* 3.4:
Fix optional cache warmers are always instantiated whereas they should be lazy-loaded
add some \ on PHP_VERSION_ID for 2.8
[Di] Remove closure-proxy arguments
[PropertyInfo][DoctrineBridge] The bigint Doctrine's type must be converted to string
* 3.3:
Fix optional cache warmers are always instantiated whereas they should be lazy-loaded
add some \ on PHP_VERSION_ID for 2.8
[Di] Remove closure-proxy arguments
[PropertyInfo][DoctrineBridge] The bigint Doctrine's type must be converted to string
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[DI] Deprecate XML services without ID
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no, confusing though
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | yes
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #... <!-- #-prefixed issue number(s), if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | symfony/symfony-docs#... <!--highly recommended for new features-->
On slack someone had a issue with class named services;
> So, probably should have done this sooner, I stepped through with a debugger and it looks like \Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Loader\XmlFileLoader::processAnonymousServices assigns a sha256 to services that don't have any IDs
> When my manually wired service is registered, it has an ID that looks like 1_344b468f6069ffe8c32092409d99c59abc218f41071ce4c4230c198876129bc0, so it doesn't override the auto-loaded one
> I swear I read that IDs default to the class name now...
The fix was easy; doing `<service id="ClassName"/>` instead of `<service class="ClassName"/>`. However the thing is... i made the exact same mistake trying to reproduce 😅
I think given the recent developments (dropping type based autowiring and class named services) it makes sense to force XML service to specify an ID attribute (the top level ones). This would be consistent with YAML and PHP as well.
Fixing deprecations is also easy, just change `class` attribute to `id` like i've done for the frameworkbundle in this PR.
Any thoughts?
Commits
-------
b8c68da010 [DI] Deprecate XML services without ID
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 4.0-dev branch (closes#22763).
Discussion
----------
[DI] Remove deprecated isFrozen()
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | should be
| Fixed tickets | #... <!-- #-prefixed issue number(s), if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | symfony/symfony-docs#... <!--highly recommended for new features-->
See #19673
Test failure seems unrelated.
Commits
-------
04b39a3 [DI] Remove deprecated isFrozen()
Now that inherit_tags has been removed, 3.3 has the same functionality as 3.2: tags
are *never* cascaded from parent to child (but you tags do inherit from defaults
to a service and instanceof to a service).
The DefinitionDecorator class does not deal with decorated services. It
reflects a parent-child-relationship between definitions instead. To
avoid confusion, this commit deprecates the existing DefinitionDecorator
class and introduces a new ChildDefinition class as replacement.
* 2.8: (22 commits)
Fix backport
[travis] Upgrade phpunit wrapper & hirak/prestissimo
[Bridge\PhpUnit] Workaround old phpunit bug, no colors in weak mode, add tests
[PropertyAccess] Fix isPropertyWritable not using the reflection cache
[PropertyAccess] Backport fixes from 2.7
[FrameworkBundle][2.8] Add tests for the Controller class
[DependencyInjection] Update changelog
Added WebProfiler toolbar ajax panel table layout css.
[Validator] use correct term for a property in docblock (not "option")
[Routing] small refactoring for scheme requirement
[PropertyAccess] Remove most ref mismatches to improve perf
[PropertyInfo] Support Doctrine custom mapping type in DoctrineExtractor
[Validator] EmailValidator cannot extract hostname if email contains multiple @ symbols
[NumberFormatter] Fix invalid numeric literal on PHP 7
[Process] fix docblock syntax
use the clock mock for progress indicator tests
Use XML_ELEMENT_NODE in nodeType check
[PropertyAccess] Reduce overhead of UnexpectedTypeException tracking
[PropertyAccess] Throw an UnexpectedTypeException when the type do not match
[FrameworkBundle] Add tests for the Controller class
...
