* 2.1: (24 commits)
forced Travis to use source to workaround their not-up-to-date Composer on PHP 5.3.3
[Routing] removed irrelevant string cast in Route
Fixed typo
Make YamlFileLoader and XmlFileLoader file loading extensible
[HttpKernel] fix typo
Fixed singularization of "prices"
[Form] Removed an exception that prevented valid formats from being passed, e.g. "h" for the hour, "L" for the month etc.
[HttpKernel] fixed Client when using StreamedResponses (closes#5370)
fixed PDO session handler for Oracle (closes#5829)
[HttpFoundation] fixed PDO session handler for Oracle (closes#5829)
[Locale] removed a check that is done too early (and it is done twice anyways)
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.fa.xlf
Adding new localized strings for farsi validation.
[HttpFoundation] moved the HTTP protocol check from StreamedResponse to Response (closes#5937)
[Form] Fixed forms not to be marked invalid if their children are already marked invalid
[Form] Excluded some tests in NumberToLocalizedStringTransformerTest which fail on ICU 4.4, but work on ICU 4.8
added missing tests from previous merge
[Form] Fixed NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer to accept both comma and dot as decimal separator, if possible
Fix export-ignore on Windows
Show correct class name InputArgument in error message
...
Conflicts:
.travis.yml
src/Symfony/Component/Form/Extension/Core/DataTransformer/NumberToLocalizedStringTransformer.php
we don't need the logic to merge numeric keys, as we don't have them. I could also improve the genrated code by PhpMatcherDumper a little by saving a function call.
This PR was squashed before being merged into the master branch (closes#5904).
Commits
-------
84adcb1 [2.2][Routing] Added support for default attributes with default values of method params
Discussion
----------
[2.2][Routing] Added support for default attributes with default values of method params
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
With this patch, you can configure your default values likes this:
``` php
/**
* @Route("/hi/{name}", name="hi")
*/
public function hiAction($name = "Bob")
{
return new Response($name);
}
```
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-03T23:15:32Z
I'm unsure. How does one know if that param defines a default value or a requirement? It's too vague.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-03T23:35:27Z
It's only a default value, not a requirement.
It's just a shortcut to avoid `defaults={"name"="bob"}`
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-03T23:43:51Z
Yes, but its not clear. It could also be a shortcut to `requirements={"name"="bob"}`, which has totally different meaning. So it's not self-explanatory.
-1 for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-03T23:48:21Z
it is the default php behavior. It's a default value for a variable...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-11-04T00:22:58Z
@Tobion using the default value of the method to set a requirement does not make any sense. I don't see why someone would expect this behavior
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-06T10:12:05Z
@lyrixx Can you add some unit tests?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-06T10:28:42Z
Oh I misunderstood the PR. I thought this makes the `name` param default to `hi`. `@Route("/hi/{name}", name="hi")`. But it's just the name of the route. Your example was easy to misinterpret as you used `name` everywhere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-10T08:33:13Z
@lyrixx Can you finish this PR?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-10T13:16:34Z
@fabpot Yes i will as soon as possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-10T18:34:07Z
I rebase and amend my commit. (I changed doc in commit message to be less confusing)
I will try to add tests.
But for now, `AnnotationClassLoader::load` is not really tested, and `AnnotationClassLoader::addRoute` is absolutely not tested. So I think I should add tests for these methods ? And then add tests for my patch.
I will try tomorrow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by lyrixx at 2012-11-11T18:23:41Z
@fabpot I added new tests. I tried to made very atomic commits.
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
c7a8f7a [Routing] fixed possible parameters conflict in apache url matcher
Discussion
----------
[Routing] fixed possible parameters conflict in apache url matcher
Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: no (as long as rewrite rules are generated after upgrading)
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
- This fixes a conflict in route parameters:
The rewrite rules currently pass route informations through environment variables:
`_ROUTING_DEFAULT_x`: passes the default value of parameter x
`_ROUTING__allow_x`: passes the information that method x was allowed for this route
`_ROUTING_x`: passes the value of parameter x
The problem is that naming a route parameter `DEFAULT_*` or `_allow_*` would not behave as expected.
I fixed this by namespacing all environment variables; e.g. parameters are in `_ROUTING_param_*`, defaults in `_ROUTING_default_*`, etc.
- The PR fixes a second issue: sometimes the variables are prefixed with multiple REDIRECT_. This PR handles this case by ignoring them all.
