* 2.2: (30 commits)
[HttpFoundation] Added support for partial ranges in the BinaryFileResponse.
[HttpFoundation] Fixed byte ranges in the BinaryFileResponse.
updated required versions when depending on the HttpFoundation component
updated required versions when depending on the HttpKernel component
updated required versions when depending on the Config component
updated required versions when depending on the Form component
updated required versions when depending on the DependencyInjection component
updated required versions when depending on the Validator component
updated required versions when depending on the Translation component
updated required versions when depending on the Routing component
updated required versions when depending on the EventDispatcher component
updated required versions when depending on the OptionsResolver component
updated required versions when depending on the PropertyAccess component
updated required versions when depending on the Security component
updated required versions when depending on the Templating component
updated required versions when depending on the Stopwatch component
updated required versions when depending on the Process component
updated required versions when depending on the Finder component
updated required versions when depending on the Dom Crawler component
use ~2.0 when depending on the Dom Crawler component
...
* 2.2:
fixed regression in the Finder component (it was possible to use it without using exec before, closes#6357)
fixed a circular call (closes#6864)
typo
[Security] [Tests] added unit tests for the UserPasswordValidator class and made the validator service for the UserPassword constraint configurable.
fixed wrong indentation
tweaked previous commit
[HttpKernel] Fix the URI signer (closes#6801)
Add Arabic translations.
[HttpKernel] fixed regression when rendering an inline controller and passing some objects (closes#6822)
[FrameworkBundle] fixed typo
renamed some classes and Twig functions to more descriptive names (refs #6871)
Classcollectionloader: fix traits + enhancements
Fix a deprecated method call in the tests
Update `composer.json` files: - to allow versions ~2.2 (>=2.2,<3.0) of Doctrine DBAL, ORM & Common - fixed Propel1 versions difference between main and bridge files - fixed Twig versions difference between main and bridge files - to allow versions ~1.11 (>=1.11,<2.0) of Twig - fixed Locale ext-intl version to accept all, not non-existing version
Correct comment in NativeSessionStorage regarding session.save_handler
[Security] Add PHPDoc to AuthenticationEvents
* 2.1:
[Yaml] fixed default value
Added Yaml\Dumper::setIndentation() method to allow a custom indentation level of nested nodes.
added a way to enable/disable object support when parsing/dumping
added a way to enable/disable PHP support when parsing a YAML input via Yaml::parse()
fixed CS
[Process] Fix docblocks, remove `return` from `PhpProcess#start()` as parent returns nothing, cleaned up `ExecutableFinder`
fixes a bug when output/error output contains a % character
[Console] fixed input bug when the value of an option is empty (closes#6649, closes#6689)
[Profiler] [Redis] Fix sort of profiler rows.
Fix version_compare() calls for PHP 5.5.
Removed underscores from test method names to be consistent with other components.
[Process] In edge cases `getcwd()` can return `false`, then `proc_open()` should get `null` to use default value (the working dir of the current PHP process)
Fix version_compare() calls for PHP 5.5.
Handle the deprecation of IntlDateFormatter::setTimeZoneId() in PHP 5.5.
removed the .gitattributes files (closes#6605, reverts #5674)
[HttpKernel] Clarify misleading comment in ExceptionListener
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bundle/WebProfilerBundle/Resources/views/Profiler/toolbar_style.html.twig
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Tests/Extension/Core/Type/DateTimeTypeTest.php
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Tests/Extension/Core/Type/TimeTypeTest.php
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Tests/Util/PropertyPathTest.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Profiler/RedisProfilerStorage.php
src/Symfony/Component/Process/Process.php
It is more common to use fully camel-cased names for test methods. Only some of the test methods are called with underscore notation. To avoid confusion it is better to be consistent.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
6b1652e [PropertyAccess] Property path, small refactoring, read/writeProperty to read/write Property/Index.
1bae7b2 [PropertyAccess] Extracted PropertyAccess component out of Form
Discussion
----------
[PropertyAccess] Extracted PropertyAccess component out of Form
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: -
TODO: adapt DoctrineBundle/PropelBundle to pass the "property_accessor" service to EntityType/ModelType
Usage:
```php
$accessor = PropertyAccess::getPropertyAccessor();
// equivalent to $object->getFoo()->setBar('value')
$accessor->setValue($object, 'foo.bar', 'value');
// equivalent to $object->getFoo()->getBar()
$accessor->getValue($object, 'foo.bar');
// equivalent to $object->getFoo()['bar']
$accessor->getValue($object, 'foo[bar]');
// equivalent to $array['foo']->setBar('value')
$accessor->setValue($array, '[foo].bar', 'value');
// equivalent to $array['foo']['bar']
$accessor->getValue($array, '[foo][bar]');
```
Later on, once we have generation and caching of class-specific accessors, configuration will be something like this (consistent with the Form and Validator component):
```php
$accessor = PropertyAccess::getPropertyAccessorBuilder()
->setCacheDirectory(__DIR__ . '/cache')
->setCacheLifeTime(86400)
->enableMagicGetSet()
->enableMagicCall()
->getPropertyAccessor();
```
or
```php
$accessor = PropertyAccess::getPropertyAccessorBuilder()
->setCache($cache)
->getPropertyAccessor();
```
etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Burgov at 2013-01-07T08:48:15Z
+1. I use this feature outside of the Form context a lot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-07T08:49:34Z
The classes in the Form component should be kept for BC (and deprecated) for people using the feature
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2013-01-07T10:02:19Z
YES YES YES 👍. Sorry for my enthusiasm, but I already copy pasted the PropertyPath class to some of my libraries to avoid linking to the whole Form component. I thus will be glad to officially use this component into my libraries via composer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by norzechowicz at 2013-01-07T10:17:39Z
Same as @michelsalib to avoid linking full Form component I was using copied parts of code. Can't wait to use this component in my lib. 👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2013-01-07T10:43:41Z
I split away `getValue()` and `setValue()` from `PropertyPath` into a new class `ReflectionGraph`. The component is also named ReflectionGraph now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2013-01-07T10:47:10Z
I am not found of the name. What do you intend to do in the component more than what PropertyPath does ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2013-01-07T10:58:59Z
@michelsalib A `PropertyPath` is simply a string like `foo.bar[baz]`. `getValue()` and `setValue()` interpret this path. There may be different interpretations for the same path, so these methods were split into a new class.
