* 2.1:
[FrameworkBundle] Fix code status in dockblock
Fixed test to use Reflection
[Finder] fixed a potential issue on Solaris where INF value is wrong (refs #7269)
Update RouteCompiler.php
[FrameworkBundle] avoids cache:clear to break if new/old folders already exist
[HttpKernel] Fixed possible profiler token collision (closes#7272, closes#7171)
[ClassLoader] tweaked test
[ClassLoader] made DebugClassLoader idempotent
[DomCrawler] Fix relative path handling in links
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Link.php
src/Symfony/Component/Finder/Iterator/DepthRangeFilterIterator.php
src/Symfony/Component/Routing/RouteCompiler.php
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
76fefe3 updated CHANGELOG and UPGRADE files
f7da1f0 added some unit tests (and fixed some bugs)
f17f586 moved the container aware HTTP kernel to the HttpKernel component
2eea768 moved the deprecation logic calls outside the new HttpContentRenderer class
bd102c5 made the content renderer work even when ESI is disabled or when no templating engine is available (the latter being mostly useful when testing)
a8ea4e4 [FrameworkBundle] deprecated HttpKernel::forward() (it is only used once now and not part of any interface anyway)
1240690 [HttpKernel] made the strategy a regular parameter in HttpContentRenderer::render()
adc067e [FrameworkBundle] made some services private
1f1392d [HttpKernel] simplified and enhanced code managing the hinclude strategy
403bb06 [HttpKernel] added missing phpdoc and tweaked existing ones
892f00f [HttpKernel] added a URL signer mechanism for hincludes
a0c49c3 [TwigBridge] added a render_* function to ease usage of custom rendering strategies
9aaceb1 moved the logic from HttpKernel in FrameworkBundle to the HttpKernel component
Discussion
----------
[WIP] Kernel refactor
Currently, the handling of sub-requests (including ESI and hinclude) is mostly done in FrameworkBundle. It makes these important features harder to implement for people using only HttpKernel (like Drupal and Silex for instance).
This PR moves the code to HttpKernel instead. The code has also been refactored to allow easier integration of other rendering strategies (refs #6108).
The internal route has been re-introduced but it can only be used for trusted IPs (so for the internal rendering which is managed by Symfony itself, or by a trusted reverse proxy like Varnish for ESI handling). For the hinclude strategy, when using a controller, the URL is automatically signed (see #6463).
The usage of a listener instead of a controller to handle internal sub-requests speeds up things quite a lot as it saves one sub-request handling. In Symfony 2.0 and 2.1, the handling of a sub-request actually creates two sub-requests.
Rendering a sub-request from a controller can be done with the following code:
```jinja
{# default strategy #}
{{ render(path("partial")) }}
{{ render(controller("SomeBundle:Controller:partial")) }}
{# ESI strategy #}
{{ render(path("partial"), { strategy: 'esi' }) }}
{{ render(controller("SomeBundle:Controller:partial"), { strategy: 'esi' }) }}
{# hinclude strategy #}
{{ render(path("default1"), { strategy: 'hinclude' }) }}
```
The second commit allows to simplify the calls a little bit thanks to some nice syntactic sugar:
```jinja
{# default strategy #}
{{ render(path("partial")) }}
{{ render(controller("SomeBundle:Controller:partial")) }}
{# ESI strategy #}
{{ render_esi(path("partial")) }}
{{ render_esi(controller("SomeBundle:Controller:partial")) }}
{# hinclude strategy #}
{{ render_hinclude(path("default1")) }}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-03T17:58:49Z
I've just pushed a new version of the code that actually works in my browser (but I've not yet written any unit tests). I've updated the PR description accordingly.
All comments welcome!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Koc at 2013-01-03T20:11:43Z
what about `render(controller="SomeBundle:Controller:partial", strategy="esi")`?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-04T09:01:01Z
shouldn't we have interfaces for the UriSigner and the HttpContentRenderer ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2013-01-04T19:28:09Z
btw .. as mentioned in #6213 i think it would make sense to refactor the HttpCache to use a cache layer to allow more flexibility in where to cache the data (including clustering) and better invalidation. as such if you are refactoring HttpKernel .. it might also make sense to explore splitting off HttpCache.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-04T19:30:07Z
@lsmith77 This is a totally different topic. This PR is just about moving things from FrameworkBundle to HttpKernel to make them more reusable outside of the full-stack framework.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-05T09:39:52Z
I think this PR is almost ready now. I still need to update the docs and add some unit tests. Any other comments on the whole approach? The class names? The `controller` function thingy? The URI signer mechanism? The proxy protection for the internal controller? The proxy to handle internal routes?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2013-01-05T10:08:25Z
Looks good to me 👍
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sdboyer at 2013-01-07T18:17:08Z
@Crell asked me to weigh in, since i'm one of the Drupal folks who's likely to work most with this.
i think i've grokked about 60% of the big picture here, and i'm generally happy with what i see. the assumption that the HInclude strategy makes about working with templates probably isn't one that we'll be able to use (and so, would need to write our own), but that's not a big deal since the whole goal here is to make strategies pluggable.
so, yeah. +1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by winzou at 2013-01-09T20:21:44Z
Just for my information: will this PR be merged for 2.2 version? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-09T20:41:04Z
@winzou according to the blog post announcing the beta 1 release, yes. It is explicitly listed as being one of the reason to make it a beta instead of the first RC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by winzou at 2013-01-09T20:49:36Z
OK thanks, I've totally skipped this blog post.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2013-01-10T15:26:15Z
I've just added a bunch of unit tests and fix some bugs I found while writing the tests.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
67d7423 Remove use of deprecated HttpKernel LoggerInterface
dca4528 [HttpKernel] Extend psr/log's NullLogger class
1e5a890 [Monolog] Mark old non-PSR3 methods as deprecated
91a86f8 [HttpKernel][Monolog] Add PSR-3 support to the LoggerInterface
Discussion
----------
[HttpKernel][MonologBridge] PSR-3 support
This enables PSR-3 support and monolog 1.3+. The first commit is the main part. The rest deals with deprecation of short-hand methods (warn/err/crit/emerg) that are fully expanded in PSR-3 (warning/error/critical/emergency).
