Commits
-------
d08a688 [Form] Fixed CS
954bdb5 [Form] Updated DateTimeType to accept a custom date pattern for the DateType child * Added a test also about this change
e7e744f [Form] Synced changes in this branch with current Symfony master branch
436cb95 [Form] Changed to a CreateException when the 'format' option is invalid * Updated DateTypeTest also
0045ffe [Form] Added tests to check that the date format option is validated correctly * Format option must be either a IntlDateFormatter constants (FULL, LONG, MEDIUM, SHORT) or a string
a815232 [Form] The IntlDateFormatter pattern can now be passed via the format option * Also changed the default value of the calendar paramter to \IntlDateFormatter:GREGORIAN in DateTimeToLocalizedStringTransformer which is the same as the default value in StubIntlDateFormatter
58f869a [Form] Synced custom pattern tests with master branch
c20edde [Form] Added some tests * Tests to check if the pattern option is handled correctly by DateType * Tests to check if the pattern parameter is handled correctly by DateTimeToLocalizedStringTransformer
52a1e1d moved date_pattern to IntlDateFormatter
dd104bc added code to use custom date_pattern
Discussion
----------
[Form] Added code to use custom date_pattern
Current DateType doesn't make use of the `date_pattern` option. Added code to use the custom `date_pattern` if provided.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/02 21:52:37 -0700
You should also pass the pattern option to the DateTimeToLocalizedStringTransformer so the pattern is taken in consideration when converting from and to localized string. You can check the commit I did on my repository (maoueh/symfony@01ae75dd84) which do the same as yours for the DateType but also includes the modification needed by the DateTimeToLocalizedStringTransformer class.
Not sure if there is more work needed to fully support the pattern option. Moreover, I did not run the tests to check if everything pass correctly. It would also be a good idea to add some tests to check that the date_pattern is working as expected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/02 22:02:14 -0700
There is also a problem with the regex, but this is not regarding the pattern option. If you set the 'format' option to 0, it returns the IntlDateFormatter::FULL but it does not pass the regex because there is first EEEE in the standard pattern so it comes on the fallback pattern year month day
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kertz at 2011/05/02 23:36:05 -0700
Thanks for your suggestions @maoueh and @dot-i-fy, I will check them.
I found the `date_pattern` doesn't work when using text widget. I will try to fix this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/03 00:02:45 -0700
Here the regex I use now and working with IntlDateFormatter::FULL
https://gist.github.com/952929
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/03 07:13:01 -0700
@kertz: It is working for me using the text widget on my development machine. Don't know what is the problem on our side but it is working correctly for me. I'm willing to help track this problem if you want. Just let me know.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/03 07:57:34 -0700
@kertz : It is also working for me, we just have to pay attention about the format to be used in the text input regarding IntlDateFormatter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kertz at 2011/05/03 11:15:23 -0700
Ah well I guess I screwed up the whole commit log!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/03 11:19:08 -0700
wow !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/03 11:23:51 -0700
Hell yeah! :) You should do a rebase the next time instead of merging Symfony master branch into yours:
`git rebase symfony/master date_pattern` and when you need to push your changes to your repository, do `git push -f origin date_pattern`. This way, it will be easier for the core team to handle the merge process.
Since @dot-i-fy opened a pull request for fixing the same issue as here, maybe it would be a good idea to close this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kertz at 2011/05/03 11:33:34 -0700
Well, it's done. I just pushed it a little earlier that I should have! Well I didn't know that @dot-i-fy opened a PR, where is it? This patch currently works for me.
Regarding the change in regex, well I think it should also have a ChoiceList for week days, otherwise it's not useful. Probably that alone can be a separate PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/03 11:46:09 -0700
Yep it is much better now :) I think it would be a good idea to remove this commit from your PR kertz/symfony@e47cfb6d49.
The other PR is [PR751](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/751). Maybe @dot-i-fy could change is PR so it will only be about the regex? In both cases, you should coordinate with each other I think.
Thanks for merging the changes I made to the DateTimeToLocalizedStringTransformer class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/03 12:00:06 -0700
Yeah, I will modify my commit to take only the regex in account.
Would someone work with me on the TimeType ? The pattern is also not working there but it looks like a little bit more complicated!
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kertz at 2011/05/03 12:02:18 -0700
Thanks for the changes in DateTimeToLocalizedStringTransformer.