I chose the name `ReflectionGraph` because the functionality is very similar to `ReflectionProperty`.
```php
$reflProperty = new ReflectionProperty('Vendor/Class', 'property');
$reflProperty->setValue($object, 'foo');
$reflGraph = new ReflectionGraph();
$reflGraph->setValue($object, 'property.path', 'foo');
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2013-01-07T11:00:42Z
What about naming it `Reflection`, maybe sometime we will want to add more reflection tools for classes, interfaces... ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2013-01-07T11:02:32Z
@michelsalib I doubt that we will do that. PHP's implementation is sufficient.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-07T11:03:57Z
> Backwards compatibility break: no
Really ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2013-01-07T11:05:07Z
Well, that is just a suggestion. If I am the only one to oppose, I won't complain.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2013-01-07T11:09:08Z
> Really ?
@vicb Would you please refrain from such meanginless comments in the future? I'm getting a bit tired of them. If you think that BC is broken somewhere, tell me where so that I can fix it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-07T11:09:43Z
@vicb There is no BC break as he kept deprecated classes for BC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by norzechowicz at 2013-01-07T11:13:12Z
@bschussek what do you think about some kind of factory for Reflection? This will prevent creating new Reflection objects each time you want to access properties values.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-07T11:18:47Z
@bschussek my point is that my comment is no more meaningless than closing #6453 because it will break BC.We could also keep BC by extending the classes in the new ns but in both cases BC will ultimately be broken (when the legacy classes are removed)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-07T12:23:45Z
@bschussek @stof I think that modifying the constructor signatures of `EntityChoiceList`, `FormType` are BC breaks (this is not an exhaustive list)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2013-01-07T12:35:13Z
@vicb You are right. I added corresponding entries to the CHANGELOG and adapted the above description.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-08T13:39:13Z
@bschussek looking at this PR, I was wondering if an alternate syntax would make sense:
```php
<?php
$reflGraph = new ReflectionGraph($object);
// equivalent to $object->getFoo()->setBar('value')
$reflGraph['foo.bar'] = 'value';
// equivalent to $object->getFoo()->getBar()
$reflGraph['foo.bar'];
```
_Sorry for the off topic_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-08T13:49:46Z
The advantage of using such a `ReflectionGraph` factory is that it might be easier to return specialized reflection graphs, ie optimized instances (that would be cached).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Toflar at 2013-01-08T14:49:54Z
I was also puzzled by the fact that there will be many `ReflectionGraph` instances although they don't have to. I'm with @vicb and I'd also vote for using the constructor to set the subject you're working on. Otherwise you'll repeat yourself over and over again by passing the subject - say `$object` - to `getValue()` or `setValue()`. If however you don't like the constructor thing then why do we have to have an instance of `ReflectionGraph` rather than just go for static methods and use `ReflectionGraph::getValue()` and `ReflectionGraph::setValue()`?
In my opinion there are a few methods that could be static anyway (especially some private ones) :)
But probably I misunderstood something as I'm just about to discover the SF components and don't have any experience working with them (so basically I just read the PR because of @bschussek's tweet :D)
Couldn't come up with any intuitive name for the component though :(
Generally when we talk about "getting" and "setting" values we call those things "mutators"...so `GraphMutator` might be more intuitive than the word `Reflection` :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Taluu at 2013-01-08T14:57:42Z
I like the last proposition made by @vicb (implementing `ArrayAccess` on `ReflectionGraph` - or whatever name will be chosen (`PathMutator` for example :D), and also specify which object should be worked on in the constructor rather than in each method).
Would this also be used in the `Validator` component ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-08T15:16:12Z
@Toflar A static ``ReflectionGraph::getValue()`` means you have a coupling to the implementation (as with any static call). The current implementation allows you to replace it with your own implementation as long as you implement the interface as it follows the DI pattern (as done in other places in Symfony).
@vicb The issue with ``$reflGraph = new ReflectionGraph($object);`` is that you cannot inject the ReflectionGraph anymore, as you need a new one each time. This would mean adding a ``ReflectionGraphFactory`` to be injected (and which could then be replaced by a factory using code generation). Using the constructor directly would not allow using a replacement based on code generation later. So the resulting code would more likely be
```php
$reflGraph = new ReflectionGraph();
$mutator = $reflGraph->getMutator($object);
// equivalent to $object->getFoo()->setBar('value')
$mutator['foo.bar'] = 'value';
// equivalent to $object->getFoo()->getBar()
$mutator['foo.bar'];
```
Btw, writing this, I find the naming Mutator suggested by @Taluu good when it concerns the setter, but quite weird when getting the value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Taluu at 2013-01-08T15:21:00Z
I was not the one to suggest though, it was @everzet. But then something like `PathAccessor`, as it is both a mutator and a getter ? I also like @stof suggestion, still in the idea of avoiding to have to put the object as an argument and also allowing to use an `ArrayAccess` interface..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-08T15:21:54Z
@stof your remark makes sense.