The downside of deprecating them is that for bundles it's a bit harder to support older and newer versions. If that is too much of a hassle you can drop that for now and cherry pick the first commit.
The upside is that it forces people to move towards PSR-3 compatible stuff, which means eventually we could completely drop the LoggerInterface from the framework. In any case I think the documentation should only mention the `Psr\Log\LoggerInterface` and people should start hinting against that. The change should be done in core as well I suppose.
Anyway I wanted to throw this out there as it is to get feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-09T09:15:15Z
@Seldaek I also think you should change the typehint to use the PSR LoggerInterface in all classes using the logger
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-09T09:54:55Z
OK updated according to all the feedback. I tested it in an app and it still seems to work so there shouldn't be any major issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-09T09:59:55Z
@fabpot if you merge please merge also the bundle PR, otherwise it won't be possible to update without conflict.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T14:59:20Z
I'm trying to understand why a `composer update` of a Symfony 2.1.* resulted in a fatal error. Shouldn't a stable version don't break like this?
As @olaurendeau points, why Symfony depends 1.* instead of 1.2.*? Or why Monolog 1.3 breaks its public interface (EDIT: I'm not sure about it)? Or why isn't this PR being merged (into branch 2.1) at the same time Monolog 1.3 is released?
Please, understand I'm not looking for who to blame, it's just I want to know if this situation is unexpected or if otherwise a `composer update` on a stable branch is not as innocent as it seems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T15:06:51Z
@frosas it cannot be merged into 2.1 as it is a BC break. The 2.1 branch has been updated to forbid Monolog 1.3 already
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T15:11:58Z
@frosas you can blame me for releasing as 1.3.0 and not 2.0, but technically for monolog this isn't really a BC break, I just added an interface. The problem is due to the way it's used in symfony, it ended up as a fatal error. In any case the situation is now sorted out I think.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T15:26:43Z
@stof now I see this `>=1.0,<1.3-dev` change in the 2.1 branch. Now, shouldn't a new (2.1.7) version be released for all of us not in the dev minimum-stability?
@Seldaek then do you see feasible to rely only in X.Y.* versions to avoid this kind of errors?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T15:45:22Z
@frosas relying on X.Y.* is painful because you always need to wait until someone updates the constraint to get the new version. Of course using ~1.3 like in this PR means if I fuck up and break BC people will update to it, but that's a less likely occurrence than the alternative I think, so I would rather not use X.Y.*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T15:50:50Z
@Seldaek you are right about this, but I was thinking more in changing it only for the stable versions. EDIT: I mean, how often do you need a new feature in a branch you only apply fixes to?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T15:57:32Z
@frosas Monolog and Symfony have separate release cycles. Foorcing Symfony users to use an old version of Monolog until they update to a new version of Symfony whereas the newer Monolog is compatible is a bad idea. Thus, as Monolog keeps BC, it does not maintain bugfix releases for all older versions (just like Twig does too). So it would also forbid you to get the fixes done in newer Monolog versions.
The incompatibility between Symfony 2.1 LoggerInterface and PSR-3 (whereas they expect exactly the same behavior and signature for methods with the same name) is unfortunate and is the reason why we get some issues here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by frosas at 2013-01-10T16:21:06Z
@stof I appreciate you prefer to allow newer versions at the price of having to be constantly monitoring its changes to avoid breaks.
Another similar but safer strategy would be to stick to X.Y.* versions and upgrade to X.Y+1.* once the new version integration is tested, but I understand this is discutible in projects as close to Symfony as Monolog.
Returning to the issue, what do you say to release this 2.1.7 version? Or is it only me who is having issues here?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2013-01-10T16:26:20Z
@frosas a minor release should not break BC when following smeantic versionning (Symfony warned about the fact it is not strictly followed for the first releases of 2.x). But as far as monolog is concerned, 1.3 is BC with 1.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2013-01-10T16:49:55Z
@frosas sorry I didn't get you still had the problem. I tagged a 2.1.7 of monologbundle which hopefully fixes your issue.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
6703fb5 added changelog entries
1997e2e fix phpdoc of UrlGeneratorInterface that missed some exceptions and improve language of exception message
f0415ed [Routing] made reference type fully BC and improved phpdoc considerably
7db07d9 [Routing] added tests for generating relative paths and network paths
75f59eb [Routing] add support for path-relative and scheme-relative URL generation
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Routing] add support for path-relative URL generation
Tests pass: yes
Feature addition: yes
BC break: <del>tiny (see below)</del> NO
deprecations: NO
At the moment the Routing component only supports absolute and domain-relative URLs, e.g.
`http://example.org/user-slug/article-slug/comments` and
`/user-slug/article-slug/comments`.
But there are two link types missing: schema-relative URLs and path-relative URLs.
schema-relative: e.g. `//example.org/user-slug/article-slug/comments`
path-relative: e.g. `comments`.