Is it really necessary to remove the initial commit?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/03 12:06:41 -0700
What does it mean CS ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/03 12:08:44 -0700
@dot-i-fy: It means Code Style, the comma is not placed correctly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kertz at 2011/05/03 12:11:24 -0700
`Coding Standards` seems right :) http://symfony.com/doc/2.0/contributing/code/standards.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/03 12:11:27 -0700
ah ok, thx
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/03 12:12:10 -0700
@kertz: I don't think it is strictly necessary to remove this commit. But I think it is a good idea since you kinda reverted it with some changes in a later commit. The core team might ask you to remove it. So leave it for now, and change it if they ask you to do so.
Hehe right, Coding Standards looks way better :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/03 12:30:00 -0700
@dot-i-fy: I will check later in the evening what can be done about the pattern in the TimeType class. I'm also planning on adding some tests about this PR. If I do so, I will send a PR to your repository @kertz so you will be able to add the tests to this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/03 13:04:35 -0700
I had some problems with PHPUnit, seems to be ok now. Another problem, damned, APC is showing in my browser when in app_dev.php, not in prod. Any idea ? Can't get html output in dev env.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/04 00:43:46 -0700
@RapotOR : Are you talking about the dateType method in IntlDateFormatter ? If no can you make a snippet in gist with an example ?
If yes ...The option "format" already allows an IntlDateFormatter input, you can either set a \IntlDateFormatter::MEDIUM for example or an integer representing the dateType to use (0 -> full, 1 -> long, ... ).
The problem we are reveling here is the pattern based off the dateFormat option :
the $formatter look for Locale -> then for format option and based off these options he generate a pattern who can be different regarding the Locale. For example, for me I have my locale in php set to fr_BE, so my dates are always d-m-Y formatted but if I want to modify that it is momently not possible.
Grtz
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by RapotOR at 2011/05/04 00:57:03 -0700
@dot-i-fy : my thought was more about having a full control of IntlDateFormatter from outside; instead of defining every variables. It is more like a DI way... especially if you have more than one DateType field!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/04 01:11:21 -0700
Oh so, it may be indeed a nice way to follow. Don't hesitate to submit your code suggestions.
But I think that if we go deeper in the core modifications, it is maybe a solution to take the $formatter out of the dateType class and put it in a own class and call it from the dateType class ???@}#
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/05 08:22:40 -0700
@mweimerskirch: Maybe it would be better to rename your option html_pattern? Since the pattern is not strictly associated to a date type, it would be a better name in my opinion if it was named html_pattern or html5_pattern?
I think it would lead to more misunderstandings if we had a date_pattern and a pattern option. In both cases, I agree totally that one or the other needs a renaming. Moreover, if we change the pattern option in the date type, I think the format option should be changed also to date_format.
What do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kertz at 2011/05/05 23:58:21 -0700
@mweimerskirch
I too think when we specify `pattern` in `DateType` everyone expects it to be the date pattern. So maybe renaming the HTML5 pattern to `html_pattern` would be more appropriate?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2011/05/18 12:20:56 -0700
Looks good. Why don't we reuse the "format" option for this? If "format" is not one of the predefined constants, we could treat it as a custom date format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/18 12:28:22 -0700
@bschussek: I think it is a good idea indeed. When I first played with forms, I thought that the purpose of the format option was exactly for this but I soon realized it wasn't. I'm +1 for this.
@kertz: Let me know if you don't have time to do this switch, I will gladly submit the changes to you own repo if we agree to use "format" option instead of the "pattern" one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/18 12:33:33 -0700
``format`` and ``pattern`` options are related to the IntlDateFormatter, I also agree with you but we have to keep in mind that we will loose the symmetry with the IntlDateFormatter class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2011/05/18 13:39:07 -0700
I think we can safely add this level of abstraction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kertz at 2011/05/18 20:29:11 -0700
@maoueh Would be great if you can make the changes :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/19 09:09:41 -0700
@bschussek : I saw you removed pattern option, what are further intentions ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/19 09:42:40 -0700
@kertz: I will do the changes needed tomorrow as I have some spare times. You will need to sync your branch with current master or I will need to send another PR since @bschussek removed the pattern option which will cause bad conflicts with this implementation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kertz at 2011/05/20 06:45:22 -0700
@maoueh I've merged the changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kertz at 2011/05/20 07:11:36 -0700
@maoueh I just removed a couple of commits from the log. Seems like the tests you committed are now missing from the PR. Can you please send the tests once again? Sorry about that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/20 09:03:52 -0700
@kertz: I will resend them along with the code modifications to use `format` instead of `pattern`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/05/20 19:11:28 -0700
I did the changes to make it possible to pass a custom pattern via the format option. I sent a PR on @kertz repository [here](https://github.com/kertz/symfony/pull/2) that will be merge eventually in this PR.
