Commits
-------
d675c28 [FrameworkBundle] Use Router instead of RouterInterface
ae7ae8d [FrameworkBundle] Moved router_listener from web to router.xml since it depends on the router
35a9023 [FrameworkBundle] Added isEnabled to Router commands, fixes#1467536d979 [Console] Added Command::isEnabled method that defines whether to add the command or not
Discussion
----------
[2.1] [Console] Added Command::isEnabled method
This addresses #1467.
The idea is to allow commands to evaluate whether they can run or not, since they are automatically registered.
- It's useful for the two router:* commands since they're optional (router can be disabled), but part of the FrameworkBundle that is not really optional.
- It could be useful for third party code as well.
- It's BC.
- aa95bb0d395810b29a3e654673e130736d9d1080 should address the issue in #1467, while the other commits just make sure the command is not registered at all if the router isn't standard.
One issue remains though:
- A few other services like twig helpers get the `ròuter` injected, this means that if there is really **no** router service defined, there is still an error. I'm not sure how to fix those beyond adding `on-invalid="null"` but I'm not sure if that's desirable. I guess we could argue that the router is a big candidate for replacement/suppression, and as such it should be truly optional, but if we do it I don't know where it'll lead. I don't want to end up in a situation where half the dependencies are optional to support every possible combination. @fabpot wdyt?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/28 16:19:46 -0700
I'd rather see us not register a command instead of register and then disable it. Can we do the same thing you've done here in the bundle's registerCommands() method?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/06/28 16:51:36 -0700
Note that it's never really registered. During the registration it's checked and skipped if not enabled.
However, doing it as you suggest means overriding/copy-pasting all the code from the core Bundle class, which I don't like so much. It also means adding code specific to those two commands in a somewhat unrelated place, which I also don't like.
I'm not saying the current solution is perfect, but from the alternatives I considered, it's the best I have found.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 04:58:04 -0700
@Seldaek your branch conflicts with master. could you rebase it ?
@fabpot what do you think about this PR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/04 08:39:05 -0700
Rebased
No other helpers have request scope and the assets helper's parameters don't appear to depend on the request in any way, so this appears to be unnecessary. As-is, request scope here prevents use of the assets helper from a console command that may need to internally render a template.
Commits
-------
e6e5146 [Translation] now support ResourceBundle
Discussion
----------
[2.1][Translation] now support ResourceBundle
support `.res` and `.dat` bundles
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by marijn at 2011/09/08 08:59:39 -0700
There are a few references to `ressource`, I guess that is a typo...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/08 09:13:32 -0700
@marijn thank, done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/11 00:42:37 -0700
Is it possible to add a dumper like we have for all other loaders?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/11 03:46:39 -0700
Btw, you need to rebase your branch as it conflicts with master
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/11 04:04:23 -0700
@fabpot it's more difficult (or the easy way it's to use `exec` with `derb`), I can create the text resources
@stof oki
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/11 23:52:19 -0700
@stealth35: Can you remove the `@api` tags? We will review what is included into the public API later on. thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stealth35 at 2011/09/12 04:18:07 -0700
@fabpot done
Commits
-------
a0a97c6 Removed executable bits from all php files
Discussion
----------
Removed executable bits from all PHP files
Some files had a file mode of 755 and this PR changes them to 644. The reason behind this is that git always thinks that those files are changed when accessing the repository via a samba share on windows (tested with PhpStorm).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/09 05:51:30 -0700
That was on my radar too. Can you do the same for the 2.0 branch?
-- add missing files
-- tweak translation command files
-- dumpers are now responsive for writting the files
-- moved the twig extractor the bridge
-- clear temp files after unit tests
-- check the presence of dumper in translation writer
-- General cleaning of the code
-- clean phpDoc
-- fix PHPDoc
-- fixing class name in configuration
-- add unit tests for extractors (php and twig)
-- moved test to correct location
-- polish the code
-- polish the code
This commit also fixes exception pages when Twig is not enabled as a templating engine.
Instead of just displaying the raw Twig template as before, we now fallback to the default
exception handler introduced some time ago.
Commits
-------
9bcce9f fix tests
fc4787a fix non-extensible router
Discussion
----------
Router fix
Right now, the router is hard to overwrite (you need always a compiler pass). This commit fixes this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/18 01:15:36 -0700
Why do you need a complier pass to override the router?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/18 01:47:47 -0700
How would you suggest to overwrite it?
Basically, I want to do something like this:
```yml
services:
router:
parent: router.default
class: MyClass
calls:
- [moreDeps, []]
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/18 05:07:19 -0700
Then maybe we should somehow support redefining services with the same name while keeping the old one as parent, otherwise we need this foo.default for every service out there?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/18 06:30:34 -0700
as @Seldeak said, why do that for the router and not all services?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/18 06:38:39 -0700
I have designed the SecurityBundle this way where extension is encouraged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/18 11:15:57 -0700
I should add that this is mainly a problem for services where you still want to use the semantic configuration that is provided by the bundle. For services which are not configured by the extension, this is not so much of an issue.
Anyway, if you don't want to merge it, just close the PR. I have no problem with using a compiler pass.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/18 11:55:11 -0700
We already have such a case with translator and translator.real. I will review the existing services to see where it makes sense to implement the same strategy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/18 12:20:55 -0700
I guess you'd do it anyway, but we should pick a winner between .real and .default
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/07/18 12:26:52 -0700
I would prefer ".default" as ".real" always confused me.
The current implementation is not ready for inclusion in 2.0. It has several
known problems (security, not possible to disable it, not "cloud-compatible",
...) and it's not a must have feature anyway.
Some references:
* Security issue in FileType: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1001
* Validation fails on file, still stored in TemporaryStorage: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/908
* Add a size argument & ability to configure TemporaryStorage: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/748
This feature should be reworked and discussed for inclusion in 2.1.
Here are the new simplified rules:
* Required cache warmers are *always* executed when the Kernel boots for the first time;
* Optional cache warmers are *only* executed from the CLI via cache:warmup
These new rules means that all the configuration settings for the cache
warmers have been removed. So, if you want the best performance, remember to
warmup the cache when going to production.
This also fixed quite a few bugs.
The main benefit is that in XML/YML files we have common syntax (i.e. core.controller, form.pre_bind) that properly namespaces event names (before: onCoreController was ok, preBind was not).
On the other hand in PHP land we also have namespaced events, CoreEvents::controller, FormEvents::preBind, before it was Events::onCoreController, Events::onPreBind, we now have more context.
Running it before other onCoreResponse listeners avoids seeing them
as called listeners in the event panel. The priority is set to -100
because it has to be called before the WebProfilerListener (-128) so
that the token is set.
This feature added complexity to the framework but wasn't used in the core anyway.
You can still use the Map class loader in your application though. But most of the time, using the APC
autoloader is just better.
* bschussek/form-extensions:
[Form] Refactored code from CoreExtension to new ValidatorExtension
[Form] Added FormTypeExtensionInterface
[Form] Reorganized code into "form extensions"
