Commits
-------
d19f1d7 [Doctrine] Fix UniqueEntityValidator reporting a false positive by ignoring multiple query results
Discussion
----------
[Doctrine] Fix UniqueEntityValidator reporting a false positive by ignoring multiple query results
An entity should only be considered unique if its search criteria returns no matches or a single, identical entity. Multiple results indicates that conflicting entities exist.
Note: the DoctrineMongoDBBundle's unique validator checks identifier values if the object strict-equality check is false. This may be a worthwhile improvement, as it would prevent reporting a validation error for an enttiy which is going to overwrite its conflicting counter-part in the database.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2011/09/01 14:23:27 -0700
This is the Doctrine bridge equivalent for my fix to DoctrineMongoDBBundle: https://github.com/symfony/DoctrineMongoDBBundle/pull/42
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/02 00:13:52 -0700
As this is a bug fix, can you base your PR on the symfony/2.0 branch? Thanks.
An entity should only be considered unique if its search criteria returns no matches or a single, identical entity. Multiple results indicates that conflicting entities exist.
Commits
-------
6bd1749 Fixed a bug when multiple expanded choices would render unchecked because of the Form Framework's strict type checking.
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Entities to array transformer
Fixed a bug when multiple expanded choices would render unchecked because of the Form Framework's strict type checking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/08/31 09:01:47 -0700
Looks good to me. Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
Commits
-------
c558b78 avoid rendering the `ChoiceType` separator if all `choices` are `preferred_choices`
Discussion
----------
avoid rendering the `ChoiceType` separator if all `choices` are `preferred_choices`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/24 00:51:21 -0700
The same change should be made to the PHP template.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/25 00:31:39 -0700
I forgot to ask you to add some unit tests too. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 10:23:34 -0700
Are you asking for PHPUnit tests? If so, unfortunately, I'm not able to add those because I haven't used PHPUnit yet. ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 12:47:51 -0700
I would prefer ```choises | length``` without spaces as everywhere else.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 12:50:32 -0700
@fabpot: Since <option disabled> is unclickable in browser (by HTML spec) this really doesn't change anything (something not there is as unclickable) except the the look when rendered. I have hard time to imagine what could become unit-testable here by this change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/25 13:03:47 -0700
@lenar unit testing is not about what the browser could do. What should be unit-tested is that an example will only preferred choices does not output the separator, which is exactly what this PR is about
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/25 13:04:03 -0700
@lenar unit testing is not about what the browser could do. What should be unit-tested is that an example will only preferred choices does not output the separator, which is exactly what this PR is about
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 13:08:33 -0700
@stof: ok, put this way you are definitely right.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 13:37:50 -0700
@lenar: You're right about the spaces. I'm using them in my projects but will remove them here for the sake of consistency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/25 13:40:40 -0700
@craue I will write today/tomorrow test to cover your code and send you PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 14:00:26 -0700
@stloyd: That would be nice. But I'm still not that familiar with Git(Hub). Is there anything I have to take care of?
Also, I'd like to squash my three commits into one ... if this is possible for an open PR and if I find out how to do that easily. :D
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/26 00:18:22 -0700
@craue: yes, you should squash your commits into one and use `--force` when you push (the PR will automatically be updated accordingly).
Commits
-------
85c0087 [TwigBridge] Made the locale configurable for the trans and transchoice tags
3ea31a0 [TwigBridge] Made the locale configurable for the trans and transchoice filters
Discussion
----------
Trans locale
This allows setting the locale when translating in a Twig template. This was already allowed in the Translator and in the PHP templates
Commits
-------
52fdd53 [Bridge/Twig] Add required class to labels that match required fields
Discussion
----------
[Bridge/Twig] Add required class to labels that match required fields
I have used this to simply style labels that are required with a red star behind them using this CSS:
``` css
label.required::after {
content: " *";
color: #c00;
}
```
The problem is that you can't use `input[required] + label::after` as a selector since the label is typically rendered before the input. There is no way to check for an element that is *followed by* another, only elements *following*.
