Commits
-------
5f22268 [Profiler] Sync with master
1aef4e8 Adds collecting info about request method and allowing searching by it
Discussion
----------
[WebProfiler] Add ability to filter data by request method
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #1515
For discussion & description checkout: #1515 & #2279
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/11 10:02:41 -0800
After merging this PR, the toolbar is not displayed anymore for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/12 14:18:20 -0800
@fabpot the toolbar works for me using this branch
Commits
-------
6548354 fixed data-url
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] fixed and adjusted HTML5 markup
I corrected some markup errors that I found when validating the pages of the WebProfilerBundle.
Along the way I also improved the semantic structure of HTML5 like table header and body, lang attribute.
Removed type="text/css" that is the default with rel="stylesheet". Also no need for media="screen"!? Otherwise style does not apply when debugging with handheld device or when printing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/12 23:37:15 -0800
@Tobion: Can you squash your commit before I merge your PR? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2011/12/13 03:14:51 -0800
@fabpot I would appreciate if you could do this.
I see two problems with pull requests on @github that occur again and again. It's pretty annoying compared to the otherwise very user-friendly Github.
1. Squashing commits of a pull request: If you've already pushed commits to GitHub, and then squash them locally, you will not be able to push that same branch to GitHub again. So you need to create a new branch and a new pull request.
So there should be a button on Github that simply squashes all commits and allows you to enter a new commit message.
2. Opening a pull request based on the master branch instead of the 2.0 branch where bug fixes should be made. So people must rebase their stuff and open a new pull request again. All this back and forth is taking time unnecessarily (both for admins and contributors) and cluttering Githubs news feed.
There should be the possibility to allow switching the pull request base branch. Or at least give the users a configurable hint about the best practice of contributing to a specific repo when they open a pull request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/12/13 03:16:10 -0800
@Tobion
1. Solved by doing a git push -f remote_name branch_name
2. Yes here you need to open a new PR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/13 03:21:47 -0800
@Tobion: I'm more than aware of these issues but unfortunately, there is nothing I can do if we want to continue using the Github PRs (and automatic closing).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2011/12/13 03:51:47 -0800
That's why I hope that @github will provide a convenient solution to these issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/13 04:08:07 -0800
@Tobion send a feature request to github. Commenting here will not make them implement it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2011/12/13 04:18:31 -0800
@fabpot I squashed commits.
@stof I will do it. But there is no public issue tracker for the Github software, is there? So need to use the contact form I suppose.
fixed markup: <pre> not valid inside <p>
adjusted base html structure for HTML5
improved table markup in bag.html.twig
improved table markup in results.html.twig
update exception.html.twig
Commits
-------
fea74db Added information page with better messages for Profiler
Discussion
----------
[WebProfiler] Added information page with better messages
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/08/30 23:29:27 -0700
@fabpot Any decision about this ?
Commits
-------
132fbe3 [WebProfilerBundle] Merge position and css_position
defdb82 [WebProfilerBundle] Remove unused line
69a50ab [WebProfilerBundle] Add the posibility to specify position of toolbar
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] Add the posibility to specify position of toolbar
I'm facing a project where everything is at the bottom of the page, positioned with CSS.
This PR adds the possibility to specify the position of the toolbar, with configuration :
web_profiler:
toolbar: true
intercept_redirects: false
css_position: top
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/06 12:11:27 -0700
Looking at the code rendering the toolbar, there is already a ``position`` parameter used to display the toolbar on top in the profiler. Maybe we could look into reusing it instead of having a second one named ``css_position``.
But the phpdoc says ``bottom, normal, or null -- automatically guessed``. Using ``bottom`` will result in ``position: bottom`` in the CSS, which is broken. @fabpot is it simply a left-over of a previous version ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by alexandresalome at 2011/09/16 00:56:11 -0700
I merged parameters and changed the documentation for 3 values : ```bottom, top or normal```.
Commits
-------
c6b15b3 [WebProfilerBundle] Variables only used once
847c665 [WebProfilerBundle] Use panel URL for debugging toolbar
fe13a6c [WebProfilerBundle] Fix CS
fe76d74 [WebProfilerBundle] Propose to open debug toolbar request in an error occured.
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] Propose to open debug toolbar request in an error occ
[WebProfilerBundle] Propose to open debug toolbar request in an error occured.
This is very useful when creating data collectors and an error occurs
when redering the toolbar via XHR.
The only problem is that the exception page renders the toolbar via JS, too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/17 05:26:10 -0700
IMO, you should propose to open the link to the profiler (if the profiler is enabled) instead of opening the toolbar alone
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by alexandresalome at 2011/09/17 05:34:50 -0700
Thanks @stof
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by alexandresalome at 2011/09/17 05:50:11 -0700
4 commits for 2 lines... I should change my job. Thanks @stof, again
This commit also fixes exception pages when Twig is not enabled as a templating engine.
Instead of just displaying the raw Twig template as before, we now fallback to the default
exception handler introduced some time ago.
Commits
-------
abd60ac [WebProfilerBundle] Do not display toolbar loading result if it's not a valid toolbar
406c8d8 [WebProfilerBundle] Make toolbar loading non-blocking
Discussion
----------
Non-blocking WDT & prevents garbage to slip in the page
I made the loading non-blocking so that it's not preventing normal operation of the page when the WDT takes a bit long to come up (happens sometimes when the machine is busy).
The second commit also checks that the response looks correct, to prevent stack traces and such to appear in the page if there was a problem. The main issue is not really stack traces though it's mostly with security and intercept_redirect enabled, if you look at a fully secured site you get twice the redirect intercept message to the login page.
Tested in IE7/9/FF4/Opera11
* Seldaek/events:
[EventDispatcher] Removed temporary code
[FrameworkBundle] Improved code readability
[FrameworkBundle] Clarified code and fixed regression
Update Core and Security events to latest model
[EventDispatcher] Allow registration of arbitrary callbacks
[EventDispatcher] Remove useless code
[EventDispatcher] Minor memory optimization to getListeners()
[FrameworkBundle] Small optimization, remove some function calls
The main benefit is that in XML/YML files we have common syntax (i.e. core.controller, form.pre_bind) that properly namespaces event names (before: onCoreController was ok, preBind was not).
On the other hand in PHP land we also have namespaced events, CoreEvents::controller, FormEvents::preBind, before it was Events::onCoreController, Events::onPreBind, we now have more context.
This in effect removes the direct link between event name and the method name on the handler.
Any callback can be given as a handler and the event name becomes an arbitrary string. Allowing for easier namespacing (see next commit)
