Commits
-------
3c227fd [Propel] Fixed naming due to changes in #87b16e7015c02e794c33dbfc05812cf070b4ac68
Discussion
----------
[Propel] Fixed naming due to changes in #87b16e7015c02e794c33dbfc05812cf070b4ac68
+ minor CS fix
I'll provide unit tests for the Propel bridge in a separate PR.
Commits
-------
8714d79 [Form] Simplified code in MergeCollectionListener
8ab982a [Form] Fixed: Custom add and remove method are not invoked if disallowed
02f61ad [Form] Renamed choice and collection options "adder_prefix" and "remover_prefix" to "add_method" and "remove_method" and allowed to specify full method names
b393774 [Form] Used direct method access in MergeCollectionListener instead of Reflection to avoid problems when using class hierarchies
d208f4e [Form] Made it possible to use models with only either addXxx() or removeXxx()
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed edge cases in MergeCollectionListener
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
Fixes an issue mentioned in the comments of #3239
see https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3239#issuecomment-3776312
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T12:12:17Z
Wait a minute before merging this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T13:01:55Z
@fabpot Ready to merge
Commits
-------
bd461e2 [Form] Forms now don't create empty objects anymore if they are completely empty and not required. The empty data for these forms is null.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Forms now don't create empty objects anymore if they are empty and not required
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2861
Todo: -
If a form (or a nested form) is left completely empty upon submission and is not required, no new data object will be generated anymore. Instead, the form returns null as data.
Commits
-------
9b0245b [Form] Made prefix of adder and remover method configurable. Adders and removers are not called if "by_reference" is disabled.
49d1464 [Form] Implemented MergeCollectionListener which calls addXxx() and removeXxx() in your model if found
7837f50 [Form] Added FormUtil::singularify()
Discussion
----------
[Form] Forms now call addXxx() and removeXxx() in your model
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #1540
Todo: adapt documentation
Adds functionality for calling `addXxx` and `removeXxx` method in your model. All types returning a collection of values are affected: "collection", "choice" (with multiple selection) and "entity" (with multiple selection).
Example:
class Article
{
public function addTag($tag) { ... }
public function removeTag($tag) { ... }
public function getTags($tag) { ... }
}
And the controller:
$form = $this->createFormBuilder($article)
->add('tags')
->getForm();
Upon modifying the form, addTag() and removeTag() are now called appropiately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-01T18:23:49Z
Really great
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-01T18:24:04Z
Great !!
Two suggestions:
* make "add" and "remove" configurable,
* introduce a base class for the remove listeners with (final?) `::getSubscribedEvents()` and `::getEventPriorities()`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by haswalt at 2012-02-01T18:57:46Z
+1 this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by daFish at 2012-02-01T19:54:46Z
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2012-02-01T20:55:37Z
Can wait to have it!
It will save lots of time trying to solve WTF effects and making workarounds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T09:37:12Z
@vicb: Your first point is done. The second, I don't understand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-02T09:40:50Z
@bschussek your branch conflicts with master according to github
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-02T09:52:40Z
@bschussek my point is that I can stand hard-coded priorities which are error prone. A better solution might be to introduce constants (in `FormEvents` / `FormEventPriorities` ?) with meaningful names.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T10:21:52Z
@stof Rebased
@vicb I know, but who is responsible for managing priorities? There is no central entitty that can do this. (btw this is a general problem of the priority system of the EventDispatcher)
@fabpot Ready to merge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-02T10:23:28Z
@bschussek doesn't each form has is own dispatcher so there is no need for a global registry here, something local to the form could be good enough.
The listener is used by the Collection type as well as the Choice and Entity type (with multiple
selection). The effect is that you can have for example this model:
class Article
{
public function addTag($tag) { ... }
public function removeTag($tag) { ... }
public function getTags($tag) { ... }
}
You can create a form for the article with a field "tags" of either type "collection" or "choice"
(or "entity"). The field will correctly use the three methods of the model for displaying and
editing tags.