Both of them would now be possible with this PR. I think it closes a huge gap in the Routing component.
Use cases are pretty common. Schema-relative URLs are for example used when you want to include assets (scripts, images etc) in a secured website with HTTPS. Path-relative URLs are the only option when you want to generate static files (e.g. documentation) that can be downloaded as an HTML archive. Such use-cases are currently not possible with symfony.
The calculation of the relative path based on the request path and target path is hightly unit tested. So it is really equivalent. I found several implemenations on the internet but none of them worked in all cases. Mine is pretty short and works.
I also added an optional parameter to the twig `path` function, so this feature can also be used in twig templates.
Ref: This implements path-relative URLs as suggested in #3908.
<del>[BC BREAK] The signature of UrlGeneratorInterface::generate changed to support scheme-relative and path-relative URLs. The core UrlGenerator is BC and does not break anything, but users who implemented their own UrlGenerator need to be aware of this change. See UrlGenerator::convertReferenceType.</del>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-04-16T09:56:56Z
@Tobion For completeness, you should add the option to the `url` and `asset` twig functions/template helpers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-16T10:46:06Z
@jalliot adding the option to ``url`` does not make any sense. The difference between ``path`` and ``url`` is that ``path`` generates a path and ``url`` generates an absolute url (thus including the scheme and the hostname)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-16T12:27:49Z
@stof I guess jalliot meant we could then generate scheme-relative URLs with `url`. Otherwise this would have no equivalent in twig.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by jalliot at 2012-04-16T12:34:08Z
@stof Yep I meant what @Tobion said :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T11:57:04Z
The $relative parameter I added besides the existing $absolute parameter of the `->generate` method was not clear enough. So I merged those into a different parameter `referenceType`. I adjusted all parts of symfony to use the new signature. And also made the default `UrlGenerator` implementation BC with the old style. So almost nobody will recognize a change. The only BC break would be for somebody who implemented his own `UrlGenerator` and did not call the parent default generator.
Using `referenceType` instead of a simple Boolean is much more flexible. It will for example allow a custom generator to support a new reference type like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CURIE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T13:34:58Z
ping @schmittjoh considering your https://github.com/schmittjoh/JMSI18nRoutingBundle/blob/master/Router/I18nRouter.php would need a tiny change
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-18T13:37:39Z
Can you elaborate the necessary change?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T13:51:10Z
This PR changes the signature of `generate` to be able to generate path-relative and scheme-relative URLs. So it needs to be
`public function generate($name, $parameters = array(), $referenceType = self::ABSOLUTE_PATH)` and your implementation would need to change `if ($absolute && $this->hostMap) {` to `if (self::ABSOLUTE_URL === $referenceType && $this->hostMap) {`
I can do a PR if this gets merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-18T13:52:14Z
If I understand correctly, the old parameter still works, no?
edit: Ah, ok I see what you mean now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-18T13:56:33Z
Yeah the old parameter still works but $absolute would also evaluate to true (a string) in your case for non-absolute URLs, i.e. paths.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-19T21:09:46Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-20T04:30:18Z
Let's discuss that feature for 2.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-20T10:40:59Z
What are your objections against it? It's already implemented, it works and it adds support for things that are part of a web standard. The BC break is tiny at the moment (almost nobody is affected) because the core UrlGenerator works as before. But if we waited for 2.2 it will be much harder to make the transition because 2.1 is LTS. So I think is makes sense to add it now. Furthermore it makes it much more future-proof as custom generators can more easiliy add support for other link types like CURIE. At the moment a Boolean for absolute URLs is simply too limited and also somehow inconsistent because $absolute = false stands for an absolute path. You see the awkwardness in this naming.
Btw, I added a note in the changelog. And I will add documentation of this feature in symfony-docs once this is merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-04-20T12:14:32Z
nobody has ever said that 2.1 would be LTS. Actually, I think we are going to wait for 2.3 for LTS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-04-20T12:27:18Z
Well what I meant is, the longer we wait with this, the harder to apply it.
In 04ac1fdba2 you modified `generate` signature for better extensibility that is not even made use of. I think changing `$abolute` param goes in the same direction and has direct use.
I'd like to know your reason to wait for 2.2. Not enough time to review it, or afraid of breaking something, or marketing for 2.2?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-04-20T16:28:27Z
@Tobion the issue is that merging new features forces to postpone the release so that it is tested by enough devs first to be sure there is no blocking bug in it. Big changes cannot be merged when we are hunting the remaining bugs to be able to release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by schmittjoh at 2012-04-20T16:42:11Z
Considering the changes that have been made to the Form component, and are still being made, I think this is in comparison to that a fairly minor change.
Maybe a clearer guideline on the release process, or the direction would help, and avoid confusion, or wrong expectations on contributors' part.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-05T13:52:11Z
@fabpot this is ready. So if you agree with it, I would create a documentation PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-10-13T16:09:47Z
@fabpot what do you think about this PR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Crell at 2012-11-01T16:05:01Z
This feels like it's overloading the generate() method to do double duty: One, make a URl based on a route. Two, make a URI based on a URI snippet. Those are two separate operations. Why not just add a second method that does the second operation and avoid the conditionals? (We're likely to do that in Drupal for our own generator as well.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-01T16:38:39Z
@crell: No, you must have misunderstood something. The generate method still only generates a URI based on a route. The returned URI reference can now also be a relative path and a network path. Thats all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-13T18:30:28Z
@fabpot this is ready. It is fully BC! I also improved phpdoc considerably.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-12-14T20:51:38Z
@fabpot Do you want me to write documentation for it? I would also be interested to write about the new features of the routing component in general. I wanted to do that anyway and it would probably be a good fit for your "new in symfony" articles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-12-14T20:58:16Z
Im' going to review this PR in the next coming days. And to answer your second question, more documentation or better documentation is always a good thing, so go for it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2013-01-02T21:50:20Z
@fabpot ping. I added changelog entries.