Of course this CSS in particular won't work except in the latest browsers, but you could still use the `label.required` selector to add a background image and so on. I think this is a very common use case and therefore I think it'd benefit the core framework.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/05 01:27:49 -0700
Can you also update the PHP templates?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 01:43:33 -0700
How about namespacing these css classes, like for example "sf-form-required"?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/05 01:50:58 -0700
I would prefer an @schmittjoh naming, or even adding ability to setup it thought options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/05 01:54:36 -0700
Please, do not add more options. Prefix with `sf` is actually a good idea but people will argue that this is not a good idea because it gives too much information about the technology used to create the website (that's one of the things that came up pretty often in symfony1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 02:00:11 -0700
An option is not such a good idea imo since you likely want to have a uniform naming strategy across your entire site. How about adding a new service CssNamingStrategy?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/05 02:01:19 -0700
Then this can be some simpler one not giving such informations i.e.: `form-label-required`, `label-required`, `framework-form-required`, `form-required` or whatever else ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/05 02:16:41 -0700
It cannot be configurable as it would potentially break bundles that come with stylesheets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/05 02:21:10 -0700
IMO if we decide to add this one, we could add same to `inputs/selects/etc` with `required` option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 02:21:59 -0700
I think it can, consider an interface like this:
```php
interface CssNamingStrategyInterface
{
function getCssName($class);
}
```
This will give people a lot of flexibility, and it also does allow them to exclude classes which for example are provided by third-party bundles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/05 02:47:54 -0700
Wow guys, if this turns into a full blown class generator solution, I'm happy to close the PR.
"required" is not a name that's commonly used for main page elements, it's typically associated with forms, and therefore I don't see the need to make it unnecessary longer/namespaced. Similarly I don't see the need to add it to the input/select/.., because they already have an attribute, which you can very easily select as: `input[required]` in CSS. That works everywhere except IE6, but we can't build for the future on very old browsers. If you really want support for IE6, you can override the templates imo. But core should be looking forward, as it already is with HTML5, form markup, etc.
As for calling it form-label-required or label-required, again, I don't see the benefit, you can use `label.required` if you want to avoid conflicts with non-label elements having a required class, or a safer `form .required`. There are plenty of options in CSS itself, let's not make this overly complex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 02:52:17 -0700
see
http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/speed/page-speed/docs/rendering.html#UseEfficientCSSSelectors
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Seldaek <
reply@reply.github.com>wrote:
> Wow guys, if this turns into a full blown class generator solution, I'm
> happy to close the PR.
>
> "required" is not a name that's commonly used for main page elements, it's
> typically associated with forms, and therefore I don't see the need to make
> it unnecessary longer/namespaced. Similarly I don't see the need to add it
> to the input/select/.., because they already have an attribute, which you
> can very easily select as: `input[required]` in CSS. That works everywhere
> except IE6, but we can't build for the future on very old browsers. If you
> really want support for IE6, you can override the templates imo. But core
> should be looking forward, as it already is with HTML5, form markup, etc.
>
> As for calling it form-label-required or label-required, again, I don't see
> the benefit, you can use `label.required` if you want to avoid conflicts
> with non-label elements having a required class, or a safer `form
> .required`. There are plenty of options in CSS itself, let's not make this
> overly complex.
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1519#issuecomment-1502560
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/05 03:11:50 -0700
Really? Come on, we're talking about forms, it's not like you have billions of form/input tags per page that have to be parsed by the browser when you select that. Also you don't have to select the elements, if you want true performance just use no stylesheet, your users will thank you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 03:30:40 -0700
Your CSS selectors not only affect the performance of form elements, but of all elements that have a "required" class. Likewise, the same applies if we decide to add more classes.
Why close the door for people who care about performance? We can easily avoid this by making the css class more specific as suggested earlier. The idea with the renaming strategy is one step further and allows people to "obfuscate" which tool was used to generate the form, or do additional optimizations like shortening the css name.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/05 03:34:34 -0700
@Seldaek: Just for remark I've seen matrix forms spanning multiple screenfuls horizontally and vertically
containing tens of thousands inputs. Not pretty, but they do exist. Basically "poor" man's/company's excel
emulation or something.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/05 04:19:13 -0700
@schmittjoh, @lenar: We're catering to the most common use case, for which this will be more than fast enough. Small/medium scale websites don't have to optimize on CSS rules parsing, they usually have much bigger issues to deal with. If you really care about it, overriding the block to remove the class is just as easy as it was to for me to add it, but IMO this is the edge case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 05:37:19 -0700
IMO Symfony should follow best practices by encouraging to use class selectors, and not tag selectors for the reasons explained on the page I linked.