I have two small questions about it. First, since format option can now be a string, the allowed values for the option `format` have been removed from the array returned by `getAllowedOptionValues`. The check is done instead in the method `buildForm` directly. The 'format' option can be either one of the `IntlDateFormatter` constants (FULL, LONG, MEDIUM, or SHORT) or a string. If those conditions are not respected, a `FormException` is thrown. Is this correct?
When the `format` option is a custom pattern, the IntlDateFormatter needs a valid format even if it will not be used. So I retrieved the default format option by using the `getDefaultOptions` method. Is this correct or should I specify the default value directly:
this (specify directly):
$format = \IntlDateFormatter::MEDIUM;
instead of (use predefined defaults):
$defaultOptions = $this->getDefaultOptions($options);
$format = $defaultOptions['format'];
Also added more tests to verify that the format option is validated correctly and updated previous ones.
Regards,
Matt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kertz at 2011/05/20 20:38:32 -0700
Merged the changes. I have not tested this yet... Thanks @maoueh :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dot-i-fy at 2011/05/20 22:48:47 -0700
nice job @maoueh
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mprizmic at 2011/06/16 14:06:47 -0700
what do you think about
$pattern = $form->getAttribute('pattern');
instead of
$pattern = $form->getAttribute('formatter')->getPattern();
in line 96 of
symfony/component/form/extension/core/type/datetype.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by maoueh at 2011/06/16 14:40:37 -0700
It is simpler to use the pattern of the formatter directly I think. The reason is that if the option to change the format is null, the default pattern of the formatter will be available and will be the right pattern to use. If the option is set, we modify the formatter before hand so getting the pattern from it will return the custom pattern we have set in the options.
So in both cases, no conditional is required to verify if it is set or not when retrieving the pattern from the formatter. Moreover, I think the pattern must be set as an attribute of the form for your suggestion to work correctly which is not the case right now.
Regards,
Matt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/05 13:41:36 -0700
@fabpot What we do with that ? I have tried to rebase it with master, but my (Windows) git always gets insane and this ends up with unfixable error. This feature __should__ be in Symfony2 before final. Should I start work on it from "none" ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/06 05:44:26 -0700
@stloyd: I need to review the patch first.
The guesser has been removed as the constraints only knows
about the valid keys. But to be able to create the Type automatically,
we also need the values.
Commits
-------
4c6e177 [Form] Fix the default validator
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fix the default validator
When php.ini has an empty value for post_max_size
`post_max_size =`
see http://fr2.php.net/manual/en/function.ini-get.php
post_max_size can not be false as it has a default value
Commits
-------
3917ed7 Revert "* DateType, DateTimeType, TimeType: - a bit changed readability"
c85b815 Fixed few issues with Date and Time:
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed few issues with Date and Time
Fixed few issues with Date and Time:
* TimeType:
- seconds are no longer populated if "with_seconds" = false
- "widget = text" is now properly rendered (closes#1480)
* DateTimeToStringTransformer:
- fixed using not default "format" (probably fix#1183)
* DateType, DateTimeType, TimeType:
- fixed "input = datetime" and test covered
Commits
-------
2af2260 Remove useless code
Discussion
----------
Remove useless code
This PR is about removing useless code which could benefit to perfomances.
Credits go to [Jordi](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/000229dbd0d161f1eebe) for this.
As a minor modif, I can understand if this could not be merged while in RC.
* TimeType:
- seconds are no longer populated if "with_seconds" = false
- "widget = text" is now properly rendered (closes#1480)
* DateTimeToStringTransformer:
- fixed using not default "format" (probably fix#1183)
* DateType, DateTimeType, TimeType:
- fixed "input = datetime" and test covered
- a bit changed readability
Commits
-------
4e3406d Sync with master and clean up
ad5d2c1 Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to DateType option) (issue #1205) Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
Discussion
----------
[Form][TimeType] Added possibility to render form as "single_text"
Added to `TimeType` extension possibility to render form as `single_text` (similar to `DateType` option) (issue #1205)
Adjusted `DateTimeType` to allow usage of this new feature
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ouardisoft at 2011/06/17 03:41:18 -0700
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/21 01:05:51 -0700
@fabpot Any decision about this one ? I'm asking because I also have similar fix for #1323 but it requires this one ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/22 23:32:08 -0700
@stloyd: Can you rebase to master?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/23 05:03:44 -0700
@fabpot Done.
