If a request listener returns a response before calling the profiler
listener, the request will not be added in the stack leading to an error
during the handling of the kernel.response event. The profiler listener
should ideally be run first.
Commits
-------
ae342c7 unified toolbar.css
a7e4e70 unified profiler.css
09fe09e unified and corrected exception_layout.css
3a1674b unified and corrected exception.css
Discussion
----------
Unified and corrected CSS markup
Unified (spaces, braces, quotes, indention) and corrected (missing semicolon) the CSS markup.
Did not change any semantic, only markup!
@fabpot: New pull based on symfony:2.0 and changed formatting style as agreed in #2405
Commits
-------
731b28b [composer] add missing deps for FrameworkBundle
9c8f100 [composer] change ext/intl to the new ext-intl syntax
d535afe [composer] fix monolog-bridge composer.json, add more inter-component deps
9ade639 [composer] add composer.json
Discussion
----------
Composer
This PR adds a composer.json file for [composer](https://github.com/composer/composer) ([more info](packagist.org/about-composer)).
For discussion you can also go into #composer-dev on freenode and argue with naderman, seldaek and everzet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by naderman at 2011/09/26 15:51:51 -0700
You haven't entered any keywords, they might come in handy when searching for packages on packagist.
But really this is just a +1 ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/26 16:12:21 -0700
See my comments on your previous (non-rebased) commit: f1c0242b5a
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by igorw at 2011/09/27 00:04:36 -0700
Following dependencies do not have a composer.json yet: Twig, Doctrine (orm, dbal, common), swiftmailer.
Also missing from the standard edition: assetic, twig-extensions, jsm-metadata, SensioFrameworkExtraBundle, JMSSecurityExtraBundle, SensioDistributionBundle, SensioGeneratorBundle, AsseticBundle.
The point is, those can be added later on. Having the components composerized is already a leap forward. Also, doctrine depends on some symfony components, we've got to start somewhere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 00:36:41 -0700
Also, just for information, the plan is to have `symfony/framework-bundle` be the "framework", with all dependencies to doctrine etc, though we should really only have strict requirements in there, and then in symfony-standard we ship a composer.json that requires the framework-bundle, doctrine-orm and things like that that are not essential to core. Otherwise people don't have a choice about what they use anymore.
Just a comment btw, the json is invalid, all / should be escaped. However json_decode is nice enough to parse those without complaining, browsers do too, even Crockford's json2.js does, so I'm not sure if we should privilege readability over strictness, since it seems nobody really cares about this escaping.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by igorw at 2011/09/27 00:41:39 -0700
So, I've implemented all of @stof's suggestions, except (for reasons stated above):
* doctrine to DoctrineBundle
* swiftmailer to SwiftmailerBundle
* twig to TwigBundle
* doctrine-common to Validator
* FrameworkBundle (what exactly does it depend on?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/27 00:52:31 -0700
@igorw at least HttpKernel, Routing, Templating, EventDispatcher, Doctrine Common (annotations cannot be disabled), Translator, Form (optional), Validator (optional), Console (optional). See the service definitions to see the others
@Seldaek FrameworkBundle does not depend on Doctrine, except for Common
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/09/27 03:15:34 -0700
What does the symfony/ or ext/ prefix control in composer?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 03:33:52 -0700
symfony/ is just the (mandatory) vendor namespace. Also ext/ has been renamed to ext- now, so it's not in any vendor, and should avoid potential issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/09/27 05:07:03 -0700
@Seldaek Mandatory? So every package name is "vendor/package"? I like that because previously i thought package names are not namespaced, and thus clashes could occur between different communities easily.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 05:16:20 -0700
@beberlei: Mandatory. As of yesterday http://packagist.org/ will tell you you have an invalid package name if there's no slash in it. See 1306d1ca82 (diff-3)
Builds upon aead4a9836180cabae4d47fe27c634dcd79ac8f2, which prematurely removed request scoping from the assets templating helper in all cases. The helper need only be request-scoped if one or more request-scoped packages (e.g. PathPackages) are injected into it. This change makes it possible to utilize the assets helper outside of a request (e.g. during a console script).
To ensure that the assets helper is not assigned a request scope, all asset base URL's must be defined for all packages (default and any named) and both protocols: HTTP and SSL. The included test config fixtures concisely accomplish this by specifying a single HTTPS URL as the base URL for our default and named package, since FrameworkExtension's Configuration conveniently registers this URL for both protocols.
No other helpers have request scope and the assets helper's parameters don't appear to depend on the request in any way, so this appears to be unnecessary. As-is, request scope here prevents use of the assets helper from a console command that may need to internally render a template.
