Commits
-------
d974a4a Merge pull request #4 from stealth35/test_mo_loader
cf05646 delete useless tests
19f9de9 [Translation] fix gettext tests
965f2bf Merge pull request #3 from stealth35/test_mo_loader
9c2a26d [Translation] add Mo loader tests
9af2342 [Translation] Added the gettext loaders
Discussion
----------
[Translation] Added the gettext loaders
This is the squashed version of the work done by @xaav in #634.
@stealth35 you said you will work on the dumpers. do you have some stuff on it ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/10/24 19:28:43 -0700
Is there any more progress with this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/10/25 00:57:19 -0700
I work on the dumpers, but the Po loader is wrong, caus' the Po ressource can be multiline,
msgid ""
"Here is an example of how one might continue a very long string\n"
"for the common case the string represents multi-line output.\n"
http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#PO-Files
Anyway the Po format is an intermediate format to Mo file, (like .txt to .res file for ICU), IMO we can just support the real gettext format : Mo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/11/03 02:00:24 -0700
@stof The MO Dumper is ready (stealth35/symfony@f2d1d5b4de), should we keep the PO format ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/07 08:50:59 -0800
@stealth35: The PO is what people will use for their translations. They will then dump it to MO. So, we need both PO and MO loaders and dumpers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/11/08 01:25:39 -0800
@fabpot, I'm ready for both dumpers, you can merge this, and I'll open a PR for the dumpers
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/08 22:37:47 -0800
I've just had a look at this PR code again and I see that the unit tests are pretty slim. Is it possible to add some tests for the mo loader?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/11/09 01:15:25 -0800
@fabpot test send to @stof ✌️
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/09 02:22:55 -0800
and merged in this branch
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/09 02:39:09 -0800
The tests do not pass for me:
There was 1 error:
1) Symfony\Tests\Component\Translation\Loader\MoFileLoaderTest::testLoadDoesNothingIfEmpty
InvalidArgumentException: MO stream content has an invalid format.
/Users/fabien/work/symfony/git/symfony/src/Symfony/Component/Translation/Loader/MoFileLoader.php:79
/Users/fabien/work/symfony/git/symfony/src/Symfony/Component/Translation/Loader/MoFileLoader.php:46
/Users/fabien/work/symfony/git/symfony/tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/MoFileLoaderTest.php:34
--
There was 1 failure:
1) Symfony\Tests\Component\Translation\Loader\PoFileLoaderTest::testLoad
Failed asserting that two arrays are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
Array (
- 'foo' => 'bar'
)
/Users/fabien/work/symfony/git/symfony/tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/PoFileLoaderTest.php:25
Commits
-------
d08ec5e Add DelegatingValidator tests
e1822e7 Enable dynamic set of validation groups by a callback or Closure
Discussion
----------
[Form][Validator] Enable dynamic set of validation groups based on callback
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Symfony2 tests written for new feature: yes
closes tickets: #2498#1151
This will allow developer to pass a Closure or a callback array as a Validation groups option of a form. Eg:
```
class ClientType extends AbstarctType
{
// ...
public function getDefaultOptions(array $options)
{
return array(
'validation_groups' => function(FormInterface $form){
// return array of validation groups based on submitted user data (data is after transform)
$data = $form->getData();
if($data->getType() == Entity\Client::TYPE_PERSON)
return array('Default', 'person');
else
return array('Default', 'company');
},
);
}
// ...
}
```
```
class ClientType extends AbstarctType
{
// ...
public function getDefaultOptions(array $options)
{
return array(
'validation_groups' => array(
'Acme\\AcmeBundle\\Entity\\Client',
'determineValidationGroups'
),
);
}
// ...
}
```
This will make developers life easier !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/10/27 06:39:56 -0700
Does that work if your ClientType were added to another form type?
e.g.
```php
<?php
class MyComplexType extends AbstractType
{
public function buildForm(FormBuilder $builder, array $options)
{
$builder->add('client', new ClientType());
}
// ...
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/10/27 06:44:33 -0700
This is doing nothing more than injecting array of validation groups, should work, but I have not tested this use case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/10/28 01:58:26 -0700
PHPUnit output
```
OK, but incomplete or skipped tests!
Tests: 5011, Assertions: 12356, Incomplete: 36, Skipped: 32.
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/02 11:37:47 -0700
Now functionality is complete, test are written, and implementation is clean. :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/11/02 11:50:44 -0700
Can tou `squash` your commits ? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/02 11:58:41 -0700
Done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/07 07:51:18 -0800
Can you add some tests for the `DelegatingValidator` class, which is where we can ensure that the new feature actually works as expected?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/07 13:53:16 -0800
OK, I've written proof-of-concept tests, also I've squashed few commits to make things clear.
Personally I think this should go straight into 2.0 series, as it do not beak BC, and a feature is really nice to use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/07 14:17:15 -0800
@canni the 2.0 branch is for bug fixes, not for new features. This is the difference between maintenance releases and minor releases.
