Commits
-------
5f328de [console] Fixed docblock.
c80e156 [console] Added style stack getter in formatter.
0ae5a45 [console] Removed hardcoded empty style from styles stack.
Discussion
----------
[console] Removed hardcoded style formatter from style stack.
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
This PR make it possible to replace OutputFormatter again.
Fixes issue #4495.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-06T15:29:44Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1531654) (merged c80e156f into 1541fe26).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-06-06T15:29:53Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1533586) (merged 5f328dee into 1541fe26).
Commits
-------
2c19b3c Empty shortcut check in the constructor
cf9039e Added a unit test for the shortcut name of the InputOption class
Discussion
----------
[Console] Single dash for option shortcuts
See https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/4062
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-20T13:09:18Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1380389) (merged 02290da4 into f433f6b0).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-05-20T13:16:34Z
please rebase your branch to get rid of these merge commits
btw, you should use feature branches to send your next pull requests instead of using your master branch each time, which limits you to a single PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Nanocom at 2012-05-20T13:39:32Z
Sorry for the mess, cleaning it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-20T13:41:46Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1380549) (merged 63129657 into f433f6b0).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-20T13:43:07Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1380553) (merged 2c19b3c7 into f433f6b0).
Commits
-------
c195957 [Components] Tests/Autoloading fixes
Discussion
----------
Fix components
See #4141
----
This PR:
* configures each component to use composer to manage "dev" dependencies instead of env variables;
* adds phpunit configuration file on Filesystem component;
* fixes READMEs.
It's mergeable without any problems, but I would recommend to wait a fix in Composer in order to use `self.version` in `require`/`require-dev` sections.
Note: I kept `suggest` sections because it makes sense but this PR doesn't aim to provide useful explanations for each entry. It could be another PR, not that one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-04-30T20:43:13Z
@fabpot I reviewed each component, one by one. Now `phpunit` always works, even if tests are skipped. A simple `composer install --dev` allows to run the complete test suite. Each commit is well separated from the others. I guess, everything is ok now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-30T20:47:00Z
Please squash, as it makes no sense to have the same commit for each component.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-01T14:26:11Z
Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-05-01T14:29:38Z
done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-01T15:48:25Z
It does not seem that the commits are squashed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-05-01T15:54:08Z
done
* Switched to Composer to manage "dev" dependencies
* Fixed READMEs
* Excluded vendor in phpunit.xml.dist files
* Fixed message in bootstrap.php files
* Added autoloader for the component itself
Addresses issues with writing console output for IBM i5 Series (OS400).
The normal QP2TERM shell outputs garbage text when attempting to write
directly to STDOUT, likely because of EBCDIC character-encoding used
on IBM platforms. Writing to the OUTPUT mimics using 'echo' or 'print'
and prints properly in the console.
Fixes#1434
Commits
-------
2a90871 [Console] Removed previously introduced BC break.
90a2a6e [Console] Undecorated formatter must update style stack too.
bd7e01a [Console] Fixed output formatter test broken by new implementation.
a1add4b [Console] Updated output formatter to use style stack.
4f298dd [Console] Added formatter style stack.
93ffe54 [Console] Added getters to output formatter style (and its interface).
48e6b49 [Console] Updated formatter test to match styles bug fix.
ad334b6 [Console] Fixed empty style appliance.
31d5fe5 [Console] Fixed output formatter docblock.
Discussion
----------
[Console] Fixes formatter nested style appliance.
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
When outputing styled text in the console, you sometimes face to a confusing behavior: style tags cannot be nested. If tou try something like `<fg=blue>Hello <fg=red>world</fg=red>!</fg=blue>`, the trailing `!` will not be styled.
This PR introduce a new FormatterOutputStyleStack to keep open/closed styles informations up-to-date. It slightly changes OutputFormatter implementation which no longer uses `OutputFormatterStyle::apply()` method, but the new `OutputFormatterStyle::getTerminalSequence()`.
**Question:** I don't une `OutputFormatterStyleInterface` but `OutputFormatterStyle` to type `OutputFormatterStyleStack` methods arguments (to avoid BC break on the interface). Do you think it's right?
**Notice:** I also needed to fix some tests broken by new implementation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-16T10:27:56Z
Adding new methods in an interface is a BC break for people implementing it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jfsimon at 2012-03-16T10:33:21Z
@stof indeed... this is a problem, should I remove them? If I do so, I should use `OutputFormatterStyle` instead of the interface to type arguments in `OutputFormatterStyleStack` right?
Bug fix: no
BC break: no
Feature addition: yes
Symfony2 test pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2848#2847
Todo: -
See tickets for reference, need help with testing, because I don't know how to test this :)
Commits
-------
c7ab9ba [Console] Allow redefinition of application options descriptions
Discussion
----------
[Console] Allow redefinition of application options descriptions
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
This allows you to redefine an `InputOption` as long as it keeps the same semantic (same default, same name, same alias, same modes). There are two purposes:
- Modifying the description with a more accurate one
- Making sure the option appears in your commands' help
Concrete example: I often want to provide a verbose version of commands. It's an elegant and very common pattern, but I basically can't document what is going to happen if you do `--verbose` since the base Application already defines `--verbose`. Also the `--verbose` option does not appear when you do `console <command> --help`, which means people probably won't think of using that option.
Commits
-------
e417153 [BugFix][Console] Fix type hint for output formatter
Discussion
----------
[BugFix][Console] Fix type hint for OutputFormatter in OutputStream constructors
I consider this as a bug, cause it disables ability to change formatter implementation
BugFix: yes
Feature addition: no
Sysmfony2 test pass: yes
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/18 00:23:05 -0800
It's not a bug fix as existing code that extend these classes will now fail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/18 03:51:38 -0800
@fabpot does the constructor enforces its signature for child classes ? I don't think so.
