuation of a new feature)
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs/issues/7538
This is a proposal to allow the user to opt into some automatic `_instanceof` config. Suppose I want to auto-tag all of my voters and event subscribers
```yml
# current
services:
_defaults:
autowire: true
_instanceof:
Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Authorization\Voter\VoterInterface:
tags: [security.voter]
Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\EventSubscriberInterface:
tags: [kernel.event_subscriber]
# services using the above tags
AppBundle\Security\PostVoter: ~
AppBundle\EventListener\CheckRequirementsSubscriber: ~
```
If I'm registering a service with a class that implements `VoterInterface`, when would I ever *not* want that to be tagged with `security.voter`? Here's the proposed code:
```yml
# proposed
services:
_defaults:
autowire: true
autoconfigure: true
# services using the auto_configure_instanceof functionality
AppBundle\Security\PostVoter: ~
AppBundle\EventListener\CheckRequirementsSubscriber: ~
```
The user must opt into this and it only applies locally to this configuration file. It works because each enabled bundle would have the opportunity to add one or more "automatic instanceof" definitions - e.g. SecurityBundle would add the `security.voter` instanceof config, FrameworkBundle would add the `kernel.event_subscriber` instanceof config, etc.
For another example, you can check out the proposed changes to `symfony-demo` - symfony/symfony-demo#483 - the `_instanceof` section is pretty heavy: 81694ac21e/app/config/services.yml (L20)
Thanks!
Commits
-------
18627bf9f6 [DI] Introducing autoconfigure: automatic _instanceof configuration
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
Persist app bootstrapping logs for logger datacollector
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.3
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | ?
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #21405
| License | MIT
Logs generated during the container build are catched by the BufferingLogger with a special flag.
They are persist by the LoggerDataCollector and are available in the logger profiler.
In the profiler toolbar, the "container build" logs increment the current logs counter (even if the container was previously built).
<img width="540" alt="capture d ecran 2017-02-01 a 20 56 40" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1017746/22523826/0bc12e4a-e8c1-11e6-830f-7f6238ea7423.png">
<img width="1022" alt="capture d ecran 2017-02-01 a 20 57 55" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1017746/22523859/2c48a698-e8c1-11e6-9bdb-d85f3e692938.png">
The BufferingLogger now require the cachePath and the filesystem to persist a (unique) container build logs.
If the current workflow is ok, I will update the test coverage (actually they fail). Maybe we can display the appDevDebugProjectContainerCompiler.log content in that logger profile.
Commits
-------
2fd18b5503 [VarDumper] Fine tune dumping log messages
ce3ef6a96e Persist app bootstrapping logs for logger datacollector
The conflict rule already forbids installing releases before 3.3 of the
Asset component. This will bring the constraint in the `require-dev`
section inline with the conflict rule.
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle][Workflow] Deprecate the default type of a workflow
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.3
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | yes
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
---
Before this patch, the default type is "workflow". Most of the time a
"state_machine" is better because it's simpler and it involves less
knowledge to be able to use it.
So this patch deprecate a missing type in Symfony 3.3. And In Symfony
4.0 the default value will become "state_machine".
Commits
-------
004751c [FrameworkBundle][Workflow] Deprecate the default type of a workflow
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.3-dev branch (closes#22420).
Discussion
----------
[DI] Make tagged abstract services throw earlier
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.3
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
As spotted by @stof in https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/22388#issuecomment-293565243, skipping abstract tagged services removes an opportunity to report config mistakes to users.
Instead of skipping them, let's throw as done before (thus reverting #22039, ping @chalasr).
I made `$container->findTaggedServiceIds()` accept a 2nd arg to make this more systematic.
To keep the possibility to have abstract tagged services *for the purpose of tag inheritance*, `ResolveTagsInheritancePass` now resets their tags.
Commits
-------
388e4b3389 [DI] Make tagged abstract services throw earlier
cd06c1297b Revert "minor #22039 Skip abstract definitions in compiler passes (chalasr)"
Before this patch, the default type is "workflow". Most of the time a
"state_machine" is better because it's simpler and it involves less
knowledge to be able to use it.
So this patch deprecate a missing type in Symfony 3.3. And In Symfony
4.0 the default value will become "state_machine".
* 3.2:
[2.8] Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
[3.2] Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
[2.8] Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
#22396 on 2.8
Commits
-------
2be5821743 [2.8] Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch.
Discussion
----------
Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.7
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
The current logic is inconsistent, and allows the same id to be used several times. This makes the first explicit priority to always win.
Commits
-------
6764dcdf39 Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
added a more specialized exception for a better error message
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | yes/no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
When trying to load a resource, it is very interesting to understand why a resource cannot be loaded. Especially when you get `Cannot load resource "../src/Controller/".`... when the real error is that annotation support is disabled. This PR adds more information in that case.
Commits
-------
aeb9bffa8f added a more specialized exception for a better error message
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Use findDefinition() instead of getDefinition() on aliases
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
The services for which `has()` is called might be aliases at this point so `getDefinition()` gives an exception, I ran into by executing this pass but not the removing ones (skipping ReplaceAliasByActualDefinitionPass) while working on https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/16388. Let's make it safe to use independently.
Commits
-------
41f3d1f166 Use findDefinition() instead of getDefinition() after calling has()
