* 2.0:
fixed functional tests so that the cache/logs are specific to one version of Symfony (to avoid weird side effects)
[FrameworkBundle] Prove client insulation and non-insulation works in session tests.
[FrameworkBundle] Add tests to prove functional testing works with simultaneous clients.
[FrameworkBundle] Small changes to test setup.
[DoctrineBundle] Fixed incorrectly shown params
[SwiftmailerBundle] fixed the send email command when the queue does not extends Swift_ConfigurableSpool
* 2.0:
[FrameworkBundle] Added functional tests.
[Form] Added missing use statements (closes#2880)
[Console] Improve input definition output for Boolean defaults
[SecurityBundle] Changed environment to something unique.
2879: missing space between catch and the brace
#2688: Entities are generated in wrong folder (doctrine:generate:entities Namespace)
[TwigBundle] Fix the exception message escaping
Commits
-------
cd24fb8 change explode's limit parameter based on known variable content
b3cc270 minor optimalisations for explode
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle][CssSelector][HttpFoundation][HttpKernel] [Security][Validator] Minor optimizations for "explode" function
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
I added limit parameter in some places, where it may be usefull. I did not check the context of what values may have been exploded. So to not break anything, I added +1 to limit parameter.
If you find out that in some places limit (or limit+1) is not important or meaningless, write a comment please and I will fix it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/07 06:56:49 -0800
Adding +1 just to be sure to not break anything is clearly something we won't do. What is the benefit of doing that anyway?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/07 13:50:24 -0800
The main idea of making this PR was to notify about some places that may run faster with just adding one parameter to explode function.
If in code is someting like: ```list($a, $b) = explode(':', $s);```
Function ```explode``` will create n-items (depends on ```$s```), but we need in code only the first two items. There is no reason to let ```explode``` create more items in memory that are NEVER used in our code. The limit parameter is there for these situations, so let's use it.
I know that it is microoptimization and may look unimportant, but we are writing a framework - so people expect that code will be as fast as possible without this kind of mistakes.
As I've noticed above, I know that +1 is not ideal solution, but the fastest without debugging the code. I expect that someone (with good knowledge of that code) will look at it and write in comments if variable may contain 1 comma (dot or someting on what is doing the explode) or maybe 2 in some situations or more.
Anyway, +1 will not break anything, because same items are created as it is now, but no unnecessary item is created.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/07 23:14:59 -0800
I'm +1 for adding the number to avoid problems but I'm -1 on the optimization side of things as it won't optimize anything.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/12/08 12:46:49 -0800
*.. The main idea of making this PR was to notify about some places that **may** run faster ..*
I am also unsure the optimization is really an optimization, care to benchmark (with meaningful inputs)? As for the limit+1 thing, why would you want to +1 it? The number of ``list`` arguments should always reflect the ``limit`` parameter, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/08 23:11:34 -0800
@helmer please try this simple benchmark:
```
<?php
header('Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8');
define('COUNT', 10000);
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc:dddddddddddddddddddddd:eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee:fffffffffffffffffffffffffff';
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < COUNT; $i++) {
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string);
}
$end = microtime(true)-$start;
echo 'without limit: '.$end."\n";
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < COUNT; $i++) {
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 2);
}
$end = microtime(true)-$start;
echo 'with limit: '.$end."\n";
```
My results are:
```
without limit: 0.057228803634644
with limit: 0.028676986694336
```
That is 50% difference (with APC enabled). Of course the result depends on the length of source string and if it's too short, the difference may be none or very very small. That's why I said, that it **may** run faster and is just a micro optimization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/08 23:18:12 -0800
@helmer And why +1? It depends on a code:
```
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc';
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 2);
var_dump($a, $b);
```
and
```
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc';
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 3);
var_dump($a, $b);
```
gives different results. That's why the content of the variable must be known.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/12/09 00:08:28 -0800
@pulzarraider Thanks for the benchmark, seems like a gain enough. Although, we are more likely having a scenario of:
``explode(':', 'a🅱️c')`` vs ``explode(':', 'a🅱️c', 3)`` with a ``COUNT`` of 10, where the difference is not even in microseconds anymore :)
The limit addition alters the behaviour though, ie suddenly you can define a controller [logical name](http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/routing.html#controller-string-syntax) as ´´AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:show:something``, and things go downhill from there on.