* 2.1:
[FrameworkBundle] added support for URIs as an argument to HttpKernel::render()
[FrameworkBundle] restricted the type of controllers that can be executed by InternalController
[Process] Allow non-blocking start with PhpProcess
Making it easier to grab the PR template.
[Locale] fixed a test
Fixed failing test
fix double-decoding in the routing system
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/Process/PhpProcess.php
* 2.0:
[FrameworkBundle] added support for URIs as an argument to HttpKernel::render()
[FrameworkBundle] restricted the type of controllers that can be executed by InternalController
Making it easier to grab the PR template.
fix double-decoding in the routing system
Conflicts:
README.md
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/EventListener/RouterListener.php
src/Symfony/Component/Security/Http/HttpUtils.php
* 2.1:
[Console] Add support for parsing terminal width/height on localized windows, fixes#5742
[Form] Fixed treatment of countables and traversables in Form::isEmpty()
refactor ControllerNameParser
[Form] Fixed FileType not to throw an exception when bound empty
- Test undefined index #
Maintain array structure
Check if key # is defined in $value
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.pl.xlf
* 2.1:
fixed CS
fixed CS
[Security] fixed path info encoding (closes#6040, closes#5695)
[HttpFoundation] added some tests for the previous merge and removed dead code (closes#6037)
Improved Cache-Control header when no-cache is sent
removed unneeded comment
Fix to allow null values in labels array
fix date in changelog
removed the Travis icon (as this is not stable enough -- many false positive, closes#6186)
Revert "merged branch gajdaw/finder_splfileinfo_fpassthu (PR #4751)" (closes#6224)
Fixed a typo
Fixed: HeaderBag::parseCacheControl() not parsing quoted zero correctly
[Form] Fix const inside an anonymous function
[Config] Loader::import must return imported data
[DoctrineBridge] Fixed caching in DoctrineType when "choices" or "preferred_choices" is passed
[Form] Fixed the default value of "format" in DateType to DateType::DEFAULT_FORMAT if "widget" is not "single_text"
[HttpFoundation] fixed a small regression
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/HttpFoundation/Tests/Session/Storage/Handler/MongoDbSessionHandlerTest.php
* 2.1: (29 commits)
[DependencyInjection] fixed composer.json
[Validator] Fix typos in validators.ru.xlf
Edited some minor grammar and style errors in russian validation file
Updated Bulgarian translation
[Form] improve error message with a "hasser" hint for PropertyAccessDeniedException
[Form] Updated checks for the ICU version from 4.5+ to 4.7+ due to test failures with ICU 4.6
[Form] simplified a test from previous merge
Update src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/Type/FileType.php
fixed CS
Xliff with other node than source or target are ignored
small fix of #5984 when the container param is not set
Filesystem Component mirror symlinked directory fix
[Process][Tests] fixed chainedCommandsOutput tests
fixed CS
Use better default ports in urlRedirectAction
Add tests for urlRedirectAction
info about session namespace
fix upgrade info about locale
Update src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Tests/FormTest.php
Update src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Form.php
...
* 2.0:
[DependencyInjection] fixed composer.json
[Form] Updated checks for the ICU version from 4.5+ to 4.7+ due to test failures with ICU 4.6
fixed CS
small fix of #5984 when the container param is not set
fixed CS
Use better default ports in urlRedirectAction
Add tests for urlRedirectAction
Update src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Tests/FormTest.php
Update src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Form.php
[Security] remove escape charters from username provided by Digest DigestAuthenticationListener
[Security] added test extra for digest authentication
fixed CS
[Security] Fixed digest authentication
[Security] Fixed digest authentication
[SecurityBundle] Convert Http method to uppercase in the config
Use Norm Data instead of Data
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Bridge/Doctrine/Form/EventListener/MergeCollectionListener.php
src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Controller/RedirectController.php
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/composer.json
this can happen when the config for the router is unset, but this method
does not need to depend on routing. reading an unset config would raise an exception.
Commits
-------
3f8127c fixed '0' problem
7bec460 fixed phpdoc
4c5bfab [FrameworkBundle] non-permanent redirect should be status code 404 according to spec
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] non-permanent redirect to unknown location with 404
according to spec: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html see 410 Gone
bc break: tiny when omitting 2 parameter (I can avoid this with `func_num_args` but i think its not necessary and makes the code strange and inconsistent)
* 2.0:
updated VERSION for 2.0.17
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.17
updated vendors for 2.0.17
fixed XML decoding attack vector through external entities
prevents injection of malicious doc types
disabled network access when loading XML documents
refined previous commit
prevents injection of malicious doc types
standardized the way we handle XML errors
Redirects are now absolute
Conflicts:
CHANGELOG-2.0.md
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoader.php
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Crawler.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Routing/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Serializer/Encoder/XmlEncoderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/XliffFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Validator/Mapping/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
vendors.php
Commits
-------
887c0e9 moved EngineInterface::stream() to a new StreamingEngineInterface to keep BC with 2.0
473741b added the possibility to change a StreamedResponse callback after its creation
8717d44 moved a test in the constructor
e44b8ba made some cosmetic changes
0038d1b [HttpFoundation] added support for streamed responses
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] added support for streamed responses
To stream a Response, use the StreamedResponse class instead of the
standard Response class:
$response = new StreamedResponse(function () {
echo 'FOO';
});
$response = new StreamedResponse(function () {
echo 'FOO';
}, 200, array('Content-Type' => 'text/plain'));
As you can see, a StreamedResponse instance takes a PHP callback instead of
a string for the Response content. It's up to the developer to stream the
response content from the callback with standard PHP functions like echo.
