Commits
-------
e83e00a Fixed rendering of FileType (value is not a valid attribute for input[type=file])
Discussion
----------
Fixed rendering of FileType
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
According to the W3C validator, `value` is not a valid attribute for `input[type=file]`.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/11/10 23:01:24 -0800
Instead of creating yet another block, what about modifying the `field_widget` to not render the `value` attribute if the value is empty? Also, the PHP template must be fixed too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2011/11/11 02:02:52 -0800
@fabpot Changed ;)
Without this, the exception is eventually thrown in EntityChoiceList::getIdentifierValues() with a very a message that doesn't really suit the real error: "Entities passed to the choice field must be managed"
Commits
-------
731b28b [composer] add missing deps for FrameworkBundle
9c8f100 [composer] change ext/intl to the new ext-intl syntax
d535afe [composer] fix monolog-bridge composer.json, add more inter-component deps
9ade639 [composer] add composer.json
Discussion
----------
Composer
This PR adds a composer.json file for [composer](https://github.com/composer/composer) ([more info](packagist.org/about-composer)).
For discussion you can also go into #composer-dev on freenode and argue with naderman, seldaek and everzet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by naderman at 2011/09/26 15:51:51 -0700
You haven't entered any keywords, they might come in handy when searching for packages on packagist.
But really this is just a +1 ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/26 16:12:21 -0700
See my comments on your previous (non-rebased) commit: f1c0242b5a
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by igorw at 2011/09/27 00:04:36 -0700
Following dependencies do not have a composer.json yet: Twig, Doctrine (orm, dbal, common), swiftmailer.
Also missing from the standard edition: assetic, twig-extensions, jsm-metadata, SensioFrameworkExtraBundle, JMSSecurityExtraBundle, SensioDistributionBundle, SensioGeneratorBundle, AsseticBundle.
The point is, those can be added later on. Having the components composerized is already a leap forward. Also, doctrine depends on some symfony components, we've got to start somewhere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 00:36:41 -0700
Also, just for information, the plan is to have `symfony/framework-bundle` be the "framework", with all dependencies to doctrine etc, though we should really only have strict requirements in there, and then in symfony-standard we ship a composer.json that requires the framework-bundle, doctrine-orm and things like that that are not essential to core. Otherwise people don't have a choice about what they use anymore.
Just a comment btw, the json is invalid, all / should be escaped. However json_decode is nice enough to parse those without complaining, browsers do too, even Crockford's json2.js does, so I'm not sure if we should privilege readability over strictness, since it seems nobody really cares about this escaping.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by igorw at 2011/09/27 00:41:39 -0700
So, I've implemented all of @stof's suggestions, except (for reasons stated above):
* doctrine to DoctrineBundle
* swiftmailer to SwiftmailerBundle
* twig to TwigBundle
* doctrine-common to Validator
* FrameworkBundle (what exactly does it depend on?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/27 00:52:31 -0700
@igorw at least HttpKernel, Routing, Templating, EventDispatcher, Doctrine Common (annotations cannot be disabled), Translator, Form (optional), Validator (optional), Console (optional). See the service definitions to see the others
@Seldaek FrameworkBundle does not depend on Doctrine, except for Common
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/09/27 03:15:34 -0700
What does the symfony/ or ext/ prefix control in composer?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 03:33:52 -0700
symfony/ is just the (mandatory) vendor namespace. Also ext/ has been renamed to ext- now, so it's not in any vendor, and should avoid potential issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by beberlei at 2011/09/27 05:07:03 -0700
@Seldaek Mandatory? So every package name is "vendor/package"? I like that because previously i thought package names are not namespaced, and thus clashes could occur between different communities easily.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/27 05:16:20 -0700
@beberlei: Mandatory. As of yesterday http://packagist.org/ will tell you you have an invalid package name if there's no slash in it. See 1306d1ca82 (diff-3)
Commits
-------
d19f1d7 [Doctrine] Fix UniqueEntityValidator reporting a false positive by ignoring multiple query results
Discussion
----------
[Doctrine] Fix UniqueEntityValidator reporting a false positive by ignoring multiple query results
An entity should only be considered unique if its search criteria returns no matches or a single, identical entity. Multiple results indicates that conflicting entities exist.