Commits
-------
e8326aa Renamed attributes to attr to be consistent with templating.
c707467 Added support for additional attributes in Form types that list field as their parent.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Added support for additional attributes
Added support for additional attributes in Form types that list field as their parent.
This is needed particularity for html5 data and data- attributes support, unfortunately $options['data'] is already taken, so adding a general $options['attributes'] is the easiest solution without breaking BC.
Now I know that this will be tempting for some to stuck style and class attributes here also, but I'd rather not restrict the keys that are passed in.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/05/22 14:51:02 -0700
Maybe it should be called attr for consistency with the template stuff, or the other should be renamed attributes. Other than that, I'm +1, data-* attributes are awesome, and abusers will find ways to abuse things either way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/05/22 21:48:01 -0700
Naming it attr also crossed my mind when I was signing off yesterday.
Along with the possibility to go the way xml attributes are handled when node is converted to/from array.
So every option with @ prefix would automatically become html attribute. However going the latter path, it'd be harder to implement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/13 07:43:52 -0700
Can you give an example of a real-world use case? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/06/13 07:54:51 -0700
You can use `array('attr' => array('data-foo' => 'bar'))`, which will output `data-foo="bar"`, which can be read easily by jQuery for example as `$('el').data('foo')`. It's a standard compliant and elegant way to pass extra data needed by the JS code along with DOM nodes, without polluting everything with script tags and all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/13 08:01:08 -0700
@Seldaek: I understand that. But why not doing this in the template?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/06/13 08:04:10 -0700
Well, I agree it most likely belongs in the template, but it's kind of data stuff that is not directly impacting the display rules of the element, so in some cases having the possibility to set that from the php code might be useful. Anyway I'll let @mvrhov answer maybe he had a more concrete use case. I just think it's nice to leave the door open, but I don't really need it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/06/13 10:27:03 -0700
A bit late to the party. Ok, here is my use-case.
I have a pretty large form where part of the data is of tabular form. The number of rows is almost every time a lot larger than the number of columns
So I can either output a lot of text inputs filled with data and make already a large form intimidating. Or I can use a grid that supports editing. So I serialize that tabular data as json and put it as a value into one hidden field. Somehow I also have to get the column definitions to that grid. I decided to I serialize it and put it inside data-* attribute. Putting it into another hidden field doesn't make sense as when data is submitted back I don't need the column definitions as only the number of rows changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/13 10:44:58 -0700
@mvrhov: ok, but what prevents you from doing this in the template directly?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/06/13 11:22:53 -0700
I have to get it into the view somehow. What I'd really not like to do is, iterate through that data in a controller and then pass it as another template variable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/14 00:10:22 -0700
But the controller is where you prepare the data that you want to send to the view. Without any concrete example, I'm going to close this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/06/14 01:21:10 -0700
IMHO this has to go out through form as this is the part of the form also I do have a very slim controllers in this case 10 LOC, where half of them is just setting up an view data..
Nonetheless I went looking again very closely at the AbstractType and I do have buildView function available which I can override and set the column data I need there, and then provide custom view for that, so at least from this part this is an non issue.
With this PR all default form attributes can be set from outside and when searching for a good use-case I have found out that @henrikbjorn has implemented this via extensions [1], maybe he has a good use-case for this.
[1] - https://github.com/Comways/ComwaysFormExtraBundle/blob/master/Form/Extension/FieldTypeExtension.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/06/14 01:48:53 -0700
Convenience is the only use case
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/06/14 02:08:09 -0700
@fabpot The issue is that passing it from the controller as another template variable makes it really hard when you use the type twice with different values. Passing them from the form would be the easiest way
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by shuogawa at 2011/06/14 19:37:50 -0700
hello. thanks for great form library.
I want to support two ways to display additional attributes for form elements.
1) control in template like
{{ form_row(form.name, { 'width': '30' }) }}
2) control from php
$builder->add('name', 'text', array('attr'=>array('width'=>'30')));
If form elements configure by end user like cms,
and form elements dynamically change.