You can also use flush() if needed.
From a controller, do something like this:
$twig = $this->get('templating');
return new StreamedResponse(function () use ($templating) {
$templating->stream('BlogBundle:Annot:streamed.html.twig');
}, 200, array('Content-Type' => 'text/html'));
If you are using the base controller, you can use the stream() method instead:
return $this->stream('BlogBundle:Annot:streamed.html.twig');
You can stream an existing file by using the PHP built-in readfile() function:
new StreamedResponse(function () use ($file) {
readfile($file);
}, 200, array('Content-Type' => 'image/png');
Read http://php.net/flush for more information about output buffering in PHP.
Note that you should do your best to move all expensive operations to
be "activated/evaluated/called" during template evaluation.
Templates
---------
If you are using Twig as a template engine, everything should work as
usual, even if are using template inheritance!
However, note that streaming is not supported for PHP templates. Support
is impossible by design (as the layout is rendered after the main content).
Exceptions
----------
Exceptions thrown during rendering will be rendered as usual except that
some content might have been rendered already.
Limitations
-----------
As the getContent() method always returns false for streamed Responses, some
event listeners won't work at all:
* Web debug toolbar is not available for such Responses (but the profiler works fine);
* ESI is not supported.
Also note that streamed responses cannot benefit from HTTP caching for obvious
reasons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/12/21 06:34:13 -0800
Just an idea: what about exposing flush() to twig? Possibly in a way that it will not call it if the template is not streaming. That way you could always add a flush() after your </head> tag to make sure that goes out as fast as possible, but it wouldn't mess with non-streamed responses. Although it appears flush() doesn't affect output buffers, so I guess it doesn't need anything special.
When you say "ESI is not supported.", that means only the AppCache right? I don't see why this would affect Varnish, but then again as far as I know Varnish will buffer if ESI is used so the benefit of streaming there is non-existent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by cordoval at 2011/12/21 08:04:21 -0800
wonder what the use case is for streaming a response, very interesting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by johnkary at 2011/12/21 08:19:48 -0800
@cordoval Common use cases are present fairly well by this RailsCast video: http://railscasts.com/episodes/266-http-streaming
Essentially it allows faster fetching of web assets (JS, CSS, etc) located in the <head></head>, allowing those assets to be fetched as soon as possible before the remainder of the content body is computed and sent to the browser. The end goal is to improve page load speed.
There are other uses cases too like making large body content available quickly to the service consuming it. Think if you were monitoring a live feed of JSON data of newest Twitter comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/12/21 08:54:35 -0800
How does this relate the limitations mentioned in:
http://yehudakatz.com/2010/09/07/automatic-flushing-the-rails-3-1-plan/
Am I right to understand that due to how twig works we are not really streaming the content pieces when we call render(), but instead the entire template with its layout is rendered and only then will we flush? or does it mean that the render call will work its way to the top level layout template and form then on it can send the content until it hits another block, which it then first renders before it continues to send the data?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/21 09:02:53 -0800
@lsmith77 this is why the ``stream`` method calls ``display`` in Twig instead of ``render``. ``display`` uses echo to print the output of the template line by line (and blocks are simply method calls in the middle). Look at your compiled templates to see it (the ``doDisplay`` method)
Rendering a template with Twig simply use an output buffer around the rendering.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/21 09:24:33 -0800
@lsmith77: We don't have the Rails problem thanks to Twig as the order of execution is the right one by default (the layout is executed first); it means that we can have the flush feature without any change to how the core works. As @stof mentioned, we are using `display`, not `render`, so we are streaming your templates for byte one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/21 09:36:41 -0800
@Seldaek: yes, I meant ESI with the PHP reverse proxy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/21 09:37:34 -0800
@Seldaek: I have `flush()` support for Twig on my todo-list. As you mentioned, It should be trivial to implement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fzaninotto at 2011/12/21 09:48:18 -0800
How do streaming responses deal with assets that must be called in the head, but are declared in the body?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/21 09:52:12 -0800
@fzaninotto: What do you mean?
With Twig, your layout is defined with blocks ("holes"). These blocks are overridden by child templates, but evaluated as they are encountered in the layout. So, everything works as expected.
As noted in the commit message, this does not work with PHP templates for the problems mentioned in the Rails post (as the order of execution is not the right one -- the child template is first evaluated and then the layout).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fzaninotto at 2011/12/21 10:07:35 -0800
I was referring to using Assetic. Not sure if this compiles to Twig the same way as javascript and stylesheet blocks placed in the head - and therefore executed in the right way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/21 10:34:59 -0800
@Seldaek: I've just added a `flush` tag in Twig 1.5: 1d6dfad4f5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by catchamonkey at 2011/12/21 13:29:22 -0800
I'm really happy you've got this into the core, it's a great feature to have! Good work.
