Commits
-------
cea2c7e removed unneeded local variable
924f378 updated changelog
72d5805 changed route name
41cc0d6 [FrameworkBundle] added support for HInclude
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] added support for HInclude
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: discuss
Example: https://github.com/kbond/symfony-standard/tree/hinclude
**Reopened this as I broke #2903**
References:
- http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/b74e587d6f2f87b0
- http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_thread/thread/8776a9833d4a5f79
- #2903
- #2865
[](http://travis-ci.org/kbond/symfony)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kbond at 2012-02-11T20:27:22Z
unless there is anything else I think this is ready, want me to squash again?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-11T21:07:33Z
@kbond: Can you add some information about the changes in the CHANGELOG?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-02-11T21:33:32Z
Do I see it correctly that we cannot set a default template on a per hinclude tag basis? But only global?
That's not really usefull when javascript is disabled because it should resemble the content to be included as an alternative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-11T21:42:15Z
@Tobion currently it is not possible. But changing the content on a tag basis may require changing the way the render tag look like (as there is no content in the tag currently) so this needs further discussion and @fabpot said he wants to merge a first implementation without it. See the discussion above.
Commits
-------
9d6eb82 [Routing] Fix a bug in the TraceableUrlMatcher
9fc8d28 [FrameworkBundle] Fix a bug in the RedirectableUrlMatcher
4fcf9ef [Routing] Small optimization in the UrlMatcher
abc2141 [Routing] Added a missing property declaration
d86e1eb [Routing] Remove a weird dependency
Discussion
----------
[Routing] Remove a dependency on a derived class, fixes, optim
Subset of #3296 which should be acceptable.
Travis is happy.
The side effect of removing the dependency is that the `UrlMatcher` does not throw an exception any more when the scheme does not match the required scheme. I think it is better because:
* it removes a dependency on a derived class,
* it was an undocumented "feature",
* other thrown excs are component specific while this one was raw SPL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-09T14:43:02Z
let me know what should go in 2.0 as well.
Commits
-------
cde34fd [Form] Throwing an AlreadyBoundException in `add`, `remove`, `setParent`, `bind` and `setData` if called on a bound form
Discussion
----------
[Form] Throwing an AlreadyBoundException in `add`, `remove`, `setParent`, `bind` and `setData` if called on a bound form
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: **yes**
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
The above mentioned methods now throw an exception because when invoked on a bound form they might cause strange side effects. You should rely on event listeners instead of modifying bound forms.
See also #3022
Commits
-------
ac59db7 cleanup
64ea95d [WebProfilerBundle] Add redirection info to the router panel
826bd23 [FrameworkBundle] fix phpDoc of ControllerResolver::createController()
e3cf37f [HttpFoundation] RedirectResponse: add the ability to retrieve the target URL, add unit tests
50c85ae [WebProfiler] Add info to the router panel
Discussion
----------
[WIP][Profiler] Routing
former #3206 part 3 (depends on part 1 - #3280)
The goal of this PR is to fix#3264 by adding redirection infos on the router panel.
Done:
* Add info on the target url / route
To do:
* Display an accurate URL matching process (when using the RedirectableUrlMatcher)
Commits
-------
22c8f80 [Form] Fixed issues mentioned in the PR comments
3b1b570 [Form] Fixed: The "date", "time" and "datetime" types can be initialized with \DateTime objects
88ef52d [Form] Improved FormType::getDefaultOptions() to see default options defined in parent types
b9facfc [Form] Removed undefined variables in exception constructor
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed: "date", "time" and "datetime" fields can be initialized with \DateTime objects
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: **yes**
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #3288
Todo: -
Fixed exception that was thrown when doing:
$builder->add('createdAt', 'date', array('data' => new \DateTime()));
On a side note, the options passed to `FieldType::getDefaultOptions` now always also contain the default options of any parent types. This is necessary if you want to be independent of how `getDefaultOptions` is implemented in the parent type and still rely on the already defined values.