- This also improves performance a little:
Matching a route with two parameters and two default parameters 100K times: (`$_SERVER` was copied from a real request, so with many non `_ROUTING_` variables)
master: 6.6s
this branch: 4.7s
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-27T13:37:24Z
Any news on this PR? Is it mergeable?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-27T14:50:08Z
There is an issue with default parameter values, I can't find how to fix that in a simple way. Before this PR, default values are never used (if a parameter is an optional not present in the url, the parameter's value is the empty string); after this PR, when a parameter is present and empty (e.g. a requirement like `.*`), its value is set to its default value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-29T01:36:08Z
The problem is, it's not consistent with the default php matcher. So one cannot safely exchange it with the apache matcher because it behaves differently under some (special) circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-11-05T08:05:54Z
We need to move forward as I want to merge the hostname support in the routing ASAP to have plenty of time for feedback before the 2.2 release.
Does it sound reasonable to merge this PR as is an open a ticket about the remaining issue (which should not occur that often anyways)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-11-05T09:22:02Z
@fabpot it sounds reasonable to me. Also, I've the hostname support branch is currently rebased so that it can be merged without this one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-11-11T21:50:20Z
Btw, does the ApacheMatcherDumper handle the _scheme requirement? It doesn't look like it. This would be another bug.
Anyway, we can probably merge this PR and open new issues for the remaining bugs.
* 2.1:
[ClassLoader] fixed unbracketed namespaces (closes#5747)
slight refactoring in UrlMatcher
[Form] Created test for DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser see #5790
[Form] Fixed DoctrineOrmTypeGuesser to guess the "required" option for to-one associations
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
e54d749 [Routing] Simplified php matcher dumper (and optimized generated matcher)
Discussion
----------
[Routing] Simplified php matcher dumper (and optimized generated matcher)
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: no
Related: #3378
Backwards compatibility break: no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
This simplifies the php matcher dumper by allowing the dumper to re-organize routes in the dumper's own structure.
As a result, dumping is made a little simpler. This is also helps much for my hostname-based routes PR #3378.
Reorganizing routes also allows to find more optimization opportunities:
Currently the dumper wraps some collections of routes in a `if (0 === strpos($pathinfo, '/someprefix')` if the collection has user-defined prefix, and if it contains more than one direct child Route. This can miss many optimization opportunities.
The PR changes this by building a prefix tree of routes based on the static prefix extracted from routes' patterns. Then every leave having a prefix and more than one child (route or collection) will be wrapped in a `if` statement.
Example:
```
// No explicit prefix is specified
@Route("/cafe")
@Route("/cacao")
@Route("/coca")
```
is compiled like this:
```
if (url starts with /c) {
if (url starts with /ca) {
// test route "/cafe"
// test route "/cacao"
}
// test route "/coca"
}
```
Some tests have many white space changes, much more easier to review [here](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5734/files?w=1)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-13T02:27:54Z
I'm not sure if adding these specific classes just for dumping is the best implementation because they duplicate some logic and this optimization should also work out-of-the-box with the standard RouteCollection etc.
What I have in mind is a new method in RouteCollection like `RouteCollection::optimizeTree` that returns a new RouteCollection with the Routes that includes these optimization you do here. So there would probably be no need for the new classes.
It think it requires some changes in RouteCollection like the handling of prefix that must start with a slash currently, which is too restrictive. But it should be possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-13T12:52:32Z
@Tobion
> I'm not sure if adding these specific classes just for dumping is the best implementation because they duplicate some logic and this optimization should also work out-of-the-box with the standard RouteCollection etc.
I think RouteCollection and DumperCollection do not share the same concerns; and RouteCollection does things that don't allow to reorganize routes freely. For instance when adding a collection to a RouteCollection this changes all the child routes' prefix, requirements, options, etc. When setting a collection's prefix, this prepends the prefix to every child route's pattern, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-15T08:50:23Z
squashed the CS commits
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-15T13:50:16Z
@fabpot @Tobion this PR is ready to be merged if everyone agrees
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-16T18:10:36Z
When the above is fixed, I think it's good to be merged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by arnaud-lb at 2012-10-17T08:40:20Z
Fixed; thanks @Tobion @stof for your reviews
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-19T03:30:10Z
@arnaud-lb could you please test whether your PR fixes#5780 as a side-effect?
I can image that it's fixed because you use `$route->compile()->getStaticPrefix();` for prefix optimization.
If it's fixed please add a test case. If not, that's fine, and we need to fix it in another PR.
