Commits
-------
e9d2a67 CS
3a64b08 Search in others user providers when a user is not found in the first user provider and throws the right exception.
Discussion
----------
Chain user provider doesn't search in all user providers
I commit these changes because Chain user provider doesn't search in all user providers.
Example with the Acme/DemoBundle:
// security.yml
...
providers:
chain_provider:
providers: [in_memory, in_memory_extend]
in_memory_extend:
users:
admin2: { password: adminpass2, roles: [ 'ROLE_ADMIN' ] }
in_memory:
users:
user: { password: userpass, roles: [ 'ROLE_USER' ] }
...
firewalls:
...
secured_area:
pattern: ^/demo/secured/
provider: chain_provider OR in_memory_extend
...
We can see these logs :
security.INFO: User "admin2" has been authenticated successfully [] []
security.DEBUG: Write SecurityContext in the session [] []
security.DEBUG: Read SecurityContext from the session [] []
security.DEBUG: Reloading user from user provider. [] []
security.WARNING: Username "admin2" could not be found. [] []
The new code search in others user providers when a user is not found in the first user provider and throws the right exception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/08/14 12:20:04 -0700
I wonder if it should be a provider option to continue on a failed user lookup. I can see cases where you really dont want to iterate over all providers and others where you do.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/14 17:27:16 -0700
If someone need a provider like you describe, he can create one.
Here we talk about a chain user provider.
Doc : [using-multiple-user-providers](http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/security.html#using-multiple-user-providers)
We can read in the doc: "The chain_provider will, in turn, try to load the user from both the in_memory and user_db providers."
But its not the case right now.
Commits
-------
09c41d3 [Security] Fixed incorrect merge of two modifications (53f5c23c and 85199677) to AclVoter
Discussion
----------
[Security] Fixed incorrect merge of two modifications to AclVoter
It seems two modifications to `AclVoter` (53f5c23c and 85199677) have been merged incorrectly, leading to a method call on an object that is known to be `null` and a fatal error when running the tests
Commits
-------
eae6a77 fixed wrong case
d0a175bfixes#1659f300ede fixes several bugs
a4f05ac added some tests
Discussion
----------
Http util fixes
Fixes several bugs in the http utils.
Please don't add anymore features without sufficient tests. Especially for the Security\Http namespace, regressions are very likely otherwise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/19 22:37:26 -0700
Tests do not pass for me:
There were 2 errors:
1) Symfony\Bundle\SecurityBundle\Tests\Functional\LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testLoginLogoutProcedure with data set #0 ('en')
InvalidArgumentException: The current node list is empty.
.../src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Crawler.php:604
.../src/Symfony/Bundle/SecurityBundle/Tests/Functional/LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest.php:16
2) Symfony\Bundle\SecurityBundle\Tests\Functional\LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testLoginLogoutProcedure with data set #1 ('de')
InvalidArgumentException: The current node list is empty.
.../src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Crawler.php:604
.../src/Symfony/Bundle/SecurityBundle/Tests/Functional/LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest.php:16
--
There were 4 failures:
1) Symfony\Bundle\SecurityBundle\Tests\Functional\LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testAccessRestrictedResource with data set #0 ('en')
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
-http://localhost/en/login
+http://localhost/login
.../src/Symfony/Bundle/Securitybundle/Tests/Functional/WebTestCase.php:22
.../src/Symfony/Bundle/SecurityBundle/Tests/Functional/LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest.php:38
2) Symfony\Bundle\SecurityBundle\Tests\Functional\LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testAccessRestrictedResource with data set #1 ('de')
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
-http://localhost/de/login
+http://localhost/login
.../src/Symfony/Bundle/Securitybundle/Tests/Functional/WebTestCase.php:22
.../src/Symfony/Bundle/SecurityBundle/Tests/Functional/LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest.php:38
3) Symfony\Bundle\SecurityBundle\Tests\Functional\LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testAccessRestrictedResourceWithForward with data set #0 ('en')
HTTP/1.0 302 Found
Cache-Control: no-cache
Content-Length: 299
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:36:27 GMT
Location: http://localhost/login
Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=11c9c6a7e7620e13bddef223a5ba46d9; path=/; domain=
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1;url=http://localhost/login" />
</head>
<body>
Redirecting to <a href="http://localhost/login">http://localhost/login</a>.
</body>
</html>
Failed asserting that <integer:0> matches expected <integer:1>.
.../src/Symfony/Bundle/SecurityBundle/Tests/Functional/LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest.php:50
4) Symfony\Bundle\SecurityBundle\Tests\Functional\LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testAccessRestrictedResourceWithForward with data set #1 ('de')
HTTP/1.0 302 Found
Cache-Control: no-cache
Content-Length: 299
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:36:28 GMT
Location: http://localhost/login
Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=2bbe63786a088471ade3717917f4ba4f; path=/; domain=
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1;url=http://localhost/login" />
</head>
<body>
Redirecting to <a href="http://localhost/login">http://localhost/login</a>.