All that aside, I'm +1 for setting the limit to the exact number of ``list`` parameters, but certainly not number+1, this is just too wtfy (as you said, this was a safety thing, but I reckon for this PR to be merged it needs to be +0).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/12/09 08:28:58 -0800
Overall `list()` is ugly as it's not very explicit. Even though it would mean extra lines, it's better to `explode()` then explicitly assign variables:
```
$parts = explode(':', $foo);
$name = $parts[0];
$tel = $parts[1];
```
`list()` is one of those bad relics from the PHP past...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/11 10:07:47 -0800
@drak: why is `list` not explicit? It is in fact as explicit as the more verbose syntax you propose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/11 13:08:50 -0800
@drak: I agree with @fabpot. In speech of benchmarks ```list``` is faster then using a helper variable.
@fabpot, @helmer I've changed explode's limit to be correct (without +1) and removed some changes from this PR, where I can't find out what the content of variable may be. Unit tests pass, so I think it's ready for merge.
Commits
-------
fabe818 [EventDispatcher] Add reference to the EventDispatcher on the Event
Discussion
----------
[EventDispatcher] Add reference to the EventDispatcher on the Event
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
I don't like registering event listeners unless they are really used, it seems wasteful. So I tend to register listeners for the response event in other listeners, only when they will be required. @stof has [brought to my attention](fb243ace83 (commitcomment-696467)) that this may cause issues in Silex or any other situation where event listeners are not lazy loaded, since it creates a circular reference in that case.
With this PR, avoiding the circular reference is possible, without bloating the response listener with unnecessary "do I need to do anything?" code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/11/06 05:28:39 -0800
Did you do any benchmarks? It's just a feeling, but registering a listener at runtime might be more expensive than just having it always executed.
Also, I find these dynamic listeners a bit of a code smell. They are not easily testable, and the control flow is harder to track. Besides, you do not take into account subrequests which might happen in between.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/06 09:34:27 -0800
I don't see why it would be slower, if it's a commonly fired event yes you blast away the `sorted` listener cache every time you add one, but most of the time those optional listeners are for the response, which is typically not sorted yet when you add the listener, so I don't think there is any overhead.
As for the code smell, of course it's a matter of preference, but I have the opposite view on control flow, I find it weird that listeners are registered when they are not used in the end, while doing it my way I think it's more clear what happens.
For sub-requests, I'm not sure what you mean. In this instance, and in most response listeners I have seen, the sub-requests are always ignored anyway by the listener.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 06:07:45 -0800
I don't see how loading up the dispatcher with a bunch of callables can be expensive - it's just loading an array basically.
Wouldn't it be better to have a separate `DispatcherAwareEvent extends Event`
class DispatcherAwareEvent extends Event
{
protected $dispatcher;
public function setDispatcher(EventDispatcher $dispatcher)
{
$this->dispatcher = $dispatcher;
}
public function getDispatcher()
{
return $this->dispatcher;
}
This can then be used as a base class for what you need `MyEvent extends DispatcherAwareEvent`
$event = new MyEvent($dispatcher, $foo);
$dispatcher->dispatch($event);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/11/10 06:18:57 -0800
@drak: Every event is part the event dispatching system and therefore should be aware of the dispatcher imo. It's not like the ContainerAwareInterface which is gluing things that do not especially have to know about the DIC together.
If we do that, then we have to start arguing every time we need the dispatcher in a given event, because the original author did not think it was necessary, and then that will only make it into the next minor version, etc. Not fun at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 06:36:26 -0800
By the way, the event dispatchers looks to be pretty well optimized given the fact that it only sorts listeners if they are called, and then only once.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 12:33:28 -0800
It just seems weird. I mean, following on, why isn't the event name a compulsory parameter also? - again, you can say both ways, if you need it, make it part of your custom Event class, or since it's a required param to be able to dispatch an event in the first place, make it part of the base Event class. All I'm saying it it seems suspicious when it could be achieved a different way.
For example, you could inject the dispatcher into the listener itself and then the event handler could access the dispatcher if it needs:
class MyListener
{
public function __construct(EventDispatcher $eventDispatcher)
{
//...
}
public function someListener(Event $event)
{
//...
}
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/11/10 15:20:07 -0800
@drak The issue when injecting the dispatcher in the listener is described in the issue: circular dependency: you need to create the dispatcher before the listener (as it is injected in it) and when the listener is not lazy-loaded (in Silex for instance), you need to create it before the dispatcher.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/11/10 21:15:45 -0800
Indeed, although it might not unreasonable to expect to create the dispatcher first... but anyway I'm convinced!