Conflicts:
.travis.yml
composer.json
src/Symfony/Bridge/PhpUnit/DeprecationErrorHandler.php
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/Intl/NumberFormatter/NumberFormatter.php
* 2.8:
asset test coverage
[HttpKernel] PostResponseEvent should extend the KernelEvent
[travis] session.gc_probability=0 to fix transient tests on hhvm
Write the log message on a single line againn
[DI] Deprecate ContainerAware in favor of ContainerAwareTrait
[VarDumper] Deprecate VarDumperTestCase in favor of the trait
Check whether $this->logger is not null on GuardAuthenticationListener
[Console] Add progress indicator helper
Conflicts:
.travis.yml
* 2.8:
[2.8] Cleanup
allow more versions of the ACL package
[Translator] Added missing changelog notes.
[2.7] Clean deprecated interfaces
use new repo location in some readme.md
[Validator] Cleanup a test
[translation][framework-bundle] Deprecated DiffOperation
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bridge/Doctrine/Tests/Form/ChoiceList/ORMQueryBuilderLoaderTest.php
src/Symfony/Bridge/ProxyManager/LazyProxy/PhpDumper/ProxyDumper.php
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/composer.json
src/Symfony/Bundle/SecurityBundle/composer.json
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/IntrospectableContainerInterface.php
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Tests/ChoiceList/Factory/CachingFactoryDecoratorTest.php
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Tests/ChoiceList/Factory/DefaultChoiceListFactoryTest.php
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Tests/ChoiceList/Factory/PropertyAccessDecoratorTest.php
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Tests/ChoiceList/LegacyChoiceListAdapterTest.php
src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Tests/Validator/AbstractLegacyApiTest.php
This allows to remove references to all services during shutdown, giving
much more chances to destruct services and the container through
refcounting rather than waiting GC, as it will break cycles between the
container and container-aware services.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
d7a1154 make it possible for bundles extensions to prepend settings into the application configuration of any Bundle
Discussion
----------
[2.2] add possibility for bundles extensions to prepend the app configs
Bug fix: #4652
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
License of the code: MIT
As can be seen in the patch the extensions that should prepend the configuration are enabled automatically if they implement ``PrependExtensionInterface``.
Just as an example, here an extension, which checks if SonataAdminBundle is available and if not disables integration with it in several Bundles. It also sets some default settings for ``document_class`` and ``default_document_manager_name``:
```
diff --git a/DependencyInjection/SymfonyCmfCoreExtension.php b/DependencyInjection/SymfonyCmfCoreExtension.php
index 9f92410..c0a8dbb 100644
--- a/DependencyInjection/SymfonyCmfCoreExtension.php
+++ b/DependencyInjection/SymfonyCmfCoreExtension.php
@@ -3,11 +3,12 @@
namespace Symfony\Cmf\Bundle\CoreBundle\DependencyInjection;
use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\DependencyInjection\Extension;
+use Symfony\Component\\DependencyInjection\PrependExtensionInterface;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerBuilder;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Loader\XmlFileLoader;
use Symfony\Component\Config\FileLocator;
-class SymfonyCmfCoreExtension extends Extension
+class SymfonyCmfCoreExtension extends Extension implements PrependExtensionInterface
{
public function load(array $configs, ContainerBuilder $container)
{
@@ -15,4 +16,45 @@ class SymfonyCmfCoreExtension extends Extension
$loader->load('config.xml');
$loader->load('services.xml');
}
+
+ public function prepend(ContainerBuilder $container)
+ {
+ $bundles = $container->getParameter('kernel.bundles');
+ if (!isset($bundles['SonataDoctrinePHPCRAdminBundle'])) {
+ // disable SonataDoctrinePHPCRAdminBundle admin support in Bundles
+ $config = array('use_sonata_admin' => false);
+ foreach ($container->getExtensions() as $name => $extension) {
+ switch ($name) {
+ case 'symfony_cmf_menu':
+ case 'symfony_cmf_routing_extra':
+ case 'symfony_cmf_simple_cms':
+ $container->prependExtensionConfig($name, $config);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // process the configuration of SymfonyCmfCoreExtension
+ $configs = $container->getExtensionConfig($this->getAlias());
+ $config = $this->processConfiguration(new Configuration(), $configs);
+ // add the default configs to various Bundles
+ foreach ($container->getExtensions() as $name => $extension) {
+ switch ($name) {
+ case 'symfony_cmf_content':
+ case 'symfony_cmf_simple_cms':
+ $container->prependExtensionConfig($name, $config);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-21T21:10:00Z
I think you are giving too much power to bundles here: a bundle becomes able to modify all the config defined explicitly by the user if it wants to do it.