The second method is useful.
template designer can write {{form_row(form)}}
but
template designer can not write {{form_row(form.name), { 'width': '30' }}}
Thank you
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/14 23:01:18 -0700
@shuogawa: That's what I fear. Setting the `width` or any other attribute in PHP is wrong. This belongs to the templates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/06/15 00:09:05 -0700
@fabpot Then maybe just restrict allowed tags to `data-*` and don't use `attr` but some other not confusing name ? Just like we do with i.e. `maxlength`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/15 04:44:25 -0700
I'm going to merge it as a "convenience" tool, but the documentation should clearly state that the only usage should be for `data-*` attributes.
Commits
-------
07fa82d [Form] Revert changes impacting perfomance and readability
b709551 [Order] Make Form::types and FormView::types use the same order (Parent > Child)
e56dad6 [Form] simplify the code
bdd755e [Form] Fix the exception message when no block is found
c68c511 [Form] Make theming form prototypes consistent (start by looking for a '_<id>_<section>' block)
9ec9960 [Form] Simplify the code
4e3e276 [Form] Make the prototype view child of the collection view
Discussion
----------
[Form] Make the prototype view child of the collection view
This PR should be a base for discussion.
The [current implementation](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1188) has some drawbacks because the prototype view is not a child of the collection view:
* The 'multipart' attribute is not propagated from the prototype to the collection,
* The prototype view do not use the theme from the collection.
Those 2 points are fixed by the proposed implementation and one more benefit is that the template markup might be easier to work with:
before:
```html
<div id="form_emails">
<div>
<label for="form_emails_0">0</label>
<input type="email" id="form_emails_0" name="form[emails][0]" value="a@b.com">
</div>
<script type="text/html" id="form_emails_prototype">
<div>
<label for="$$name$$">$$name$$</label>
<input type="email" id="$$name$$" name="$$name$$" value="" />
</div>
</script>
</div>
```
after:
```html
<div id="form_emails">
<div>
<label for="form_emails_0">0</label>
<input type="email" id="form_emails_0" name="form[emails][0]" value="a@b.com">
</div>
<script type="text/html" id="form_emails_prototype">
<div>
<label for="form_emails_$$name$$">$$name$$</label>
<input type="email" id="form_emails_$$name$$" name="form[emails][$$name$$]" value="" />
</div>
</script>
</div>
```
@kriswallsmith I'd like to get your feedback on this PR. thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/06/14 07:01:01 -0700
@fabpot any ETA about merging it ? Using the prototype currently is a pain to build the name. The change makes it far easier
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/14 07:09:46 -0700
The templates are much better but I'm a bit concerned that we need to add the logic into the Form class directly. That looks quite ugly. If there is no other way, I will merge it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 07:14:32 -0700
I have found no better way... I am testing some minor tweaks I want to submit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 07:34:25 -0700
I'm not happy with the code in Form.php either... would creating a PrototypeType accomplish the same thing?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 07:42:07 -0700
@kriswallsmith tried and dismissed, the id and name are bad & you have to go for `render_widget(form.get('proto'))` in the template. That should be fixeable but not any better.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 07:45:21 -0700
What do you mean the id and name are bad? If we have a distinct type for the prototype, can't we do whatever we want using buildView() and the template?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 07:53:31 -0700
@kriswallsmith the id would be smthg like `form_emails_$$name$$_prototype` but yes we should be able to do whatever we want but the code might end up being more complex.
I am done with the tweaks but still open to feedback on this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:08:21 -0700
Yes, that is the type of name I would expect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:08:33 -0700
Oops -- I mean id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:09:42 -0700
Maybe I'm confused what id you're referring to. I'll try to spend some time on this today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 08:23:56 -0700
That should be the id of the `<input>`, the id of the script would be `form_emails_$$name$$_prototype_prototype` (if prototype is the name of the nested node).
I am trying to setup a branch with my code (playing with git & netbeans local history)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/14 08:46:25 -0700
@kriswallsmith https://github.com/vicb/symfony/tree/kris/proto if that can help (there are still changes in Form.php)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/14 08:47:08 -0700
Thanks, I'll take a look.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/15 00:48:38 -0700
I would have expected it to be faster however `array_map` is about twice slower... reverted !
Rules are as follows:
* If multiple is true, then the empty_value is ignored
* If not, and if the field is not required, the empty_value is set to the empty string by default and displayed
* If the field is required, and if the user explicitely set the empty_value, then it is displayed
* kriswallsmith/form/collection-proto:
added script[type="text/html"] collection prototype to form themes
[Form] removed collection prototype from form tree
* kriswallsmith/form/lazier-csrf-token:
[Form] fixed xpath
[Form] moved csrf listener to its own class
fix issue with csrf token not present on collection fields because of resize listener
The current implementation is not ready for inclusion in 2.0. It has several
known problems (security, not possible to disable it, not "cloud-compatible",
...) and it's not a must have feature anyway.