To stream a Response, use the StreamedResponse class instead of the
standard Response class:
$response = new StreamedResponse(function () {
echo 'FOO';
});
$response = new StreamedResponse(function () {
echo 'FOO';
}, 200, array('Content-Type' => 'text/plain'));
As you can see, a StreamedResponse instance takes a PHP callback instead of
a string for the Response content. It's up to the developer to stream the
response content from the callback with standard PHP functions like echo.
You can also use flush() if needed.
From a controller, do something like this:
$twig = $this->get('templating');
return new StreamedResponse(function () use ($templating) {
$templating->stream('BlogBundle:Annot:streamed.html.twig');
}, 200, array('Content-Type' => 'text/html'));
If you are using the base controller, you can use the stream() method instead:
return $this->stream('BlogBundle:Annot:streamed.html.twig');
You can stream an existing file by using the PHP built-in readfile() function:
new StreamedResponse(function () use ($file) {
readfile($file);
}, 200, array('Content-Type' => 'image/png');
Read http://php.net/flush for more information about output buffering in PHP.
Note that you should do your best to move all expensive operations to
be "activated/evaluated/called" during template evaluation.
Templates
---------
If you are using Twig as a template engine, everything should work as
usual, even if are using template inheritance!
However, note that streaming is not supported for PHP templates. Support
is impossible by design (as the layout is rendered after the main content).
Exceptions
----------
Exceptions thrown during rendering will be rendered as usual except that
some content might have been rendered already.
Limitations
-----------
As the getContent() method always returns false for streamed Responses, some
event listeners won't work at all:
* Web debug toolbar is not available for such Responses (but the profiler works fine);
* ESI is not supported.
Also note that streamed responses cannot benefit from HTTP caching for obvious
reasons.
Commits
-------
cd24fb8 change explode's limit parameter based on known variable content
b3cc270 minor optimalisations for explode
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle][CssSelector][HttpFoundation][HttpKernel] [Security][Validator] Minor optimizations for "explode" function
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: -
Todo: -
I added limit parameter in some places, where it may be usefull. I did not check the context of what values may have been exploded. So to not break anything, I added +1 to limit parameter.
If you find out that in some places limit (or limit+1) is not important or meaningless, write a comment please and I will fix it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/07 06:56:49 -0800
Adding +1 just to be sure to not break anything is clearly something we won't do. What is the benefit of doing that anyway?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/07 13:50:24 -0800
The main idea of making this PR was to notify about some places that may run faster with just adding one parameter to explode function.
If in code is someting like: ```list($a, $b) = explode(':', $s);```
Function ```explode``` will create n-items (depends on ```$s```), but we need in code only the first two items. There is no reason to let ```explode``` create more items in memory that are NEVER used in our code. The limit parameter is there for these situations, so let's use it.
I know that it is microoptimization and may look unimportant, but we are writing a framework - so people expect that code will be as fast as possible without this kind of mistakes.
As I've noticed above, I know that +1 is not ideal solution, but the fastest without debugging the code. I expect that someone (with good knowledge of that code) will look at it and write in comments if variable may contain 1 comma (dot or someting on what is doing the explode) or maybe 2 in some situations or more.
Anyway, +1 will not break anything, because same items are created as it is now, but no unnecessary item is created.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/07 23:14:59 -0800
I'm +1 for adding the number to avoid problems but I'm -1 on the optimization side of things as it won't optimize anything.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/12/08 12:46:49 -0800
*.. The main idea of making this PR was to notify about some places that **may** run faster ..*
I am also unsure the optimization is really an optimization, care to benchmark (with meaningful inputs)? As for the limit+1 thing, why would you want to +1 it? The number of ``list`` arguments should always reflect the ``limit`` parameter, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/08 23:11:34 -0800
@helmer please try this simple benchmark:
```
<?php
header('Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8');
define('COUNT', 10000);
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc:dddddddddddddddddddddd:eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee:fffffffffffffffffffffffffff';
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < COUNT; $i++) {
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string);
}
$end = microtime(true)-$start;
echo 'without limit: '.$end."\n";
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < COUNT; $i++) {
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 2);
}
$end = microtime(true)-$start;
echo 'with limit: '.$end."\n";
```
My results are:
```
without limit: 0.057228803634644
with limit: 0.028676986694336
```
That is 50% difference (with APC enabled). Of course the result depends on the length of source string and if it's too short, the difference may be none or very very small. That's why I said, that it **may** run faster and is just a micro optimization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/08 23:18:12 -0800
@helmer And why +1? It depends on a code:
```
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc';
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 2);
var_dump($a, $b);
```
and
```
$source_string = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb:cccccccccccccccccccccccc';
list($a, $b) = explode(':', $source_string, 3);
var_dump($a, $b);
```
gives different results. That's why the content of the variable must be known.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by helmer at 2011/12/09 00:08:28 -0800
@pulzarraider Thanks for the benchmark, seems like a gain enough. Although, we are more likely having a scenario of:
``explode(':', 'a🅱️c')`` vs ``explode(':', 'a🅱️c', 3)`` with a ``COUNT`` of 10, where the difference is not even in microseconds anymore :)
The limit addition alters the behaviour though, ie suddenly you can define a controller [logical name](http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/routing.html#controller-string-syntax) as ´´AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:show:something``, and things go downhill from there on.