Injecting the dispatcher could lead to some __very interesting possibilities__ as standard. While we are at it though, we should have a getter and setter for `$name` in the `Event` class and `$event->setName($eventname)` in the `dispatch()` method. Allowing an event to know it's name is very useful. It allows a single listener to be registered for multiple names, and even makes the event object reusable. I don't know why $name was removed, it was in the Symfony 1 dispatcher and while the new dispatcher is brilliant from an OO point of view, missing the name as standard is a big shame.
+1 from me.
Commits
-------
78883f9 Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}``
Discussion
----------
Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}`
Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}``
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2424
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/18 07:44:48 -0700
@docteurklein still the same issue. github says it conflicts. Are you sure you fetched the latest version ?
Thus it should be sent to 2.0 IMO as it is a bugfix
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2011/10/18 07:51:21 -0700
@stof Yes, i'm pretty sure I followed the patches sending flow. (http://symfony.com/doc/2.0/contributing/code/patches.html
My tools are telling me it's ok.
I then merged it into master without any problem, which is up to date with upstream.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
I'll try to send it to 2.0 branch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2011/10/18 07:53:52 -0700
@stof, what's wrong with https://github.com/docteurklein/symfony/commits/ticket_2424 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/18 08:28:21 -0700
hmm, seems like github has an issue when determining if it conflicts or not. It's sad
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/10/20 09:49:56 -0700
Dosent this already work ? as classes are namespaces the / should be a \ i think ?
Works for routes at least.
The locale management does not require sessions anymore.
In the Symfony2 spirit, the locale should be part of your URLs. If this is the case
(via the special _locale request attribute), Symfony will store it in the request
(getLocale()).
This feature is now also configurable/replaceable at will as everything is now managed
by the new LocaleListener event listener.
How to upgrade:
The default locale configuration has been moved from session to the main configuration:
Before:
framework:
session:
default_locale: en
After:
framework:
default_locale: en
Whenever you want to get the current locale, call getLocale() on the request (was on the
session before).
Builds upon aead4a9836180cabae4d47fe27c634dcd79ac8f2, which prematurely removed request scoping from the assets templating helper in all cases. The helper need only be request-scoped if one or more request-scoped packages (e.g. PathPackages) are injected into it. This change makes it possible to utilize the assets helper outside of a request (e.g. during a console script).
To ensure that the assets helper is not assigned a request scope, all asset base URL's must be defined for all packages (default and any named) and both protocols: HTTP and SSL. The included test config fixtures concisely accomplish this by specifying a single HTTPS URL as the base URL for our default and named package, since FrameworkExtension's Configuration conveniently registers this URL for both protocols.
-- add missing files
-- tweak translation command files
-- dumpers are now responsive for writting the files
-- moved the twig extractor the bridge
-- clear temp files after unit tests
-- check the presence of dumper in translation writer
-- General cleaning of the code
-- clean phpDoc
-- fix PHPDoc
-- fixing class name in configuration
-- add unit tests for extractors (php and twig)
-- moved test to correct location
-- polish the code
-- polish the code
when esi is enabled and internal uris are generated for esi-tags, an
attribute-array consisting entirely of null-values isn't handled correctly.
The reason is that php's `http_build_query()`-method outputs an empty string
for such arrays:
http_build_query(array('foo' => '')) == 'foo='
http_build_query(array('foo' => null)) == ''
In the latter case, the generation of an URI in `HttpKernel::generateInternalUri()`
generates an URI that could not be matched by the corresponding route (ex.
`_internal/Controller/.html` opposed to `_internal/Controller/none.html` which
should be expected).
This commit adds a possible solution as well as a simple test for this issue.
Commits
-------
9bcce9f fix tests
fc4787a fix non-extensible router
Discussion
----------
Router fix
Right now, the router is hard to overwrite (you need always a compiler pass). This commit fixes this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/18 01:15:36 -0700
Why do you need a complier pass to override the router?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/18 01:47:47 -0700
How would you suggest to overwrite it?
Basically, I want to do something like this:
```yml
services:
router:
parent: router.default
class: MyClass
calls:
- [moreDeps, []]
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/18 05:07:19 -0700
Then maybe we should somehow support redefining services with the same name while keeping the old one as parent, otherwise we need this foo.default for every service out there?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/18 06:30:34 -0700
as @Seldeak said, why do that for the router and not all services?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/18 06:38:39 -0700
I have designed the SecurityBundle this way where extension is encouraged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/18 11:15:57 -0700
I should add that this is mainly a problem for services where you still want to use the semantic configuration that is provided by the bundle. For services which are not configured by the extension, this is not so much of an issue.
