This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.1 branch (closes#7297).
Commits
-------
ef53456 [DoctrineBridge] Avoids blob values to be logged by doctrine
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Avoids blob values to be logged by doctrine
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #7012
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2013-03-07T17:07:23Z
what about clob ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-07T17:10:45Z
@pborreli do you think clob values shouldn't be logged?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2013-03-07T17:26:27Z
well they can have same size than blob
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2013-03-07T18:07:15Z
I agree, skipping clobs as well would be WIN :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by francisbesset at 2013-03-08T08:44:08Z
Where are the tests?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2013-03-08T09:25:20Z
Ah yes, the DbalLogger has a testsuite, can you extend it to show this behavior works?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-08T10:28:53Z
@francisbesset @beberlei tests written.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by staabm at 2013-03-10T16:00:55Z
May I also ask for text/char fields with a certain amount of chars?
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.1 branch (closes#7325).
Commits
-------
6575df6 [Security] use current request attributes to generate redirect url?
Discussion
----------
[Security] use current request attributes to generate redirect url?
Maybe we should consider to use current request attributes to generate the login/logout redirections URL?
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #5080
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-03-11T08:33:37Z
Can you explain why?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-11T09:30:07Z
@Seldaek let say I prefixed all my URLs with a `{domain}` var (`_locale` for instance), I'd like it to be passed to my redirected request. I guess it could lead to side effects, that's why I tagged this PR `RFC`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-03-11T09:46:33Z
Fair enough. The main issue I see is that you end up with "garbage" query params in the URL. Any params that was needed by the previous page and not needed by the new one ends up as ?foo=bar in the URL. It's usually not harmful, but not very clean either. I'm not sure what it would take to grab all the params that a route can use, and only copy those over.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-11T10:12:49Z
@Seldaek indeed, I didn't think about those query parameters... I'll try to fix this in a simple way this afternoon.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-11T14:54:31Z
@Seldaek tell me if what you think of this, it may look like a hack (which wont be acceptable).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-03-11T14:59:39Z
Eh I see. I can't say it's the less hacky thing I ever saw, but it might be alright. I don't think I'm the best person to take this call though.. Let's see what @fabpot thinks.
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
7216cb0 [Validator] fix showing wrong max file size for upload errors
Discussion
----------
[Validator] fix showing wrong max file size for upload errors
this was because the maxSize option wasn't parsed correctly and simple string comparision could lead to wrong results, e.g. 200 > 1000M
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | [yes]
| New feature? | [no]
| BC breaks? | [no]
| Deprecations? | [no]
| Tests pass? | [yes|]
| Fixed tickets | [#6441,#5551]
| License | MIT
Will apply cleanly to 2.2
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.1 branch (closes#7344).
Commits
-------
c423f16 [2.1][TwigBridge] Fixes Issue #7342 in TwigBridge
Discussion
----------
[2.1][TwigBridge] Fixes Issue #7342 in TwigBridge
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #7342
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-03-12T13:28:15Z
Can you add a test to avoid regressions ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by benbender at 2013-03-12T13:54:02Z
Done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stevelacey at 2013-03-12T14:40:59Z
Looks good to me?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2013-03-12T16:04:27Z
👍
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
5ad4bd1 [TwigBridge] now enter/leave scope on Twig_Node_Module
fe4cc24 [TwigBridge] fixed fixed scope & trans_default_domain node visitor
c5e999a [TwigBridge] fixed non probant tests & added new one
Discussion
----------
[TwigBundle] fixes errors with the default domain node visitor & scope
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #7281
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Julien-Webgenery at 2013-03-12T16:35:58Z
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lennerd at 2013-03-12T16:38:40Z
👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by rc2c at 2013-03-12T16:53:04Z
👍
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
ae0b8ea [Translation] removed wriong 'use'
Discussion
----------
[Translation] removed wrong 'use'
Fixes last comment from #7304 // cc @stof
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.1 branch (closes#7304).
Commits
-------
5bc30bb [Translation] added xliff loader/dumper with resname support
Discussion
----------
[Translation] added xliff loader/dumper with resname support
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #5940
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-08T15:49:18Z
@Tobion what do you think of `XliffFileWithResnameDumper` and `XliffFileWithResnameLoader`?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by robinduval at 2013-03-08T15:49:58Z
💯 great idea !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lizjulien at 2013-03-08T15:51:45Z
🌟 better.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by saro0h at 2013-03-08T15:52:50Z
👍 Can't be worse than the previous one
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dxb at 2013-03-08T16:00:32Z
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2013-03-08T16:07:59Z
@jfsimon yes the name make sense. It is not possible to add this feature without BC break?
And if not, why not simply add an option/enable method to the existing classes. Having new classes for this seems awkward to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-08T16:17:44Z
@Tobion I totaly agree with you, but this has been discussed in #5940.
Does the presence of the `resname` attribute in the `trans-unit` tags represent a BC break?
Would opening another PR with this solution be a good idea?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-03-08T17:01:00Z
Your XliffFileWithResnameLoader is able to load all files supported by XliffFileLoader so IMO you don't need to add a new class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-08T18:21:32Z
@stof would the `resname` attribute addition in the dumped XLIFF be considered as a BC break?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-09T13:16:32Z
@stof done.
@mvrhov done.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.1 branch (closes#7281).
Commits
-------
e3547c6 [TwigBridge] fixes
Discussion
----------
[TwigBridge] fixes `TranslationDefaultDomainNodeVisitor`
... by adding scope management.
