This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[DI] Throw on "configured-keys <> getSubscribedServices()" mismatch
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
As reported on Slack, this creates DX issues, and provides no practical benefit. Let's throw instead of logging.
Commits
-------
4da8884ca4 [DI] Throw on "configured-keys <> getSubscribedServices()" mismatch
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[DX] [DI] Throw more helpful error when shortcutting global classes
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? |no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #22146
| License | MIT
As discussed in #22146 the error message received when trying to use a class in the global
namespace as a service without defined class is confusing. Helpful information was added
pointing out this current limitation.
Commits
-------
b9e7b4fd61 [DependencyInjection] Throw helpful error when shortcutting global classes
As discussed in #22146 the error message received when trying to use a class in the global
namespace as a service without defined class is confusing. Helpful information was added
pointing out this current limitation.
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[DI] Add "by-id" autowiring: a side-effect free variant of it based on the class<>id convention
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
This PR adds a new autowiring mode, based only on the class <> id convention.
This way of autowiring is free from any conflicting behavior, which is what I was looking for to begin with.
The expected DX is a bit more involving than the current way we do autowiring. But it's worth it to me, because it's plain predictable - a lot less "magic" imho.
So in this mode, for each `App\Foo` type hint, a reference to an "App\Foo" service will be created. If no such service exists, an exception will be thrown. To me, this opens a nice DX: when type hinting interfaces (which is the best practice), this will tell you when you need to create the explicit interface <> id mapping that is missing - thus encourage things to be made explicit, but only when required, and gradually, in a way that will favor discoverability by devs.
Of course, this is opt-in, and BC. You'd need to do eg in yaml: `autowire: by_id`.
For consistency, the current mode (`autowire: true`) can be configured using `autowire: by_type`.
Commits
-------
c298f2a90c [DI] Add "by-id" autowiring: a side-effect free variant of it based on the class<>id convention
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[*Bundle] Add autowiring aliases for common services
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
As spotted while working on #22060, we're missing many aliases to prevent any autowiring ambiguities.
I also removed the "Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\EventDispatcher" and "Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Container" aliases: we'd better encourage using the corresponding interfaces instead.
On ControllerTrait, we need to type hint against SessionInterface, because otherwise, when session support is disabled, autowiring still auto-registers an "autowired.Session" service, which defeats the purpose of being able to enable/disable it.
Commits
-------
08c2ee32f1 [*Bundle] Add autowiring aliases for common services
* 3.2:
Fixes a typo in the form collector styles
[WebProfilerBundle] Fix content-security-policy compatibility
[WebProfilerBundle] Drop dead code
[HttpKernel] Fixed bug with purging of HTTPS URLs
fix some risky tests
[DI] [YamlFileLoader] change error message of a non existing file
[WebProfilerBundle] Handle Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header correctly
[Security] Added option to return true in the method isRememberMeRequested
* 2.8:
Fixes a typo in the form collector styles
[HttpKernel] Fixed bug with purging of HTTPS URLs
fix some risky tests
[DI] [YamlFileLoader] change error message of a non existing file
[Security] Added option to return true in the method isRememberMeRequested
* 2.7:
[HttpKernel] Fixed bug with purging of HTTPS URLs
fix some risky tests
[DI] [YamlFileLoader] change error message of a non existing file
[Security] Added option to return true in the method isRememberMeRequested
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch.
Discussion
----------
fix some risky tests
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 2.7
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
PHPUnit 6 marks tests as risky when they have no assertions (and are not marked as skipped or incomplete). This PR will update our test suite accordingly.
Component that still need to be covered:
- [ ] Config
- [ ] Form
- [ ] HttpFoundation
- [ ] Security
- [ ] Workflow
Commits
-------
abf1787dcc fix some risky tests
* 3.2:
[Yaml] CS
[DI] Fix PhpDumper generated doc block
#20411 fix Yaml parsing for very long quoted strings
[Workflow] add Phpdoc for better IDE support
fix package name in conflict rule
improve message when workflows are missing
[Doctrine Bridge] fix priority for doctrine event listeners
Use PHP functions as array_map callbacks when possible
[Validator] revert wrong Phpdoc change
Use proper line endings
* 2.8:
[DI] Fix PhpDumper generated doc block
#20411 fix Yaml parsing for very long quoted strings
[Doctrine Bridge] fix priority for doctrine event listeners
Use PHP functions as array_map callbacks when possible
[Validator] revert wrong Phpdoc change
Use proper line endings
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[DI] Remove skipping magic for autowired methods
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no (master only)
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
Wildcard based autowiring made it required to auto-skip methods that were not wireable.
Now that things need to be explicit (ie via the `@required` annotation, or via configuration), this "automagic" behavior is not required anymore.
Since it can lead to wtf moments ("*I* did *put that `@required` annotation, why is it ignored by autowiring?*"), I think we should remove it.
This also fixes another issue where configured method calls had their optional arguments wired, while we want only the constructor's to behave as such.
Commits
-------
a6bfe1c [DI] Remove skipping magic for autowired methods
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[DI] Introduce "container.service_locator" tag, replaces ServiceLocatorArgument
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no (master only)
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
I first started working on adding this new "container.service_locator" tag, so here it is.