As a result, `FieldType::getParent` doesn't see default options anymore. This shouldn't be a big problem, because this method only relies on options in few cases. If it does, options now need to be checked for existence with `isset` before being used (BC break).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-09T16:14:46Z
@fabpot Ready to merge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-10T12:15:04Z
@fabpot Ready to merge
Commits
-------
411a0cc [Validator] Added GroupSequenceProvider to changelog
815c769 [Validator] Renamed getValidationGroups to getGroupSequence
d84a2e4 [Validator] Updated test expectations
9f2310b [Validator] Fixed typos, renamed hasGroupSequenceProvider
e0d2828 [Validator] GroupSequenceProvider tests improved, configuration changed
c3b04a3 [Validator] Changed GroupSequenceProvider implementation
6c4455f [Validator] Added GroupSequenceProvider
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Added GroupSequenceProvider
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: 
As discussed in #3114 I implemented the "GroupSequenceProvider" pattern for the validator component. It allows the user to select certain validation groups based on the current state of an object. Here is an example:
/**
* @Assert\GroupSequenceProvider("UserGroupSequnceProvider")
*/
class User
{
/**
* @Assert\NotBlank(groups={"Premium"})
*/
public function getAddress();
public function hasPremiumSubscription();
}
class UserGroupSequenceProvider implements GroupSequenceProviderInterface
{
public function getValidationGroups($user)
{
if ($user->hasPremiumSubscription()) {
return array('User', 'Premium');
} else {
return array('User');
}
}
}
With this patch there are two mechanisms to define the group sequence now. Either you can use @GroupSequence to define a static order of validation groups or you can use @GroupSequenceProvider to create dynamic validation group arrays.
The ClassMetadata therefore has methods now which implement quite similar things. The question is whether it would make sense to interpret the static group sequence as a special case and create something like a DefaultGroupSequenceProvider or StaticGroupSequenceProvider which is assigned by default. This would cause a BC break inside the validator component.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-28T13:39:54Z
I like the implementation, but I think we should differ a little bit from Java here.
1. `GroupSequenceProviderInterface` should be implemented by the domain classes themselves (`User`), not by a separate class.
2. As such, the parameter `$object` from `getValidationGroups($object)` can be removed
3. `ClassMetadata::setGroupSequenceProvider()` should accept a boolean to activate/deactivate this functionality. Also the check for the interface (does the underlying class implement it?) should be done here
Apart from that, special cases need to be treated:
* A definition of a group sequence and a group sequence provider in the same `ClassMetadata` should not be allowed. Either of them must not be set.
* Metadata loaders must take care of settings made by parent classes. If `Animal` is extended by `Dog`, `Animal` defines a group sequence (or group sequence provider) and `Dog` a group sequence provider (or group sequence), only the setting of `Dog` should apply
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by blogsh at 2012-01-28T21:25:37Z
Changes of the latest commit:
- GroupSequenceProviderInterface has to be implemented by the domain class
- The annotation/configuration options let the user define whether the provider is activated or not (is this neccessary at all?)
- An error is thrown if the user wants to use static group sequences and the provider simultaneously
At the moment neither the static group sequence nor the provider is inherited from parent classes or interfaces. I don't know if it would make sense to enable this feature. There could be problems if a user wants to define a static group sequence in the parent class and a sequence provider in the child class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-30T13:07:04Z
> There could be problems if a user wants to define a static group sequence in the parent class and a sequence provider in the child class.
In this case, the setting in the child class should override the setting of the parent class.
But we can leave this open for now. As it seems, [this issue is unresolved in Hibernate as well](https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HV-467).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by blogsh at 2012-01-30T22:54:41Z
Okay, finally I managed to upload the latest commit. If you got a bunch of notifications or so I'm sorry, but I had to revert some accidental changes in the commit :(
I've rewritten the tests and have removed the "active" setting in the XML configuration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by blogsh at 2012-02-02T15:24:01Z
Okay, typos are fixed now and `hasGroupSequenceProvider` has been renamed to `isGroupSequenceProvider`. I also had to adjust some tests after the rebase with master.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-03T09:25:19Z
Looks good.
@fabpot 👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-03T09:46:52Z
Can you add a note in the CHANGELOG before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by blogsh at 2012-02-09T12:31:27Z
@fabpot done
Commits
-------
8714d79 [Form] Simplified code in MergeCollectionListener
8ab982a [Form] Fixed: Custom add and remove method are not invoked if disallowed
02f61ad [Form] Renamed choice and collection options "adder_prefix" and "remover_prefix" to "add_method" and "remove_method" and allowed to specify full method names
b393774 [Form] Used direct method access in MergeCollectionListener instead of Reflection to avoid problems when using class hierarchies
d208f4e [Form] Made it possible to use models with only either addXxx() or removeXxx()
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed edge cases in MergeCollectionListener
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
Fixes an issue mentioned in the comments of #3239
see https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3239#issuecomment-3776312
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T12:12:17Z
Wait a minute before merging this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T13:01:55Z
@fabpot Ready to merge
The listener is used by the Collection type as well as the Choice and Entity type (with multiple
selection). The effect is that you can have for example this model:
class Article
{
public function addTag($tag) { ... }
public function removeTag($tag) { ... }
public function getTags($tag) { ... }
}
You can create a form for the article with a field "tags" of either type "collection" or "choice"
(or "entity"). The field will correctly use the three methods of the model for displaying and
editing tags.
