Commits
-------
9ed7c03 fixed code coverage raport generation
Discussion
----------
fixed code coverage raport generation
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: no (tests were already broken)
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
I wanted to run the test coverage for Symfony2.1.
I installed vendors using composer but code coverage script failed (running unit tests failed too).
After installing vendors using vendors.php I got errors about missing classes:
`Class 'Doctrine\Common\DataFixtures\Loader' not found`
and later: `Class 'Monolog\Handler\ChromePHPHandler' not found.`
The changes made it possible to run the code coverage script.
Monolog was already present in autoload.php.dist but was not present in vendors.php script, doctrine fixtures were not included in both.
Commits
-------
4d4ef24 [Console] Stop parsing options after encountering "--" token
Discussion
----------
[Console] Stop parsing options after encountering "--" token
This enables support for arguments with leading dashes (e.g. "-1"), as supported by getopt in other languages.
[](http://travis-ci.org/jmikola/symfony)
The test suite currently fails due to 7a54fe41ca. ArgvInputTest passes, and these changes don't appear to break anything else.
Aside: This got me thinking about how one would pass an option value of "-1". I suppose for input options with `VALUE_OPTIONAL`, it would be ambiguous if "-1" followed; however, `VALUE_REQUIRED` should probably require that the next token is captured as the option value. In my tests, a required option value with a leading dash was interpreted as another option. The workaround for all of this is to use the space-less syntax (e.g. `-f=-1`).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-17T08:43:15Z
AFAIK, the `--` should disable both option and argument parsing, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2012-03-18T02:13:51Z
If that were the case, what would be the point of using `--` at all? :)
* http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/dict/terms/end_of_options
* http://perldoc.perl.org/Getopt/Long.html#Mixing-command-line-option-with-other-arguments
Commits
-------
8642473 Changed instances of \DateTimeZone::UTC to 'UTC' as the constant is not valid a produces this error when DateTimeZone is instantiated: DateTimeZone::__construct() [<a href='datetimezone.--construct'>datetimezone.--construct</a>]: Unknown or bad timezone (1024)
Discussion
----------
[Locale] DateTimeZone called incorrectly by default
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: no (there were two tests that were failing previously, that still fail)
Fixes the following tickets: none
Todo: none
While running, a warning throws every single time when the code
```php
new \DateTimeZone(\DateTimeZone::UTC);
```
is encountered. It is normally caught as a thrown exception and then corrected here:
```php
// src/Symfony/Component/Locale/Stub/StubIntlDateFormatter.php:442
try {
$this->dateTimeZone = new \DateTimeZone($timeZoneId);
} catch (\Exception $e) {
$this->dateTimeZone = new \DateTimeZone('UTC');
}
```
However in my particular infrastructure, for whatever reason in production only, it causes an error to appear on shutdown in the logs. As ultimately the constant can NEVER pass, it should not be attempted with the constant. Instead, the correct 'UTC' should be passed in (as done in the catch statement).
Commits
-------
2c4a43d Made option to use symlink explicit in the output. This can clear up any issues for example when running composer update to know if assets:install did a symlink or hard copy.
Discussion
----------
Made assets:install output copy mode its using
Made option to use symlink explicit in the output. This can clear up any issues for example when running composer update to know if assets:install did a symlink or hard copy.
On a general it just makes communication a bit clearer on what is being executed.
Further improvement is to make Composer install use the same process as was previously used on that server.
Commits
-------
fbed9ff Update src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/HttpCache/HttpCache.php
Discussion
----------
Branch 2.0 - Correct bad HttpCache behaviour when waiting for unlock.
I read the class Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\HttpCache\HttpCache and I found something which looks like a bug lines 518-520 (in lock method) :
$wait = 0;
while (is_file($lock) && $wait < 5000000) {
usleep($wait += 50000);
}
This code can wait at maximum 50000+100000+150000+.... 4950000 µs = more than 250 seconds !
I corrected like that :
$wait = 0;
while (is_file($lock) && $wait < 5000000) {
usleep(50000);
$wait += 50000
}
This code will wait 5 sec maximum.
This is more coherent if we read the following lines of this method.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnapou at 2012-03-15T20:09:13Z
Hope I succeded to do a correct PR.
One hour of manipulation in Github for 2 lines of code let me a bitter taste on the tongue...
I was closed to tell you "Do It Yourself" ... what a waste of time...
This interface is not obvious, even if we had already worked on svn/git on *nix.
