This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
b27b749 made usage of Composer autoloader for subtree-split unit tests
Discussion
----------
made usage of Composer autoloader for subtree-split unit tests
This PR also normalizes the way components are tested.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-09T23:14:22Z
👍
* 2.1:
removed unused use statements
[Form] Adapted HTML5 format in DateTimeType as response to a closed ICU ticket
[2.1][HttpFoundation] Fixed Php doc in Request::get
bumped Symfony version to 2.1.4-DEV
updated VERSION for 2.1.3
update CONTRIBUTORS for 2.1.3
updated CHANGELOG for 2.1.3
merged branch jakzal/yamlDoubleQuotesDumperFix (PR #4320)
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#5032).
Commits
-------
afba15f [2.2] Translatable field type for Propel i18n columns
Discussion
----------
[2.2] Translatable field type for Propel i18n columns
A field type which allows to automatically generate the correct fields for propels i18n behavior.
Usage example:
$builder->add('pageI18ns', 'translatable_collection', array(
'i18n_class' => '\foo\barBundle\Model\PageI18n',
'languages' => array('de', 'fr'),
'label' => 'Translations',
'columns' => array(
'title' => array(
'label' => 'Custom title',
),
'description' => array(
'type' => 'textarea'
)
)
));
With this configuration the field automatically generates the correct fields for the title and description column for the given languages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-24T14:37:27Z
tests are also missing
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kufi at 2012-07-27T08:50:05Z
Ok. Moved the Listeners into own classes. Changed the names of the types. Fixed the TranslationCollectionType which now is a Subclass of AbstractType and has the parent collection.
Edit:
The syntax changed slighty for the form:
$builder->add('pageI18ns', new \Symfony\Bridge\Propel1\Form\Type\TranslationCollectionType(), array(
'languages' => array('de', 'fr', 'en'),
'label' => 'Translations',
'options' => array(
'data_class' => 'foo\bar\Modell\PageI18n',
'columns' => array(
'title' => array(
'label' => 'Custom title',
),
'description' => array(
'type' => 'textarea'
)
)
)
));
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-27T08:55:07Z
tests are still missing, and you have some CS issue (which can probably all be fixed by running the [PHP-CS-Fixer](http://cs.sensiolabs.org/) on your classes)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sindro88 at 2012-08-13T13:27:46Z
I followed step by step the implementation but the form type return an error "Could not load type propel1_translation".
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kufi at 2012-08-14T06:21:40Z
Could you try again. The problem was that the type propel1_translation_collection relied on a registered form type propel1_translation. I removed this one and replaced it with the actual form class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sindro88 at 2012-08-14T06:35:33Z
I replaced with the class and now it work, thank you so much!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-09-18T16:53:21Z
ping @willdurand
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-10-13T17:56:16Z
@willdurand ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-10-23T12:03:22Z
There are a few comments by @stloyd to fix, but I'm 👍 on this PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-23T13:18:59Z
@kufi Can you add a note in the CHANGELOG of the Propel bridge before I merge this PR? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by kufi at 2012-10-23T13:32:31Z
@fabpot Sure. Does this belong to Version 2.1.0 or the upcoming 2.2.0?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-23T13:59:04Z
2.2
* 2.1:
[ClassLoader] fixed unbracketed namespaces (closes#5747)
slight refactoring in UrlMatcher
[Form] Created test for DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser see #5790
[Form] Fixed DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser to guess the "required" option for to-one associations
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch.
Commits
-------
5d2525b [Form] Created test for DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser see #5790b844d6b [Form] Fixed DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser to guess the "required" option for to-one associations
Discussion
----------
[Form] Doctrine orm type guesser tests
This PR adds tests to https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5790
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-20T10:53:56Z
Using real test entities would be better IMO. Using mocks ties it pretty much to the implementation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-10-21T10:38:53Z
@Tobion thats true, but Doctrine Class meta data takes quite some coding to set-up.
For instance you need the EntityManager to get even get the meta data set!
So you'd end having more code to set-up then your actually testing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Burgov at 2012-10-21T12:58:58Z
I wasn't sure whether do use a test entity manager, or do it the way I finally did it.
@sstok true, it's quite some work to set it up, but on the other hand there's the base OrmTestCase class which does it for you, so it'd actually mean I'd only have to create one entity for all the cases: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Bridge/Doctrine/Tests/DoctrineOrmTestCase.php
@Tobion on the other hand I tend to use a test EM only when I actually need to test persisting and loading, while this test case here is so isolated that I didn't really feel it would be necessary.
I'd like to know which method is preferred though, I'll change it if necessary, and other tests can be added to test the rest of this specific class
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
b31ae34 [WebProfilerBundle] Remove the now unneeded BC var and fixed a typo
d07ce03 [TwigBundle] Moved the registration of the app global to the environment
Discussion
----------
[TwigBundle] Moved the registration of the app global to the environment
This makes the app global variable available also when accessing the Twig
environment directly instead of using the TwigEngine.
* 2.1:
fixed CS
added doc comments
added doc comments
[Validator] Updated swedish translation
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.de.xlf
[2.1] Exclude tests from zips via gitattributes
[HttpKernel][Translator] Fixed type-hints
Updated lithuanian validation translation
[DomCrawler] Allows using multiselect through Form::setValues().
[Translation] forced the catalogue to be regenerated when a resource is added (closes symfony/Translation#1)
Unit test for patched method OptionsResolver::validateOptionValues().
validateOptionValues throw a notice if an allowed value is set and the corresponding option isn't.