What about `Accessor`, the benefit being that it might well be the name of a coming PHP feature: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-v1.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by everzet at 2013-01-08T15:27:02Z
```php
$manager = new PropertyManager(new PropertyPath());
$num = $manager->getValue($object, 'foo.num');
$manager->setValue($object, 'foo.num', $num + 1);
$objectManager = new ObjectPropertyManager($object[, $manager]);
$num = $objectManager->getValue('foo.num');
$objectManager->setValue('foo.num', $num + 1);
$objectManager['foo.num'] += 1;
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2013-01-08T15:28:01Z
It might be me, but I don't like `ArrayAccess` to be misused for features like that. If I access a key in an array access structure, I expect it to be something like a collection, an associative array or a key value store. This class is neither.
Putting that aside, an accessor for a specific object might make sense, but I'm not sure about that yet.
```php
$reflObject->setValue('foo.bar', 'value');
$reflObject->getValue('foo.bar');
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-08T15:28:52Z
@vicb I would vote for PathAccessor then, as we are not doing simple accessor but accessors through a path in an object graph.
In my snippet above, we would then have a ReflectionGraph instance and a PathAccessor instance (``$mutator``).
Btw, I would also keep the methods ``setValue`` and ``getValue``. I find it more clear.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2013-01-08T15:32:07Z
@stof But then we're rather left with the question of ReflectionGraph **vs.** PathAccessor. I don't think that the tiny interface difference (one global, one object-based) justifies the big naming difference.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-08T15:33:24Z
> This class is neither.
It might be `$pa['foo.bar[baz]'] = $pa['foo.bar']['baz'];` I don't know if it would help though.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-08T15:35:51Z
@bschussek In my suggestion, ``ReflectionGraph`` is a factory for the PathAccessor objects. It is not accessing anymore itself (which would probably continue to cause issues to implement it with code generation). But the naming could indeed be changed to something else.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
67d7423 Remove use of deprecated HttpKernel LoggerInterface
dca4528 [HttpKernel] Extend psr/log's NullLogger class
1e5a890 [Monolog] Mark old non-PSR3 methods as deprecated
91a86f8 [HttpKernel][Monolog] Add PSR-3 support to the LoggerInterface
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel][MonologBridge] PSR-3 support
This enables PSR-3 support and monolog 1.3+. The first commit is the main part. The rest deals with deprecation of short-hand methods (warn/err/crit/emerg) that are fully expanded in PSR-3 (warning/error/critical/emergency).
The downside of deprecating them is that for bundles it's a bit harder to support older and newer versions. If that is too much of a hassle you can drop that for now and cherry pick the first commit.
The upside is that it forces people to move towards PSR-3 compatible stuff, which means eventually we could completely drop the LoggerInterface from the framework. In any case I think the documentation should only mention the `Psr\Log\LoggerInterface` and people should start hinting against that. The change should be done in core as well I suppose.
Anyway I wanted to throw this out there as it is to get feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-09T09:15:15Z
@Seldaek I also think you should change the typehint to use the PSR LoggerInterface in all classes using the logger
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-09T09:54:55Z
OK updated according to all the feedback. I tested it in an app and it still seems to work so there shouldn't be any major issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-09T09:59:55Z
@fabpot if you merge please merge also the bundle PR, otherwise it won't be possible to update without conflict.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T14:59:20Z
I'm trying to understand why a `composer update` of a Symfony 2.1.* resulted in a fatal error. Shouldn't a stable version don't break like this?
As @olaurendeau points, why Symfony depends 1.* instead of 1.2.*? Or why Monolog 1.3 breaks its public interface (EDIT: I'm not sure about it)? Or why isn't this PR being merged (into branch 2.1) at the same time Monolog 1.3 is released?
Please, understand I'm not looking for who to blame, it's just I want to know if this situation is unexpected or if otherwise a `composer update` on a stable branch is not as innocent as it seems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T15:06:51Z
@frosas it cannot be merged into 2.1 as it is a BC break. The 2.1 branch has been updated to forbid Monolog 1.3 already
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T15:11:58Z
@frosas you can blame me for releasing as 1.3.0 and not 2.0, but technically for monolog this isn't really a BC break, I just added an interface. The problem is due to the way it's used in symfony, it ended up as a fatal error. In any case the situation is now sorted out I think.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T15:26:43Z
@stof now I see this `>=1.0,<1.3-dev` change in the 2.1 branch. Now, shouldn't a new (2.1.7) version be released for all of us not in the dev minimum-stability?
@Seldaek then do you see feasible to rely only in X.Y.* versions to avoid this kind of errors?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T15:45:22Z
@frosas relying on X.Y.* is painful because you always need to wait until someone updates the constraint to get the new version. Of course using ~1.3 like in this PR means if I fuck up and break BC people will update to it, but that's a less likely occurrence than the alternative I think, so I would rather not use X.Y.*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T15:50:50Z
@Seldaek you are right about this, but I was thinking more in changing it only for the stable versions. EDIT: I mean, how often do you need a new feature in a branch you only apply fixes to?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T15:57:32Z
@frosas Monolog and Symfony have separate release cycles. Foorcing Symfony users to use an old version of Monolog until they update to a new version of Symfony whereas the newer Monolog is compatible is a bad idea. Thus, as Monolog keeps BC, it does not maintain bugfix releases for all older versions (just like Twig does too). So it would also forbid you to get the fixes done in newer Monolog versions.