Commits
-------
0c83c5d [Form] Alternate syntax for form_theme
Discussion
----------
[RFC][Form] Alternate syntax for form_theme
before
`{% form_theme form _self "::base.html.twig" %}`
after
`{% form_theme form with "::base.html.twig" %}`
`{% form_theme form with varTheme %}`
`{% form_theme form with [_self, "::base.html.twig"] %}`
_the former syntax is still supported_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-12T15:42:32Z
do you really need ``with`` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-12T15:50:41Z
it's not needed but I find it more clear (It can be drop if a consensus is reached)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-12T17:05:46Z
+1 for `with`. Documentation for master should be updated as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-03-13T02:26:22Z
+1 for `with`, but the syntax without array like `{% form_theme form with "::base.html.twig" %}` should also be supported
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-13T07:16:55Z
`[]` are nice as they clearly indicate the ability to use multiple themes (which I think is yet to be documented). We'll pick the most popular syntax only.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-13T08:16:40Z
@vicb supporting a string instead of an array should be possible when you need only one element. supporting several ones and turning it into an array is the mistake we made for 2.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hhamon at 2012-03-13T08:16:45Z
+1 for the new syntax
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-13T08:29:45Z
@stof @Tobion what about using the former syntax then ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Baachi at 2012-03-13T08:32:09Z
+1 for new syntax. But it should be possible to use strings instead of arrays.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-13T08:33:07Z
@vicb Having one wyntax using ``with`` and the other without will confuse users IMO. this is why I suggested allowing to pass a Twig array without adding an extra word
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-03-13T08:40:02Z
@Baachi not stringS as it is precisely what we are trying to solve :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Baachi at 2012-03-13T08:42:03Z
Oh sry. I mean __string__. :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-13T11:16:30Z
+1 for supporting a string or an array with the new syntax as using only one element is probably the most common use case. But then, why not supporting any valid Twig expression?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-13T11:54:51Z
Something like the latest commit ? (Tests have to be updated).
@fabpot What is the best place to handle array / non-array ? This is currenlty handled in the node but the parser might be a better place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-13T13:23:08Z
@vicb: I would just remove the special array case in the node as it's not needed anymore.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-13T13:24:15Z
... and update FormExtension::setTheme() to also accept a string in which case we convert it to an array there.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-03-13T14:26:17Z
I'd prefer a named argument instead of an ubiquitous "with" keyword which does not really tell me what's coming next.
Something like ``{% form_theme _form templates=[a, b, c] %}``. This is pretty nicely done for the assetic tags "javascripts", and "stylesheets".
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-03-13T16:04:26Z
@schmittjoh it would only make sense if there are multiple named arguments. With only one available it seems redundant.
Also `{% form_theme _form templates="template.html.twig" %}` is bad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-14T07:59:08Z
I tend to agree with @Tobion but I'll have a closer look at assetic to see if we can make things more consistent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-03-14T10:36:15Z
This would be more consistent with assetic, but assetic isn't really consistent with anything else in twig, although I see the benefits in that particular case for swapping and omitting parameters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-03-14T15:49:37Z
My goal was not really consistency, but I simply find it more obvious,
self-explanatory and easier to understand if you name things explicitly. We
are using the "with" keyword in several places and each time something
different is expected.
To me explicit naming is superior, but just my 2c
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Jordi Boggiano <
reply@reply.github.com
> wrote:
> This would be more consistent with assetic, but assetic isn't really
> consistent with anything else in twig, although I see the benefits in that
> particular case for swapping and omitting parameters.
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3576#issuecomment-4495732
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-03-14T16:48:01Z
When I first saw this tag I didn't understand the role of first parameter.
So if we use johannes suggestion it should rather be `{% form_theme form=myForm templates=[a, b, c] %}`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2012-03-14T18:09:09Z
Before we complicate this any further can I add another thing here.
Moving to dedicated issue: Inflexible form theming #3598
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-14T18:20:54Z
@mvrhov that is not the good place to discuss this (both this particular issue and GH as this is a support request).
_Have you tried `{% form_theme form.subForm ... %}`_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-15T07:39:14Z
Where do you think we should go:
1. `{% form_theme form with [_self, "::base.html.twig"] %}`
2. `{% form_theme form=form src=[_self, "::base.html.twig"] %}`
Let's discuss the structure first & not the details (i.e. src vs templates).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Baachi at 2012-03-15T07:52:51Z
I tend to ```{% form_theme form with [_self, "::base.html.twig"] %}```, because its more consistent to the twig syntax.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-15T13:10:56Z
@vicb: I like 1) more than 2) as this how the built-in tags work.
To keep BC even further, can we just remove the `with` keyword? To make it BC, we just need to have a look at extra parameters and add it to an array if they exist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-03-15T13:19:52Z
For newcomers 2) is definitely easier to understand. But it would also only make sense if you can change the parameter order, so `{% form_theme form=form src=[_self, "::base.html.twig"] %}` == ` {% form_theme src=[_self, "::base.html.twig"] form=form %}`. At the same time it reduces consistency. So for experienced developers option 1) [without "with"] is less redundant and preferable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-15T13:53:49Z
@fabpot removing the `with` will make `Parser::parsePostfixException()` scream when providing an array of themes.
Commits
-------
e6577de Added a 'post validation' event to the form component.
Discussion
----------
[Form] Add post-validate event
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: n/a
Fixes the following tickets: n/a
Todo: n/a
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-03-02T20:34:18Z
ping @bschussek
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-04T09:19:53Z
I think this is a good idea (It was something missing to properly handle PersistentFile i.e. you should not persist invalid files)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-03-09T22:35:26Z
@jankramer please remove the second commit from this PR (see http://symfony.com/doc/current/contributing/code/patches.html) in order to make this mergeable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jankramer at 2012-03-10T09:26:04Z
@vicb done, sorry about that commit: overlooked the fact that it was on the same branch...
Commits
-------
eee5065 [TwigBundle] Workaround a flaw in the design of the configuration (normalization)
Discussion
----------
[TwigBundle] Workaround a flaw in the design of the configuration (norma...
...lization)
see #2823
@Seldaek please comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2012-03-09T20:52:47Z
It seems fine at first glance. I don't have time to look at it in detail right now sorry.
