This PR was merged into the 2.2 branch.
Commits
-------
a433ba2 [Security] [Tests] added unit tests for the UserPasswordValidator class and made the validator service for the UserPassword constraint configurable.
Discussion
----------
[Security] [Tests] added unit tests for the UserPasswordValidator class ...
...and made the validator service for the UserPassword constraint configurable.
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
This PR was merged into the 2.2 branch.
Commits
-------
8f8d6cf [HttpKernel] fixed regression when rendering an inline controller and passing some objects (closes#6822)
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel] fixed regression when rendering an inline controller and passing some objects (closes#6822)
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #6822
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
e7624b6 [Security] Add PHPDoc to AuthenticationEvents
Discussion
----------
[Security] Added PHPDoc to AuthenticationEvents
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
HttpContentRenderer has been renamed to FragmentHandler.
The RendererStrategy subnamespace has been renamed to Fragment.
The strategy classes now have Fragment in their names.
ProxyRouterListener has been renamed to FragmentListener
The router_proxy configuration entry has been renamed to fragments.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
b1d1168 Fixed the NullLogger to implement the HttpKernel interface again
Discussion
----------
Fixed the NullLogger to implement the HttpKernel interface again
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no (reverting one introduced by mistake)
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
This BC breaking mistake has been reported in https://github.com/schmittjoh/JMSSecurityExtraBundle/pull/105#issuecomment-12908659
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6852).
Commits
-------
fde7585 [DIC] Better handling of enableable configurations
Discussion
----------
[DIC] Better handling of enableable configurations
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no, this feature has not been released yet
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
My definition of bug fix might be discussable. The thing which I think is not discussable is that this PR fixes the semantic - and I think it is important for a "semantic configuration": before this PR, some nodes had `->canBeDisabled` for nodes that were actually disabled by default. Those nodes now have `->canBeEnabled` which sounds right.
**Edit: Jan 28, 2013** - history:
See [the related comments](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/6829#discussion_r2727742).
I think Symfony **must** get the configuration right as we can expect of lot of devs to use this as a template when writting their own configuration.
@schmittjoh could you please give me your feedback on [this change](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/6852/files#L4R224) considering [the rationale](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/6852/files#L3R7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-23T16:10:33Z
@vicb your links are broken as they are pointing to the PR creation page
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-23T16:10:55Z
and to create a TODO list, it has to be a list first
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-23T16:31:10Z
@stof thanks for reporting the broken links, they are fixed /cc @schmittjoh
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-23T16:31:50Z
@Tobion please submit a PR to my repo, I don't have much time to work on this. Thanks !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-25T15:14:47Z
@fabpot @schmittjoh I'd like your feedback on the latest commit, rationale is in the method phpDoc. It better matches what we do now and seem the most sensible thing to do.
edit: with this you can no more disable the node explicitly, I have to find a better solution
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2013-01-25T15:20:13Z
Looks good.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Victor Berchet <notifications@github.com>wrote:
> @fabpot <https://github.com/fabpot> @schmittjoh<https://github.com/schmittjoh>I'd like your feedback on the latest commit, rationale is in the method
> phpDoc. It better matches what we do now and seem the most sensible thing
> to do.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/6852#issuecomment-12704585>.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-28T14:37:57Z
@fabpot I know I keep insisting on this one and I am sorry for that but I think this should be considered as a bug fix (see the PR header for details) and should be merged in 2.2. I think the Symfony core should be exemplary as it is used by many developers as a template when creating their own bundle. *This PR is no more a WIP and can be merged right now*.
In addition to fixing the enableable nodes, this PR contain new UTs and some fixes to the code / tests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-28T16:43:42Z
@vicb As explained in a comment, this is not a BC break as this feature does not exist in 2.1. So, I can make the change to the CHANGELOG if you want after merging, or I can let you make the change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-28T16:46:33Z
I am going to change it right now !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-28T16:46:56Z
(and thanks for having checked this)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2013-01-28T16:54:37Z
@fabpot I have updated the changelog and the PR header.
