* 2.0:
fixed functional tests so that the cache/logs are specific to one version of Symfony (to avoid weird side effects)
[FrameworkBundle] Prove client insulation and non-insulation works in session tests.
[FrameworkBundle] Add tests to prove functional testing works with simultaneous clients.
[FrameworkBundle] Small changes to test setup.
[DoctrineBundle] Fixed incorrectly shown params
[SwiftmailerBundle] fixed the send email command when the queue does not extends Swift_ConfigurableSpool
Commits
-------
8713c2d [DoctrineBridge][DoctrineBundle] Refactored the DBAL logging
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge][DoctrineBundle] Refactored the DBAL logging
This allows enabling the logging and the profiling separately. This is useful for instance when doing batch processing leading to memory issue because of the profiling. In such case, the only solution currently is to disable the logging totally whereas disabling only the use of the profiler would allow seeing the queries in the logs (and the profiles are not collected in the CLI anyway).
I'm not sure about the place where the ``Stopwatch`` should be used. Keeping it in the ``DbalLogger`` with Monolog was the easy way as it allows using the DBAL class directly to collect queries for the profiler but technically the ``Stopwatch`` is used by the profiler.
the bundle changes are part of the PR to avoid letting the bundle in a broken state. I will also submit them to the doctrine/DoctrineBundle repo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/16 02:33:05 -0800
Tests do not pass for me (even after upgrading the Doctrine deps to their latest versions):
There was 1 error:
1) Symfony\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Tests\ContainerTest::testContainer
Argument 1 passed to Doctrine\DBAL\Logging\LoggerChain::addLogger() must implement interface Doctrine\DBAL\Logging\SQLLogger, instance of Doctrine\Dbal\Logging\DebugStack given
vendor/doctrine-dbal/lib/Doctrine/DBAL/Logging/LoggerChain.php:39
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/ContainerBuilder.php:777
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/ContainerBuilder.php:349
src/Symfony/Bundle/DoctrineBundle/Tests/ContainerTest.php:22
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/16 04:24:46 -0800
this is weird. DebugStack implements the interface, and the test passes for me
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/16 05:30:11 -0800
actually, the test pass when I run the `ContainerTest.php` file alone, but fail when I'm running the whole test suite.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/16 05:39:15 -0800
I'm not able to run the whole testsuite. With intl enabled, it fails before the first test somewhere in the Locale component tests (Intl seems to be broken on 5.3.8 on windows as using the constructor of the intl classes gives me ``null`` in the variable). And after disabling intl, I got an error about allowed memory size exhausted during the EntityType tests
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/12/16 05:42:09 -0800
@stof And here goes Travis with help! ;-)
Just log in there, enable hook for your symfony repo, force an push, and watch result at: http://travis-ci.org/#!/stof/symfony
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/16 05:47:57 -0800
Note: when running only the testsuite for bundles, I also get such an error after about 450 of the 500 tests. It seems like the garbage collector does not clean the memory between tests...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/16 05:52:08 -0800
anyway, the error seems really weird as the class implements the interface. I don't see how it could be passed without implementing it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/16 06:10:43 -0800
@stloyd Travis allows me to see that this issue is not specific to @fabpot's computer. But it does not allow me to debug the test as I only get the result of the test, which does not make any sense
After the changes in #2733, the parameters to Doctrine queries were
always shown as 'Array' in the profiler. This commit puts back the
yaml_encode that is still needed after all.
* 2.0:
[FrameworkBundle] Added functional tests.
[Form] Added missing use statements (closes#2880)
[Console] Improve input definition output for Boolean defaults
[SecurityBundle] Changed environment to something unique.
2879: missing space between catch and the brace
#2688: Entities are generated in wrong folder (doctrine:generate:entities Namespace)
[TwigBundle] Fix the exception message escaping
Commits
-------
62f3dc4 [SecurityBundle] Changed environment to something unique.
Discussion
----------
[SecurityBundle] Fix name clash with functional tests
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
Functional tests need a unique environment or it will produce class redeclare errors when multiple bundles are functional tested at the same time.
Commits
-------
f3e92c4 [TwigBundle] Fix the exception message escaping
Discussion
----------
[2.0][TwigBundle] Fix exception new line
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Commits
-------
cd24fb8 change explode's limit parameter based on known variable content
b3cc270 minor optimalisations for explode
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle][CssSelector][HttpFoundation][HttpKernel] [Security][Validator] Minor optimizations for "explode" function
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
I added limit parameter in some places, where it may be usefull. I did not check the context of what values may have been exploded. So to not break anything, I added +1 to limit parameter.