It allows defining and dumping service-locator services properly, where it wasn't possible previously (you had to create a DI extension to do so.)
Then I realized that this allowed us to entirely drop `ServiceLocatorArgument` and replace it with the more flexible `ServiceClosureArgument`.
This makes things simpler overall, see diff stat.
Commits
-------
5d230b5871 [DI] Introduce "container.service_locator" tag, replaces ServiceLocatorArgument
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.3-dev branch (closes#21937).
Discussion
----------
[DependencyInjection] Handle void return types in closure-proxy
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | N/A
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | N/A
I recently got an error when registering an event listener that specifies a `void` return type. Dumping the container generates a closure proxy that always returns a value, which then conflicts with the return type hint.
E.G the following code is generated (some class names removed for readability)
```
$instance->addListener('kernel.view', /** @closure-proxy ... */ function (...\GetResponseForControllerResultEvent $event): void {
return ${($_ = isset($this->services[listener']) ? $this->services['listener'] : $this->get('listener')) && false ?: '_'}->onKernelView($event);
}, 128);
```
This then causes the error `A void function must not return a value in ...`
So void return types should be handled by removing the `return` inside the closure
Commits
-------
a5c5ad1 [DependencyInjection] Handle void return types in closure-proxy
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[DI] Allow extensions to create ServiceLocator as services
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/21770/files?w=1
With this PR, DI extensions are able to create "service locator" services.
They are easily created as such:
```php
$container->register('my_service_locator', ServiceLocator::class)
->addArgument(array(
'exposed_id' => new ServiceClosureArgument(new Reference('internal_id')),
))
```
I already need this in two different PRs to come.
Commits
-------
1d9663326e [DI] Allow creating ServiceLocator-based services in extensions
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[DI][Router][DX] Invalidate routing cache when container parameters changed
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #21426
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | N/A
Supersedes #21443 but only for master.
Indeed, this implementation uses a new feature: a `ContainerParametersResource` which compares cached containers parameters (collected at some point, here by the `Router`) with current ones in the container.
On the contrary of the previous PR targeting 2.7, this will only invalidate routing cache when parameters actually used in the routes changed and will avoid always rebuilding the routing cache when the container is rebuilt, just to catch the edge case of someone modifying a parameter.
Commits
-------
fad4d9e2ef [DI][Router][DX] Invalidate routing cache when container parameters changed
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.3-dev branch (closes#21763).
Discussion
----------
[DI] Replace wildcard-based methods autowiring by `@required` annotation
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no (affects things that are only on master)
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
While playing a bit with new features in master around DI configuration, several people around me got bitten by wildcard-based autowiring. The typical example is adding `autowire: [set*]` in `_defaults`: use that on `resource: ../src/Command/` PSR4-based loading and boom, `setApplication` and `setHelperSet` will now be wrongly called. You could tell me "of course, don't to that" - but being bitten so early on a master-only feature makes me really unconfident that this will be easy enough for people after the release.
If wildcard-based autowiring is removed, then I don't see anymore the need for allowing arrays as in `autowire: [setFoo,getBar]`. Moreover, this array syntax has a core DX issue: it's a dead end as far as the learning curve is concerned. You learn it, then when becoming a more advanced dev, someone teaches you that you'd better use another syntax: explicit wiring.
And in fact, we don't need it at all, because something else already exists: just declare a method call, but don't define its arguments. If `autowire: true` is set, then the AutowiringPass already fills in the holes. There is only one tweak required to make this work: don't autowire optional arguments for method calls - or that'd be a BC break. To my PoV that's even better: this makes autowiring fit a "do the minimum to make it work" strategy. A really good one to me.
But there is still an issue: wildcard-based autowiring fits a need. Namely, it allows one to define a convention (eg. `'set*'`), and have all such methods that follow the convention be autowired. To me, this looks like doing it reverse (the DI config should adapt to the code, not reverse). So, to fill this need, let the declaration be in the source: just use an annotation!
This PR adds support for the `@required` annotation, borrowed from the Spring framework:
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/spring/spring_required_annotation.htm
Using the annotation is totally optional of course. If you do, *and if autowiring is on*, then it'll be autowired. If you don't, nothing changes: do manual wiring.
Even when not using autowiring, the annotation is still a nice hint for the consumer of your classes: it tells the reader that this method needs to be called for correct instantiation - thus lowering one drawback of setter injection (discoverability).
The implementation of the annotation parsing is done using a few regexp (no dep on any complex parser) - and works with inheritance, by leveraging the `@inheritdoc` tag (the default behavior being to *not* inherit anything from parent methods).
All in all, looking at the diff stats, it makes everything simpler. Good sign, isn't it?
Commits
-------
f286fcc25f [DI] Replace wildcard-based methods autowiring by `@required` annotation
9081699980 Revert "minor #21315 [DI][FrameworkBundle] Show autowired methods in descriptors (ogizanagi)"
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
Fix DI test
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Tests pass? | yes
Should fix appveyor/travis builds
Commits
-------
8740e44086 Fix DI test
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[DependencyInjection] make the service container builder register its own self referencing definition
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | ~
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | ~
Commits
-------
9c97496b5f [DependencyInjection] make the service container builder register the definition of its related service container service (and aliases) in order to make compiler passes be able to reference the special service_container service.