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #6747
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-03-06T15:14:57Z
Are `open` and `close` good names ? I would prefer `addChild` and `getParent` as there is nothing that is really opened or closed ?
Edit: by looking at the code a second time, I think open & close make sense .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-07T13:46:13Z
@vicb I know this is not consistent with the rest of the framework.
I dont think @fabpot will like them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-03-07T13:53:14Z
what about enter and leave ? It would be consistent with the naming used for scopes in the DI component
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-03-07T13:59:35Z
@stof I like your proposal. My main concern being "leave" (former "close"), @jfsimon could you throw when a scope is used after it has been left ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2013-03-07T14:01:56Z
go for enter/leave, but why throwing an exception on using a leaved scope?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-03-07T14:05:22Z
because if you have a ref to a left scope, you can still use it which is bad
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
547350c [FrameworkBundle] Fix code status in dockblock
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Fixed code status in docblock
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2013-03-09T15:23:46Z
👍
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
27cc0df Merge pull request #1 from merk/class-loader/idempotent
95af84c Fixed test to use Reflection
bb08247 [ClassLoader] tweaked test
73bead7 [ClassLoader] made DebugClassLoader idempotent
Discussion
----------
[ClassLoader] made DebugClassLoader idempotent
The DebugClassLoader will wrap itself if `enable()` is called multiple time, such as when running functional tests.
Please merge to 2.2 and master ASAP.
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | ~
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | ~
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2013-03-07T16:38:55Z
ping @fabpot: this will speed up lots of functional tests :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2013-03-08T04:51:51Z
@fabpot fixed by @merk
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
a4ec677 [DomCrawler] Fix relative path handling in links
Discussion
----------
[2.1][DomCrawler] Fix relative path handling in links
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #7219
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
Added relative path canonicalization according to RFC 3986, section 5.2.4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-03-02T14:48:46Z
@fabpot seems like 2.1 as a deps issue if you look at travis logs
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.1 branch (closes#7260).
Commits
-------
1d3da29 [FrameworkBundle] avoids cache:clear to break if new/old folders already exist
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] avoids cache:clear to break if new/old folders already exist
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #6502
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mahmouds at 2013-03-04T19:07:20Z
👍
This PR was submitted for the master branch but it was merged into the 2.1 branch instead (closes#7264).
Commits
-------
edda254 remove dead code in yaml component
Discussion
----------
remove dead code in yaml component
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| License | MIT
Cleanup unused code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-03-06T16:27:57Z
Can you explain why it is not needed anymore?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by igorw at 2013-03-06T16:44:30Z
`$subject` is no longer used anywhere. The `substr` is now done inline in the `preg_match` call. This code is effectively dead.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.1 branch (closes#7177).
Commits
-------
c82c754 RedisProfilerStorage wrong db-number/index-number selected
Discussion
----------
RedisProfilerStorage wrong db-number/index-number selected
bug: in the webprofiler the wrong database (0) is selected when storage should not go to index 0. on redis connect the default behaviour is to select index/database number 0, but it is necessary to select a special index/database.
see: http://rediscookbook.org/multiple_databases.html
[HttpKernel] [Profiler] [RedisProfilerStorage] added select for a db-number/db-index to dsn-patttern
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | [yes]
| New feature? | [no]
| BC breaks? | [no]
| Deprecations? | [no]
| Tests pass? | [yes]
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
Usage with index/db-number = 7 :
```xml
<!-- config_dev.xml -->
<symfony:profiler only-exceptions="false" dsn="redis://127.0.0.1:6379/7" lifetime="3600" />
```
```yml
#config_dev.yml
framework:
...
profiler:
...
dsn: redis://127.0.0.1:6379/7
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-02-27T07:21:02Z
Can you also add some unit tests?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by JohnDoe007 at 2013-02-27T09:36:28Z
@fabpot the function getRedis() is currently not testable, I think. this means I have to do a bigger change to the class, add a public function initRedis() or something and move initialize code there to make the initialization process, where my change is, testable. is this ok to do it in that bugfix/pull request? or should I add this test change to master and only adding this small bugfix to the 2.1-branch?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-03-06T16:47:37Z
Thanks, I've merged the fix. Can you work on the changes needed to allow the code to be testable (on the master branch)?
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
6681df0 [Console] fixed StringInput binding
6b98883 [Console] added string input test
32f1904 Revert "merged branch jfsimon/issue-6749 (PR #7220)"
Discussion
----------
[Console] fixes tests
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #7231
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gigablah at 2013-03-02T13:25:10Z
Apparently 5b19c892cf broke the console shell. I was wondering why all commands executed through the shell in 2.2.0 were throwing "Too many arguments" exception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-03-02T13:27:09Z
@gigablah This is already fixed in the 2.2 branch as this PR has already been merged in 2.2 (but the revert is also needed in 2.1)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gigablah at 2013-03-02T13:51:44Z
Ah, guess I'll have to wait for it to be pushed to the symfony/console repository then.
This PR was submitted for the master branch but it was merged into the 2.1 branch instead (closes#7261).
Commits
-------
ff8c5ca Unset loading[$id] in ContainerBuilder on exception
Discussion
----------
Unset loading[$id] in ContainerBuilder on exception
This is the same functionality that Container provides.
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-03-04T22:43:07Z
could you add a unit test and use the standard PR header (symfony.com > doc > contributing). thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by igorw at 2013-03-04T22:48:02Z
Can you add a test case? EDIT: I guess someone beat me to that comment. :)
