This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#5853).
Commits
-------
63b0059 [Process] Add ability to reset arguments on ProcessBuilder
Discussion
----------
[Process] Add ability to reset arguments on ProcessBuilder
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
This PR adds the ability to "reset" the arguments set on a `ProcessBuilder`. This allows the builder to be re-used without having to set things like custom environment variables, current working directory etc again.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#5860).
Commits
-------
d0057d0 Added failure_path_parameter to mirror target_path_parameter
Discussion
----------
Added failure_path_parameter to mirror target_path_parameter
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
Enable login failure redirect path can be assigned in a form field just like target path.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-10-29T09:40:17Z
Please also open a PR to the doc repo to document this new feature
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by leevigraham at 2012-10-29T09:56:29Z
@stof @fabpot Done.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
7f16c1f [HttpKernel] Add DI extension configs as ressources when possible
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel] Add DI extension configs as ressources when possible
/cc @rdohms @richardmiller
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-11-30T11:57:48Z
btw @fabpot what about having a base class for `Extension` in the DI ? Would make it easier to re-use it when using standalone components, Di and (the suggested) Config as the greatest part of the class is not HttpKernel specific.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-06T08:47:28Z
@vicb your suggestion makes sense.
Can you also explain the goal of this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-12-06T09:01:58Z
The goal of this PR is to avoid having to sfcc when you modify a DI extension configuration. I think @rdohms got trapped.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-12-06T09:08:08Z
see https://twitter.com/rdohms/status/274059267428978688
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-12-06T09:20:54Z
I thought about it several times but never took time to implement it. It is annoying to have to clear the cache when you modify a default value in the Configuration class. So +1
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6173).
Commits
-------
4878ec0 [HttpKernel] [WebProfilerBundle] Better handling of deprecated methods
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel] [WebProfilerBundle] Better handling of deprecated methods
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: yes, if you were expecting E_USER_DEPRECATED or E_DEPRECATED to throw an exception
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #6139 partly, I'd go through and add the actual trigger_error() calls in another (or possibly one per component) PR
Todo: call trigger_error()
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: -
I added the deprecation count with the Exception icon in the Profiler Toolbar, and changed the color of it to be yellow for deprecations and red for exceptions (was yellow for exceptions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-03T09:43:09Z
Adding trigger_error calls should be done in one PR to ease the merging. thanks.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
51223c0 added upgrade instructions
50e6259 adjusted tests
98f3ca8 [Routing] removed tree structure from RouteCollection
Discussion
----------
[Routing] removed tree structure from RouteCollection
BC break: yes (see below)
Deprecations: RouteCollection::getParent(); RouteCollection::getRoot()
tests pass: yes
The reason for this is so quite simple. The RouteCollection has been designed as a tree structure, but it cannot at all be used as one. There is no getter for a sub-collection at all. So you cannot access a sub-collection after you added it to the tree with `addCollection(new RouteCollection())`. In contrast to the form component, e.g. `$form->get('child')->get('grandchild')`.
So you can see the RouteCollection cannot be used as a tree and it should not, as the same can be achieved with a flat array!
Using a flat array removes all the need for recursive traversal and makes the code much faster, much lighter, less memory (big problem in CMS with many routes) and less error-prone.
BC break: there is only a BC break if somebody used the PHP API for defining RouteCollection and also added a Route to a collection after it has been added to another collection.
So
```
$rootCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection = new RouteCollection();
$rootCollection->addCollection($subCollection);
$subCollection->add('foo', new Route('/foo'));
```
must be updated to the following (otherwise the 'foo' Route is not imported to the rootCollection)
```
$rootCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection = new RouteCollection();
$subCollection->add('foo', new Route('/foo'));
$rootCollection->addCollection($subCollection);
```
Also one must call addCollection from the bottom to the top. So the correct sequence is the following (and not the reverse)
```
$childCollection->->addCollection($grandchildCollection);
$rootCollection->addCollection($childCollection);
```
Remeber, this is only needed when using PHP for defining routes and calling methods in a special order. There is no change required when using XML or YAML for definitions. Also, I'm pretty sure that neither the CMF, nor Drupal routing, nor Silex is relying on the tree stuff. So they should also still work.
cc @fabpot @crell @dbu
One more thing: RouteCollection wasn't an appropriate name for a tree anyway as a collection of routes (that it now is) is definitely not a tree.
