Commits
-------
67c33a8 Rebased with master, and fixed wrong behavior with proper tests coverage
f8a6a4b Be sure that both fields have same value for required option in RepeatedType
0679220 Additional test coverage for changes in RepeatedType
b23d47d moved options test form from class->method scope
5fe5556 fixed accidental permission change
a969434 [Form] fixed CS, merged options, added tests
8819db3 [Form] Allow setting different options to repeating fields
Discussion
----------
[2.1] [Form] Allow setting different options at RepeatedType fields
This an test covered version of #1348 (rebased with master).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/27 04:18:19 -0700
@fabpot What do you think about this ? I'm just not sure that we should allow setting `required` per field, IMO better would be forcing this option from default `$options['options']` and ignore that field in `$options['first_options']` and/or `$options['second_options']`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/02 00:00:04 -0700
@fabpot ping.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/06 05:45:56 -0700
Let's discuss this new feature for 2.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/08/24 01:12:59 -0700
Rebased with master.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 05:02:42 -0700
@fabpot What do you think about this feature ? It is now time to discuss it :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/22 00:18:29 -0700
Tests do not pass.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/09/24 01:54:42 -0700
@fabpot Should be ok now.
Commits
-------
a0329c3 Added lifetime/cleanup support.
365e73a Fixed the find() method and changed the way the profile data is stored.
beeec5e Allow socket dsn (for example mongodb:///tmp/mongodb-27017.sock).
218eaba Fixed storage of time value.
85c3806 Added support for sorting by time like other profiler storage implementations.
73692c6 Fixed MongoDbProfilerStorage::find() when passing empty parameters.
4cd2dec Use token as identifier to make usage of the automatically created index.
Discussion
----------
[2.1] [HttpKernel] MongoDB profiler updates
I fixed one issue within the MongoDbProfilerStorage::find() function and made some more changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by snc at 2011/09/11 02:28:35 -0700
Please don't merge this in yet. There are some more commits pending...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/14 01:07:39 -0700
@snc: is it ready for a merge?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by snc at 2011/09/14 01:20:32 -0700
Unfortunately not... while testing I found out that the currently merged in implementation does not work completely. The web profiler search function errors because the find function returns the wrong data. I fixed this already but now I have some strange "maximum function nesting level reached" errors when viewing profiles with children. I will work on it later today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by snc at 2011/09/14 13:27:50 -0700
Now only one thing is missing... the generated container code looks like this:
`$this->services['profiler'] = $instance = new \Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Profiler\Profiler(new \Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Profiler\MongoDbProfilerStorage('mongodb://localhost/sf2-mongo-profiler/profiler', '', '', 86400), $a);`
The current constructor only uses the first parameter (dsn). What about the username, password and lifetime? Username and passwort can already be passed via the dsn... but the lifetime feature is not part of the interface... should I implement it?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/15 11:03:02 -0700
The `lifetime` is used to cleanup the database (see https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Profiler/PdoProfilerStorage.php#L136). So, it should probably be implemented for MongoDB as well (but it can probably be done in another PR).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by snc at 2011/09/19 13:42:52 -0700
Sorry for the delay, lifetime support is now implemented. What do you think about an AbstractProfilerStorageTest class to share some testing code between the different implementations (of cause in a separate PR)?
* 2.0:
[HttpKernel] fixed typo
fixed previous merge, done the same change to other occurences
fixes usage of mb_*
Profiler session import fixed.
[Process] workaround a faulty implementation of is_executable on Windows
Swedish translation fix.
