Commits
-------
3ae976c fixed CS
84ad40d added cache clear hook
Discussion
----------
[Cache][2.1] Added cache clear hook
Allows bundles to hook into the `cache:clear` command by using the `kernel.cache_clearer` tag instead of using the `event_dispatcher` service.
See #1884
Bug fix: No
Feature addition: Yes
Backwards compatibility break: No
Symfony2 tests pass: Yes
Fixes the following tickets: #1884
References the following tickets: #1884
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dustin10 at 2011/12/16 11:03:54 -0800
Rebased to squash all commits into one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lsmith77 at 2011/12/17 05:27:29 -0800
@fabpot: we figured that priorities wouldn't be needed for cleaning .. haven't tested the PR, but conceptually it looks good to me and aside from the priority stuff its modeled after the cache warners.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dustin10 at 2011/12/19 09:46:26 -0800
@fabpot Updated to pass cache dir to `clear` method.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dustin10 at 2011/12/19 10:02:21 -0800
@stof and @fabpot Another thought I just had. Should the `$this->getContainer()->get('cache_clearer')->clear($realCacheDir);` call in the `CacheClearCommand` be done before the warming?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/19 10:03:59 -0800
indeed. the clearing should be done before the warming.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dustin10 at 2011/12/19 10:19:28 -0800
Squashed all commits into one. Let me know if there is anything else.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by dustin10 at 2011/12/19 10:31:50 -0800
Fixed extra lines.
Commits
-------
63d2ce2 [FrameworkBundle] Fixed the ckeck for the router class
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle] Fixed the ckeck for the router class
The getRouteCollection method is now part of the RouterInterface so the
command should accept any implementation of the interface instead of just
the implementations extending the core one.
The getRouteCollection method is now part of the RouterInterface so the
command should accept any implementation of the interface instead of just
the implementations extending the core one.
Commits
-------
dd20f01 Fixed assets:install to use a relative path instead of an absolute
Discussion
----------
[2.1] Fixed "assets:install" to create relative instead of absolute symlinks
This is a fairly simple fix so that the symlinks are relative to the resources rather than an absolute path that breaks from machine-to-machine or upon deployment.
We were trying to figure out why styles were messed up for other contributors, but then found that the paths were hard-coded for my machine :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/06/04 09:44:11 -0700
Any other thoughts/updates on this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/06/04 22:31:39 -0700
We have such a feature in symfony1 and IIRC it does not work very well. One problem is when you use symlink for some bundles. Then, you should not use a relative symlink as there is a common path between the two.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/06/05 09:55:00 -0700
Sorry, I didn't think that we would be an issue since the Bundle "Best Practices" states to not include other bundles as dependencies.
If absolute links are a must, then the next alternative is for collaborators to add "/web/bundles" to .gitignore and each person run "assets:install" upon installation/update.
I was personally hoping there were a way to have this versioned for easier deployment.
On Jun 5, 2011, at 12:31 AM, fabpot<reply@reply.github.com> wrote:
> We have such a feature in symfony1 and IIRC it does not work very well. One problem is when you use symlink for some bundles. Then, you should not use a relative symlink as there is a common path between the two.
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1173#issuecomment-1303600
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/06/27 04:56:58 -0700
``` php
<?php
// ...
->addOption('relative', null, InputOption::VALUE_NONE, 'The --symlink option will generate relative paths')
// ...
```
and just default to absolute paths ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/06/27 08:37:50 -0700
I'm very supportive of that compromise. Up to @fabpot if I should add this back in, since relative paths were apparently problematic with symfony1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sbusch at 2011/07/15 08:46:01 -0700
+1
I'm developing on Mac and the files are mounted on a Linux box which serves the project. The paths are not the same on those two systems. If I accidentally install assets on my Mac the absolute paths won't work on the Linux webserver.
Other scenario: one teammate could add those symlinks by accident to the git repository, which breaks all other installations.
Relative symlinks could help a lot in these cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/07/15 08:47:53 -0700
@sbusch Your issues are the same as mine, which prompted this ticket :)
Until this gets @fabpot's blessing, it's best to simply add `web/bundles` to your `.gitignore` file and tell your users to always run `assets:install --symlink` each time they pull down code & something breaks ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sbusch at 2011/07/15 08:58:33 -0700
The handling (calculation) of relative symlinks IMO fits better to the `symlink()` method of `\Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Util\Filesystem`. Possible method signature:
symfony/src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Util/Filesystem.php:
```php
<?php
// ...