I think it would be safer to give them the possibility to load an additional config file which would be prepended (so that user-defined config would still win). Giving the ability to load files means passing the loader used by the kernel, and it should then be called before calling the load method on the kernel itself (to respect the order of loaded files)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-09-22T05:50:08Z
Not sure how a config file helps solve anything. I mean they can load as many config files as they want already. The key is being able to automatically apply configuration to multiple Bundles as well as enabling/disabling features based on if certain Bundles are registered.
BTW the end result in my examples is also prepended, so that user config wins. However yes this would be up to the person implementing the Bundle. We could however provide a dedicated method for prepending in addition to or instead of ``setExtensionConfig``.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-22T11:40:29Z
@lsmith77 If you can load a file with the main loader, this file can provide some app-level configuration (be it for your own bundle or others).
And your code example is indeed prepending. But imagine what would occur when someone uses this feature without knowing well how the component works: he will likely call ``setExtensionConfig`` in a first implementation, thus dropping all userland config for the bundle. Your setup does not only allow to make a file win over the userland config but makes it even easier to remove the userland config.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-09-22T18:11:29Z
but i dont get how that would help. the point is to be able for one bundle to configure other bundles before the load as this is obviously alot cleaner than trying to do the same via a compiler pass. so imho this is what is needed to encourage decoupled bundles. otherwise for example CMS or other reuseable and extensible apps will be forced to always put everything in one bundle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-09-22T19:23:45Z
@lsmith77 I agree about the feature, not about the way to implement it. If you allow bundles to load a file as it it were some app-level config, they would become able to provide some config for other bundles (and you could load several files depending of which bundles are enabled), but without allowing bundles to remove the userland config.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-09-22T19:50:19Z
sorry but i dont understand what you suggest. more over i dont see the problem. its already possible to seriously break stuff with compiler passes which cannot be easily enabled/disabled. this is just convenience. if it doesnt work because of some obscure combo then simply dont use it for the app since it needs to be explicitly enabled in the kernel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-09-24T09:25:10Z
@stof thought about your comments, are you suggesting for a Bundle to be able to generate a config file that is prepended? in that case the current behavior would already be that if we change ``setExtensionConfig`` to just be a ``prependExtensionConfig`` .. however i am not sure if we really need this limitation since as i point out this would still by far be less dangerous than compiler passes and also i expect this to be used mainly by open source applications on top of Symfony2 rather than standard bundles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-10-13T13:28:29Z
@lolautruche i also think this is relevant for you guys. this way you could start preconfiguring 3rd party bundles as part of your main ezPublish bundle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lolautruche at 2012-10-13T13:57:09Z
While I suspect a nice feature, the implementation looks obscure to me...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-10-13T17:43:02Z
The implementation of the example extension or the implementation of the actual changes proposed in this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lolautruche at 2012-10-13T17:46:57Z
The example, sorry 😃
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-10-13T17:50:38Z
The example was fairly quickly hacked together. The basic thing you need to do is fetch the config for the bundle you want to change, manipulate the config (usually by appending an array to the array of configs so that you dont affect explicit configuration) and then set it again.