Anyway, I think everybody made his points. Time for @fabpot to make a decision :)
Commits
-------
1cc1027 added @Annotation to UniqueEntity
ee22c5d added a note to update file
efcb435 updated to doctrine changes
Discussion
----------
updated to doctrine changes
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by excelwebzone at 2011/06/30 06:29:23 -0700
Should also be implemented to the Route class and to all SensioFrameworkExtraBundle annotation classes
Commits
-------
4e3406d Sync with master and clean up
ad5d2c1 Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to DateType option) (issue #1205) Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
Discussion
----------
[Form][TimeType] Added possibility to render form as "single_text"
Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to `DateType` option) (issue #1205)
Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ouardisoft at 2011/06/17 03:41:18 -0700
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/21 01:05:51 -0700
@fabpot Any decision about this one ? I'm asking because I also have similar fix for #1323 but it requires this one ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 23:32:08 -0700
@stloyd: Can you rebase to master?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/23 05:03:44 -0700
@fabpot Done.
Commits
-------
2c1108c [Form] Revert the ability to override anything else than the text of the label while rendering a row
da467a6 [Form] Fix the exception message when no block is found while rendering
8670995 [Form] Optimize rendering when the block to render is known
41e07c9 [Form] Optimize rendering
ee5d975 [Form] Remove a test which is no more relevant (after recent FileType refactoring)
f729c6b [Form] Add the ability to override label & widget options when rendering a row
e09ae3f [Form][FrameworkBundle] Make FormHelper::renderSection() recursively callable, introduce FormHelper::renderBlock()
e43fb98 [Form][TwigBridge] Make FormExtension::render() recursively callable to ease theming
Discussion
----------
[Form] Some refactoring of the rendering
# First two commits
## FormExtension::render() can now be called recursively.
The main use case is theming support in for collections. Let's consider that you have a collection of `CustomType`, the type hierarchy while rendering the proto would be `field < form < custom < prototype`. Before this change any theme applied to your custom type (i.e. a `custom_row` block) would not have been taken into account while rendering the prototype because of the structure of the `prototype_row` block:
```html
{% block prototype_row %}
{% spaceless %}
<script type="text/html" id="{{ proto_id }}">{{ block('field_row') }}</script>
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock prototype_row %}
```
which skip the `custom_row` block rendering to fallback to the `field_row` block rendering.
With this PR `prototype_row` recursively calls `FormExtension::render()`
```html
{% block prototype_row %}
{% spaceless %}
<script type="text/html" id="{{ proto_id }}">{{ form_row(form) }}</script>
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock prototype_row %}
```
this has for effect to render the block for the parent type (i.e. `custom_row`)
## FormHelper
The `FormHelper` has been updated to more closely match the `FormExtension` architecture and the templates have been modified accordingly. `echo $view['form']->renderBlock(<block name>)` is the php equivalent of `{{ block(<block name>) }}`.
The attributes are now rendered using a template rather than by the `FormHelper::attributes()` method.
Several templates have been fixed.
# Third commit
The `$varStack` property was used to forward options to the label and the widget when rendering a row. The implementation was not working as expected. The proposed way to override label and widget options is to pass these options in the `label` and `widget` keys while callinf `render_row`.
That would be:
`{{ form_row(form.field, {"attr": {<row attributes>}, "label" : {"label": <text>, "attr": {<label attr>}}, "widget" : { "attr" : {<widget attributes}} } }}`
So there is now the ability to set attributes for the row (`<div>` or `<tr>`).
This has been discussed on [the mailing list](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/17754128ba480545). **I would like to find a compromise with @Seldaek before this gets merged**
The `$varStack` property is now only used when recursively calling `FormExtension::render()`
# Notes
I have preferred to submit several commits in order to ease review and to keep some history.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/06/20 05:20:56 -0700
@vicb On a side note, do you think it would be possible to support form theming in PHP templates too ? Currently, the only way to customize the rendering of forms when using PHP templates is to overwrite the FrameworkBundle's templates, and this impacts all forms. This makes the PHP rendering far less powerful than the Twig one.
I don't know the Form rendering and the PHPEngine well enough to know if it is feasible for 2.1 or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/20 05:35:11 -0700
@stof I hope to make it possible but I need a little bit more thinking to find the best possible solution which should not look like a hack.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 01:13:10 -0700
This should not be merged yet, it might have some issue with the variable stack. I am working on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 01:41:11 -0700
Sorted out the issue, it was linked to some local _optimization_, the code of this PR is ok.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 02:01:24 -0700
I have pushed a [POC of php theming based on this PR](https://github.com/vicb/symfony/commits/form%2Fphp-theme) to my repo - it is lacking a configuration and cache layer.
I have open [a thread on the ml](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/9b3f131fe116b511) to discuss this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 23:40:21 -0700
@fabpot fixed in the last commit.
