This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
e2aa79b Added CardScheme validator
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Validator] Added CardScheme validator
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets:
Todo: Adding documentation
License of the code: MIT
CardScheme separated into its own PR from #4734 as requested by @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-05T17:08:24Z
As far I understand the discussion on #4734, a few people seemed to be concerned about the usefulness of adding such a validator in Symfony core. Anyone wanting to give his point of view? Personally, I'm -0 on merging this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by merk at 2012-10-05T22:27:05Z
There are circumstances where such logic is required, and it could be desired by the programmer to filter out valid cards for a payment gateway before sending a request.
However, this is already included in JMSPaymentBundle if people don't think it should be in core.
Commits
-------
6ff9b04 Add Luhn validator
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Validator] Add Luhn validator
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets:
Todo: Adding documentation if this PR is blessed.
License of the code: MIT
I submitted these validators to JMSPaymentCoreBundle, because they're payment related, but @schmittjoh feels that they're a better choice for adding to Symfony2.
See schmittjoh/JMSPaymentCoreBundle#52 for the original submission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-04T05:19:42Z
I'm +1. @bschussek?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by shieldo at 2012-07-04T15:46:05Z
+1 in principle (certainly the Luhn check). I did wonder whether Visa Electron should also be in there (although, that uses a subset of the Visa range, and the chance that you would be checking for a Visa Electron but *not* Visa at the same time is vanishingly small, so maybe this is unnecessary).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by merk at 2012-07-04T21:25:30Z
@shieldo I did have a concern about the Electron as well, but in the case of an online system doing payment processing, I'm not sure anyone would ever need to check if it was an Electron card or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by merk at 2012-07-04T21:28:25Z
We could expand the CardScheme stuff further with this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Issuer_Identification_Numbers
Is there any point expanding the validator beyond financial services and into the other sevices listed?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by shieldo at 2012-07-04T21:37:41Z
@merk Yes, in actuality there are always going to be cases you can't trap with a regex - I'd say validation like this is working if it catches a majority of cases of invalid numbers, because in reality ones that get through will just fail downstream anyway. The purpose of the validator isn't to identify individual schemes for numbers, it's to do a sanity check across collections of schemes.
I don't really see any point expanding beyond financial services for a core validator (imho) - I'm not sure how stable some of this information is.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Gator92 at 2012-07-11T00:45:50Z
+1 on the Luhn check (without the authorship, just give credit to Greg Knapp), the CardScheme, however, is not really required by most gateways these days, it's a better candidate for a custom constraint.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by merk at 2012-07-11T00:47:20Z
I dont object, but Greg's algorithm has a flaw for odd length creditcard numbers. The unit testing written by Infinite caught this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Gator92 at 2012-07-11T01:35:46Z
You're right, the Knapp algo is flawed and does not appear to work on odd-numbered length cards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-07-11T05:49:22Z
@merk: Can you open two new pull requests? One for each validator?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by merk at 2012-07-26T23:42:24Z
PR updated to remove CardScheme into its own PR.
Documentation PR added to symfony-docs
When match is false the html5 validation regexp should be either inverted or not added.
Since we are in RC added a fix where this is not added, but marked a @todo so that this
can be revisited and we try to inverse the regexp instead.
* 2.0:
updated VERSION for 2.0.17
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.17
updated vendors for 2.0.17
fixed XML decoding attack vector through external entities
prevents injection of malicious doc types
disabled network access when loading XML documents
refined previous commit
prevents injection of malicious doc types
standardized the way we handle XML errors
Redirects are now absolute
Conflicts:
CHANGELOG-2.0.md
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoader.php
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Crawler.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Routing/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Serializer/Encoder/XmlEncoderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/XliffFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Validator/Mapping/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
vendors.php
Commits
-------
a92f80b [Validator] Added Length constraint and deprecated MinLength and MaxLength
83a3f75 [Validator] Deprecated the constraints Min and Max in favor of Range
0cdacee [Validator] Removed MinCount and MaxCount and replaced them by the constraint Count
741c147 [Validator] Renamed deprecated Size constraint to Range
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Reintroduced Range constraint and created Count and Length constraints
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
After @Tobion's comment to #4851, this is the next try to streamline the constraints and reduce duplication of logic. The downside of the current MinLength/MaxLength and MinCount/MaxCount pairs is that they cannot output a fitting error message if a value should have an *exact* length/count. So this PR introduces
* Range (formerly Size) to replace Min/Max
* Count to replace MinCount/MaxCount
* Length to replace MinLength/MaxLength
Feedback is appreciated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-07-11T20:40:08Z
The `choice` constraint also cannot handle `min = max`. Or maybe we don't need these options on choice anymore as we can achieve the same with the new `count` constraint?!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2012-07-12T08:59:44Z
Dude, nobody has time to fix the BC breaks you introduce :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by TomAdam at 2012-07-12T12:38:49Z
The changes to the `Size` validator yesterday broke my project, and I started rewriting to use `MaxLength / MinLength` validators today, until I spotted this. It would be good if this PR could have a reasonably high priority (whether or not it is accepted) as it will change how I fix my issues. I suspect a lot of people using the master branch will be in the same situation.
