Commits
-------
3a7e038 [FrameworkBundle] sanitize target arg in asset:install command
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] sanitize target arg in asset:install command
`php app/console assets:install web/`
(removed tailing /)
before
`Installing assets for Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle into web//bundles/framework`
after
`Installing assets for Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle into web/bundles/framework`
Commits
-------
eb8f3cb added uniqueEntity message translation (fr)
df9f223 added missing french translations
f4c133e removed trailing dot to make it consistent with other validator messages
Discussion
----------
[Translation] Unique Entity message
I've added the translation of uniqueEntity validation message, I've used ``trans-unit id="41"`` which seems to be unused
Since the key was previously concatenating service ID and method without a separator, it's possible that two different listeners could conflict (e.g. service/method pairs: foo/bar and fo/obar).
Commits
-------
89f477e [WebProfilerBundle] Throw exception if a collector template isn't found
6ca72cf [WebProfilerBundle] Allow .html.twig in collector template names
Discussion
----------
WDT debugging
While implementing collectors I did a mistake in the template name and it never told me, so I was left wondering why my stuff didn't show up. Not so nice IMO. Also the first commit is to allow template names to be specified fully. I don't see why this shouldn't be allowed, since it is the way you specify templates everywhere else.
Commits
-------
ee5b9ce [SwiftmailerBundle] Allow non-file spools
Discussion
----------
[SwiftmailerBundle] Allow non-file spools
Actually if I have the following configuration:
swiftmailer:
spool:
type: not_file
path: some_path
The DIC compiler will complain:
'The service "swiftmailer.spool.file" has a dependency on
a non-existent parameter "swiftmailer.spool.file.path"
Because the file spool service is declared no matter the spool type configured.
And it requires the file.path, which is not available.
This patch aims to load the file spooler only if required by the
configuration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by cystbear at 2011/07/29 16:36:04 -0700
Nice catch Thibault.
Commits
-------
86f888f fix https default port check
Discussion
----------
fix https default port check
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/03 03:26:15 -0700
I think it's better to delete $httpsPort variable from the prototype and use only $httpPort variable.
public function urlRedirectAction($path, $permanent = false, $scheme = null, $httpPort = 80)
...
$port = '';
if (('http' === $scheme && 80 != $httpPort) || ('https' === $scheme && 443 != $httpPort)) {
$port = ':'.$httpPort;
}
But if this method is already used with the $httpsPort variable elsewhere, your change is ok with me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gimler at 2011/08/03 04:52:08 -0700
You can use different ports for http and https so when you call the function $scheme = null than it use the $request->getScheme() so you must add both ports so i think it is not a good idea to merge the http and https vars.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gimler at 2011/08/03 04:53:17 -0700
damn sorry i have accidentally close the pull request ;(
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/03 05:13:24 -0700
I agree with @gimler. Merging them as a single parameter does not make sense here
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/03 05:33:12 -0700
I've juste think it's weird to set a useless parameter ($httpPort) when you want to use the last parameter ($httpsPort).
And I don't think someone want http protocole on 433 or https on 80 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/03 05:35:16 -0700
@Abhoryo what if you are using this controller in a general way, without knowing by advance if the handled request is a secure one ? You need both parameters.
If you need to change the https port by keeping the default http port, you indeed need to pass it but blame PHP: it does not support named parameters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/03 06:02:18 -0700
Ok, right.
Commits
-------
e78bc32 Fixed: Notice: Undefined index: enable_annotations in ...
Discussion
----------
Fixed: Notice: Undefined index: enable_annotations in ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/08/04 03:57:49 -0700
IMO `isset()` should be good enough here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/04 04:18:20 -0700
I don't see how such a notice could occur. There is a default value for this node so as soon as the validation node exists, there will be a value for this node. Could you give an example of configuration that causes the notice ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/08/04 04:23:33 -0700
I don't have any validation node set up in my config in such a case it seems that sub nodes doesn't get build. So it seems that I found a bug in config builder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/04 04:54:05 -0700
This is in fact due to a hackish stuff in the DI extension. It changes the configuration after using the Config component to merge them in the case where you enable the forms without enabling the validator, to force enabling it.
Commits
-------
ba6a09d [DoctrineBundle] Adding a message in doctrine:generate:entities to notify people when a backup file is created
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBundle] Adding a message in doctrine:generate:entities to notify
Hey guys!
This adds a message to the doctrine:generate:entities command when a backup file is created. This is because the backup file causes confusion in some cases (where did it come from?) and in rare cases - for reasons I don't know yet - the backup file causes "Cannot redeclare class ..." errors.
This is a not a BC-break, but of course could potentially cause an issue if there's some edge case that line 112 doesn't consider. For that reason, I'm pulling against master instead of 2.0.
Thanks!
Actually if I have the following configuration:
swiftmailer:
spool:
type: not_file
path: some_path
The DIC compiler will complain:
'The service "swiftmailer.spool.file" has a dependency on
a non-existent parameter "swiftmailer.spool.file.path"
Because the file spool service is declared no matter the spool type configured.
And it requires the file.path, which is not available.
This patch aims to load the file spooler only if required by the
configuration.