Note: the DoctrineMongoDBBundle's unique validator checks identifier values if the object strict-equality check is false. This may be a worthwhile improvement, as it would prevent reporting a validation error for an enttiy which is going to overwrite its conflicting counter-part in the database.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jmikola at 2011/09/01 14:23:27 -0700
This is the Doctrine bridge equivalent for my fix to DoctrineMongoDBBundle: https://github.com/symfony/DoctrineMongoDBBundle/pull/42
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/09/02 00:13:52 -0700
As this is a bug fix, can you base your PR on the symfony/2.0 branch? Thanks.
An entity should only be considered unique if its search criteria returns no matches or a single, identical entity. Multiple results indicates that conflicting entities exist.
Commits
-------
6bd1749 Fixed a bug when multiple expanded choices would render unchecked because of the Form Framework's strict type checking.
Discussion
----------
[DoctrineBridge] Entities to array transformer
Fixed a bug when multiple expanded choices would render unchecked because of the Form Framework's strict type checking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/08/31 09:01:47 -0700
Looks good to me. Can you squash your commits before I merge? Thanks.
Commits
-------
c558b78 avoid rendering the `ChoiceType` separator if all `choices` are `preferred_choices`
Discussion
----------
avoid rendering the `ChoiceType` separator if all `choices` are `preferred_choices`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/24 00:51:21 -0700
The same change should be made to the PHP template.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/25 00:31:39 -0700
I forgot to ask you to add some unit tests too. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 10:23:34 -0700
Are you asking for PHPUnit tests? If so, unfortunately, I'm not able to add those because I haven't used PHPUnit yet. ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 12:47:51 -0700
I would prefer ```choises | length``` without spaces as everywhere else.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 12:50:32 -0700
@fabpot: Since <option disabled> is unclickable in browser (by HTML spec) this really doesn't change anything (something not there is as unclickable) except the the look when rendered. I have hard time to imagine what could become unit-testable here by this change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/25 13:03:47 -0700
@lenar unit testing is not about what the browser could do. What should be unit-tested is that an example will only preferred choices does not output the separator, which is exactly what this PR is about
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/25 13:04:03 -0700
@lenar unit testing is not about what the browser could do. What should be unit-tested is that an example will only preferred choices does not output the separator, which is exactly what this PR is about
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/25 13:08:33 -0700
@stof: ok, put this way you are definitely right.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 13:37:50 -0700
@lenar: You're right about the spaces. I'm using them in my projects but will remove them here for the sake of consistency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/25 13:40:40 -0700
@craue I will write today/tomorrow test to cover your code and send you PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by craue at 2011/07/25 14:00:26 -0700
@stloyd: That would be nice. But I'm still not that familiar with Git(Hub). Is there anything I have to take care of?
Also, I'd like to squash my three commits into one ... if this is possible for an open PR and if I find out how to do that easily. :D
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/26 00:18:22 -0700
@craue: yes, you should squash your commits into one and use `--force` when you push (the PR will automatically be updated accordingly).
Commits
-------
85c0087 [TwigBridge] Made the locale configurable for the trans and transchoice tags
3ea31a0 [TwigBridge] Made the locale configurable for the trans and transchoice filters
Discussion
----------
Trans locale
This allows setting the locale when translating in a Twig template. This was already allowed in the Translator and in the PHP templates
Commits
-------
52fdd53 [Bridge/Twig] Add required class to labels that match required fields
Discussion
----------
[Bridge/Twig] Add required class to labels that match required fields
I have used this to simply style labels that are required with a red star behind them using this CSS:
``` css
label.required::after {
content: " *";
color: #c00;
}
```
The problem is that you can't use `input[required] + label::after` as a selector since the label is typically rendered before the input. There is no way to check for an element that is *followed by* another, only elements *following*.