The incompatibility between Symfony 2.1 LoggerInterface and PSR-3 (whereas they expect exactly the same behavior and signature for methods with the same name) is unfortunate and is the reason why we get some issues here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T16:21:06Z
@stof I appreciate you prefer to allow newer versions at the price of having to be constantly monitoring its changes to avoid breaks.
Another similar but safer strategy would be to stick to X.Y.* versions and upgrade to X.Y+1.* once the new version integration is tested, but I understand this is discutible in projects as close to Symfony as Monolog.
Returning to the issue, what do you say to release this 2.1.7 version? Or is it only me who is having issues here?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T16:26:20Z
@frosas a minor release should not break BC when following smeantic versionning (Symfony warned about the fact it is not strictly followed for the first releases of 2.x). But as far as monolog is concerned, 1.3 is BC with 1.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T16:49:55Z
@frosas sorry I didn't get you still had the problem. I tagged a 2.1.7 of monologbundle which hopefully fixes your issue.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
586a16e [Validator] Changed DefaultTranslator::getLocale() to always return 'en'
58bfd60 [Validator] Improved the inline documentation of DefaultTranslator
cd662cc [Validator] Added ExceptionInterface, BadMethodCallException and InvalidArgumentException
e00e5ec [Validator] Fixed failing test
cc0df0a [Validator] Changed validator to support pluralized messages by default
56d61eb [Form][Validator] Added BC breaks in unstable code to the CHANGELOG
1e34e91 [Form] Added upgrade instructions to the UPGRADE file
b94a256 [DoctrineBridge] Adapted DoctrineBridge to translator integration in the validator
c96a051 [FrameworkBundle] Adapted FrameworkBundle to translator integration in the validator
92a3b27 [TwigBridge] Adapted TwigBridge to translator integration in the validator
e7eb5b0 [Form] Adapted Form component to translator integration in the validator
46f751c [Validator] Extracted message interpolation logic of ConstraintViolation and used the Translation component for that
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Integrated the Translator in the Validator component
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #5844, #6117
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: -
This PR allows to replace the default message substitution strategy in the validator (`strtr()`) by passing an implementation of `Symfony\Component\Translation\TranslatorInterface`. The motivation for this are both #5844 and the need to replace the translation strategy in Drupal's integration of the Validator.
In the stand-alone usage of the validator, both the translator and the default translation domain can now be passed to `ValidatorBuilderInterface`:
```php
$validator = Validation::createValidatorBuilder()
->setTranslator(new MyTranslator())
->setTranslationDomain('validators')
->getValidator();
```
References:
* #5844
* #6117
* #6129
* [Add a validation framework to Drupal 8](http://drupal.org/node/1845546)
* [Add the symfony validator component to core despite Symfony potentially releasing BC-breaking updates after 2.3.](http://drupal.org/node/1849564)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-28T08:53:25Z
no BC break? Looking at ValidatorBuilderInterface there is definitely one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-11-28T08:55:01Z
ValidatorBuilderInterface is not part of the stable API. You are not supposed to implement this interface.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-28T09:01:07Z
We're not only documenting bc breaks for stable API, otherwise we could remove 90% of the upgrade file since few methods are tagged with API.
An interface that nobody should implement?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-11-28T09:30:02Z
The question is what to consider a BC break. Something will always break for someone. Should we consequently mark everything as BC break? I don't think so.
For example, since 2.1, you are supposed to use `Validation::createValidator*()` for creating a validator. Because of that, I won't consider changing the constructor signature of `Validator` a BC break anymore from 2.1 on.
The same for the unstable interfaces. These are currently meant to be used only, that is, type hint against them and call their methods. But we don't guarantee that we won't add methods to them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-28T09:38:19Z
I agree that almost any change could be considered a BC break. So we probably need to better define what a BC break is and what not. Otherwise Symfony will stop evolving after 2.3 because from then on Fabien wanted to prevent BC breaks which is almost impossible in a strict definition of bc break.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-28T11:37:22Z
BC breaks should always be documented, and we guarantee BC only for things tagged with @api. I'm going to update the docs to make things clearer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-11-28T13:09:57Z
@fabpot I documented these changes now in the CHANGELOG: af99ebb1206ac92889b7193ba1ecc12bf2617e85
Are we sure we want to document *all* BC breaks from now on, even in non-@api code? This could rather scare people looking at our changelogs (lots of BC BREAKS there).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fago at 2012-11-28T17:29:58Z
Unfortunately, it turns out the symfony translator interface does not mach the Drupal translation system as well as we initally thought, see http://drupal.org/node/1852106. Given that, this would integrating the validator component into Drupal even harder, because it introduces the dependency on the (unwanted) translation component. :(
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-28T18:19:36Z
If this does not help Drupal anyway, maybe #5844 is a better way to manage translations for people using the validator outside forms ?
and the Drupal guys would simply follow a similar approach, but based on their own translator instead of the symfony one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fago at 2012-11-28T18:50:12Z
Yeah. The only problem I see with the approach of #5844 is that *after* validation only the translated messages are available. We'd need to have access to the untranslated messages also.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fago at 2012-11-29T09:49:47Z
As our translation system handles translating pluralized messages differently, the current ExecutionContextInterface::addViolation() method poses a problem also. We need to pass on - both the single and plural - message, as the message gets chosen during translation, see http://api.drupal.org/api/drupal/core!includes!common.inc/function/format_plural/8
So maybe, we could allow adding an already created ConstraintViolation object also? Then, we could implement a "PluralConstraintViolation" class that takes both message templates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-12-03T15:52:36Z
I updated this PR to support pluralized messages by default in the validator. This should solve the problem of the Drupal guys, because their implementation of `TranslatorInterface::transChoice($id, $number, ...)` can now simply split the $id by pipes (`|`) and pass the parts to their own `format_plural($count, $singular, $plural, ...)` function.