</body>
</html>
Failed asserting that <integer:0> matches expected <integer:1>.
.../src/Symfony/Bundle/SecurityBundle/Tests/Functional/LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest.php:50
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/19 23:47:29 -0700
I fixed a wrong case, but I couldn't reproduce the other errors (tested on Ubuntu).
My guess is that the temporary directory on your machine couldn't be deleted for some reason, and the test runs with the configuration of some of the previous tests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/20 00:28:41 -0700
That does not make any difference for me. For instance, in `LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testLoginLogoutProcedure()`, the first request to `'/'.$locale.'/login'` returns the following Response:
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1;url=http://localhost/login" />
</head>
<body>
Redirecting to <a href="http://localhost/login">http://localhost/login</a>.
</body>
</html>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/20 00:31:34 -0700
That's weird, did you make sure that the temporary directory does not exist?
``rm -Rf /tmp/StandardFormLogin/``
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, fabpot <
reply@reply.github.com>wrote:
> That does not make any difference for me. For instance, in
> `LocalizedRoutesAsPathTest::testLoginLogoutProcedure()`, the first request
> to `'/'.$locale.'/login'` returns the following Response:
>
> <html>
> <head>
> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
> charset=utf-8" />
> <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1;url=
> http://localhost/login" />
> </head>
> <body>
> Redirecting to <a href="http://localhost/login">
> http://localhost/login</a>.
> </body>
> </html>
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1739#issuecomment-1613504
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/20 00:33:40 -0700
Yes, I've just checked and the directory does not exist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/20 00:39:55 -0700
Sorry, I can't reproduce it on Ubuntu and unless someone wants to sponsor me a Mac, there is not much I can do.
Upon unserialize of the acl, the acl is currently set to the id field which should be a string. Currently it passes the acl object into the id field which causes the following error.
Warning: Illegal offset type in isset or empty in Symfony/Component/Security/Acl/Dbal/AclProvider.php line 404
Commits
-------
29e4063 [Security] changed order of checks to check for more specific things first
Discussion
----------
[Security] changed order of checks
Commits
-------
26ff05bfixes#1538
Discussion
----------
fixes#1538
Constructor of Symfony\Component\Security\Acl\Domain\RoleSecurityIdentity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
currently it check if the argument is instance of Symfony\Component\Security\Core\Role\Role by
``if ($role instanceof Role)``
Maybe it should be changed to
``if ($role instanceof RoleInterface)``
Because if we use another Role class which implements RoleInterface
it dosen't work when we check access, it will throw a *NoAceFoundException* when vote
Commits
-------
164aea4 [Security] Add tests for the channel listener
d51cbc0 [Security] Remove useless attribute in basic authentication listener & test it
91e6dc9 [Security] Add tests for the anonymous authentication listener
3c2affb [Security] Update access listener constructor's prototype and add tests
81afd77 [Security] Add tests for the firewall map
aa6ae33 [Security] Remove useless attribute & var in firewall
Discussion
----------
Test security
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/06/29 13:41:07 -0700
@schmittjoh is probably the person to review this change ..
This change removes the need for the {_locale} hack.
Now, all paths in the Security component can be:
* An absolute path (/login)
* An absolute URL (http://symfony.com/login)
* A route name (login)
So, if you want to use a path that includes a global parameter (like _locale),
use a route instead of a path.
Commits
-------
cdf4b6a Checked log levels
a45d3ee Reverted last commit
529381b ControllerNotFound: Changed log level from info to error. Also moved throw exception code block up, to prevent the message from beeing logged multiple times.
7c29e88 Changed log level of "Matched route ..." message from info to debug
dca09fd Changed log level of "Using Controller ..." message from info to debug
Discussion
----------
Log levels
Just wanted to ask if the log level INFO is still correct for these messages?
As there are only four log levels left (DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR), DEBUG might be the more appropriate level for these messages now.
Let me give an example: An application is logging user actions (maybe to database) in order to assure comprehensibility, e. g. "User %s deleted post %d", "User %s written a message to user %s". These are not warnings of course, so the only suitable log level is INFO.
But they will be thrown together with these very common (at least two per request?) "Using controller..." and "Matched route..." messages when choosing INFO as log level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/05/24 07:13:18 -0700
Agreed, this stuff is framework debug information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/05/24 08:53:24 -0700
Why do you want to change these two specific ones? The framework uses the INFO level at other places too. Is it a good idea to say that the framework only logs with DEBUG?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/05/24 09:12:53 -0700
Doctrine logs at the INFO level too and I think it is useful to keep it as INFO. Being able to see the queries without having all DEBUG messages of the event dispatcher and security components is useful IMO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/05/25 02:30:24 -0700
Yeah, that's true, maybe we just need to reintroduce (again, meh:) NOTICE between INFO and WARNING.
