This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
Add a note about the ServiceLocator class in the changelog
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
In addition to have `container.service_locator` and `container.service_subscriber` based on, this class is useful on its own as it is the one avoiding the need for having the `Container` class filling this role.
Commits
-------
92994f3 Add a note about the ServiceLocator class in the changelog
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
relax FormPass test assertions
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/22404#discussion_r111269604
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Relying on a precalculated hash makes the test very fragile as the hash
value changes with every change we make for some of the DI classes.
Commits
-------
9d73317 relax FormPass test assertions
This PR was merged into the 3.2 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Yaml] add changelog for the DUMP_OBJECT_AS_MAP flag
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.2
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #17728
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Adds missing changelog entry for the `DUMP_OBJECT_AS_MAP` flag introduced in #17728.
Commits
-------
8fd3602 add changelog for the DUMP_OBJECT_AS_MAP flag
This PR was merged into the 3.2 branch.
Discussion
----------
Relax some mocks
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.2
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
We should not use mocks when it's not required - they too often run assertions on internal behavior.
These changes will unlock #22388
Commits
-------
61be73394e Relax some mocks
* 3.2:
[2.8] Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
[3.2] Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
This PR was merged into the 3.2 branch.
Discussion
----------
[3.2] Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.2
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
#22396 and #22399 on 3.2
Commits
-------
ec6a2f9eba [3.2] Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch.
Discussion
----------
[2.8] Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.8
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
#22396 on 2.8
Commits
-------
2be5821743 [2.8] Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch.
Discussion
----------
Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.7
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
The current logic is inconsistent, and allows the same id to be used several times. This makes the first explicit priority to always win.
Commits
-------
6764dcdf39 Prevent double registrations related to tag priorities
This PR was merged into the 3.2 branch.
Discussion
----------
[TwigBridge] use risky tests free version of the Form component
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.2
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Should make tests on the `3.2` branch pass again.
Commits
-------
e581fda use risky tests free version of the Form component
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[DI] Replace autowiring BC break by regular deprecation
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.3
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | yes
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
It happens that doing so is really easy now. And as discussed in #22295, this should be more friendly to our users.
Commits
-------
0ed087d972 [DI] Replace autowiring BC break by regular deprecation
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch.
Discussion
----------
fail when detecting risky tests
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.7
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
The `--fail-on-risky` option is available since sebastianbergmann/phpunit@7e06a82806 which was first released with PHPUnit 5.2.
Commits
-------
3792ee6c93 fail when detecting risky tests
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
added a more specialized exception for a better error message
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | yes/no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
When trying to load a resource, it is very interesting to understand why a resource cannot be loaded. Especially when you get `Cannot load resource "../src/Controller/".`... when the real error is that annotation support is disabled. This PR adds more information in that case.
Commits
-------
aeb9bffa8f added a more specialized exception for a better error message