For us, it breaks BC because translation catalog sources had to be adapted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-03T16:25:52Z
Most of the XLF files are broken (the end is missing now).
IIUC, we now have a hard dependency on the Translation component, which is something we wanted to avoid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-03T16:27:56Z
Oops, clicked on the "comment" button too fast.
So, the dependency is hard (you need to install the dep) but light as we only rely on the translation interface from the component (when using the default translator). It looks acceptable to me, especially because we now use Composer to manage dependencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-12-03T16:54:10Z
@fabpot Thanks for the hint. Going to fix this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-12-04T11:34:43Z
@fabpot Fixed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-12-07T12:40:24Z
Is there anything missing for this PR to be merged?
* 2.1:
[Console] Fix style escaping parsing
[Console] Make style formatter matching less greedy to avoid having to escape when not needed
[Bundle] [FrameworkBundle] fixed indentation in esi.xml services file.
[Component] [Security] fixed PSR-2 coding violation in ClassUtilsTest class.
[Form] Fixed EntityChoiceList when loading objects with negative integer IDs
[TwigBundle] There is no CSS visibility of display, should be visible instead
[Form] corrected source node for a Danish translation
[DependencyInjection] fixed a bug where the strict flag on references were lost (closes#6607)
[HttpFoundation] Check if required shell functions for `FileBinaryMimeTypeGuesser` are not disabled
[CssSelector] added css selector with empty string
[HttpFoundation] Docblock for Request::isXmlHttpRequest() now points to Wikipedia
[DependencyInjection] refactored code to avoid logic duplication
[Form] Deleted references in FormBuilder::getFormConfig() to improve performance
[HttpFoundation] Update docblock for non-working method
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/Resources/views/Exception/trace.html.twig
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/Resources/views/Exception/traces.html.twig
* 2.1: (24 commits)
updated license year
Update src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Response.php
[Form] Fixed inheritance of "error_bubbling" in RepeatedType
[Form] Fixed DateType when used with the intl extension disabled.
[HttpFoundation] fix return types and handling of zero in Response
[HttpFoundation] better fix for non-parseable Expires header date
Fixed missing plural message in portuguese validator
Fix Expires when the header is -1
[DoctrineBridge] Allowing memcache port to be 0 to support memcache unix domain sockets.
[Console] fixed unitialized properties (closes#5935)
[Process] Prevented test from failing when pcntl extension is not enabled.
Revert "[DoctrineBridge] Improved performance of the EntityType when used with the "query_builder" option"
[Form] Fixed failing tests for DateTimeToStringTransformer.
[Locale] Fixed the StubLocaleTest for ICU versions lower than 4.8.
[Bundle] [FrameworkBundle] fixed typo in phpdoc of the SessionListener.
[Form] Fixed test regression introduced in #6440
[Tests] Fix namespaces
Fixed php doc of GenericEvent::__construct
HttpUtils must handle RequestMatcher too
use preferred_choices in favor of preferred_query
...
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bridge/Propel1/Form/ChoiceList/ModelChoiceList.php
* 2.0:
updated license year
Update src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Response.php
[Console] fixed unitialized properties (closes#5935)
[Bundle] [FrameworkBundle] fixed typo in phpdoc of the SessionListener.
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.21-DEV
updated VERSION for 2.0.21
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.21
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bundle/SwiftmailerBundle/LICENSE
src/Symfony/Component/Filesystem/LICENSE
src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Response.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
6b10550 Merge branch 'master' of github.com:symfony/symfony into deprecationErrors
1d82112 [Form] Fix two cases where deprecated methods were being used
b8cdbdc [Form] Catch deprecation errors that are caused by BC code
ebcb432 [Form] [FrameworkBundle] catch deprecation errors in tests
c21b12e [Form] handle BC use of deprecated stuff in non-test-methods.
fc2be6d [Form] catch deprecated errors in tests
800a032 [Form] replace bindRequest() with bind(), as bindRequest is deprecated
d5b2638 [Form] Trigger errors for deprecated methods in Form Component
f3d6966 [Validator] Stop using deprecated methods
d57ad32 [Form] Catch deprecation errors when using deprecated methods/classes in tests
3241157 [Validator] Trigger errors for deprecations
1f9eb7f return value of handleError
b35de9e Handle errors using a custom error handler
f49704b trigger errors for deprecated methods in HttpFoundation component
Discussion
----------
trigger_error() for deprecations
See also #6173 and #6139.
Started triggering errors in the HttpFoundation component.
It seems as if most of the time the error is just duplicating the text in the @deprecation comment.
