Commits
-------
2a90871 [Console] Removed previously introduced BC break.
90a2a6e [Console] Undecorated formatter must update style stack too.
bd7e01a [Console] Fixed output formatter test broken by new implementation.
a1add4b [Console] Updated output formatter to use style stack.
4f298dd [Console] Added formatter style stack.
93ffe54 [Console] Added getters to output formatter style (and its interface).
48e6b49 [Console] Updated formatter test to match styles bug fix.
ad334b6 [Console] Fixed empty style appliance.
31d5fe5 [Console] Fixed output formatter docblock.
Discussion
----------
[Console] Fixes formatter nested style appliance.
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
When outputing styled text in the console, you sometimes face to a confusing behavior: style tags cannot be nested. If tou try something like `<fg=blue>Hello <fg=red>world</fg=red>!</fg=blue>`, the trailing `!` will not be styled.
This PR introduce a new FormatterOutputStyleStack to keep open/closed styles informations up-to-date. It slightly changes OutputFormatter implementation which no longer uses `OutputFormatterStyle::apply()` method, but the new `OutputFormatterStyle::getTerminalSequence()`.
**Question:** I don't une `OutputFormatterStyleInterface` but `OutputFormatterStyle` to type `OutputFormatterStyleStack` methods arguments (to avoid BC break on the interface). Do you think it's right?
**Notice:** I also needed to fix some tests broken by new implementation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-16T10:27:56Z
Adding new methods in an interface is a BC break for people implementing it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-03-16T10:33:21Z
@stof indeed... this is a problem, should I remove them? If I do so, I should use `OutputFormatterStyle` instead of the interface to type arguments in `OutputFormatterStyleStack` right?