* 2.1: (28 commits)
Delete use of CreationExeption
[Form] Fixed error message in PropertyPath to not advice to use a non-existing feature
[Form] Fixed creation of multiple money fields with different currencies
[Form] Fixed setting the "data" option to an object in "choice" and "entity" type
Fixed Serbian plural translations.
Fixed IPv6 Check in RequestMatcher
Fix typo
change what I think is a typo
[Console] Fix error when mode is not in PATH
[WebProfilerBundle] fixed macro usage (to be forward compatible with Twig 2.x)
Change monolog require-dev to use the branch alias instead of dev-master
[FrameworkBundle] partially reverted previous merge
[2.1] Added missing error return codes in commands
Made the router lazy when setting the context
[WebProfilerBundle] fixed typos
Fix incorrect variable in FileProfilerStorage
UnitTest fix
UnitTest fix
added a unit test
fixed#5384
...
Initializing the matcher and the generator to set the context does not make
sense as it is set anyway when building them. This avoids initializing
them in the RouterListener if you never actually use them (for instance
because you use the apache matcher).
* 2.1:
fixed CS
added doc comments
added doc comments
[Validator] Updated swedish translation
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.de.xlf
[2.1] Exclude tests from zips via gitattributes
[HttpKernel][Translator] Fixed type-hints
Updated lithuanian validation translation
[DomCrawler] Allows using multiselect through Form::setValues().
[Translation] forced the catalogue to be regenerated when a resource is added (closes symfony/Translation#1)
Unit test for patched method OptionsResolver::validateOptionValues().
validateOptionValues throw a notice if an allowed value is set and the corresponding option isn't.
[Form] Hardened code of ViolationMapper against errors
[HttpFoundation] Fixed#5611 - Request::splitHttpAcceptHeader incorrect result order.
[Form] Fixed negative index access in PropertyPathBuilder
Update src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Resources/translations/validators.ro.xlf
Conflicts:
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Form.php
src/Symfony/Component/Process/Process.php
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
e22823b [Routing] context params should have higher priority than defaults
16c1b01 [Routing] fixed 4 bugs in the UrlGenerator
Discussion
----------
[Routing] UrlGenerator: fixed missing query param and some ignored requirements
reopened version of #5181 (cherry-picked)
On top of that I fixed#5437 in my code and added test case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T18:41:45Z
@fabpot ping
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-10-03T18:43:43Z
IIUC, #5437 is a regression in 2.1 and should be done in 2.1, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-10-03T18:46:42Z
It's not in 2.1 anymore as you reverted the PR. #5437 is not valid currently and can be closed.
So this can either be merged in master or 2.1 whatever you prefer.
My benchmarks showed a performance improvement of 20% when matching routes that make use of possesive quantifiers because it prevents backtracking when it's not needed
This PR was merged into the master branch.
Commits
-------
005a9a3 [Routing] fixed RouteCompiler for adjacent and nested placeholders
Discussion
----------
[2.2] [Routing] fixed RouteCompiler for adjacent placeholders
Tests pass: yes
Feature addition: no
Fixes: #4215
BC break: no
- Nesting placeholders works now properly, e.g. `/{foo{bar}}`. Only `bar` is a variable, the rest is static text.
- Variables without separator work now correctly too, e.g. `/{w}{x}{y}{z}.{_format}`. All variables will have the correct default regex in the current manner, that is exclude the previous static char and the next static char (which means disregarding the placeholder in between that have no seperator).
As you can see, I have not modified any tests, only added some. So this change is BC. The compiler now works under all conditions and does not fail for such patterns.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-05-08T22:34:58Z
ready for review / merging
Thanks @snc for giving a helpful tip.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-06-12T23:22:54Z
fabpot told me, he doesn't like PRs that both fix and enhance stuff. So I reworked this PR so that it only contains the bug fixes.
The new PR #4563 contains the feature addition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-06-26T12:33:43Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-14T16:29:27Z
Why wait for 2.2? It's a bugfix only, without BC break.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-31T17:04:37Z
@fabpot I think this should go into 2.1
Commits
-------
02516de [Routing] fix variable with a requirement of '0'
1f5b793 [Routing] fix setting empty requirement in Route
Discussion
----------
[Routing] fix setting empty requirement
First commit: A requirement of "^$" was overlooked and wasn't recognized as empty after stripping it in Route.
Second commit: Fixes a requirement of '0' that was ignored by the Compiler.
Commits
-------
be28e56 [Routing] disallow numeric named variables in pattern
Discussion
----------
[Routing] compile check for numeric named variables in pattern
Because PHP raises an error for such subpatterns in PCRE and thus would break matching, e.g. this is not allowed as regex `(?<123>.+)`.