[Validator] Added delimiter escaping to Validator\Constraints\Regex::getNonDelimitedPattern
[Form][Validator] Added htmlPattern option for Regex Validation.
[Validator] Fixed Validator\Constraints\Regex::getNonDelimitedPattern variable declarations
[Validator] Fixed tests for Regex htmlPattern option (instead of html_pattern)
[Validation] tweaked generation of pattern to include .* when not anchors are present. Also removed the exception and made getNonDelimitedPattern private
Commits
-------
64101ab separate numeric value from suffix in File constraint's error message `$uploadIniSizeErrorMessage`
ff122d3 fixed tests
868d649 separate numeric values from suffixes in File constraint's error message `$maxSizeMessage`
Discussion
----------
[Validator] separate numeric values from suffixes in File validation error messages
This change allows me to locale-aware format the numbers in a form theme, i.e., to use a comma instead of a dot. If there's a better way without re-implementing the entire validator, let me know.
Such changes also allow for using a different separator than the usual space in translations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-08T19:14:16Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1278845) (merged f7c50098 into e54f4e46).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-08T19:23:31Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1278940) (merged ce1cdafc into e54f4e46).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by r1pp3rj4ck at 2012-05-10T11:05:18Z
I don't know if there is a better way to do this, but I like the idea anyway.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2012-05-11T14:18:52Z
Separated numeric values and suffixes for `$maxSizeMessage` and `$uploadIniSizeErrorMessage` now. Can't find any other relevant places (in other validators). Might be merged if accepted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-11T14:19:10Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1305246) (merged 438da7dd into e54f4e46).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-11T21:22:25Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1309277) (merged 64101aba into dd0da03c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-05-13T13:29:07Z
Using the NumberFormatter class would be an option, but that would also add a dependency when using Validation as stand-alone so using the {{ suffix }} is a good idea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2012-05-13T14:15:54Z
Using a NumberFormatter (if available) directly in the validator might indeed be a good option. In either case, having the numeric value separated from its suffix looks cleaner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2012-05-19T13:36:00Z
@fabpot: Would you merge this?
Commits
-------
3a5e84f [Validator] Add CollectionSize constraint
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Add CollectionSize constraint
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
I will also send a PR to the documentation as soon as this one is accepted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-29T08:24:28Z
-1
I dislike the rising amount of very specific constraints in the core. Can't we add this to Size?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-29T09:01:39Z
@bschussek #3918 implements what you propose but then the messages are not valid any more:
```php
<?php
public $minMessage = 'This value should be {{ limit }} or more';
public $maxMessage = 'This value should be {{ limit }} or less';
public $invalidMessage = 'This value should be a valid number';
```
I can imagine 2 solutions:
- adding some more message,
- rename the `Size` constraint to `Range` and create a new `Size` constraint for arrays / countables.
What do you think ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-04-29T09:27:53Z
I'd prefer the second solution and merge `Size` with `SizeLength` as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-29T09:34:50Z
@bschussek It would make sense. @makasim @Herzult any one of you would like to contribute this (i.e. rename the current Size to Range and create a new Size supporting arrays / countables / strings) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-04-29T14:31:12Z
Yep, I'm on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-29T15:22:44Z
@Herzult could you take the other comment into account and merge SizeLength into you Size ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-29T15:33:05Z
The guessers should also be modified (it might also affect the ODM which is in an other repo, if so it would be good to sync the changes).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-04-29T16:38:19Z
@stof the problem merging SizeLength into Size is that they don't have the same required options & messages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-04-29T16:47:40Z
And what about renaming Range to Interval and SizeLength to IntervalLength?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-29T16:54:38Z
Well, SizeLength is about matching the length of a string currently. Nothing related to intervals
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-04-29T17:29:40Z
Here are the current names:
* **Size** for collection (countable) size
* **Range** for numbers
* **SizeLength** for strings
Merging **SizeLength** into **Size** is maybe not appropriate because collections and strings are different things. It'll be hard to find messages that fit both collections and strings. Maybe we had better to find a better name for both. What do you think?
About the ValidatorTypeGuesser, I'll update it as soon as we know ow to name the constraints.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-29T17:43:01Z
Size is a good name for both strings and "collections", could we have two sets of strings and select according to the type ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-04-29T22:39:55Z
I tried to merge them together, what do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-04-30T06:52:37Z
I think your changes are great, may be @bschussek has more feedback. The ValidatorTypeGuesser and the translation are yet to be updated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hhamon at 2012-05-01T12:32:28Z
Am I missing something or `SizeLength` for strings is a duplicate for `MinLength` and `MaxLength` constraints?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-05-02T13:29:36Z
Yep, that's true. But the only link between this PR and the SizeLength constraint is that I merged it to the one I introduced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Herzult at 2012-05-07T07:48:01Z
@bschussek what do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-10T19:51:26Z
@Herzult this PR looks good to me, could you update the changelog and update guides, try to factorize the code and squash the commits ? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-11T15:42:35Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1306112) (merged 8d8e6443 into 4ac3bddb).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-11T21:42:21Z
* could #4259 be helpful ?