Commits
-------
2e4ebe4 [Validator] Renamed methods addViolationAtRelativePath() and getAbsolutePropertyPath() in ExecutionContext
9153f0e [Validator] Deprecated ConstraintValidator methods setMessage(), getMessageTemplate() and getMessageParameters()
0417282 [Validator] Fixed typos
a30a679 [Validator] Made ExecutionContext immutable and introduced new class GlobalExecutionContext
fe85bbd [Validator] Simplified ExecutionContext::addViolation(), added ExecutionContext::addViolationAt()
f77fd41 [Form] Fixed typos
1fc615c Fixed string access by curly brace to bracket
a103c28 [Validator] The Collection constraint adds "missing" and "extra" errors to the individual fields now
f904a9e [Validator] Fixed: GraphWalker does not add constraint violation if error message is empty
1dd302c [Validator] Fixed ConstraintViolationList::__toString() to not include dots in the output if the root is empty
1678a3d [Validator] Fixed: Validator::validateValue() propagates empty validation root instead of the provided value
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Improved "missing" and "extra" errors of Collection constraint
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2615
Todo: -
Instead of a single violation
Array:
The fields "foo", "bar" are missing
various violations are now generated.
Array[foo]:
This field is missing
Array[bar]:
This field is missing
Apart from that, the PR contains various minor fixes to the Validator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T09:14:52Z
@fabpot Ready for merge.
Commits
-------
7cecb4e [Form] added support for parent of FormBuilder
Discussion
----------
[Form] added support for parent of FormBuilder
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
In some cases of building forms, it is good to know the attributes of the parent builder. In my case I want to automaticaly add the subscriber to the fields, whose parent builder has a concrete attribute.
Replace #2882
Commits
-------
e9b4c58 [Console] Enable process isolantion in Shell
Discussion
----------
[Console] Enable process isolantion in Shell
Bug fix: no
BC break: no
Feature addition: yes
Symfony2 test pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2848#2847
Todo: Write unit tests
See tickets for reference, need help with unit testing, because I don't know how to test this :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011-12-16T09:36:32Z
I've tested this with different scenarios like "inception" (invoking shell from shell - will not work) ;) and others, everything seems to work great.
As I have no idea on how to pack this with unit testing some help needed, also as I don't have any windows in home ;) need someone to test it on MS os.
And we should decide, do we want process isolation by default? (This will not break the BC, break only the "expected behavior" - colorful output and "interactivity")
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011-12-18T15:14:26Z
I've rebased this branch to match current `HEAD` and I've added usage of new process builder, for better portability an shell arg escaping.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-02T08:28:32Z
@canni: Can you squash your commits before I merge this PR? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-02-02T09:07:16Z
@fabpot @stof done.
Bug fix: no
BC break: no
Feature addition: yes
Symfony2 test pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2848#2847
Todo: -
See tickets for reference, need help with testing, because I don't know how to test this :)
Commits
-------
de253dd [Form] read_only and disabled attributes
Discussion
----------
[Form] read_only and disabled attributes (closes#1974)
1. Removed ``readOnly`` property from ``Form``, as it is no longer required
2. Introduced ``disabled`` property to ``Form``, behaves exactly like ``readOnly`` used to
3. Added ``disabled`` property to fields, defaults to ``false``, renders as ``disabled="disabled"``
4. A field with positive ``read_only`` property now renders as ``readonly="readonly"``
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2012-01-26T17:46:17Z
I changed ``Form`` and ``FormBuilder`` property ``readOnly`` to ``disabled``. On second thought, this is perhaps not such good change - while readOnly somewhat implied the use-case, disabled no longer does.
Perhaps something else, like ``bindable`` (as not to confuse with read_only attribute of Fields)?
@bschussek, others, any thoughts?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-31T06:53:59Z
Please prefix commits with the affected component, if applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2012-01-31T08:41:03Z
@bschussek Prefixed. Please also see see to [this question](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3193#issuecomment-3673074)