Any opinions on if duplicating the text is acceptable, or if fetching the comment text to output the error makes sense?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-12-04T13:39:42Z
IMO it's fine to just duplicate the `@deprecated` note in the message, since anyway this code is meant to be completely deleted, this duplication should not do much harm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-06T08:22:21Z
@colinfrei I've merged PR #6173. Do you have time to implement the `trigger_error()` call everywhere? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by colinfrei at 2012-12-06T08:36:55Z
Yep I'll finish that, probably until the beginning of next week.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-12-10T10:15:12Z
Thank you for working on this!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-12T11:08:53Z
@colinfrei: Is this PR finished? Can I merge it?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by colinfrei at 2012-12-12T12:09:19Z
@fabpot not quite - I lost some work due to a computer crash over the weekend. The only thing open is fixing the tests for the Form Component and catching the cases where the Form Component intentionally uses deprecated stuff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by colinfrei at 2012-12-15T07:32:28Z
@fabpot - finished adding trigger_errors and catching them in Tests and as needed.
Travis is failing, but that seems to be master being broken due to the Finder changes?
I changed a few cases where the code was using deprecated methods which wasn't necessary in my eyes, specifically 1d8211249b, 800a032f07, f3d696636a
* 2.1:
fixed CS
fixed CS
[Security] fixed path info encoding (closes#6040, closes#5695)
[HttpFoundation] added some tests for the previous merge and removed dead code (closes#6037)
Improved Cache-Control header when no-cache is sent
removed unneeded comment
Fix to allow null values in labels array
fix date in changelog
removed the Travis icon (as this is not stable enough -- many false positive, closes#6186)
Revert "merged branch gajdaw/finder_splfileinfo_fpassthu (PR #4751)" (closes#6224)
Fixed a typo
Fixed: HeaderBag::parseCacheControl() not parsing quoted zero correctly
[Form] Fix const inside an anonymous function
[Config] Loader::import must return imported data
[DoctrineBridge] Fixed caching in DoctrineType when "choices" or "preferred_choices" is passed
[Form] Fixed the default value of "format" in DateType to DateType::DEFAULT_FORMAT if "widget" is not "single_text"
[HttpFoundation] fixed a small regression
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Tests/Session/Storage/Handler/MongoDbSessionHandlerTest.php
* 2.1:
[HttpFoundation] changed UploadedFile::move() to use move_uploaded_file() when possible (closes#5878, closes#6185)
[HttpFoundation] added a check for the host header value
[DoctrineBridge] Improved performance of the EntityType when used with the "query_builder" option
[DoctrineBridge] Improved exception message
[DoctrineBridge] Fixed: Exception is thrown if the entity class is not known to Doctrine
Removed useless branch alias for dev-master in composer.json
Conflicts:
composer.json
src/Symfony/Bridge/Doctrine/composer.json
src/Symfony/Bridge/Monolog/composer.json
src/Symfony/Bridge/Propel1/composer.json
src/Symfony/Bridge/Swiftmailer/composer.json
src/Symfony/Bridge/Twig/composer.json
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/composer.json
src/Symfony/Bundle/SecurityBundle/composer.json
src/Symfony/Bundle/TwigBundle/composer.json
src/Symfony/Bundle/WebProfilerBundle/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/BrowserKit/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/ClassLoader/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Config/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Console/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/CssSelector/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/EventDispatcher/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Filesystem/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Finder/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Form/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Locale/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/OptionsResolver/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Process/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Routing/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Security/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Serializer/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Templating/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Translation/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Validator/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Yaml/composer.json
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
b604eb7 [DoctrineBridge] Improved performance of the EntityType when used with the "query_builder" option
db2ee54 [DoctrineBridge] Improved exception message
99321cb [DoctrineBridge] Fixed: Exception is thrown if the entity class is not known to Doctrine
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] fixed caching when EntityType is used with the "query_builder" option
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: -
* 2.1: (29 commits)
[DependencyInjection] fixed composer.json
[Validator] Fix typos in validators.ru.xlf
Edited some minor grammar and style errors in russian validation file
Updated Bulgarian translation
[Form] improve error message with a "hasser" hint for PropertyAccessDeniedException
[Form] Updated checks for the ICU version from 4.5+ to 4.7+ due to test failures with ICU 4.6
[Form] simplified a test from previous merge
Update src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/Type/FileType.php
fixed CS
Xliff with other node than source or target are ignored
small fix of #5984 when the container param is not set
Filesystem Component mirror symlinked directory fix
[Process][Tests] fixed chainedCommandsOutput tests
fixed CS
Use better default ports in urlRedirectAction
Add tests for urlRedirectAction
info about session namespace
fix upgrade info about locale
Update src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Tests/FormTest.php
Update src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Form.php
...
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
1858b96 [Form] Adapted FormValidator to latest changes in the Validator
1f752e8 [DoctrineBridge] Adapted UniqueValidator to latest changes in the Validator
efe42cb [Validator] Refactored the GraphWalker into an implementation of the Visitor design pattern.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Refactored the Validator for use in Drupal
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: TODO
Drupal wants to use the Symfony Validator component in their next version. I was talking to @fago recently about the changes that we'd need to make and implemented these changes in this PR. I don't want to rush this, but the deadline is tight, since Drupal feature freeze is on December 1st and @fago needs at least a couple of days to integrate the Validator into Drupal.
This PR introduces two significant changes:
* Interfaces were created for all classes that constitute the Validator's API. This is were the PR breaks BC, because `ConstraintValidatorInterface::initialize()` is now type hinted against `ExecutionContextInterface` instead of `ExecutionContext`.
* The graph walker was refactored into an implementation of the Visitor pattern. This way, the validator was decoupled from the structure of the metadata (class → properties and getter methods) and makes it possible to implement a different metadata structure, as is required by the Drupal Entity API.