Commits
-------
2e4ebe4 [Validator] Renamed methods addViolationAtRelativePath() and getAbsolutePropertyPath() in ExecutionContext
9153f0e [Validator] Deprecated ConstraintValidator methods setMessage(), getMessageTemplate() and getMessageParameters()
0417282 [Validator] Fixed typos
a30a679 [Validator] Made ExecutionContext immutable and introduced new class GlobalExecutionContext
fe85bbd [Validator] Simplified ExecutionContext::addViolation(), added ExecutionContext::addViolationAt()
f77fd41 [Form] Fixed typos
1fc615c Fixed string access by curly brace to bracket
a103c28 [Validator] The Collection constraint adds "missing" and "extra" errors to the individual fields now
f904a9e [Validator] Fixed: GraphWalker does not add constraint violation if error message is empty
1dd302c [Validator] Fixed ConstraintViolationList::__toString() to not include dots in the output if the root is empty
1678a3d [Validator] Fixed: Validator::validateValue() propagates empty validation root instead of the provided value
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Improved "missing" and "extra" errors of Collection constraint
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2615
Todo: -
Instead of a single violation
Array:
The fields "foo", "bar" are missing
various violations are now generated.
Array[foo]:
This field is missing
Array[bar]:
This field is missing
Apart from that, the PR contains various minor fixes to the Validator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-02-02T09:14:52Z
@fabpot Ready for merge.
Commits
-------
e9b4c58 [Console] Enable process isolantion in Shell
Discussion
----------
[Console] Enable process isolantion in Shell
Bug fix: no
BC break: no
Feature addition: yes
Symfony2 test pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2848#2847
Todo: Write unit tests
See tickets for reference, need help with unit testing, because I don't know how to test this :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011-12-16T09:36:32Z
I've tested this with different scenarios like "inception" (invoking shell from shell - will not work) ;) and others, everything seems to work great.
As I have no idea on how to pack this with unit testing some help needed, also as I don't have any windows in home ;) need someone to test it on MS os.
And we should decide, do we want process isolation by default? (This will not break the BC, break only the "expected behavior" - colorful output and "interactivity")
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2011-12-18T15:14:26Z
I've rebased this branch to match current `HEAD` and I've added usage of new process builder, for better portability an shell arg escaping.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-02T08:28:32Z
@canni: Can you squash your commits before I merge this PR? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by canni at 2012-02-02T09:07:16Z
@fabpot @stof done.
Bug fix: no
BC break: no
Feature addition: yes
Symfony2 test pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2848#2847
Todo: -
See tickets for reference, need help with testing, because I don't know how to test this :)
Commits
-------
de253dd [Form] read_only and disabled attributes
Discussion
----------
[Form] read_only and disabled attributes (closes#1974)
1. Removed ``readOnly`` property from ``Form``, as it is no longer required
2. Introduced ``disabled`` property to ``Form``, behaves exactly like ``readOnly`` used to
3. Added ``disabled`` property to fields, defaults to ``false``, renders as ``disabled="disabled"``
4. A field with positive ``read_only`` property now renders as ``readonly="readonly"``
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2012-01-26T17:46:17Z
I changed ``Form`` and ``FormBuilder`` property ``readOnly`` to ``disabled``. On second thought, this is perhaps not such good change - while readOnly somewhat implied the use-case, disabled no longer does.
Perhaps something else, like ``bindable`` (as not to confuse with read_only attribute of Fields)?
@bschussek, others, any thoughts?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-01-31T06:53:59Z
Please prefix commits with the affected component, if applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2012-01-31T08:41:03Z
@bschussek Prefixed. Please also see see to [this question](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/3193#issuecomment-3673074)
A new ExecutionContext is now created everytime that GraphWalker::walkConstraint() is
launched. Because of this, a validator B launched from within a validator A can't break
A anymore by changing the context.
Because we have a new ExecutionContext for every constraint validation, there is no point
in modifying its state anymore. Because of this it is now immutable.
Fabien Potencier
Drak
Kevin Bond
Bernhard Schussek
Victor Berchet
Sebastian Hörl
Dariusz Górecki
Eric Clemmons
Helmer Aaviksoo
Toni Uebernickel