Yet another point: The XML declaration of routes uses the `<import>` element, which is excatly what the new implementation of addCollection without the need of a tree does. So this is now also more analogous.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-26T17:34:15Z
What benefit of this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-26T17:56:53Z
@Koc Why did you not simply wait for the description? ^^
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-26T18:33:09Z
i love PR that remove more code than they add whithout removing functionality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-26T18:49:52Z
There's an issue somewhere in Drupal where we're trying to use addCollection() as a shorthand for iterating over one collection and calling add() on the other for each item. We can't do that, however, because the subcollections are not flattened properly when reading back and our current dumper can't cope with that. So this change would not harm Drupal at all, and would mean I don't have fix a bug in our dumper. :-) I cannot speak for any other projects, of course.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-27T19:06:34Z
Ok, this is ready.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
acfc750#2042 initial implementation of fatal error handler
Discussion
----------
Display traces for fatal errors
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: looks like yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2042 (partly)
License of the code: MIT
Output looks like on screen http://easycaptures.com/fs/uploaded/737/1191436899.png . I've added one line to css to prevent displaying standard xdebug trace http://easycaptures.com/fs/uploaded/737/5939488074.png
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-08T21:55:41Z
So, community please advice me, how can I trigger `KernelEvents::EXCEPTION` event in `ErrorHandler` or `ExceptionHandler`? Or should I provide other event for this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-08T22:03:23Z
@Koc Don't. the exception handler is there to be the safe guard when developing, and does not depend on the kernel (which would be required to trigger the event). If you were triggering the listener again, it would mean that any exception thrown in a listener would lead to a loop.
And if it is for the fatal error handling, you simply cannot be sure the kernel is still available (and even less in a wokring state) at this point.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-08T22:06:31Z
But how can I notify logger (which will send me mail or just log this situation)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-09T07:33:41Z
The error handler is only registered when in debug mode in the Kernel and can be triggered very early in the handling of a request (even before we have access to the dispatcher or anything else). So, the current PR looks fine to me (apart from the typo and the lack of unit tests).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-09T09:13:03Z
> The error handler is only registered when in debug mode
Ooh! I haven't see that before. But the goal - be notified about errors by email or log-file. Like now exceptions with traces from site emails to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-09T09:20:54Z
I think there are two goals. The first one being to have nice pages in the development environment when a fatal error occurs. And this PR addresses that feature quite nicely. The second can be addressed in another PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-11-14T11:50:22Z
I have some questions about the ErrorHandler. Is there a reason for it only to be registered in an debug environment (which prod is not). Would assume that if i enable the ErrorHandler in productions aswell Monolog would log thoose instead of them just vanishing?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-14T12:01:50Z
I am thinking about it too. But as Fabien says it will another PR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by GromNaN at 2012-11-18T10:38:09Z
You should add a memory reserve to be able to handle "Out of memory" errors.
An example is here :
513d628966/lib/Raven/ErrorHandler.php (L91)513d628966/lib/Raven/ErrorHandler.php (L62)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-28T11:35:21Z
@Koc can you finish this PR (probably by integrating the memory reserve as explained by @GromNaN)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-11-28T11:46:12Z
of course, on this weekend
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2012-12-02T17:44:44Z
@fabpot done
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6100).
Commits
-------
0e3671b [WiP] Split urlmatcher for easier overriding
Discussion
----------
[WiP] Split urlmatcher for easier overriding
Based on discussion in https://github.com/symfony-cmf/Routing/pull/30, this PR splits the matchCollection() method of UrlMatcher into two methods. The reason is to allow Symfony CMF and Drupal to override just one of them, while leaving the actual meat of the class intact.
Additionally, it switches $routes from private to protected for the same reason: It makes it possible for us to extend the class cleanly.