Commits
-------
57040a8 document exceptions on the interfaces, inheritDoc on implementations, use statements instead of fully qualified exception names
Discussion
----------
Fix routing exception doc
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
This is only documentation cleanup for the url matcher and generator interfaces as they did not properly reflect the exceptions that are expected to be thrown. when the exceptions are not respected, unexpected behaviour can happen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2011/11/07 00:49:08 -0800
ok, changed that. thought in an interface definition we would not want to "use" exceptions just for doc, but its changed now.
i rebased on the upstream master and got this additional commit about portuguese translations, no idea why this happened. and my local git diff does not show it either. is it creating problems in the pull request or can you still merge?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/07 01:11:31 -0800
@dbu: Can you squash your commits and remove a commit that is not related to this PR? Thanks a lot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2011/11/07 23:49:37 -0800
ok, done. thanks to you, i learn a lot about git :-)
for the record: i did git rebase --soft on the commit id before my first commit, then git reset HEAD and git checkout on all the files not related to my changes, then commit again with the consolidated message, then git push --force origin fix-routing-exception-doc
Commits
-------
7346896 Changed Serialized#supportsNormalization to PRIVATE
e851efc Updated SerializerTest with "normalizeTraversable" & "testNormalizeGivesPriorityToInterfaceOverTraversable"
d789f94 Serializer#normalize gives precedence to objects that support normalization
9e6ba9a Added protected Serializer#supportsNormalization
Discussion
----------
[Serializer] `normalize` should use supported normalizer before Traversable
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no (discussion needed)
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2295
**Same as PR #2539, except rebased onto `2.0`**
Should I abstract out a `supportsDenormalization` function just for symmetry?
Commits
-------
ab9caa0 [Security] Check for request's session before attempting writes.
dabff0e [Security] Support removing tokens from a session.
Discussion
----------
[Security] Support removing tokens from a session.
Currently there is no way to remove a session's security token without invalidating the entire session and all its data (the ContextListener will only update the session if a token is non-null and non-anonymous). This patch fixes that.
I consider this a bug and I found no tests to prove otherwise. Let me know if I'm mistaken. Originally mentioned at https://groups.google.com/d/topic/symfony-devs/ojLvh0WUbfo/discussion
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ms937 at 2011/10/24 05:19:21 -0700
This change looks good to me. In fact I'm using similar patch in my app and it works as intended. Also, several other people requested this on the mailing list. Could someone from Symfony team merge this? Thanks.
This will enable developer, to set a callback or a closure as a `'validation_groups'` form option,
this is usefull when we have to determine validation groups based on a client submitted data.
Commits
-------
09e1e60 Grammar changes.
b4d0f4b Grammar changes
a0e62f0 Fix typos.
e6627fb Docblocks.
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Docblocks.
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: n/a
Fixes the following tickets: -
Added missing docblocks and type hints. Improves use with IDE and auto-generated API docs.
Commits
-------
ffa537c replace occurences of "an UserInteface" with "a UserInterface"
Discussion
----------
replace occurences of "an UserInteface" with "a UserInterface"
Commits
-------
fbd2a0e make suggested changes for default value
c507b1d update variable name to match the option name
b53f000 add the ability to set the form prototype name in CollectionType. this will aid in handling nested collections in forms
Discussion
----------
[Form] Collection
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: [#1324](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1324)
add the ability to set the form prototype name in CollectionType. this will aid in handling nested collections in forms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by IamPersistent at 2011/10/17 02:54:45 -0700
Actually, as an afterthought, I looked over at the issues and this is basically https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1324 just adding an extra option instead of using the prototype option.
@stloyd, my thought was handling the case where someone was "clever" enough to set the 'prototype_name' option to "". But I could be over-thinking :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/10/17 03:00:23 -0700
@IamPersistent IMO if someone is setting this option, he should be aware of that problem, also AFAIK `$$$$` could be *valid* name too ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by IamPersistent at 2011/10/17 03:02:14 -0700
@stloyd, I'm fine with changing it, I'll wait to see what everyone else has to say about this request vs using the prototype option for the name in 1324
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by IamPersistent at 2011/10/17 03:28:49 -0700
@stloyd, @stof, I made the suggested changes, now I suppose, let the debate begin over PR1324 vs this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/10/17 03:47:53 -0700
IMO this PR makes changing prototype name in more clean way, so I would prefer this one over that proposed in #1324.
Commits
-------
89cd64a Set error code when number cannot be parsed. Fixes#2389
Discussion
----------
Set error code when number cannot be parsed in StubNumberFormatter
The stub implementation of NumberFormatter never sets an error code and instead always returns the "no-error" code. This causes unexpected results when a transformer gives it bad arguments, such as transforming the input value to boolean false and causing exceptions further down the line, as in #2389.
Instead, it should set an error code when appropriate and return it when requested so that a TransformationFailedException can be raised and the input value left unaltered.
There may be other instances where an error should be set. This covers the common use case of non-numeric input.
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2389
Commits
-------
c9d05d7 Let NumberFormatter handle integer type casting
Discussion
----------
Let NumberFormatter handle integer type casting
The integer to localised string transformer is currently casting everything it gets to an integer, even if it is not a number. This responsibility should be passed off to NumberFormatter.
Partially addresses #2389 by not mistakenly typecasting a boolean false into an integer 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mrtorrent at 2011/10/30 15:04:28 -0700
Apologies, forgot the template:
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2389 (partial)
Commits
-------
05a4e9d [Validators][Type] Added support for ctype_* functions + tests
Discussion
----------
[Validators][Type] Added support for ctype_* functions + tests
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Not sure if the ctype_* functions support should be included in the AssertTypeValidator or in a dedicated one.
What do you think ?
Commits
-------
cbd0c3c [Config] Implemented Serializable on resources
Discussion
----------
[Config] Implemented Serializable on resources
bug fix: no
feature addition: no
BC break: not really. you simply need to clear your cache in debug mode
test passes: yes
Serializing private variables without implementing Serializable uses far more space as it prepend the fully qualified class name before the name of each property. This change allows keeping the meta file smaller.