Anyway, if you don't want to merge it, just close the PR. I have no problem with using a compiler pass.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/18 11:55:11 -0700
We already have such a case with translator and translator.real. I will review the existing services to see where it makes sense to implement the same strategy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/18 12:20:55 -0700
I guess you'd do it anyway, but we should pick a winner between .real and .default
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/07/18 12:26:52 -0700
I would prefer ".default" as ".real" always confused me.
Commits
-------
5d46e63 [Form] Add the FormHelper configuration
a43fad4 [Form] Improve unit tests for rendering
1cb2129 [FrameworkBundle][Form] Adding a cache to FormHelper::lookupTemplate()
f39ce67 [Form][FrameworkBundle] PHP theming
Discussion
----------
[2.1] RFC [Form] Php theming
This PR implements theming support for the php engine.
It works similarly as the twig theming with themes being folders and blocks being individual files.
There are probably a few things to tune before this can get merged:
### Theme naming
The current format is "\<Bundle\>:\<Controller\>" i.e. "FrameworkBundle:Form".
Is this ok or could you imagine something better ?
### Div and Table theme folders
Currently "FrameworkBundle\\Resources\\views\\Form" and "FrameworkBundle\\Resources\\views\\FormTable"
Is this ok or anything better ?
### Form helper configuration
I am not sure if the configuration is at the best possible location:
```
framework:
templating:
form:
resources: [themeA, themeB]
```
Any better idea ?
There is a [thread on the ml](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/9b3f131fe116b511)
Commits
-------
2c1108c [Form] Revert the ability to override anything else than the text of the label while rendering a row
da467a6 [Form] Fix the exception message when no block is found while rendering
8670995 [Form] Optimize rendering when the block to render is known
41e07c9 [Form] Optimize rendering
ee5d975 [Form] Remove a test which is no more relevant (after recent FileType refactoring)
f729c6b [Form] Add the ability to override label & widget options when rendering a row
e09ae3f [Form][FrameworkBundle] Make FormHelper::renderSection() recursively callable, introduce FormHelper::renderBlock()
e43fb98 [Form][TwigBridge] Make FormExtension::render() recursively callable to ease theming
Discussion
----------
[Form] Some refactoring of the rendering
# First two commits
## FormExtension::render() can now be called recursively.
The main use case is theming support in for collections. Let's consider that you have a collection of `CustomType`, the type hierarchy while rendering the proto would be `field < form < custom < prototype`. Before this change any theme applied to your custom type (i.e. a `custom_row` block) would not have been taken into account while rendering the prototype because of the structure of the `prototype_row` block:
```html
{% block prototype_row %}
{% spaceless %}
<script type="text/html" id="{{ proto_id }}">{{ block('field_row') }}</script>
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock prototype_row %}
```
which skip the `custom_row` block rendering to fallback to the `field_row` block rendering.
With this PR `prototype_row` recursively calls `FormExtension::render()`
```html
{% block prototype_row %}
{% spaceless %}
<script type="text/html" id="{{ proto_id }}">{{ form_row(form) }}</script>
{% endspaceless %}
{% endblock prototype_row %}
```
this has for effect to render the block for the parent type (i.e. `custom_row`)
## FormHelper
The `FormHelper` has been updated to more closely match the `FormExtension` architecture and the templates have been modified accordingly. `echo $view['form']->renderBlock(<block name>)` is the php equivalent of `{{ block(<block name>) }}`.
The attributes are now rendered using a template rather than by the `FormHelper::attributes()` method.
Several templates have been fixed.
# Third commit
The `$varStack` property was used to forward options to the label and the widget when rendering a row. The implementation was not working as expected. The proposed way to override label and widget options is to pass these options in the `label` and `widget` keys while callinf `render_row`.
That would be:
`{{ form_row(form.field, {"attr": {<row attributes>}, "label" : {"label": <text>, "attr": {<label attr>}}, "widget" : { "attr" : {<widget attributes}} } }}`
So there is now the ability to set attributes for the row (`<div>` or `<tr>`).
This has been discussed on [the mailing list](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/17754128ba480545). **I would like to find a compromise with @Seldaek before this gets merged**
The `$varStack` property is now only used when recursively calling `FormExtension::render()`
# Notes
I have preferred to submit several commits in order to ease review and to keep some history.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/06/20 05:20:56 -0700
@vicb On a side note, do you think it would be possible to support form theming in PHP templates too ? Currently, the only way to customize the rendering of forms when using PHP templates is to overwrite the FrameworkBundle's templates, and this impacts all forms. This makes the PHP rendering far less powerful than the Twig one.