So add a compile time check for a non-working pattern like '/{123}'.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by sstok at 2012-09-06T08:31:42Z
Strangely enough Regex buddy gives no warning or error with the pattern.
Is the name all numeric invalid or just the beginning?
1e4 and 0xFF would be perfectly valid but returns true with is_nummeric()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-09-06T08:59:07Z
Any numeric is not valid. I guess this limitation is unique to PHP's binding to PCRE.
I think it's because the returned matches array of of preg_match contains both the subpattern as integer index and as named variable. So having a numeric named variable would conflict as `array['1'] === array[1]`.
Commits
-------
7c5cfeb [Routing] added test why #5238 is not that easy
Discussion
----------
[Routing] added test why #5238 is not that easy
This just adds a test that wasn't covered yet and shows why #5238 is not that easy as I thought at first.
Commits
-------
0706d18 [Routing] fixed 4 bugs in the UrlGenerator
Discussion
----------
[Routing] UrlGenerator: fixed missing query param and some ignored requirements
This was pretty hard to figure out. I could fix 4 bugs and refactor the code to safe 2 variables and several assignments. Sorry for doing this in one commit, but they were highly interdependent.
See the added tests for what was fixed. The most obvious bug was that a query param was ignored if it had by accident the same name as a default param (but wasn't used in the path).
In 3 cases it generated the wrong URL that wouldn't match this route. The generator wrongly ignored either the requirements or the passed parameter. I had to adjust one test that was asserting something wrong (see comments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-13T14:22:35Z
ping @fabpot
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-08-29T17:53:07Z
@fabpot I think it's important to merge this before 2.1 final.
* 2.0:
updated VERSION for 2.0.17
updated CHANGELOG for 2.0.17
updated vendors for 2.0.17
fixed XML decoding attack vector through external entities
prevents injection of malicious doc types
disabled network access when loading XML documents
refined previous commit
prevents injection of malicious doc types
standardized the way we handle XML errors
Redirects are now absolute
Conflicts:
CHANGELOG-2.0.md
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoader.php
src/Symfony/Component/DomCrawler/Crawler.php
src/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/Kernel.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/DependencyInjection/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Routing/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Serializer/Encoder/XmlEncoderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Translation/Loader/XliffFileLoaderTest.php
tests/Symfony/Tests/Component/Validator/Mapping/Loader/XmlFileLoaderTest.php
vendors.php
Commits
-------
933e821 Add minimum-stability (dev) in each component
Discussion
----------
Add minimum-stability (dev) in each component
This fixes the ability to run the test suite in each component if a `composer install` is needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T13:57:14Z
If you really want to run the testsuite standalone, some dev requirements are missing (SecurityBundle needs the FrameworkBundle for its functional tests for instance). If you have some time to check the missing dev requirement, it would be great.
Anyway, 👍 for this
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by willdurand at 2012-08-22T13:59:15Z
Yes I already did that once. I'll try to fix more components later.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Christophe Coevoet <
notifications@github.com> wrote:
> If you really want to run the testsuite standalone, some dev requirements
> are missing (SecurityBundle needs the FrameworkBundle for its functional
> tests for instance). If you have some time to check the missing dev
> requirement, it would be great.
> Anyway, [image: 👍] for this
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/5318#issuecomment-7934886>.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:02:23Z
Well, I think most components should be good now (as some work has been done on them). But the bridges and bundles may need some work (bundles were not having any dev requirements until yesterday when @guilhermeblanco added some on FrameworkBundle)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-22T14:14:00Z
what about having for each READ-ONLY repo his own .travis.yml and travisci hook activated ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-08-22T14:30:13Z
please, don't add more travis files. The main already tests everything, and that's all we need.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-22T14:33:46Z
@pborreli tests should not be different for subtree split repos as the code is the same and the tests are the same (except that more tests could be skipped because of missing deps).
Note that for the bundles, it is likely to be different currently as I think some skip tests are missing (just like dev requirements are). But fixing this does not require enablign travis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by pborreli at 2012-08-22T14:42:30Z
ok, i was just thinking about a way to be sure each component is usable individually but yeah that would require to relaunch each tests and add a bunch of travis files + hook
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by hason at 2012-08-24T13:12:04Z
@stof, @eriksencosta, @fabpot: Tests are different for Locale component, see #5235
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-08-24T13:35:07Z
@hason no. You also need to do it when running the tests of the Locale component as part of the full run.