/**
* Creates a symbolic link or copy a directory.
*
* @param string $originDir The origin directory path
* @param string $targetDir The symbolic link name
* @param Boolean $copyOnWindows Whether to copy files if on Windows
* @param Boolean $makeRelative Whether to try to create a relative link
*/
public function symlink($originDir, $targetDir, $copyOnWindows = false, $makeRelative = false)
{
```
And what about changing the `--symlink` option to optionally have a value, instead of adding a new depending option? E.g. `--symlink[=absolute|relative]`, with "absolute" as default:
symfony/src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Command/AssetsInstallCommand.php:
```php
<?php
// ...
class AssetsInstallCommand extends ContainerAwareCommand
{
/**
* @see Command
*/
protected function configure()
{
$this
->setDefinition(array(
new InputArgument('target', InputArgument::REQUIRED, 'The target directory (usually "web")'),
))
->addOption('symlink', null, InputOption::VALUE_OPTIONAL, 'Symlinks the assets instead of copying it. Allowed values: "absolute" (default) and "relative".', 'absolute')
->setHelp(<<<EOT
The <info>assets:install</info> command installs bundle assets into a given
directory (e.g. the web directory).
<info>./app/console assets:install web [--symlink]</info>
A "bundles" directory will be created inside the target directory, and the
"Resources/public" directory of each bundle will be copied into it.
To create a symlink to each bundle instead of copying its assets, use the
<info>--symlink</info> option. Use <info>--symlink=relative</info> for relative symlinks.
EOT
)
->setName('assets:install')
;
}
/**
* @see Command
*
* @throws \InvalidArgumentException When the target directory does not exist
*/
protected function execute(InputInterface $input, OutputInterface $output)
{
if (!is_dir($input->getArgument('target'))) {
throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('The target directory "%s" does not exist.', $input->getArgument('target')));
}
if ($input->hasOption('symlink'))
{
if (!function_exists('symlink')) {
throw new \InvalidArgumentException('The symlink() function is not available on your system. You need to install the assets without the --symlink option.');
}
if (!in_array($input->getOption('symlink'), array('absolute', 'relative'))) {
throw new \InvalidArgumentException(sprintf('Invalid value "%s" for option "symlink"', $input->getOption('symlink')));
}
}
$filesystem = $this->getContainer()->get('filesystem');
// Create the bundles directory otherwise symlink will fail.
$filesystem->mkdir($input->getArgument('target').'/bundles/', 0777);
foreach ($this->getContainer()->get('kernel')->getBundles() as $bundle) {
$originDir = $bundle->getPath().'/Resources/public';
if (is_dir($originDir)) {
$targetDir = $input->getArgument('target').'/bundles/'.preg_replace('/bundle$/', '', strtolower($bundle->getName()));
$output->writeln(sprintf('Installing assets for <comment>%s</comment> into <comment>%s</comment>', $bundle->getNamespace(), $targetDir));
$filesystem->remove($targetDir);
if ($input->hasOption('symlink')) {
$filesystem->symlink($originDir, $targetDir, false, $input->getOption('symlink') == 'relative');
} else {
$filesystem->mkdir($targetDir, 0777);
$filesystem->mirror($originDir, $targetDir);
}
}
}
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sbusch at 2011/07/15 09:04:46 -0700
@ericclemmons: yes, that's our current workaround. I started with manually converting absolute links to relative ones, but that quickly got very annoying ;-)
After that I tried to implement the generation of relative links by myself (where the proposals of my previous comment come from) until I found your PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/07/18 00:20:38 -0700
@sbush if it defaults to something how would you turn it off ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/18 00:26:16 -0700
@henrikbjorn a default value for the option is used when using ``--symlink`` without the value. If you don't use the option at all, it is disabled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/07/18 11:58:29 -0700
In fact no. The default value seems to be also used when the option is not set at all. @fabpot is this intended ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/07/19 05:18:29 -0700
Symlinks on windows, although technically possible, don't quite work with PHP on most setups. Also git doesn't seem to support them either on windows (not sure why not). For those reasons, and although I'm sure this doesn't apply to every project, I would recommend you just have everyone run `assets:install [--symlink]` on their local machine, and make that command run on the server as part of your deployment process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by ericclemmons at 2011/07/19 06:15:34 -0700
Nobody is even entertaining --relative?