All that aside, I'm +1 for setting the limit to the exact number of ``list`` parameters, but certainly not number+1, this is just too wtfy (as you said, this was a safety thing, but I reckon for this PR to be merged it needs to be +0).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by drak at 2011/12/09 08:28:58 -0800
Overall `list()` is ugly as it's not very explicit. Even though it would mean extra lines, it's better to `explode()` then explicitly assign variables:
```
$parts = explode(':', $foo);
$name = $parts[0];
$tel = $parts[1];
```
`list()` is one of those bad relics from the PHP past...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/11 10:07:47 -0800
@drak: why is `list` not explicit? It is in fact as explicit as the more verbose syntax you propose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pulzarraider at 2011/12/11 13:08:50 -0800
@drak: I agree with @fabpot. In speech of benchmarks ```list``` is faster then using a helper variable.
@fabpot, @helmer I've changed explode's limit to be correct (without +1) and removed some changes from this PR, where I can't find out what the content of variable may be. Unit tests pass, so I think it's ready for merge.
Commits
-------
78883f9 Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}``
Discussion
----------
Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}`
Allow syntax like ``{% render "AcmeDemoBundle:Frontend/Default:index" %}``
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #2424
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/18 07:44:48 -0700
@docteurklein still the same issue. github says it conflicts. Are you sure you fetched the latest version ?
Thus it should be sent to 2.0 IMO as it is a bugfix
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2011/10/18 07:51:21 -0700
@stof Yes, i'm pretty sure I followed the patches sending flow. (http://symfony.com/doc/2.0/contributing/code/patches.html
My tools are telling me it's ok.
I then merged it into master without any problem, which is up to date with upstream.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
I'll try to send it to 2.0 branch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by docteurklein at 2011/10/18 07:53:52 -0700
@stof, what's wrong with https://github.com/docteurklein/symfony/commits/ticket_2424 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/10/18 08:28:21 -0700
hmm, seems like github has an issue when determining if it conflicts or not. It's sad
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/10/20 09:49:56 -0700
Dosent this already work ? as classes are namespaces the / should be a \ i think ?
Works for routes at least.
Commits
-------
86f888f fix https default port check
Discussion
----------
fix https default port check
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/03 03:26:15 -0700
I think it's better to delete $httpsPort variable from the prototype and use only $httpPort variable.
public function urlRedirectAction($path, $permanent = false, $scheme = null, $httpPort = 80)
...
$port = '';
if (('http' === $scheme && 80 != $httpPort) || ('https' === $scheme && 443 != $httpPort)) {
$port = ':'.$httpPort;
}
But if this method is already used with the $httpsPort variable elsewhere, your change is ok with me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gimler at 2011/08/03 04:52:08 -0700
You can use different ports for http and https so when you call the function $scheme = null than it use the $request->getScheme() so you must add both ports so i think it is not a good idea to merge the http and https vars.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by gimler at 2011/08/03 04:53:17 -0700
damn sorry i have accidentally close the pull request ;(
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/03 05:13:24 -0700
I agree with @gimler. Merging them as a single parameter does not make sense here
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/03 05:33:12 -0700
I've juste think it's weird to set a useless parameter ($httpPort) when you want to use the last parameter ($httpsPort).
And I don't think someone want http protocole on 433 or https on 80 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/08/03 05:35:16 -0700
@Abhoryo what if you are using this controller in a general way, without knowing by advance if the handled request is a secure one ? You need both parameters.
If you need to change the https port by keeping the default http port, you indeed need to pass it but blame PHP: it does not support named parameters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Abhoryo at 2011/08/03 06:02:18 -0700
Ok, right.
This commit also fixes exception pages when Twig is not enabled as a templating engine.
Instead of just displaying the raw Twig template as before, we now fallback to the default
exception handler introduced some time ago.
Commits
-------
cdf4b6a Checked log levels
a45d3ee Reverted last commit
529381b ControllerNotFound: Changed log level from info to error. Also moved throw exception code block up, to prevent the message from beeing logged multiple times.
7c29e88 Changed log level of "Matched route ..." message from info to debug
dca09fd Changed log level of "Using Controller ..." message from info to debug
Discussion
----------
Log levels
Just wanted to ask if the log level INFO is still correct for these messages?
As there are only four log levels left (DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR), DEBUG might be the more appropriate level for these messages now.
Let me give an example: An application is logging user actions (maybe to database) in order to assure comprehensibility, e. g. "User %s deleted post %d", "User %s written a message to user %s". These are not warnings of course, so the only suitable log level is INFO.
But they will be thrown together with these very common (at least two per request?) "Using controller..." and "Matched route..." messages when choosing INFO as log level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/05/24 07:13:18 -0700
Agreed, this stuff is framework debug information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/05/24 08:53:24 -0700
Why do you want to change these two specific ones? The framework uses the INFO level at other places too. Is it a good idea to say that the framework only logs with DEBUG?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/05/24 09:12:53 -0700
Doctrine logs at the INFO level too and I think it is useful to keep it as INFO. Being able to see the queries without having all DEBUG messages of the event dispatcher and security components is useful IMO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/05/25 02:30:24 -0700
Yeah, that's true, maybe we just need to reintroduce (again, meh:) NOTICE between INFO and WARNING.
@kaiwa Of course the other way could be that you just add your DB handler to the app logger stack. That could be done in a onCoreRequest listener or such, basically you'd have to call `->pushHandler($yourDBHandler)` on the `monolog.logger.app` service. That way your messages will flow to it, but it won't receive noise from the framework stuff since those log on monolog.logger.request and other log channels.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/05/25 02:48:26 -0700
@Seldaek: I don't think we need another level. We just need to come up with a standard rules about the usage of each level. Adapted from log4j:
* ERROR: Other runtime errors or unexpected conditions.