If you find out that in some places limit (or limit+1) is not important or meaningless, write a comment please and I will fix it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/07 06:56:49 -0800
Adding +1 just to be sure to not break anything is clearly something we won't do. What is the benefit of doing that anyway?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/07 13:50:24 -0800
The main idea of making this PR was to notify about some places that may run faster with just adding one parameter to explode function.
If in code is someting like: ```list($a, $b) = explode(':', $s);```
Function ```explode``` will create n-items (depends on ```$s```), but we need in code only the first two items. There is no reason to let ```explode``` create more items in memory that are NEVER used in our code. The limit parameter is there for these situations, so let's use it.
I know that it is microoptimization and may look unimportant, but we are writing a framework - so people expect that code will be as fast as possible without this kind of mistakes.
As I've noticed above, I know that +1 is not ideal solution, but the fastest without debugging the code. I expect that someone (with good knowledge of that code) will look at it and write in comments if variable may contain 1 comma (dot or someting on what is doing the explode) or maybe 2 in some situations or more.
Anyway, +1 will not break anything, because same items are created as it is now, but no unnecessary item is created.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/07 23:14:59 -0800
I'm +1 for adding the number to avoid problems but I'm -1 on the optimization side of things as it won't optimize anything.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/12/08 12:46:49 -0800
*.. The main idea of making this PR was to notify about some places that **may** run faster ..*
I am also unsure the optimization is really an optimization, care to benchmark (with meaningful inputs)? As for the limit+1 thing, why would you want to +1 it? The number of ``list`` arguments should always reflect the ``limit`` parameter, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/08 23:11:34 -0800
@helmer please try this simple benchmark:
```
<?php
header('Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8');
define('COUNT', 10000);
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc:dddddddddddddddddddddd:eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee:fffffffffffffffffffffffffff';
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < COUNT; $i++) {
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string);
}
$end = microtime(true)-$start;
echo 'without limit: '.$end."\n";
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < COUNT; $i++) {
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 2);
}
$end = microtime(true)-$start;
echo 'with limit: '.$end."\n";
```
My results are:
```
without limit: 0.057228803634644
with limit: 0.028676986694336
```
That is 50% difference (with APC enabled). Of course the result depends on the length of source string and if it's too short, the difference may be none or very very small. That's why I said, that it **may** run faster and is just a micro optimization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/08 23:18:12 -0800
@helmer And why +1? It depends on a code:
```
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc';
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 2);
var_dump($a, $b);
```
and
```
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc';
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 3);
var_dump($a, $b);
```
gives different results. That's why the content of the variable must be known.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/12/09 00:08:28 -0800
@pulzarraider Thanks for the benchmark, seems like a gain enough. Although, we are more likely having a scenario of:
``explode(':', 'a🅱️c')`` vs ``explode(':', 'a🅱️c', 3)`` with a ``COUNT`` of 10, where the difference is not even in microseconds anymore :)
The limit addition alters the behaviour though, ie suddenly you can define a controller [logical name](http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/routing.html#controller-string-syntax) as ´´AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:show:something``, and things go downhill from there on.
All that aside, I'm +1 for setting the limit to the exact number of ``list`` parameters, but certainly not number+1, this is just too wtfy (as you said, this was a safety thing, but I reckon for this PR to be merged it needs to be +0).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/12/09 08:28:58 -0800
Overall `list()` is ugly as it's not very explicit. Even though it would mean extra lines, it's better to `explode()` then explicitly assign variables:
```
$parts = explode(':', $foo);
$name = $parts[0];
$tel = $parts[1];
```
`list()` is one of those bad relics from the PHP past...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/11 10:07:47 -0800
@drak: why is `list` not explicit? It is in fact as explicit as the more verbose syntax you propose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/11 13:08:50 -0800
@drak: I agree with @fabpot. In speech of benchmarks ```list``` is faster then using a helper variable.
@fabpot, @helmer I've changed explode's limit to be correct (without +1) and removed some changes from this PR, where I can't find out what the content of variable may be. Unit tests pass, so I think it's ready for merge.
Commits
-------
5f22268 [Profiler] Sync with master
1aef4e8 Adds collecting info about request method and allowing searching by it
Discussion
----------
[WebProfiler] Add ability to filter data by request method
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #1515
For discussion & description checkout: #1515 & #2279
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/11 10:02:41 -0800
After merging this PR, the toolbar is not displayed anymore for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/12 14:18:20 -0800
@fabpot the toolbar works for me using this branch
Commits
-------
6548354 fixed data-url
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] fixed and adjusted HTML5 markup
I corrected some markup errors that I found when validating the pages of the WebProfilerBundle.