As a consequence of the API change, custom validation code is now much easier to write, because `ValidatorInterface` and `ExecutionContextInterface` share the following set of methods:
```php
interface ValidatorInterface
{
public function validate($value, $groups = null, $traverse = false, $deep = false);
public function validateValue($value, $constraints, $groups = null);
public function getMetadataFor($value);
}
interface ExecutionContextInterface
{
public function validate($value, $subPath = '', $groups = null, $traverse = false, $deep = false);
public function validateValue($value, $constraints, $subPath = '', $groups = null);
public function getMetadataFor($value);
}
```
No more juggling with property paths, no more fiddling with the graph walker. Just call on the execution context what you'd call on the validator and you're done.
There are two controversial things to discuss and decide (cc @fabpot):
* I moved the `@api` tags of all implementations to the respective interfaces. Is this ok?
* I would like to deprecate `ValidatorInterface::getMetadataFactory()` (tagged as `@api`) in favor of the added `ValidatorInterface::getMetadataFor()`, which offers the exact same functionality, but with a different API and better encapsulation, which makes it easier to maintain for us. We can tag `getMetadataFor()` as `@api`, as I don't expect it to change. Can we do this or should we leave the old method in?
I would like to decide the major issues of this PR until **Sunday November 25th** in order to give @fago enough room for his implementation.
Let me hear your thoughts.
This PR was merged into the 2.0 branch.
Commits
-------
2d9a6fc Use Norm Data instead of Data
Discussion
----------
[Form] Use Norm Data instead of App Data
This listener is triggered when normalized data are binded.
We have to use $event->getForm()->getNormData() instead of $event->getForm()->getData().
I have made a new FormType having 'entity' as parent and having a NormTransformer. I encountered a problem in MergeCollectionListener when the request is binded.
My commit fix it.
* 2.1: (24 commits)
forced Travis to use source to workaround their not-up-to-date Composer on PHP 5.3.3
[Routing] removed irrelevant string cast in Route
Fixed typo
Make YamlFileLoader and XmlFileLoader file loading extensible
[HttpKernel] fix typo
Fixed singularization of "prices"
[Form] Removed an exception that prevented valid formats from being passed, e.g. "h" for the hour, "L" for the month etc.
[HttpKernel] fixed Client when using StreamedResponses (closes#5370)
fixed PDO session handler for Oracle (closes#5829)
[HttpFoundation] fixed PDO session handler for Oracle (closes#5829)
[Locale] removed a check that is done too early (and it is done twice anyways)
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.fa.xlf
Adding new localized strings for farsi validation.
[HttpFoundation] moved the HTTP protocol check from StreamedResponse to Response (closes#5937)
[Form] Fixed forms not to be marked invalid if their children are already marked invalid
[Form] Excluded some tests in NumberToLocalizedStringTransformerTest which fail on ICU 4.4, but work on ICU 4.8
added missing tests from previous merge
[Form] Fixed NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer to accept both comma and dot as decimal separator, if possible
Fix export-ignore on Windows
Show correct class name InputArgument in error message
...
Conflicts:
.travis.yml
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/DataTransformer/NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer.php
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
b27b749 made usage of Composer autoloader for subtree-split unit tests
Discussion
----------
made usage of Composer autoloader for subtree-split unit tests
This PR also normalizes the way components are tested.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-09T23:14:22Z
👍
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
646a714 Fix export-ignore on Windows
Discussion
----------
Fix export-ignore on Windows
Rules:
Tests/ export-ignore
don't work on Windows. My proposition is:
/Tests export-ignore
* 2.0:
[Form] Fixed NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer to accept both comma and dot as decimal separator, if possible
Show correct class name InputArgument in error message
shows correct class name InputOption in error message
The exception message should say which field is not mapped
[HttpFoundation] Fix name sanitization after perfoming move
Add check to Store::unlock to ensure file exists
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bridge/Doctrine/Validator/Constraints/UniqueEntityValidator.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/File/UploadedFile.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Console/Input/InputArgumentTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Console/Input/InputOptionTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Form/Extension/Core/DataTransformer/NumberToLocalizedStringTransformerTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/HttpFoundation/File/FileTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/HttpKernel/HttpCache/StoreTest.php
* 2.1:
[ClassLoader] fixed unbracketed namespaces (closes#5747)
slight refactoring in UrlMatcher
[Form] Created test for DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser see #5790
[Form] Fixed DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser to guess the "required" option for to-one associations
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
5d2525b [Form] Created test for DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser see #5790b844d6b [Form] Fixed DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser to guess the "required" option for to-one associations
Discussion
----------
[Form] Doctrine orm type guesser tests
This PR adds tests to https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5790
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-20T10:53:56Z
Using real test entities would be better IMO. Using mocks ties it pretty much to the implementation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-10-21T10:38:53Z
@Tobion thats true, but Doctrine Class meta data takes quite some coding to set-up.
For instance you need the EntityManager to get even get the meta data set!
So you'd end having more code to set-up then your actually testing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Burgov at 2012-10-21T12:58:58Z
I wasn't sure whether do use a test entity manager, or do it the way I finally did it.
@sstok true, it's quite some work to set it up, but on the other hand there's the base OrmTestCase class which does it for you, so it'd actually mean I'd only have to create one entity for all the cases: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Bridge/Doctrine/Tests/DoctrineOrmTestCase.php
@Tobion on the other hand I tend to use a test EM only when I actually need to test persisting and loading, while this test case here is so isolated that I didn't really feel it would be necessary.
