While Definition::getArgument() could be used to fetch replaced values, it relied upon bad comparison logic (e.g. "index_1" > 1). Additionally, storing original arguments and replacements in the same array makes Definition::getArguments()'s bounds check unreliable. A single argument and its replacement would count twice, allowing getArgument(2) to pass the bounds check and result in an array index error.
With this new method, fetching of replacement arguments is more straightforward and bounds checking functions as it should.
Commits
-------
fee217f Update tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Process/ProcessTest.php
d58e682 GH-2287 - Skip Process:processTest on Windows due to PHP bug #60120
Discussion
----------
[Process] Test with pipes hang on windows
Rebased onto 2.0
Commits
-------
d3f137b cosmetic tweak
2877883 anything in front of ;q= is part of the mime type, anything after may be ignored
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] fix splitHttpAcceptHeader() parsing of parameters
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
anything in front of ;q= is part of the mime type, anything after may be ignored
see http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/09 04:00:12 -0700
i must admit .. i am not 100% that my implemention is correct either .. but i am sure the current one isn't.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/10/09 07:57:33 -0700
@fabpot: I am also not sure if getFormat() should optionally not support matching parameters, aka anything before ``;q=..``
Commits
-------
205f524 [Tests] Skip MimeTypeTest if running as root
d3e9104 [Tests] Skip Routing annotation tests when Doctrine is not available.
Discussion
----------
[Tests] Fix tests when some vendor is not available.
Commits
-------
95049ef [Form] Added type check to `ScalarToChoiceTransformer`
Discussion
----------
[2.0][Form] Added type check to ScalarToChoiceTransformer
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Commits
-------
18a83c6 [Form] Simplified a bit `FormUtil` and extended test coverage
Discussion
----------
[2.0][Form] Simplified a bit `FormUtil` and extended test coverage
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Commits
-------
777f876 [HttpFoundation] Added test that exposes error in session saving
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Added test that exposes error in session saving
Noticed this commit in the recent release:
https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/34a1b53
And noticed that the save in __destruct won't be fired if a manual save has been called. The testSavedOnDestructAfterManualSave test I've added fails on 2.0.1 but it passes with 2.0.0. An example:
$session->set('foo', 'value');
$session->__destruct(); // eventually called during shutdown, triggers a save
// During next request, $session->get('foo') returns 'value'
$session->set('foo', 'value');
$session->save();
$session->set('foo', 'newvalue');
$session->__destruct(); // eventually called during shutdown, however WON'T trigger save
// During next request, $session->get('foo') returns 'value'
In my eyes the save on destruction should still happen whether a save has been called manually or not - it's more predictable. But i can see arguments for the opposite as well.
If consensus is that this is a bug, I'm happy to provide a fix but wanted to get feedback on the 2 options:
* Save optimisation can be reverted
* Can make the save optimisation more intelligent so a write to storage is only done if something has changed. The best way to do this would be to close down the api and mark the session as invalid when an attribute is set for example, however all properties are currently protected and would need to be private, so it might break some people's extensions of session
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 02:13:52 -0700
@fabpot what about it ?