Marking as WIP in case further discussion in CMF suggests other/different changes, but review and a conceptual go/no-go would be appreciated now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-25T12:57:46Z
i think this variant really just extracts part of the logic into a separate method whithout changing any behaviour or concept. it would help a lot for the cmf to have it this way so we can extend and tweak the logic. is this now good or anybody has more input?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-27T19:42:04Z
sorry for being pushy about this one, but we need to know if this change is ok or not, if we need to improve something. if there is some problem we did not think of, we have to find different solutions for the cmf/drupal matchers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-28T14:29:10Z
`PhpMatcherDumper` should probably also be updated to call the new `getAttributes()` method; but that won't be possible as the Route is not accessible when using this dumper. Adding a feature that can only be used by the standard `UrlMatcher` and not by the other matchers does not sound good to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dbu at 2012-11-28T17:18:09Z
in the context of the cmf, our problem is that we have too many routes to hold in memory. i think the dumper is not of interest for that use case - @Crell correct me please if i am wrong. if we need any caching we would need to write our own dumper probably. but currently we just extend the UrlMatcher
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-30T05:47:39Z
Correct. In both the CMF case and Drupal case we have our own dumpers, because the current ones don't work for us anyway. (1000 routes and all that. :-) ) This isn't a new public method. It's just a small refactor of UrlMatcher itself to make it easier to extend. If you're using a dumped PhpMatcher, I don't know why you'd be using something like NestedMatcher in the first place.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
918bad6 fix phpdoc in ExecutionContextInterface
Discussion
----------
fix phpdoc in ExecutionContextInterface
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
3d0c70e made ExecutionContext more consistent
Discussion
----------
[Validator] made ExecutionContext more consistent
BC break: no
The default should be an empty string instead of null because
1. a string is expected according to phpdoc
2. its more consistent with `validate($value, $groups = null, $subPath = '', $traverse = false, $deep = false)` and `validateValue($value, $constraints, $groups = null, $subPath = '')` that both have `''` as default for subPath
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-12-03T21:14:49Z
👍
* 2.1:
[TwigBundle] Moved the registration of the app global to the environment
needs to use simpleContent in xsd to allow empty elements
bumped Symfony version to 2.1.5-DEV
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.19-DEV
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
[HttpFoundation] added a small comment about the meaning of Request::hasSession() as this is a recurrent question (refs #4541)
updated VERSION for 2.1.4
updated CHANGELOG for 2.1.4
updated VERSION for 2.0.19
update CONTRIBUTORS for 2.0.19
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.19
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
src/Symfony/Component/Routing/Loader/schema/routing/routing-1.0.xsd
* 2.0:
[TwigBundle] Moved the registration of the app global to the environment
needs to use simpleContent in xsd to allow empty elements
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.19-DEV
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
updated VERSION for 2.0.19
update CONTRIBUTORS for 2.0.19
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.19
Conflicts:
CONTRIBUTORS.md
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/Resources/config/twig.xml
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/TwigEngine.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
Swapped arguments $groups and $subPath in ExecutionContext::validate and ExecutionContext::validateValue, so they match their interface signatures again.
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
57edf56 removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
Discussion
----------
removed wrong routing xsd statement `mixed="true"`
mixed="true" means that the element could contain both text and other elements, e.g.
`<requirement key="_locale">text <subelement /></requirement>`
But this wrong and such a definition would not even validate against the scheme as the xsd does not define which elements would be expected inside.
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
d5623b4 removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
Discussion
----------
removed unused attribute from routing.xsd
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
20dbe47 added annotation
c73cb8a add default for pattern for clarity
ddd8918 make id attribute required
62536e5 refactor to an xsd:group
451dcdc it should be possible to define the defaults, req. and options in any order, just like in YAML
Discussion
----------
improve routing xml scheme
bc break: no
Main points:
- the xml scheme only allowed defaults, requirements and options in this specific order. but the XmlFileLoader does not have the restriction and the YAML definions does not have such an restriction either. this is now fixed. so you can use
```
<requirement key="_locale">en</requirement>
<default key="_controller">Foo</default>
```
Before it had the be first all defaults, then all requirements, then all options.
- make id attribute required
For more changes see commits.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
373be62 Bugfix for creating cookie on loginSuccess in AbstractRememberMeServices
Discussion
----------
Bugfix for creating cookie on loginSuccess in AbstractRememberMeServices
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #6055
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
By a mistake setting of new cookies did not work for other RememberMe services than PersistentTokenBasedRememberMeServices
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by TerjeBr at 2012-12-01T17:28:08Z
Ping. Any feedback on this?
mixed="true" means that the element could contain both text and other elements, e.g.
`<requirement key="_locale">text <subelement /></requirement>`
But this wrong and such a definition would not even validate against the scheme as the xsd does not define which elements would be expected inside.