Commits
-------
3a7e038 [FrameworkBundle] sanitize target arg in asset:install command
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] sanitize target arg in asset:install command
`php app/console assets:install web/`
(removed tailing /)
before
`Installing assets for Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle into web//bundles/framework`
after
`Installing assets for Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle into web/bundles/framework`
Commits
-------
eb8f3cb added uniqueEntity message translation (fr)
df9f223 added missing french translations
f4c133e removed trailing dot to make it consistent with other validator messages
Discussion
----------
[Translation] Unique Entity message
I've added the translation of uniqueEntity validation message, I've used ``trans-unit id="41"`` which seems to be unused
Since the key was previously concatenating service ID and method without a separator, it's possible that two different listeners could conflict (e.g. service/method pairs: foo/bar and fo/obar).
Commits
-------
86f888f fix https default port check
Discussion
----------
fix https default port check
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/03 03:26:15 -0700
I think it's better to delete $httpsPort variable from the prototype and use only $httpPort variable.
public function urlRedirectAction($path, $permanent = false, $scheme = null, $httpPort = 80)
...
$port = '';
if (('http' === $scheme && 80 != $httpPort) || ('https' === $scheme && 443 != $httpPort)) {
$port = ':'.$httpPort;
}
But if this method is already used with the $httpsPort variable elsewhere, your change is ok with me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gimler at 2011/08/03 04:52:08 -0700
You can use different ports for http and https so when you call the function $scheme = null than it use the $request->getScheme() so you must add both ports so i think it is not a good idea to merge the http and https vars.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gimler at 2011/08/03 04:53:17 -0700
damn sorry i have accidentally close the pull request ;(
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/03 05:13:24 -0700
I agree with @gimler. Merging them as a single parameter does not make sense here
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/03 05:33:12 -0700
I've juste think it's weird to set a useless parameter ($httpPort) when you want to use the last parameter ($httpsPort).
And I don't think someone want http protocole on 433 or https on 80 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/03 05:35:16 -0700
@Abhoryo what if you are using this controller in a general way, without knowing by advance if the handled request is a secure one ? You need both parameters.
If you need to change the https port by keeping the default http port, you indeed need to pass it but blame PHP: it does not support named parameters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/03 06:02:18 -0700
Ok, right.
Commits
-------
e78bc32 Fixed: Notice: Undefined index: enable_annotations in ...
Discussion
----------
Fixed: Notice: Undefined index: enable_annotations in ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/08/04 03:57:49 -0700
IMO `isset()` should be good enough here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/04 04:18:20 -0700
I don't see how such a notice could occur. There is a default value for this node so as soon as the validation node exists, there will be a value for this node. Could you give an example of configuration that causes the notice ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by mvrhov at 2011/08/04 04:23:33 -0700
I don't have any validation node set up in my config in such a case it seems that sub nodes doesn't get build. So it seems that I found a bug in config builder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/04 04:54:05 -0700
This is in fact due to a hackish stuff in the DI extension. It changes the configuration after using the Config component to merge them in the case where you enable the forms without enabling the validator, to force enabling it.
Commits
-------
cf598de [FrameworkBundle] Updated the Chinese translations by @heccjj
e16ddcf [FrameworkBundle] Renamed validators.cn.xliff to validators.zh_CN.xliff
62da90a [FrameworkBundle] Fixed the Chinese translations by @heccjj
057cf2f Edited src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Resources/translations/validators.cn.xliff via GitHub
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Updated the Chinese translations
Commits
-------
c558b78 avoid rendering the `ChoiceType` separator if all `choices` are `preferred_choices`
Discussion
----------
avoid rendering the `ChoiceType` separator if all `choices` are `preferred_choices`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/24 00:51:21 -0700
The same change should be made to the PHP template.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/25 00:31:39 -0700
I forgot to ask you to add some unit tests too. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 10:23:34 -0700
Are you asking for PHPUnit tests? If so, unfortunately, I'm not able to add those because I haven't used PHPUnit yet. ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 12:47:51 -0700
I would prefer ```choises | length``` without spaces as everywhere else.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 12:50:32 -0700
@fabpot: Since <option disabled> is unclickable in browser (by HTML spec) this really doesn't change anything (something not there is as unclickable) except the the look when rendered. I have hard time to imagine what could become unit-testable here by this change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/25 13:03:47 -0700
@lenar unit testing is not about what the browser could do. What should be unit-tested is that an example will only preferred choices does not output the separator, which is exactly what this PR is about
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/25 13:04:03 -0700
@lenar unit testing is not about what the browser could do. What should be unit-tested is that an example will only preferred choices does not output the separator, which is exactly what this PR is about
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 13:08:33 -0700
@stof: ok, put this way you are definitely right.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 13:37:50 -0700
@lenar: You're right about the spaces. I'm using them in my projects but will remove them here for the sake of consistency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/25 13:40:40 -0700
@craue I will write today/tomorrow test to cover your code and send you PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 14:00:26 -0700
@stloyd: That would be nice. But I'm still not that familiar with Git(Hub). Is there anything I have to take care of?
Also, I'd like to squash my three commits into one ... if this is possible for an open PR and if I find out how to do that easily. :D
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/26 00:18:22 -0700
@craue: yes, you should squash your commits into one and use `--force` when you push (the PR will automatically be updated accordingly).