Of course this CSS in particular won't work except in the latest browsers, but you could still use the `label.required` selector to add a background image and so on. I think this is a very common use case and therefore I think it'd benefit the core framework.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/05 01:27:49 -0700
Can you also update the PHP templates?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 01:43:33 -0700
How about namespacing these css classes, like for example "sf-form-required"?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/05 01:50:58 -0700
I would prefer an @schmittjoh naming, or even adding ability to setup it thought options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/05 01:54:36 -0700
Please, do not add more options. Prefix with `sf` is actually a good idea but people will argue that this is not a good idea because it gives too much information about the technology used to create the website (that's one of the things that came up pretty often in symfony1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 02:00:11 -0700
An option is not such a good idea imo since you likely want to have a uniform naming strategy across your entire site. How about adding a new service CssNamingStrategy?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/05 02:01:19 -0700
Then this can be some simpler one not giving such informations i.e.: `form-label-required`, `label-required`, `framework-form-required`, `form-required` or whatever else ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/07/05 02:16:41 -0700
It cannot be configurable as it would potentially break bundles that come with stylesheets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/07/05 02:21:10 -0700
IMO if we decide to add this one, we could add same to `inputs/selects/etc` with `required` option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 02:21:59 -0700
I think it can, consider an interface like this:
```php
interface CssNamingStrategyInterface
{
function getCssName($class);
}
```
This will give people a lot of flexibility, and it also does allow them to exclude classes which for example are provided by third-party bundles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/05 02:47:54 -0700
Wow guys, if this turns into a full blown class generator solution, I'm happy to close the PR.
"required" is not a name that's commonly used for main page elements, it's typically associated with forms, and therefore I don't see the need to make it unnecessary longer/namespaced. Similarly I don't see the need to add it to the input/select/.., because they already have an attribute, which you can very easily select as: `input[required]` in CSS. That works everywhere except IE6, but we can't build for the future on very old browsers. If you really want support for IE6, you can override the templates imo. But core should be looking forward, as it already is with HTML5, form markup, etc.
As for calling it form-label-required or label-required, again, I don't see the benefit, you can use `label.required` if you want to avoid conflicts with non-label elements having a required class, or a safer `form .required`. There are plenty of options in CSS itself, let's not make this overly complex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 02:52:17 -0700
see
http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/speed/page-speed/docs/rendering.html#UseEfficientCSSSelectors
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Seldaek <
reply@reply.github.com>wrote:
> Wow guys, if this turns into a full blown class generator solution, I'm
> happy to close the PR.
>
> "required" is not a name that's commonly used for main page elements, it's
> typically associated with forms, and therefore I don't see the need to make
> it unnecessary longer/namespaced. Similarly I don't see the need to add it
> to the input/select/.., because they already have an attribute, which you
> can very easily select as: `input[required]` in CSS. That works everywhere
> except IE6, but we can't build for the future on very old browsers. If you
> really want support for IE6, you can override the templates imo. But core
> should be looking forward, as it already is with HTML5, form markup, etc.
>
> As for calling it form-label-required or label-required, again, I don't see
> the benefit, you can use `label.required` if you want to avoid conflicts
> with non-label elements having a required class, or a safer `form
> .required`. There are plenty of options in CSS itself, let's not make this
> overly complex.
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1519#issuecomment-1502560
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/05 03:11:50 -0700
Really? Come on, we're talking about forms, it's not like you have billions of form/input tags per page that have to be parsed by the browser when you select that. Also you don't have to select the elements, if you want true performance just use no stylesheet, your users will thank you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 03:30:40 -0700
Your CSS selectors not only affect the performance of form elements, but of all elements that have a "required" class. Likewise, the same applies if we decide to add more classes.
Why close the door for people who care about performance? We can easily avoid this by making the css class more specific as suggested earlier. The idea with the renaming strategy is one step further and allows people to "obfuscate" which tool was used to generate the form, or do additional optimizations like shortening the css name.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lenar at 2011/07/05 03:34:34 -0700
@Seldaek: Just for remark I've seen matrix forms spanning multiple screenfuls horizontally and vertically
containing tens of thousands inputs. Not pretty, but they do exist. Basically "poor" man's/company's excel
emulation or something.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/05 04:19:13 -0700
@schmittjoh, @lenar: We're catering to the most common use case, for which this will be more than fast enough. Small/medium scale websites don't have to optimize on CSS rules parsing, they usually have much bigger issues to deal with. If you really care about it, overriding the block to remove the class is just as easy as it was to for me to add it, but IMO this is the edge case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2011/07/05 05:37:19 -0700
IMO Symfony should follow best practices by encouraging to use class selectors, and not tag selectors for the reasons explained on the page I linked.
Anyway, I think everybody made his points. Time for @fabpot to make a decision :)