Commits
-------
07fa82d [Form] Revert changes impacting perfomance and readability
b709551 [Order] Make Form::types and FormView::types use the same order (Parent > Child)
e56dad6 [Form] simplify the code
bdd755e [Form] Fix the exception message when no block is found
c68c511 [Form] Make theming form prototypes consistent (start by looking for a '_<id>_<section>' block)
9ec9960 [Form] Simplify the code
4e3e276 [Form] Make the prototype view child of the collection view
Discussion
----------
[Form] Make the prototype view child of the collection view
This PR should be a base for discussion.
The [current implementation](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1188) has some drawbacks because the prototype view is not a child of the collection view:
* The 'multipart' attribute is not propagated from the prototype to the collection,
* The prototype view do not use the theme from the collection.
Those 2 points are fixed by the proposed implementation and one more benefit is that the template markup might be easier to work with:
before:
```html
<div id="form_emails">
<div>
<label for="form_emails_0">0</label>
<input type="email" id="form_emails_0" name="form[emails][0]" value="a@b.com">
</div>
<script type="text/html" id="form_emails_prototype">
<div>
<label for="$$name$$">$$name$$</label>
<input type="email" id="$$name$$" name="$$name$$" value="" />
</div>
</script>
</div>
```
after:
```html
<div id="form_emails">
<div>
<label for="form_emails_0">0</label>
<input type="email" id="form_emails_0" name="form[emails][0]" value="a@b.com">
</div>
<script type="text/html" id="form_emails_prototype">
<div>
<label for="form_emails_$$name$$">$$name$$</label>
<input type="email" id="form_emails_$$name$$" name="form[emails][$$name$$]" value="" />
</div>
</script>
</div>
```
@kriswallsmith I'd like to get your feedback on this PR. thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/06/14 07:01:01 -0700
@fabpot any ETA about merging it ? Using the prototype currently is a pain to build the name. The change makes it far easier
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/14 07:09:46 -0700
The templates are much better but I'm a bit concerned that we need to add the logic into the Form class directly. That looks quite ugly. If there is no other way, I will merge it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 07:14:32 -0700
I have found no better way... I am testing some minor tweaks I want to submit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 07:34:25 -0700
I'm not happy with the code in Form.php either... would creating a PrototypeType accomplish the same thing?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 07:42:07 -0700
@kriswallsmith tried and dismissed, the id and name are bad & you have to go for `render_widget(form.get('proto'))` in the template. That should be fixeable but not any better.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 07:45:21 -0700
What do you mean the id and name are bad? If we have a distinct type for the prototype, can't we do whatever we want using buildView() and the template?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 07:53:31 -0700
@kriswallsmith the id would be smthg like `form_emails_$$name$$_prototype` but yes we should be able to do whatever we want but the code might end up being more complex.
I am done with the tweaks but still open to feedback on this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:08:21 -0700
Yes, that is the type of name I would expect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:08:33 -0700
Oops -- I mean id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:09:42 -0700
Maybe I'm confused what id you're referring to. I'll try to spend some time on this today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 08:23:56 -0700
That should be the id of the `<input>`, the id of the script would be `form_emails_$$name$$_prototype_prototype` (if prototype is the name of the nested node).
I am trying to setup a branch with my code (playing with git & netbeans local history)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 08:46:25 -0700
@kriswallsmith https://github.com/vicb/symfony/tree/kris/proto if that can help (there are still changes in Form.php)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:47:08 -0700
Thanks, I'll take a look.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/15 00:48:38 -0700
I would have expected it to be faster however `array_map` is about twice slower... reverted !
Rules are as follows:
* If multiple is true, then the empty_value is ignored
* If not, and if the field is not required, the empty_value is set to the empty string by default and displayed
* If the field is required, and if the user explicitely set the empty_value, then it is displayed
* kriswallsmith/form/collection-proto:
added script[type="text/html"] collection prototype to form themes
[Form] removed collection prototype from form tree
* vicb/form-render-fix:
[Form][TwigBridge] Improve the cache layer by caching blocks instead of templates
[Form][TwigBridge] Make the template cache more efficient
[Form][TwigBridge] Fix rendering
The current implementation is not ready for inclusion in 2.0. It has several
known problems (security, not possible to disable it, not "cloud-compatible",
...) and it's not a must have feature anyway.
Some references:
* Security issue in FileType: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1001
* Validation fails on file, still stored in TemporaryStorage: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/908
* Add a size argument & ability to configure TemporaryStorage: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/748
This feature should be reworked and discussed for inclusion in 2.1.
