Commits
-------
d08ec5e Add DelegatingValidator tests
e1822e7 Enable dynamic set of validation groups by a callback or Closure
Discussion
----------
[Form][Validator] Enable dynamic set of validation groups based on callback
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Symfony2 tests written for new feature: yes
closes tickets: #2498#1151
This will allow developer to pass a Closure or a callback array as a Validation groups option of a form. Eg:
```
class ClientType extends AbstarctType
{
// ...
public function getDefaultOptions(array $options)
{
return array(
'validation_groups' => function(FormInterface $form){
// return array of validation groups based on submitted user data (data is after transform)
$data = $form->getData();
if($data->getType() == Entity\Client::TYPE_PERSON)
return array('Default', 'person');
else
return array('Default', 'company');
},
);
}
// ...
}
```
```
class ClientType extends AbstarctType
{
// ...
public function getDefaultOptions(array $options)
{
return array(
'validation_groups' => array(
'Acme\\AcmeBundle\\Entity\\Client',
'determineValidationGroups'
),
);
}
// ...
}
```
This will make developers life easier !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/10/27 06:39:56 -0700
Does that work if your ClientType were added to another form type?
e.g.
```php
<?php
class MyComplexType extends AbstractType
{
public function buildForm(FormBuilder $builder, array $options)
{
$builder->add('client', new ClientType());
}
// ...
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/10/27 06:44:33 -0700
This is doing nothing more than injecting array of validation groups, should work, but I have not tested this use case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/10/28 01:58:26 -0700
PHPUnit output
```
OK, but incomplete or skipped tests!
Tests: 5011, Assertions: 12356, Incomplete: 36, Skipped: 32.
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/02 11:37:47 -0700
Now functionality is complete, test are written, and implementation is clean. :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/11/02 11:50:44 -0700
Can tou `squash` your commits ? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/02 11:58:41 -0700
Done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/07 07:51:18 -0800
Can you add some tests for the `DelegatingValidator` class, which is where we can ensure that the new feature actually works as expected?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011/11/07 13:53:16 -0800
OK, I've written proof-of-concept tests, also I've squashed few commits to make things clear.
Personally I think this should go straight into 2.0 series, as it do not beak BC, and a feature is really nice to use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/07 14:17:15 -0800
@canni the 2.0 branch is for bug fixes, not for new features. This is the difference between maintenance releases and minor releases.
This will enable developer, to set a callback or a closure as a `'validation_groups'` form option,
this is usefull when we have to determine validation groups based on a client submitted data.
Commits
-------
fbd2a0e make suggested changes for default value
c507b1d update variable name to match the option name
b53f000 add the ability to set the form prototype name in CollectionType. this will aid in handling nested collections in forms
Discussion
----------
[Form] Collection
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: [#1324](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1324)
add the ability to set the form prototype name in CollectionType. this will aid in handling nested collections in forms
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by IamPersistent at 2011/10/17 02:54:45 -0700
Actually, as an afterthought, I looked over at the issues and this is basically https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1324 just adding an extra option instead of using the prototype option.
@stloyd, my thought was handling the case where someone was "clever" enough to set the 'prototype_name' option to "". But I could be over-thinking :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/10/17 03:00:23 -0700
@IamPersistent IMO if someone is setting this option, he should be aware of that problem, also AFAIK `$$$$` could be *valid* name too ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by IamPersistent at 2011/10/17 03:02:14 -0700
@stloyd, I'm fine with changing it, I'll wait to see what everyone else has to say about this request vs using the prototype option for the name in 1324
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by IamPersistent at 2011/10/17 03:28:49 -0700
@stloyd, @stof, I made the suggested changes, now I suppose, let the debate begin over PR1324 vs this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/10/17 03:47:53 -0700
IMO this PR makes changing prototype name in more clean way, so I would prefer this one over that proposed in #1324.
Commits
-------
c9d05d7 Let NumberFormatter handle integer type casting
Discussion
----------
Let NumberFormatter handle integer type casting
The integer to localised string transformer is currently casting everything it gets to an integer, even if it is not a number. This responsibility should be passed off to NumberFormatter.
Partially addresses #2389 by not mistakenly typecasting a boolean false into an integer 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mrtorrent at 2011/10/30 15:04:28 -0700
Apologies, forgot the template:
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2389 (partial)
Commits
-------
8bd0e42 [Form] Use proper parent (text) for EmailType and TextareaType
Discussion
----------
[2.0][Form] Use proper parent (text) for EmailType and TextareaType
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Commits
-------
95049ef [Form] Added type check to `ScalarToChoiceTransformer`
Discussion
----------
[2.0][Form] Added type check to ScalarToChoiceTransformer
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Commits
-------
67c33a8 Rebased with master, and fixed wrong behavior with proper tests coverage
f8a6a4b Be sure that both fields have same value for required option in RepeatedType
0679220 Additional test coverage for changes in RepeatedType
b23d47d moved options test form from class->method scope
5fe5556 fixed accidental permission change
a969434 [Form] fixed CS, merged options, added tests
8819db3 [Form] Allow setting different options to repeating fields
Discussion
----------
[2.1] [Form] Allow setting different options at RepeatedType fields
This an test covered version of #1348 (rebased with master).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/27 04:18:19 -0700
@fabpot What do you think about this ? I'm just not sure that we should allow setting `required` per field, IMO better would be forcing this option from default `$options['options']` and ignore that field in `$options['first_options']` and/or `$options['second_options']`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/02 00:00:04 -0700
@fabpot ping.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/06 05:45:56 -0700
Let's discuss this new feature for 2.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/08/24 01:12:59 -0700
Rebased with master.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 05:02:42 -0700
@fabpot What do you think about this feature ? It is now time to discuss it :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/22 00:18:29 -0700
Tests do not pass.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/09/24 01:54:42 -0700
@fabpot Should be ok now.
Commits
-------
c29fa9d [Form] Fix for treatment zero as empty data. Closes#1986
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fix for treatment zero as empty data. Closes#1986
For more info please read #1986.
Commits
-------
d880db2 [Form] Test covered fix for invalid date (13 month/31.02.2011 etc.) send to transformer. Closes#1755df74f49 Patched src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/DataTransformer/DateTimeToArrayTransformer.php to throw an exception when an invalid date is passed for transformation (e.g. 31st February)
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fix for "DateTimeToArrayTransformer" with invalid dates
Hey,
this is test covered fix from @mdavis1982 (closes#1755)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/08/16 01:31:32 -0700
@fabpot Can we have this fix merged ?
Commits
-------
80d1718 [Fix] Email() constraints now guess as 'email' field type
Discussion
----------
[Fix] Email() constraints now guess as 'email' field type
I don't know what this was set to "text"