I don't know the Form rendering and the PHPEngine well enough to know if it is feasible for 2.1 or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/20 05:35:11 -0700
@stof I hope to make it possible but I need a little bit more thinking to find the best possible solution which should not look like a hack.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 01:13:10 -0700
This should not be merged yet, it might have some issue with the variable stack. I am working on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 01:41:11 -0700
Sorted out the issue, it was linked to some local _optimization_, the code of this PR is ok.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 02:01:24 -0700
I have pushed a [POC of php theming based on this PR](https://github.com/vicb/symfony/commits/form%2Fphp-theme) to my repo - it is lacking a configuration and cache layer.
I have open [a thread on the ml](http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/9b3f131fe116b511) to discuss this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2011/06/21 23:40:21 -0700
@fabpot fixed in the last commit.
Here are the new simplified rules:
* Required cache warmers are *always* executed when the Kernel boots for the first time;
* Optional cache warmers are *only* executed from the CLI via cache:warmup
These new rules means that all the configuration settings for the cache
warmers have been removed. So, if you want the best performance, remember to
warmup the cache when going to production.
This also fixed quite a few bugs.
* gordonslondon/http-foundation/response:
[HttpFoundation] merge Response::isRedirected() with Response::isRedirect() - Response::isRedirected() has been removed
* Seldaek/events:
[EventDispatcher] Removed temporary code
[FrameworkBundle] Improved code readability
[FrameworkBundle] Clarified code and fixed regression
Update Core and Security events to latest model
[EventDispatcher] Allow registration of arbitrary callbacks
[EventDispatcher] Remove useless code
[EventDispatcher] Minor memory optimization to getListeners()
[FrameworkBundle] Small optimization, remove some function calls
This in effect removes the direct link between event name and the method name on the handler.
Any callback can be given as a handler and the event name becomes an arbitrary string. Allowing for easier namespacing (see next commit)
The consequence of this commit is that variables are accessible that have been passed to a surrounding form helper.
Example template:
{% block my_widget_label %}
<label>{{ label }}
{% endblock %}
{% block my_widget_row %}
{# It is not necessary to explicitely pass through the label variable #}
{{ form_label(form) }}
{{ form_widget(form) }}
{% endblock %}
Example usage:
{{ form_row(form.mywidget, { 'label': 'My Widget' }) }}
* vicb/service-event:
[FrameworkBundle] Optimization of the method ContainerAwareEventDispacther::dispatch()
[FrameworkBundle] Fix an issue with ContainerAwareEventDispatcher when re-entering a scope
* made the options array only for "global" options that are valid for all session storages
* changed the PDO session storage constructor signature to accept an array of options for DB configuration
* changed the storage_id to be the full service id, instead of just part of it
* removed the class parameter for session as it can be changed via the .class parameter (it was the only example in the framework)
* removed the configuration for the PDO session storage for now
* vicb/event_debug:
[FrameworkBundle] Make some TraceableEventDispacther properties private
[Event] Tweak phpDoc for consistency
[FrameworkBundle] Add error detection to the TraceableEventDispatcher
* vicb/locate_template2:
[FrameworkBundle] Enforce templates instances of TemplateReferenceInterface
[FrameworkBundle] Add unit tests for the CacheTemplateLocator class
[FrameworkBundle] Add unit tests for the TemplateLocator class
[TwigBundle] Fix the cache warmer
[TwigBundle] Tweak cache warmer configuration
[FrameworkBundle] Fix resource inheritance in the template cache warmer
The parameter has been removed and the service moved to the XML file (for consistency).
The behavior is still the same as before as any non-public service
which is not referenced anywhere will be automatically removed by a
compiler pass.
Controllers:
"BlogBundle:Post:show" is now "Blog:Post:show"
Templates:
"BlogBundle:Post:show.html.twig" is now "Blog:Post:show.html.twig"
Resources:
"@BlogBundle/Resources/config/blog.xml" is now "@Blog/Resources/config/blog.xml"
Doctrine:
"$em->find('BlogBundle:Post', $id)" is now "$em->find('Blog:Post', $id)"
It's a detail, but it hits usability. For normal bundles (those without children), we're able to actually print the namespace where we're looking for the Controller. For bundles with children, this would be a very verbose message, but we can at least print all of the bundles that we looked inside of.