[Locale] Fix#2179 StubIntlDateFormatter support yy format
Fixed fourth argument of Filesystem->mirror()
Commits
-------
777f876 [HttpFoundation] Added test that exposes error in session saving
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Added test that exposes error in session saving
Noticed this commit in the recent release:
https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/34a1b53
And noticed that the save in __destruct won't be fired if a manual save has been called. The testSavedOnDestructAfterManualSave test I've added fails on 2.0.1 but it passes with 2.0.0. An example:
$session->set('foo', 'value');
$session->__destruct(); // eventually called during shutdown, triggers a save
// During next request, $session->get('foo') returns 'value'
$session->set('foo', 'value');
$session->save();
$session->set('foo', 'newvalue');
$session->__destruct(); // eventually called during shutdown, however WON'T trigger save
// During next request, $session->get('foo') returns 'value'
In my eyes the save on destruction should still happen whether a save has been called manually or not - it's more predictable. But i can see arguments for the opposite as well.
If consensus is that this is a bug, I'm happy to provide a fix but wanted to get feedback on the 2 options:
* Save optimisation can be reverted
* Can make the save optimisation more intelligent so a write to storage is only done if something has changed. The best way to do this would be to close down the api and mark the session as invalid when an attribute is set for example, however all properties are currently protected and would need to be private, so it might break some people's extensions of session
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 02:13:52 -0700
@fabpot what about it ?
Commits
-------
e6e5146 [Translation] now support ResourceBundle
Discussion
----------
[2.1][Translation] now support ResourceBundle
support `.res` and `.dat` bundles
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marijn at 2011/09/08 08:59:39 -0700
There are a few references to `ressource`, I guess that is a typo...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/08 09:13:32 -0700
@marijn thank, done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/11 00:42:37 -0700
Is it possible to add a dumper like we have for all other loaders?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/11 03:46:39 -0700
Btw, you need to rebase your branch as it conflicts with master
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/11 04:04:23 -0700
@fabpot it's more difficult (or the easy way it's to use `exec` with `derb`), I can create the text resources
@stof oki
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/11 23:52:19 -0700
@stealth35: Can you remove the `@api` tags? We will review what is included into the public API later on. thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/12 04:18:07 -0700
@fabpot done
Commits
-------
aecfd0a [HttpFoundation] Support user and password in url
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Support user and password in url
Allow `http://user:password@test.com` for url request and `basic auth`
Added Methods for `Request`
- `getUser`
- `getPassword `
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/08/26 07:52:57 -0700
@seldaek @stof thanks guys it's done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/28 11:52:11 -0700
btw, you should rebase your branch on top of the upstream master branch as it conflicts
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/08/28 13:15:55 -0700
@stof done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 02:09:11 -0700
@stealth35 you made an error when rebasing: you merged the previous version of the branch instead of forcing the push, thus duplicating all commits in the PR (rebasing rewrites the history so it creates new commits). Could you clean your branch ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/05 02:00:17 -0700
@stof 👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/06 08:21:00 -0700
should be 2.0 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/11 23:52:30 -0700
@stealth35: Can you remove the `@api` tags? We will review what is included into the public API later on. thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/12 04:02:01 -0700
@fabpot done
Commits
-------
a0a97c6 Removed executable bits from all php files
Discussion
----------
Removed executable bits from all PHP files
Some files had a file mode of 755 and this PR changes them to 644. The reason behind this is that git always thinks that those files are changed when accessing the repository via a samba share on windows (tested with PhpStorm).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/09 05:51:30 -0700
That was on my radar too. Can you do the same for the 2.0 branch?
Commits
-------
ef322f6 -- add command that extracts translation messages from templates
Discussion
----------
[2.1] Extracting translation messages from templates
As seen here #1283 and here #2045, I push the command that extract translation from templates.
There are still a lot of new things here, but it seems more manageable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 02:04:40 -0700
@michelsalib Could you try to refactor the code to make it more flexible by moving the creating of the file to the dumpers to support other outputs (database...) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/04 02:35:50 -0700
You are right, I shall do it tonight.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/04 11:53:35 -0700
I just pushed a refactoring that should allow more flexibility. Dumpers are now responsive for writing the files. This way it is now possible to implement the DumperInterface that dump to a database and add it to the TranslationWriter.
