When match is false the html5 validation regexp should be either inverted or not added.
Since we are in RC added a fix where this is not added, but marked a @todo so that this
can be revisited and we try to inverse the regexp instead.
* 2.0:
updated VERSION for 2.0.17
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.17
updated vendors for 2.0.17
fixed XML decoding attack vector through external entities
prevents injection of malicious doc types
disabled network access when loading XML documents
refined previous commit
prevents injection of malicious doc types
standardized the way we handle XML errors
Redirects are now absolute
Conflicts:
CHANGELOG-2.0.md
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoader.php
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Crawler.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Routing/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Serializer/Encoder/XmlEncoderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/XliffFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Validator/Mapping/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
vendors.php
Commits
-------
933e821 Add minimum-stability (dev) in each component
Discussion
----------
Add minimum-stability (dev) in each component
This fixes the ability to run the test suite in each component if a `composer install` is needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T13:57:14Z
If you really want to run the testsuite standalone, some dev requirements are missing (SecurityBundle needs the FrameworkBundle for its functional tests for instance). If you have some time to check the missing dev requirement, it would be great.
Anyway, 👍 for this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-08-22T13:59:15Z
Yes I already did that once. I'll try to fix more components later.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Christophe Coevoet <
notifications@github.com> wrote:
> If you really want to run the testsuite standalone, some dev requirements
> are missing (SecurityBundle needs the FrameworkBundle for its functional
> tests for instance). If you have some time to check the missing dev
> requirement, it would be great.
> Anyway, [image: 👍] for this
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5318#issuecomment-7934886>.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:02:23Z
Well, I think most components should be good now (as some work has been done on them). But the bridges and bundles may need some work (bundles were not having any dev requirements until yesterday when @guilhermeblanco added some on FrameworkBundle)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-22T14:14:00Z
what about having for each READ-ONLY repo his own .travis.yml and travisci hook activated ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-22T14:30:13Z
please, don't add more travis files. The main already tests everything, and that's all we need.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:33:46Z
@pborreli tests should not be different for subtree split repos as the code is the same and the tests are the same (except that more tests could be skipped because of missing deps).
Note that for the bundles, it is likely to be different currently as I think some skip tests are missing (just like dev requirements are). But fixing this does not require enablign travis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-22T14:42:30Z
ok, i was just thinking about a way to be sure each component is usable individually but yeah that would require to relaunch each tests and add a bunch of travis files + hook
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-08-24T13:12:04Z
@stof, @eriksencosta, @fabpot: Tests are different for Locale component, see #5235
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-24T13:35:07Z
@hason no. You also need to do it when running the tests of the Locale component as part of the full run.
Commits
-------
07992d3 [Validator] Added inheritDoc phpdoc for validate methods
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Added inheritDoc phpdoc for validate methods
Was instructed by @stof to do this for a PR on comparison validators and noticed none of the validators used inheritDoc.
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: n/a
Todo: I haven't looked around too much, but I assume if none of the validators followed this standard that there would be a fair few other classes not using. Obviously not a big issue though
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: n/a
Commits
-------
a92f80b [Validator] Added Length constraint and deprecated MinLength and MaxLength
83a3f75 [Validator] Deprecated the constraints Min and Max in favor of Range
0cdacee [Validator] Removed MinCount and MaxCount and replaced them by the constraint Count
741c147 [Validator] Renamed deprecated Size constraint to Range
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Reintroduced Range constraint and created Count and Length constraints
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
After @Tobion's comment to #4851, this is the next try to streamline the constraints and reduce duplication of logic. The downside of the current MinLength/MaxLength and MinCount/MaxCount pairs is that they cannot output a fitting error message if a value should have an *exact* length/count. So this PR introduces
* Range (formerly Size) to replace Min/Max
* Count to replace MinCount/MaxCount
* Length to replace MinLength/MaxLength
Feedback is appreciated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-07-11T20:40:08Z
The `choice` constraint also cannot handle `min = max`. Or maybe we don't need these options on choice anymore as we can achieve the same with the new `count` constraint?!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2012-07-12T08:59:44Z
Dude, nobody has time to fix the BC breaks you introduce :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by TomAdam at 2012-07-12T12:38:49Z
The changes to the `Size` validator yesterday broke my project, and I started rewriting to use `MaxLength / MinLength` validators today, until I spotted this. It would be good if this PR could have a reasonably high priority (whether or not it is accepted) as it will change how I fix my issues. I suspect a lot of people using the master branch will be in the same situation.
Commits
-------
0be602d [Validator] Deprecated the Size constraint
d661837 [Validator] Reverted the changes done to the Size constraint in 3a5e84f4a7d84b689 [Validator] Added the constraints MinCount and MaxCount
1a732e4 [Validator] Removed the Range constraint as it duplicates functionality given in Min and Max
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Deprecated the Size constraint in favor of MinCount and MaxCount
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
This PR cleans up with the current ambiguity between
* Min
* Max
* MinLength
* MaxLength
* Range
* Size
in the following ways:
* The Range constraint was removed again as it can be completely replaced by Min and Max.
* The Size constraint was reverted to it's 2.0 feature set and deprecated.
* The constraints MinCount and MaxCount were added to make up for the functionality that was added to Size.