* WARN: Use of deprecated APIs, poor use of API, 'almost' errors, other runtime that are undesirable or unexpected, but not necessarily "wrong" (unable to write to the profiler DB, ).
* INFO: Interesting runtime events (security infos like the fact the user is logged-in or not, SQL logs, ...).
* DEBUG: Detailed information on the flow through the system (route match, security flow infos like the fact that a token was found or that remember-me cookie is found, ...).
What do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/05/25 02:53:38 -0700
+1 for this standard (also this PR can be merged then), but we should review code for other "wrong" log levels usage (if everyone accept this standard)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/05/25 02:55:07 -0700
I won't merge this PR before all occurrences of the logger calls have been reviewed carefully and changed to the right level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/05/25 02:58:44 -0700
@fabpot: Just noticed these two occurring for every request in my log file. You are right, there are other places where this changes must be applied if we will change the log level.
@stof: Hmm, i see. It is not possible to set the logger separately for each bundle, is it? That maybe would solve the problem. If somebody is interested in seeing the queries, he could set the log handler level to DEBUG for doctrine bundle, but still use INFO for the framwork itself. Plus he could even define a different output file or a completely different handler.
I'm not sure if something like that is possible already (?) or realizable at all... just came into my mind.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/05/25 03:01:07 -0700
Just FYI, from Monolog\Logger (which has CRITICAL and ALERT):
* Debug messages
const DEBUG = 100;
* Messages you usually don't want to see
const INFO = 200;
* Exceptional occurences that are not errors
* This is typically the logging level you want to use
const WARNING = 300;
* Errors
const ERROR = 400;
* Critical conditions (component unavailable, etc.)
const CRITICAL = 500;
* Action must be taken immediately (entire service down)
* Should trigger alert by sms, email, etc.
const ALERT = 550;
The values kind of match http error codes too, 4xx are expected errors that are not really important (404s etc) and 5xx are server errors that you'd better fix ASAP. I'm ok with the descriptions, but I think alert and critical should be included too. I'll probably update Monolog docblocks to match whatever ends up in the docs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/05/25 03:03:21 -0700
@kaiwa you can do a lot, but not from the default monolog configuration entry, I'm not sure if we can really make that fully configurable without having a giant config mess. Please refer to my [comment above](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1073#issuecomment-1234316) to see how you could solve it. Maybe @fabpot has an idea how to make this more usable though.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/05/25 03:19:43 -0700
@Seldaek the issue is that the different logging channels are only know in the compiler pass, not in the DI extension. So changing the level in the extension is really hard IMO.
Thus, the handlers are shared between the different logging channels (needed to open the log file only once for instance, or to send a single mail instead of one per channel) and the level is handled in the handlers, not the logger.
I'm +1 for the standard, by adding the distinction between 400 and 500 status calls using ERROR and CRITICAL (which is already the case in the code).
@kaiwa do you have time to review the calls to the logger between DEBUG and INFO or do you prefer I do it ? For instance, the Security component currently logs all message at DEBUG level and some of them should be INFO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/05/25 04:31:04 -0700
@stof ok i'll do that
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/05/25 12:22:51 -0700
Need some help :) I came across `ControllerNameParser::handleControllerNotFoundException()` which leads to redundant log messages currently:
>[2011-05-25 20:53:16] request.INFO: Unable to find controller "AppBaseBundle:Blog" - class "App\BaseBundle\Controller\BlogController" does not exist.
>[2011-05-25 20:53:16] request.ERROR: InvalidArgumentException: Unable to find controller "AppBaseBundle:Blog" - class "App\BaseBundle\Controller\BlogController" does not exist. (uncaught exception) at /home/ruth/symfony3/src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Controller/ControllerNameParser.php line 87
Is it necessary to call `$this->logger->info($log);` if the InvalidArgumentException will be logged anyway?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/05/25 12:39:22 -0700
Well, the issue is that the ControllerNameParser logs messages and then uses them to throw an exception. I guess the logging call should be removed as it is redundant with the one of the ExceptionListener. @fabpot thoughts ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/05/27 11:39:25 -0700
I checked all debug, info and log calls. Sometimes it is hard to distinguish between the levels, so it would be great if someone reviews @cdf4b6a. @stof, maybe you want to take a look?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kaiwa at 2011/05/31 12:52:07 -0700
@stof, thanks for your comments. I added some replies above, please let me know your suggestions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/05/31 14:04:22 -0700
@kaiwa As I said before, all the security logging calls should be DEBUG (most of them) or INFO (the one syaing that authentication succeeded for instance), but not WARN or ERROR as the exception don't go outside the firewall.
This adds to convience methods, for two separate reasons:
* Controller::getDoctrine() - this will allow method completion on the Registry class to work in IDEs, is slightly shorter, and should feel very "concrete" to beginners
* Registry::getRepository() - the repository is a very convenient thing to need - this allows it to be fetched much more succintly
Overall Before:
$product = $this->get('doctrine')
->getEntityManager()
->getRepository('AcmeDemoBundle:Product')
->find($id);
Overall After (with IDE method auto-completion for `getRepository`):
$product = $this->getDoctrine()
->getRepository('AcmeDemoBundle:Product')
->find($id);
The _scheme requirement can be used to force routes to always match one given scheme
and to always be generated with the given scheme.
So, if _scheme is set to https, URL generation will force an absolute URL if the
current scheme is http. And if you request the URL with http, you will be redirected
to the https URL.
The rationale is that this is a very common task and we can't expect non-advanced users to have to remember what the fully-qualified
class name of the Exception is in order to use it.