Along the way I also improved the semantic structure of HTML5 like table header and body, lang attribute.
Removed type="text/css" that is the default with rel="stylesheet". Also no need for media="screen"!? Otherwise style does not apply when debugging with handheld device or when printing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/12 23:37:15 -0800
@Tobion: Can you squash your commit before I merge your PR? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2011/12/13 03:14:51 -0800
@fabpot I would appreciate if you could do this.
I see two problems with pull requests on @github that occur again and again. It's pretty annoying compared to the otherwise very user-friendly Github.
1. Squashing commits of a pull request: If you've already pushed commits to GitHub, and then squash them locally, you will not be able to push that same branch to GitHub again. So you need to create a new branch and a new pull request.
So there should be a button on Github that simply squashes all commits and allows you to enter a new commit message.
2. Opening a pull request based on the master branch instead of the 2.0 branch where bug fixes should be made. So people must rebase their stuff and open a new pull request again. All this back and forth is taking time unnecessarily (both for admins and contributors) and cluttering Githubs news feed.
There should be the possibility to allow switching the pull request base branch. Or at least give the users a configurable hint about the best practice of contributing to a specific repo when they open a pull request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/12/13 03:16:10 -0800
@Tobion
1. Solved by doing a git push -f remote_name branch_name
2. Yes here you need to open a new PR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/13 03:21:47 -0800
@Tobion: I'm more than aware of these issues but unfortunately, there is nothing I can do if we want to continue using the Github PRs (and automatic closing).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2011/12/13 03:51:47 -0800
That's why I hope that @github will provide a convenient solution to these issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/13 04:08:07 -0800
@Tobion send a feature request to github. Commenting here will not make them implement it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2011/12/13 04:18:31 -0800
@fabpot I squashed commits.
@stof I will do it. But there is no public issue tracker for the Github software, is there? So need to use the contact form I suppose.
fixed markup: <pre> not valid inside <p>
adjusted base html structure for HTML5
improved table markup in bag.html.twig
improved table markup in results.html.twig
update exception.html.twig
Commits
-------
db2d773 [FrameworkBundle] Improve the TemplateLocator exception message
Discussion
----------
Template locator/exception message
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Improve the error message to include the error message from the File Locator which is more accurate : the File Locator might also look in some fallback folder(s) (i.e. `%kernel.root_dir%/Resources`)
Commits
-------
bb0d202 Switched sanitizeParameter() for existing varToString()-method; now always stores a string representation of each parameter
4fe4dfd Fixed vendor version mismatch in tests
28730e9 [DoctrineBridge] Added unit tests
4535abe [DoctrineBridge] Fixed attempt to serialize non-serializable values
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Fixed attempt to serialize non-serializable values
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no (99%)
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
The Doctrine DBAL type system does not pose any restrictions on the php-types of parameters in queries. Hence one could write a doctrine-type that uses a resource or an `\SplFileInfo` as its corresponding php-type. Parameters of these types are logged in the `DoctrineDataCollector` however, which is then serialized in the profiler. Since resources or `\SplFileInfo` variables cannot be serialized this throws an exception.
This PR fixes this problem (for known cases) by sanitizing the query parameters to only contain serializable types. The `isNotSerializable`-check surely is not complete yet, but more non-serializable classes can be added on a case-by-case basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/07 07:04:43 -0800
Tests do not pass for me.
Furthermore, let's reuse what we already have in the framework (see https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/HttpKernel.php#L187 -- yes you can just copy/paster the existing code).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by aboks at 2011/12/09 01:41:14 -0800
@fabpot I fixed the tests (seems I had the wrong vendor versions in my copy) and reused the `varToString()`-code. This introduces a tiny BC break in the rare case that someone writes his own templates for the web profiler (the parameters returned by the data collector are now always a string; could be any type before).
After merging this PR, merging 2.0 into master would give a merge conflict and failing tests (because of the changes related to the introduction of the `ManagerRegistry` interface). To prevent this, please merge #2820 into master directly after merging this PR (so before merging 2.0 into master). After that 2.0 can be cleanly merged into master.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/09 03:43:38 -0800
it is not a BC break. Using ``yaml_encode`` on a string will not break the template