* yethee/doctrine_bridge:
[DoctrineBridge] Removed all options of the parent type
[DoctrineBridge] Removed unneeded use statement
[DoctrineBridge] Fixed typo
[DoctrineBridge] Removed duplicating options in EntityType
* added a RegistryInterface
* changed all classes to depend on the Registry instead of a specific EntityManager
This is more consistent as the validator already took the registry and this allows
to use any entity manager in Forms.
* vicb/form-rendering-fix:
[Form] Fix accessibility for file inputs
[FrameworkBundle] Fix the FormHelper phpDoc
[FrameworkBundle][Form] Add some phpDoc for the FormHelper class
[FrameworkBundle][Form] Fix label rendering
[FrameworkBundle][Form] Fix rendering search inputs in PHP
[Form] FormType labels should never have a for attribute
[Form] Never render a view again
If some of the nested views are rendered individually they should not be rendered again when calling form_rest.
A typical would be when some nested file views are rendered, form_rest should not render them again.
It is still possible to render a label once the widget has been rendered. This is for checkboxes and radios
where the widget is typically rendered before the label.
* vicb/form-rendering:
[Form] The variable stack should not persist between section rendering (fixes#1157)
[Twig][Form] Tweak form extension phpDoc and code
[Form] Tweak phpDoc
[FormView] fix phpDoc
[Form] Some tweaks
* CodeMeme/889-EntityChoiceField-grouped-choices:
Whitespace cleanup
Fixed EntityChoiceList to support grouped entities Refs #889
Added test for grouped entity choice list Refs #889
* bschussek/form: (22 commits)
Fix merge error (function "guess" was in there twice)
[Form] Added test case for bf2f9d2a02
[Form] Form::isBound() and Form::isValid() work correctly now for read-only forms
[Locale] Improved error reporting and added stubs for intl_is_failure(), intl_get_error_code() and intl_get_error_message()
[Form] Implemented fix for 361c67f54f
[Form] Add test for the handling of array values in the constraint violation
[Form] Further simplified PropertyPath code
[Form] Added test for 6c337d1cc0
[Form] Removed unused option "pattern" of date and time type
[Form] Renamed view variable "name" to "full_name"
[Form] Renamed collection option "type_options" to "options" to be consistent with the repeated type
[Form] CSRF documentation and a few CS changes
[Form] Move CSRF options from types to the CSRF extension
[Form] Added a search form field type
[Form] Optimization of PropertyPath
[Form] replace assertEquals by assertFalse, assertTrue, assertNull
[Form] fix file permissions to 644 again ;)
[Form] add tests for type_options in collectionType
fix file permissions to 644
[Form] add type_options for CollectionType to be abble to set options to type
...
If you use the MinLength validator with your entities, the ValidatorTypeGuesser gets the value, stored as "minlength". Then, the FormFactory generates a "pattern" attribute out of minlength and maxlength.
Modern browsers such as Chrome use this attribute to validate the form before submitting.
a "pattern" attribute is generated that validates the
The consequence of this commit is that variables are accessible that have been passed to a surrounding form helper.
Example template:
{% block my_widget_label %}
<label>{{ label }}
{% endblock %}
{% block my_widget_row %}
{# It is not necessary to explicitely pass through the label variable #}
{{ form_label(form) }}
{{ form_widget(form) }}
{% endblock %}
Example usage:
{{ form_row(form.mywidget, { 'label': 'My Widget' }) }}
This has been removed as the same can be achieved in a cleaner way:
* Use plain HTML with calls to more granular Twig form functions
* Create a macro if you really want to reuse the template snippet elsewhere
* bschussek/form-extensions:
[Form] Refactored code from CoreExtension to new ValidatorExtension
[Form] Added FormTypeExtensionInterface
[Form] Reorganized code into "form extensions"
The extension classes are now the only constructor argument of the FormFactory class. They replace the existing "type loader" classes.
new FormFactory(array(
new CoreExtension($validator, $storage),
new CsrfExtension($csrfProvider),
new DoctrineOrmExtension($em),
));
Together with a few upcoming commits this mechanism will make
* extension of the form framework in bundles and
* usage of the forms outside of Symfony2
much easier.
[Form] Fixed {get,set,has}Var references in templating php
[Form] Added getVars to FormView to ease usage in Twig. Also added some phpdoc and cleaned up the get method by adding a default value
[Form] Fix
[Form] Delete file generated by test