Some references:
* Security issue in FileType: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1001
* Validation fails on file, still stored in TemporaryStorage: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/908
* Add a size argument & ability to configure TemporaryStorage: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/748
This feature should be reworked and discussed for inclusion in 2.1.
This fixes choices when all the keys are strings (but integers really).
That's because in PHP, if you have the following array:
array('1' => 'foo', '2' => 'bar');
PHP "converts" it automatically to the following array:
array(1 => 'foo', 2 => 'bar');
* fivestar/single-choice-expanded:
[Form] Fixed FixRadioInputListener to not ignore 0.
[Form] Fixed single expanded choice type to set checked attribute when passed boolean value
* jwage/master:
Revert back to using gmmktime and use day 15 instead of 1 to avoid edge case
Use mktime instead of gmmaketime. On the 1st of every month the following options are generated:
* Also changed the default value of the calendar paramter to \IntlDateFormatter:GREGORIAN
in DateTimeToLocalizedStringTransformer which is the same as the default value in
StubIntlDateFormatter
<select id="filter_start_date_month" name="filter[start][date][month]">
<option value="1">Dec</option>
<option value="2">Jan</option>
<option value="3">Feb</option>
<option value="4">Mar</option>
<option value="5">Apr</option>
<option value="6" selected="selected">May</option>
<option value="7">Jun</option>
<option value="8">Jul</option>
<option value="9">Aug</option>
<option value="10">Sep</option>
<option value="11">Oct</option>
<option value="12">Nov</option>
</select>
I do not totally understand the problem but using mktime instead of gmmktime fixes the issue.
* vicb/form-rendering:
[Form] The variable stack should not persist between section rendering (fixes#1157)
[Twig][Form] Tweak form extension phpDoc and code
[Form] Tweak phpDoc
[FormView] fix phpDoc
[Form] Some tweaks
* CodeMeme/1058-fix-radio-input-listener:
Fix for RadioInputListener's empty value erroneously becoming extra data Refs #1058
Added test for RadioInputListener bug treating no data as extra data
* maoueh/date_type_dead_code:
[Form] Removed dead code in the buildForm method of DateType.php * With the introduction of the getAllowedOptionValues mechanics, the check is performed prior to the buildForm call. There is no more needs to check it again in DateType.
* With the introduction of the getAllowedOptionValues mechanics, the check
is performed prior to the buildForm call. There is no more needs to check
it again in DateType.
* vicb/form-fixes:
[Form] Make the PropertyPathMapper class use the UnexpectedTypeException
[Form] Fix adding transformers in the FormBuilder
[Form] Fix the ReversedTransform class
If you use the MinLength validator with your entities, the ValidatorTypeGuesser gets the value, stored as "minlength". Then, the FormFactory generates a "pattern" attribute out of minlength and maxlength.
Modern browsers such as Chrome use this attribute to validate the form before submitting.
a "pattern" attribute is generated that validates the
The form component should now guarantee to always pass an UploadedFile object to your model. There you can call getOriginalName() to retrieve the original name of the uploaded file. For security reasons, the real file name is a generated hash value.
* bschussek/form:
[Form] Automatically setting "data_class" option if objects are passed at the creation of a form
[Form] Improved the way passed data is handled in FormFactory
[Form] Simplified FileType code
[HttpFoundation] TemporaryStorage automatically creates the directory if it doesn't exist yet
[Form] Changed FormBuilder::build() to FormBuilder::create(). You hvae to pass the resulting builder to FormBuilder::add() manually now
[Form] Added FieldTypeValidatorExtension and fixed FQCN of DelegatingValidator
With implementations of this interface, existing types can be amended.
The Csrf extension, for example, now contains a class FormTypeCsrfExtension
that adds CSRF capabilities to the "form" type.
To register new type extensions in the DIC, tag them with "form.type_extension"
and the name of the extended type as alias.
The extension classes are now the only constructor argument of the FormFactory class. They replace the existing "type loader" classes.
new FormFactory(array(
new CoreExtension($validator, $storage),
new CsrfExtension($csrfProvider),
new DoctrineOrmExtension($em),
));
Together with a few upcoming commits this mechanism will make
* extension of the form framework in bundles and
* usage of the forms outside of Symfony2
much easier.