[Form] Hardened code of ViolationMapper against errors
[HttpFoundation] Fixed#5611 - Request::splitHttpAcceptHeader incorrect result order.
[Form] Fixed negative index access in PropertyPathBuilder
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.ro.xlf
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Form.php
src/Symfony/Component/Process/Process.php
* 2.1:
[2.1] Fix SessionHandlerInterface autoloading
Remove executable bit from HttpKernel/DependencyInjection/ConfigurableExtension.php
[2.0][http-foundation] Fix Response::getDate method
[DoctrineBridge] Require class option for DoctrineType
[HttpFoundation] fixed the path to the SensioHandlerInterface class in composer.json
Support the new Microsoft URL Rewrite Module for IIS 7.0. @see http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-4491 @see http://framework.zend.com/code/revision.php?repname=Zend+Framework&rev=24842
fixed undefined variable
hasColorSupport does not take an argument
Improve FilterResponseEvent docblocks Response ref
Commits
-------
83dc966 [Form] Fixed some PHPDoc
596bbb1 [Form] fixed FormConfigBuilder to use PropertyPathInterface
a523823 [Form] fixed and added phpDoc
Discussion
----------
[Form] fixed and added phpDoc
[ci skip]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-08-26T08:11:01Z
Some descriptions don''t seem to be properly aligned, use the CS-fixer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-26T17:02:25Z
@sstok This is more about manual fixes concerning forgotten exceptions or wrong data type. The cs fixer gives many false positives and can be applied later.
Commits
-------
f1c4b8b [Doctrine Bridge] Added a parameter ignoreNull on Unique entity to allow a nullable value on field. Added Test
Discussion
----------
[Doctrine Bridge] Added parameter ignoreNull to accept a nullable value on field
In my last project, i use this syntax to test unicity on 2 fields, but it fail because the validator stop if value is null. I dropped the test on validator and my unicity work fine.
```
@UniqueEntity(fields={"username", "deletedAt"})
```
It's possible to add this PR on Bridge.
Thanks
Bertrand
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T08:14:19Z
This is wrong. RDBMS allow several null values in a unique column and this change will break it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-07-23T08:17:08Z
@stof seems weird indeed it would return if any of the values are null. Makes sense to do a query where the field `IS NULL` or whatever the find method does.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T08:18:50Z
@henrikbjorn if you do a query with IS NULL, the validator would force to have only 1 entity with a null field whereas it is not the behavior of the DB-level constraint.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2012-07-23T08:20:41Z
In this case i suspect that he wants to achieve a `WHERE username = "henrikbjorn" AND deletedAt IS NULL` which would be valid right? Currently it just returns if any of the fields are null and the validation is never done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-07-23T08:27:24Z
I suggest to make this configurable as the handling of NULL values in UNIQUE columns [differs between SQL implementations](http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?22,53591,53591#msg-53591).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T08:52:53Z
@stof What the correct solution to test my unicity with deletedAt == null ?
I use this definition: @ORM\Column(name="deleted_at", type="datetime", nullable=true)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T20:28:44Z
In my local repository, i added a new parameter "$authorizedNullField" on UniqueEntity.php and tested this on UniqueEntityValidator.php:
Code: https://gist.github.com/4122efbe569e3c2c95c0
What about that ?
Thanks for your help
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T20:45:30Z
yep, this would be good (except for the naming which seems weird)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T20:46:44Z
No problem to change this. I don't find a good name for this ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T20:47:57Z
what about ``allowMultipleNull`` (defaulting to ``true`` for BC) ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T20:51:30Z
Why multiple ? This option is for one or many. what about `allowNullable` ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T20:52:44Z
@Garfield-fr the current behavior allows having multiple null values without failing to the unique constraint
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T20:56:07Z
ok. I make `allowMultipleNull`.
It's ok with that: https://gist.github.com/cae8d43780c45a5011ed
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-07-23T20:58:12Z
What about `uniqueNull` (`false` by default)? `ignoreNull` (`true` by default)? I find `allowMultipleNull` a bit cumbersome.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T20:58:26Z
no it is not. You have an issue in the validator. You have an extra negation.
Please update your PR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-07-23T21:01:59Z
@stof `ignoreNull` is ok for you ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-07-23T21:10:24Z
yes
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-05T07:48:03Z
Is it mergeable now? Is yes, @Garfield-fr Can you squash your commits?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-08-05T08:43:23Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/2039523) (merged 19ae3cf9 into c20c1d18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-05T12:09:02Z
@Garfield-fr when squashing the commits, you need to force the push as you are rewriting the history. You should not have merged with your remote branch
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-08-05T12:10:15Z
What's the right solution for resolve this ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-05T12:11:09Z
@Garfield-fr reset your local branch to the squashed commit and force the push
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Garfield-fr at 2012-08-05T12:14:09Z
@stof Thanks for your help
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-08-05T12:19:06Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/2040210) (merged f1c4b8b4 into 20d2e5a1).
Commits
-------
fb002d8 [Form] Fixed variable passing from outer to inner blocks of the same FormView instance
Discussion
----------
[Form] Fixed variable passing from outer to inner blocks of the same FormView instance
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #5029
Todo: -
This PR fixes two bugs.
The first bug is described in #5029. The second parameter to the "form_label" function in Twig, if given, always overwrote whatever label was defined previously.
```
{# null would overwrite whatever is currently set #}
form_label(form, null, { ... })
```
The second bug affected passing variables from outer to inner blocks. In the following example, "label_attr" would not be forwarded to the "form_label" function.
```
form_row(form, { "label_attr": { "class": "my_class" }})
```
Both bugs are fixed now.