On Jul 19, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Seldaek<reply@reply.github.com> wrote:
> Symlinks on windows, although technically possible, don't quite work with PHP on most setups. Also git doesn't seem to support them either on windows (not sure why not). For those reasons, and although I'm sure this doesn't apply to every project, I would recommend you just have everyone run `assets:install [--symlink]` on their local machine, and make that command run on the server as part of your deployment process.
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/1173#issuecomment-1606463
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Gregwar at 2011/08/10 08:56:27 -0700
I agree with the idea of proposing a --relative option, I'm currently working on a Samba mounted filesystem and I'm forced to create manually symlinks to get things working since the paths are not the same
Commits
-------
d675c28 [FrameworkBundle] Use Router instead of RouterInterface
ae7ae8d [FrameworkBundle] Moved router_listener from web to router.xml since it depends on the router
35a9023 [FrameworkBundle] Added isEnabled to Router commands, fixes#1467536d979 [Console] Added Command::isEnabled method that defines whether to add the command or not
Discussion
----------
[2.1] [Console] Added Command::isEnabled method
This addresses #1467.
The idea is to allow commands to evaluate whether they can run or not, since they are automatically registered.
- It's useful for the two router:* commands since they're optional (router can be disabled), but part of the FrameworkBundle that is not really optional.
- It could be useful for third party code as well.
- It's BC.
- aa95bb0d395810b29a3e654673e130736d9d1080 should address the issue in #1467, while the other commits just make sure the command is not registered at all if the router isn't standard.
One issue remains though:
- A few other services like twig helpers get the `ròuter` injected, this means that if there is really **no** router service defined, there is still an error. I'm not sure how to fix those beyond adding `on-invalid="null"` but I'm not sure if that's desirable. I guess we could argue that the router is a big candidate for replacement/suppression, and as such it should be truly optional, but if we do it I don't know where it'll lead. I don't want to end up in a situation where half the dependencies are optional to support every possible combination. @fabpot wdyt?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kriswallsmith at 2011/06/28 16:19:46 -0700
I'd rather see us not register a command instead of register and then disable it. Can we do the same thing you've done here in the bundle's registerCommands() method?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/06/28 16:51:36 -0700
Note that it's never really registered. During the registration it's checked and skipped if not enabled.
However, doing it as you suggest means overriding/copy-pasting all the code from the core Bundle class, which I don't like so much. It also means adding code specific to those two commands in a somewhat unrelated place, which I also don't like.
I'm not saying the current solution is perfect, but from the alternatives I considered, it's the best I have found.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/04 04:58:04 -0700
@Seldaek your branch conflicts with master. could you rebase it ?
@fabpot what do you think about this PR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Seldaek at 2011/09/04 08:39:05 -0700
Rebased
-- add missing files
-- tweak translation command files
-- dumpers are now responsive for writting the files
-- moved the twig extractor the bridge
-- clear temp files after unit tests
-- check the presence of dumper in translation writer
-- General cleaning of the code
-- clean phpDoc
-- fix PHPDoc
-- fixing class name in configuration
-- add unit tests for extractors (php and twig)
-- moved test to correct location
-- polish the code
-- polish the code
* 2.0:
[Validator] Sync polish translation
[FrameworkBundle] sanitize target arg in asset:install command
few optimisations for XliffFileLoader and XmlFileLoader
[FrameworkBundle] Sync the Russian translations
[FrameworkBundle] Added Dutch validator translation for trans-unit 41
[FrameworkBundle] Updated German validator translation
[FrameworkBundle] Fixed a typo in the translation file per @PeymanHR
Here are the new simplified rules:
* Required cache warmers are *always* executed when the Kernel boots for the first time;
* Optional cache warmers are *only* executed from the CLI via cache:warmup
These new rules means that all the configuration settings for the cache
warmers have been removed. So, if you want the best performance, remember to
warmup the cache when going to production.
This also fixed quite a few bugs.