I updated the tests accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/05 23:27:27 -0700
To be consistent with other dumpers in the framework, the dumpers extending `FileDumper` should use `FileDumper` as a suffix like in `YmlFileDumper`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/05 23:41:12 -0700
A general note on PHPDoc: The first line of a phpdoc ends with a dot and starts with a present verb like in `Extracts translation messages from template files.`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/06 01:23:31 -0700
I fixed most of the remarks. I just need to go through the phpdoc (in a few minutes).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/09/06 01:28:55 -0700
@michelsalib you should use `git rebase` (see [docs](http://symfony.com/doc/current/contributing/code/patches.html#id1)) instead of `git merge`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/06 01:31:06 -0700
@stloyd sorry. I will rebase (squash) everything when I am finished.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/09/06 01:31:18 -0700
Hey, it might be a little bit late, but may i ask a not code-related question?
Is it correct that the `--force` option only means to write the output to a file instead of writing it to stdout?
If so,
1. is it semantically correct? I mean... i'm not a native english speaker, but from unix programs i'm used to interpret a `--force` option as something like "overwrite", "ignore errors" or "suppress warnings". An option which is used in case of trouble most time. Feels confusing to me to be forced ;-) to use the `--force` option for simply writing to files.
2. does it makes sense to have a default behaviour instead of requiring the user to give either `--force` or `--dump-messages`? In which cases does the user wants to dump the messages to the console? Is it only for debugging / to review the messages?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/06 01:33:58 -0700
@kaiwa Your concerns seems perfectly right. Initially I just wanted to mimic the `doctrine:schema:update` command. But it can be changed.
@fabpot what do you think ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/06 02:01:22 -0700
@stloyd I tried to do a `git rebase` and I am quite lost. I think I messed something when merge instead of rebase. How can I clean/squash my PR properly ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/09/06 02:11:29 -0700
@michelsalib for now just work as it is ;-) When I back from work I will try to help you to rebase it properly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/06 02:12:17 -0700
@stloyd Thank you !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/09/06 12:39:18 -0700
@michelsalib I was trying to rebase your code and revert it this _bad_ commit (merge), but without success.
IMO best way would be making _brand new_ branch based on symfony/master, and the `git cherry-pick` ([hint](http://ariejan.net/2010/06/10/cherry-picking-specific-commits-from-another-branch)) commits you need (almost all in this PR but without this one with merge), then you will need to apply again _by hand_ changes from commit fce24c7fa2 (this clean up you have done there).
I'm sorry I can't give you more help...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/07 09:41:36 -0700
@stloyd I finally succeed to fix this PR. Thanks to your help! I must admit the whole thing with `cherry-pick` command was quite epic.
@fabpot Don't be sorry, I am about to fix the PHPDoc. I shall squash right after.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/07 10:07:20 -0700
I just squashed and did a last polish of the code. You might want to read it again before merge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/07 11:40:48 -0700
ok, code looks really good now. I think the only missing thing is some more unit tests (for the extractors for instance).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/07 12:18:59 -0700
Thanks, I'll look into it tomorrow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/08 15:13:10 -0700
Hi,
I just added unit tests for both extractors (php and yaml).
Concerning the yaml extractor, the test is quite tricky because I need to mock the twig environment while returning a twig tree that contain a trans block and a trans filter. But it work fine with as little side effects as possible. Also I am not sure that the test should be in the TwigBundle.
IMO, the PR seems ready.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/08 15:34:41 -0700
As the extractor is in bridge, the tests should be in the folder containing the tests for the bridge in tests/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/08 15:41:45 -0700
Thanks @stof, it is now fixed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/09 00:48:47 -0700
thanks @stloyd, it is fixed now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by michelsalib at 2011/09/09 01:25:24 -0700
Fixed again ;)
-- add missing files
-- tweak translation command files
-- dumpers are now responsive for writting the files
-- moved the twig extractor the bridge
-- clear temp files after unit tests
-- check the presence of dumper in translation writer
-- General cleaning of the code
-- clean phpDoc
-- fix PHPDoc
-- fixing class name in configuration
-- add unit tests for extractors (php and twig)
-- moved test to correct location
-- polish the code
-- polish the code