I'd like to know which method is preferred though, I'll change it if necessary, and other tests can be added to test the rest of this specific class
* 2.1:
fixed CS
added doc comments
added doc comments
[Validator] Updated swedish translation
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.de.xlf
[2.1] Exclude tests from zips via gitattributes
[HttpKernel][Translator] Fixed type-hints
Updated lithuanian validation translation
[DomCrawler] Allows using multiselect through Form::setValues().
[Translation] forced the catalogue to be regenerated when a resource is added (closes symfony/Translation#1)
Unit test for patched method OptionsResolver::validateOptionValues().
validateOptionValues throw a notice if an allowed value is set and the corresponding option isn't.
[Form] Hardened code of ViolationMapper against errors
[HttpFoundation] Fixed#5611 - Request::splitHttpAcceptHeader incorrect result order.
[Form] Fixed negative index access in PropertyPathBuilder
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.ro.xlf
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Form.php
src/Symfony/Component/Process/Process.php
* 2.1:
[2.1] Fix SessionHandlerInterface autoloading
Remove executable bit from HttpKernel/DependencyInjection/ConfigurableExtension.php
[2.0][http-foundation] Fix Response::getDate method
[DoctrineBridge] Require class option for DoctrineType
[HttpFoundation] fixed the path to the SensioHandlerInterface class in composer.json
Support the new Microsoft URL Rewrite Module for IIS 7.0. @see http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-4491 @see http://framework.zend.com/code/revision.php?repname=Zend+Framework&rev=24842
fixed undefined variable
hasColorSupport does not take an argument
Improve FilterResponseEvent docblocks Response ref
Commits
-------
83dc966 [Form] Fixed some PHPDoc
596bbb1 [Form] fixed FormConfigBuilder to use PropertyPathInterface
a523823 [Form] fixed and added phpDoc
Discussion
----------
[Form] fixed and added phpDoc
[ci skip]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-08-26T08:11:01Z
Some descriptions don''t seem to be properly aligned, use the CS-fixer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-26T17:02:25Z
@sstok This is more about manual fixes concerning forgotten exceptions or wrong data type. The cs fixer gives many false positives and can be applied later.
Commits
-------
f1c4b8b [Doctrine Bridge] Added a parameter ignoreNull on Unique entity to allow a nullable value on field. Added Test
Discussion
----------
[Doctrine Bridge] Added parameter ignoreNull to accept a nullable value on field
In my last project, i use this syntax to test unicity on 2 fields, but it fail because the validator stop if value is null. I dropped the test on validator and my unicity work fine.
```
@UniqueEntity(fields={"username", "deletedAt"})
```
It's possible to add this PR on Bridge.
Thanks
Bertrand
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T08:14:19Z
This is wrong. RDBMS allow several null values in a unique column and this change will break it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-07-23T08:17:08Z
@stof seems weird indeed it would return if any of the values are null. Makes sense to do a query where the field `IS NULL` or whatever the find method does.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T08:18:50Z
@henrikbjorn if you do a query with IS NULL, the validator would force to have only 1 entity with a null field whereas it is not the behavior of the DB-level constraint.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-07-23T08:20:41Z
In this case i suspect that he wants to achieve a `WHERE username = "henrikbjorn" AND deletedAt IS NULL` which would be valid right? Currently it just returns if any of the fields are null and the validation is never done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-07-23T08:27:24Z
I suggest to make this configurable as the handling of NULL values in UNIQUE columns [differs between SQL implementations](http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?22,53591,53591#msg-53591).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T08:52:53Z
@stof What the correct solution to test my unicity with deletedAt == null ?
I use this definition: @ORM\Column(name="deleted_at", type="datetime", nullable=true)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T20:28:44Z
In my local repository, i added a new parameter "$authorizedNullField" on UniqueEntity.php and tested this on UniqueEntityValidator.php:
Code: https://gist.github.com/4122efbe569e3c2c95c0
What about that ?
Thanks for your help
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T20:45:30Z
yep, this would be good (except for the naming which seems weird)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T20:46:44Z
No problem to change this. I don't find a good name for this ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T20:47:57Z
what about ``allowMultipleNull`` (defaulting to ``true`` for BC) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T20:51:30Z
Why multiple ? This option is for one or many. what about `allowNullable` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T20:52:44Z
@Garfield-fr the current behavior allows having multiple null values without failing to the unique constraint
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T20:56:07Z
ok. I make `allowMultipleNull`.
It's ok with that: https://gist.github.com/cae8d43780c45a5011ed
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-07-23T20:58:12Z
What about `uniqueNull` (`false` by default)? `ignoreNull` (`true` by default)? I find `allowMultipleNull` a bit cumbersome.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T20:58:26Z
no it is not. You have an issue in the validator. You have an extra negation.
Please update your PR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T21:01:59Z
@stof `ignoreNull` is ok for you ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T21:10:24Z
yes
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-05T07:48:03Z
Is it mergeable now? Is yes, @Garfield-fr Can you squash your commits?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-08-05T08:43:23Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/2039523) (merged 19ae3cf9 into c20c1d18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-05T12:09:02Z
@Garfield-fr when squashing the commits, you need to force the push as you are rewriting the history. You should not have merged with your remote branch
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-08-05T12:10:15Z
What's the right solution for resolve this ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-05T12:11:09Z
@Garfield-fr reset your local branch to the squashed commit and force the push
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-08-05T12:14:09Z
@stof Thanks for your help
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-08-05T12:19:06Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/2040210) (merged f1c4b8b4 into 20d2e5a1).