I am not sure if the commits should be squashed or not. On one side the multiple commits can help understand the changes but on the other side that's a lot of small commits which could pollute history. I let you choose what to do.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
e3086cc [Console] added some missing information in the phpdoc (closes#6464)
Discussion
----------
[Console] added some missing information in the phpdoc (closes#6464)
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #6464
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
ed64413 removed deprecated message in FieldType
Discussion
----------
removed deprecated messages coming for internal calls
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #6407
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | n/a
It's probably not the cleanest code possible, but I don't see any other way to keep the type for BC and avoid the deprecated message when called internally.
That should fix the deprecated messages thrown by the Form and Validator components.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-24T15:41:26Z
The cases where you should actually be warned about the deprecation of FieldType is when using ``field`` to create a field with the factory (which would not trigger the constructor)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-24T15:46:23Z
@stof: what do you mean? That we can remove the `trigger_error()` call altogether?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-24T15:49:31Z
Nobody will ever instantiate the FieldType directly as the framework is registering it (btw, you are missing the FrameworkBundle lazy registration here).
The constructor of a form type is not the right place to deprecate it as registering it does not mean it will be used in the app.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-24T15:51:26Z
@stof: I've updated the PR to remove the `trigger_error` call.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
8bfd7a7 Remove custom error handler for deprecations
efbff0c Change deprecated Min and Max constraint
c47f027 [Validator][Constraints] Update AllValidator using new Validator API
Discussion
----------
[Validator][Constraints] Update AllValidator using new Validator API
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets:
License of the code: MIT
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
9264431 Remove custom error handler for deprecations
c80c17e Change deprecated Min constraint to Range constraint
a39fdd8 Remove getPropertyPath in the tests
ffa4c6f [Validator][Constraints] CollectionValidator
Discussion
----------
[Validator][Constraints] Update CollectionValidator using new Validator API
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #6648
License of the code: MIT
In the tests `$i = 1` is because in `validate` the first call to `$this->context` is `$this->context->getGroup();`, should I write this in a comment before each declaration?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-15T21:50:41Z
You should also modify the CollectionValidator tests to use a different constraint than ``Min`` which is deprecated. Once it is done, these tests should not need to register a custom error handler catching deprecations anymore
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by franmomu at 2013-01-15T22:33:43Z
Perfect, I'm going to do the same in #6743
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
2061cc0 Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Mapping/ClassMetadata.php
Discussion
----------
[Validator] ClassMetadata use deprecated methods
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: maybe yes (I don't have the knowlegde)
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: ?
Todo: Nothing
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR: Nothing
getValue() is deprecated since version 2.2 and will be removed in 2.3. Use getPropertyValue() instead.
ClassMetadata is still using the deprecated method, changed it to getPropertyValue to prevent a trigger error.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-14T15:35:28Z
ping @bschussek
* 2.1:
[DependencyInjection] fixed the creation of synthetic services in ContainerBuilder
[Security] PHPDoc in SecurityEvents
Fix typos in README
Added an error message in the DebugClassLoader when using / instead of \.
KNOWN_ISSUES with php 5.3.16
[FrameworkBundle] fixed Client::doRequest that must call its parent method (closes#6737)
[Yaml] fixed ignored text when parsing an inlined mapping or sequence (closes#6786)
[Yaml] fixed#6773
[Yaml] fixed#6770
bumped Symfony version to 2.1.8-DEV
bumped Symfony version to 2.0.23-DEV
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Client.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#6734).
Commits
-------
4d51ec0 Fix for hardcode (#6384) in choice widget
Discussion
----------
Fix for hardcode (#6384) in choice widget
empty_value should not be disabled if field is not required!
#6384
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2013-01-15T15:51:08Z
You need to revert the file mode changes (100644 → 100755)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by MaksSlesarenko at 2013-01-18T16:44:42Z
fixed tests
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by MaksSlesarenko at 2013-01-21T15:36:59Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-21T15:58:26Z
ping @bschussek
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by MaksSlesarenko at 2013-01-23T11:15:37Z
ping @fabpot @bschussek
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2013-01-23T12:08:19Z
I think it's good to squash and merge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-23T12:16:37Z
Can you rebase and squash before I merge? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by MaksSlesarenko at 2013-01-23T19:51:36Z
@fabpot done
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
7944860 [DIC] Move PrependExtensionInterface to the Extension namespace
Discussion
----------
[DIC] Move PrependExtensionInterface to the Extension namespace
@fabpot Please merge before 2.2 (no BC break) /cc @lsmith77