As I explained to @stof it would alternative/additionally be possible to support a method that pushes a config array to the top of the array of config stack. Such a method might make the necessary code simpler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-10-13T21:39:07Z
@fabpot what do you think about it ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jrobeson at 2012-10-20T15:45:18Z
I've been porting much of an existing framework over to use more symfony components and bundles. I think that this might help some of the problems i've been having. I would really appreciate some better examples as how to one would use it (same for the cmf router, but that's another story).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-10-21T07:28:52Z
not really sure what other examples i could give. the process is quite simple:
1) determine what configuration options to add to other Bundles
for example with the following code I determine that SonataAdmin for PHPCR is not installed (which means i should disable using it in other Bundles):
```
$bundles = $container->getParameter('kernel.bundles');
if (!isset($bundles['SonataDoctrinePHPCRAdminBundle'])) {
```
alternatively I could simply already process the configuration and then pick all or some of these configuration options:
```
$configs = $container->getExtensionConfig($this->getAlias());
$config = $this->processConfiguration(new Configuration(), $configs);
```
2) then add these configuration to what other Bundles I feel should get these options
usually I will add these to the top of the config array stack. this means that if the user would manually set the same setting in most cases the user setting will override what the pre-processor set.
```
$container->unshiftExtensionConfig($name, array('use_sonata_admin' => false));
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-10-24T12:52:38Z
added ``ContainerBuilder::unshiftExtensionConfig`` since this is the usual use case. with this method added it could be discussed if ``ContainerBuilder::setExtensionConfig`` is still needed or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-11-24T14:48:44Z
I spoke to @fabpot today and he said that since this patch just allows you to set defaults and not really "process" the actual configuration I shouldn't call it "preProcess" so I renamed it to "prepend".
Furthermore as its just prepending @fabpot said there isnt really a need to require manually enabling it, so here is a patch to auto-enable the prepending logic:
```
diff --git a/src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php b/src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
index b890fbf..7374b87 100644
--- a/src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
+++ b/src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
@@ -701,8 +701,8 @@ abstract class Kernel implements KernelInterface, TerminableInterface
*/
protected function prependExtensionConfigs(ContainerBuilder $container)
{
- foreach ($this->getPrependingExtensions() as $name) {
- $extension = $container->getExtension($name);
+ foreach ($this->bundles as $bundle) {
+ $extension = $bundle->getContainerExtension();
if ($extension instanceof PrependExtensionInterface) {
$extension->prepend($container);
}
@@ -710,16 +710,6 @@ abstract class Kernel implements KernelInterface, TerminableInterface
}
/**
- * Returns the ordered list of extensions that may prepend extension configurations.
- *
- * @return array
- */
- protected function getPrependingExtensions()
- {
- return array();
- }
-
- /**
* Gets a new ContainerBuilder instance used to build the service container.
*
* @return ContainerBuilder
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-11-25T19:31:01Z
ok .. i pondered the code some more and now i have enabled registering of the prepending extensions by default, since its now quite easy to just override the ``prependExtensionConfigs()`` method since there is almost no logic in there anymore.
@fabpot i am not 100% sure with the naming yet ..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-12-05T14:03:43Z
@fabpot if you are ok with the PR as it is now, i can do the rebase so you can merge this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-12-05T18:30:29Z
@fabpot all good now? then i will squash the commits ..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-12-05T18:34:50Z
actually looking at the full change set again i am no longer sure if it makes sense to have ``PrependExtensionInterface`` in the DI rather than the HttpKernel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-12-07T09:21:14Z
@fabpot all good now?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-07T09:37:52Z
The code looks good to me now. There are two remaining task before merging:
* Is it something we need to add somewhere in the documentation?
* Can you add a note in the DI component CHANGELOG?
Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2012-12-07T09:49:17Z
i have added a changelog entry and squashed the commits.
i will also work on a documentation entry, i guess i will make it a cookbook entry. not sure if it should be included in http://symfony.com/doc/2.0/cookbook/bundles/extension.html .. but imho it would better be a separate entry.