* please squash the commits.
* please create a PR / issue on [symfony-docs](https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs)
thanks for the updates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-13T18:38:18Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1321123) (merged eeda9044 into 4ac3bddb).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-13T18:45:12Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1321146) (merged 491ca19a into 8b54eb56).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-14T11:29:39Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1326110) (merged 44865024 into 8b54eb56).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-14T11:49:37Z
@Herzult what about plural translations ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-14T16:52:37Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1328677) (merged 93480f95 into 46ffbd52).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-14T17:03:13Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1328705) (merged 326c3b81 into 46ffbd52).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-14T20:19:18Z
thanks for the updates, this PR looks fine to me. @bschussek ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-05-16T06:45:51Z
@Herzult can you squash your commits ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-16T11:20:44Z
This pull request [passes](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1344811) (merged 3a5e84f4 into 58b6ef23).
[Validator] Rename constraint Size to Range
[Validator] Rename constraint CollectionSize to Size
[Validator] Merge the SizeLength into the Size constraint
[Validator] Update messages in Size constraint for consistancy
[Validator] Add english and french translation for Size messages
[Validator] Tweak expected types for exceptions in SizeValidator
[Validator] Fix CS in SizeValidator
[Validator] Update the ValidatorTypeGuesser
[Validator] Tweak SizeValidator
[Validator] Update CHANGELOG
[Validator] Complete previous CHANGELOG updates
[Form] Update validator type guesser
[Validator] Pluralize collection size english messages
[Validator] Pluralize Size french messages
Commits
-------
c195957 [Components] Tests/Autoloading fixes
Discussion
----------
Fix components
See #4141
----
This PR:
* configures each component to use composer to manage "dev" dependencies instead of env variables;
* adds phpunit configuration file on Filesystem component;
* fixes READMEs.
It's mergeable without any problems, but I would recommend to wait a fix in Composer in order to use `self.version` in `require`/`require-dev` sections.
Note: I kept `suggest` sections because it makes sense but this PR doesn't aim to provide useful explanations for each entry. It could be another PR, not that one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-04-30T20:43:13Z
@fabpot I reviewed each component, one by one. Now `phpunit` always works, even if tests are skipped. A simple `composer install --dev` allows to run the complete test suite. Each commit is well separated from the others. I guess, everything is ok now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-30T20:47:00Z
Please squash, as it makes no sense to have the same commit for each component.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-01T14:26:11Z
Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-05-01T14:29:38Z
done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-05-01T15:48:25Z
It does not seem that the commits are squashed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-05-01T15:54:08Z
done
* Switched to Composer to manage "dev" dependencies
* Fixed READMEs
* Excluded vendor in phpunit.xml.dist files
* Fixed message in bootstrap.php files
* Added autoloader for the component itself
Commits
-------
f9a486e [Validator] Added support for pluralization of the SizeLengthValidator
c0715f1 [FrameworkBundle], [TwigBundle] added support for form error message pluralization
7a6376e [Form] added support for error message pluralization
345981f [Validator] added support for plural messages
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Added support for plural error messages
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Todo: create translations for en and update others (FrameworkBundle)
[](http://travis-ci.org/hason/symfony)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011-05-14T20:41:01Z
@bschussek: What's your opinion?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-09-04T13:14:29Z
@hason could you rebase your branch on top of master and update the PR ?
You also need to change the messages in the constraint that uses the pluralization to a pluralized format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-10-16T18:06:22Z
@hason ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-11-11T14:58:19Z
@hason ping again
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011-12-12T20:39:10Z
@hason ping again. Can you update your PR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2011-12-12T21:29:14Z
@stof I hope that I will update PR this week.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-15T19:07:32Z
Looks good to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-02-02T17:28:54Z
@hason can you update this PR and squash commits, it conflicts with current master
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-02-09T07:21:41Z
@stof, @canni Rebased.
What is the best solution for the translation of messages?
1. Change messages in the classes and all xliff files?
2. Keep messages in the classes and change all xliff files?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-09T08:19:41Z
The constraints contain the en message so you will need to modify them to update the message
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-02-09T08:55:55Z
I prefer second option. The Validator component should be decoupled from the Translation component. The constraints contain the en message which is also the key for Translation component. We should create validators.en.xlf in the FrameworkBundle for en message. I think that this is better solution. What do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-04T02:22:02Z
@hason Please rebase your branch. It conflicts with master because of the move of the tests
@fabpot ping