@kaiwa Of course the other way could be that you just add your DB handler to the app logger stack. That could be done in a onCoreRequest listener or such, basically you'd have to call `->pushHandler($yourDBHandler)` on the `monolog.logger.app` service. That way your messages will flow to it, but it won't receive noise from the framework stuff since those log on monolog.logger.request and other log channels.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/05/25 02:48:26 -0700
@Seldaek: I don't think we need another level. We just need to come up with a standard rules about the usage of each level. Adapted from log4j:
* ERROR: Other runtime errors or unexpected conditions.
* WARN: Use of deprecated APIs, poor use of API, 'almost' errors, other runtime that are undesirable or unexpected, but not necessarily "wrong" (unable to write to the profiler DB, ).
* INFO: Interesting runtime events (security infos like the fact the user is logged-in or not, SQL logs, ...).
* DEBUG: Detailed information on the flow through the system (route match, security flow infos like the fact that a token was found or that remember-me cookie is found, ...).
What do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/05/25 02:53:38 -0700
+1 for this standard (also this PR can be merged then), but we should review code for other "wrong" log levels usage (if everyone accept this standard)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/05/25 02:55:07 -0700
I won't merge this PR before all occurrences of the logger calls have been reviewed carefully and changed to the right level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/05/25 02:58:44 -0700
@fabpot: Just noticed these two occurring for every request in my log file. You are right, there are other places where this changes must be applied if we will change the log level.
@stof: Hmm, i see. It is not possible to set the logger separately for each bundle, is it? That maybe would solve the problem. If somebody is interested in seeing the queries, he could set the log handler level to DEBUG for doctrine bundle, but still use INFO for the framwork itself. Plus he could even define a different output file or a completely different handler.
I'm not sure if something like that is possible already (?) or realizable at all... just came into my mind.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/05/25 03:01:07 -0700
Just FYI, from Monolog\Logger (which has CRITICAL and ALERT):
* Debug messages
const DEBUG = 100;
* Messages you usually don't want to see
const INFO = 200;
* Exceptional occurences that are not errors
* This is typically the logging level you want to use
const WARNING = 300;
* Errors
const ERROR = 400;
* Critical conditions (component unavailable, etc.)
const CRITICAL = 500;
* Action must be taken immediately (entire service down)
* Should trigger alert by sms, email, etc.
const ALERT = 550;
The values kind of match http error codes too, 4xx are expected errors that are not really important (404s etc) and 5xx are server errors that you'd better fix ASAP. I'm ok with the descriptions, but I think alert and critical should be included too. I'll probably update Monolog docblocks to match whatever ends up in the docs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/05/25 03:03:21 -0700
@kaiwa you can do a lot, but not from the default monolog configuration entry, I'm not sure if we can really make that fully configurable without having a giant config mess. Please refer to my [comment above](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1073#issuecomment-1234316) to see how you could solve it. Maybe @fabpot has an idea how to make this more usable though.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/05/25 03:19:43 -0700
@Seldaek the issue is that the different logging channels are only know in the compiler pass, not in the DI extension. So changing the level in the extension is really hard IMO.
Thus, the handlers are shared between the different logging channels (needed to open the log file only once for instance, or to send a single mail instead of one per channel) and the level is handled in the handlers, not the logger.
I'm +1 for the standard, by adding the distinction between 400 and 500 status calls using ERROR and CRITICAL (which is already the case in the code).
@kaiwa do you have time to review the calls to the logger between DEBUG and INFO or do you prefer I do it ? For instance, the Security component currently logs all message at DEBUG level and some of them should be INFO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/05/25 04:31:04 -0700
@stof ok i'll do that
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/05/25 12:22:51 -0700
Need some help :) I came across `ControllerNameParser::handleControllerNotFoundException()` which leads to redundant log messages currently:
>[2011-05-25 20:53:16] request.INFO: Unable to find controller "AppBaseBundle:Blog" - class "App\BaseBundle\Controller\BlogController" does not exist.
>[2011-05-25 20:53:16] request.ERROR: InvalidArgumentException: Unable to find controller "AppBaseBundle:Blog" - class "App\BaseBundle\Controller\BlogController" does not exist. (uncaught exception) at /home/ruth/symfony3/src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Controller/ControllerNameParser.php line 87
Is it necessary to call `$this->logger->info($log);` if the InvalidArgumentException will be logged anyway?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/05/25 12:39:22 -0700
Well, the issue is that the ControllerNameParser logs messages and then uses them to throw an exception. I guess the logging call should be removed as it is redundant with the one of the ExceptionListener. @fabpot thoughts ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/05/27 11:39:25 -0700
I checked all debug, info and log calls. Sometimes it is hard to distinguish between the levels, so it would be great if someone reviews @cdf4b6a. @stof, maybe you want to take a look?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/05/31 12:52:07 -0700
@stof, thanks for your comments. I added some replies above, please let me know your suggestions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/05/31 14:04:22 -0700
@kaiwa As I said before, all the security logging calls should be DEBUG (most of them) or INFO (the one syaing that authentication succeeded for instance), but not WARN or ERROR as the exception don't go outside the firewall.
