Commits
-------
bafcaaf Removed version field
f9d9dc7 Add branch-alias for composer
Discussion
----------
Add branch-alias for composer
This should restore the 2.1-dev version (as an alias of dev-master) so that `2.*` or `2.1.*` constraints work again. I'll adjust packagist soon to also display those aliases.
Commits
-------
ed028d5 [WebProfilerBundle] Made is_ajax available to the view when rendering panels
Discussion
----------
[Profiler] Ajax
The first commit should be merged as `app` is not always accessible in the twig template due to the ways the templating system is used. Then there is currently no way to check if we are dealing with an ajax request in the view.
The second commit use ajax to load the panels. This should make the interface more responsive as you don't have to load the layout each time + the panels are cached. Loading via AJAX would also work if your panel does not extend the ajax layout (legacy support) - this would be less efficient though as you would load the layout and filter it out afterwards.
I am not sure if the second commit is worth merging, maybe it is useless ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-12T20:40:16Z
@vicb please rebase
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-13T17:48:48Z
@vicb just FYI, this conflicts with master so you will need to rebased it before it can be merged.
Otherwise, what are the remaining points ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-13T17:57:27Z
I am still wondering if the second commit is a good idea or not ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-13T18:28:17Z
@stof isn't the branch based on the latest master ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-13T19:32:52Z
Well, github tells me it cannot be merged automatically. so either there is a conflict, either their conflict detection failed last time you pushed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-13T22:20:06Z
I did fail.
Should be ok now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-14T23:27:08Z
I'm -1 on the second commit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-15T07:44:25Z
Thanks all for the feedback.
@fabpot ready !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-15T07:46:53Z
@vicb not ready: you reverted all use of ``is_ajax`` in the templates (and you did not renamed it to the underscored name preferred by @fabpot)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-15T07:54:30Z
Well I did revert the use of "`isajax`" (prefer not to mix CS here, the scope of this PR is not to fix CS) because it is not used (this should be applied to the Doctrine profiler).
_What I mean is that `isajax` in all the Sf templates w/o the associated js is useless, basically all or nothing_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-15T08:26:41Z
btw @fabpot it makes me wonder if underscored variable names is a good idea, this will force us to mix (i.e. `is_ajax` vs `request.isxmlhttprequest`). What do you think ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-15T10:09:20Z
I still prefer `is_ajax` as it makes things more readable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-15T10:16:13Z
At a larger scale how do fix the inconsistency described in my previous message ?
Options are:
* fix twig cs
* create twig cs specific to sf2
* don't fix (= keep & live with some inconsistency)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-15T10:22:13Z
@vicb we also use underscores for variables used in the form themes. the official Twig CS are basically the one used by Sf2 in the form theme
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-15T10:24:46Z
I don't see any inconsistencies here. One a variable name and the other is a method call/property name. So, my vote is a don't fix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-15T10:28:53Z
I agree but then we loose one advertised benefit a twig: _"Easy to learn: The syntax is easy to learn and has been optimized to allow web designers to get their job done fast without getting in their way"_.
The designers should now be aware of the underlying implementation (i.e. Am I dealing with a variable or a function ?)
Edit: race condition here... I agree with @stof
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-15T10:45:49Z
@vicb they see that ``isXmlHttpRequest`` is not a variable. They are accessing it on the ``request`` variable (well, recurse here to reach the variable)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-15T10:46:57Z
variables and functions are underscored.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-15T10:51:28Z
I think that the beauty of Twig comes from the fact that designers do not have to wonder if "something" is an array / an object / a variable / a method / a property.
But never mind, I'll update the PR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-15T10:55:06Z
@fabpot would you mind if I open a PR against twig to check for existence of `collector::getNotCalledListeners()` when a designer writes `collector.not_called_listeners`, then we are all happy ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-15T11:21:55Z
ready !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-15T11:31:50Z
The problem is that the `Twig_Template::getAttribute()` is already the bottleneck
Commits
-------
3dd3d58 [EventListener] Fix an issue with sub-requests
71bf279 cleanup
acdb325 [StopWatch] Provide a cleaner API
acd1287 [Stopwatch] rename the section event to avoid collisions
eb540be [Profiler] Allow profiling the terminate event
4ccdc53 [HttpKernel] Cleanup of PdoProfilerStorage
814876f [HttpKernel] Tweak the code of the ProfilerListener
Discussion
----------
[Profiler] Allow profiling the terminate event
This PR is mainly about allowing to profile the terminate event (i.e. see it in the timeline panel)
There are some other tweaks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-02T14:43:20Z
please don't merge for now. good question. bad answer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-06T15:05:46Z
While first commits were focused on problem solving, the last brings a clean API with the ability to re-open an existing section in order to add events (re-setting event origins and merging them were just hacks).
Should be ready to be merged.
_Edit: Sorry, couldn't resist adding a private helper class again!_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2012-02-06T18:30:09Z
@vicb you should stop adding such classes defined in the same file. Otherwise we will have to change the CS (and to stop telling we respect the PSR-0 standard)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-06T18:33:36Z
Once again PSR-0 is about autoloading which is exactly why I do not want in such cases. CS are an other matter and yes I think they should be changed to allow this (and I am going to submit a PR right now).
The only argument I could accept is whether this class should be private or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-06T19:57:06Z
Thanks for your valuable feedback @stof
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2012-02-11T20:53:03Z
Have you tested it on a project? Because it breaks my simple examples (where I have some sub-requests).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by vicb at 2012-02-12T09:47:23Z
my bad, should be ok now.
Commits
-------
ac59db7 cleanup
64ea95d [WebProfilerBundle] Add redirection info to the router panel
826bd23 [FrameworkBundle] fix phpDoc of ControllerResolver::createController()
e3cf37f [HttpFoundation] RedirectResponse: add the ability to retrieve the target URL, add unit tests
50c85ae [WebProfiler] Add info to the router panel
Discussion
----------
[WIP][Profiler] Routing
former #3206 part 3 (depends on part 1 - #3280)
The goal of this PR is to fix#3264 by adding redirection infos on the router panel.
Done:
* Add info on the target url / route
To do:
* Display an accurate URL matching process (when using the RedirectableUrlMatcher)
Commits
-------
0d4d7e0 [WebProfilerBundle] Make the toolbar use the common JS
a440279 [WebProfilerBundle] Adds panel pages
762d90d [Profiler] Buid a common infrastructure
Discussion
----------
[Profiler] Provide a common infrastructure
former #3206 part 3
* base JS (provides ajax, toggle, css class helpers),
* panel pages (used only by the Doctrine panel for now).
Successfuly tested with the (future version of the) Doctrine panel.
Commits
-------
a52c675 [WebProfilerBundle] Improve the logger panel
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] Improve the logger panel
No more need to hit 'refresh'
Commits
-------
5f22268 [Profiler] Sync with master
1aef4e8 Adds collecting info about request method and allowing searching by it
Discussion
----------
[WebProfiler] Add ability to filter data by request method
Bug fix: no
Feature addition: yes
Backwards compatibility break: yes
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #1515
For discussion & description checkout: #1515 & #2279
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/11 10:02:41 -0800
After merging this PR, the toolbar is not displayed anymore for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/12 14:18:20 -0800
@fabpot the toolbar works for me using this branch
Commits
-------
6548354 fixed data-url
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] fixed and adjusted HTML5 markup
I corrected some markup errors that I found when validating the pages of the WebProfilerBundle.
Along the way I also improved the semantic structure of HTML5 like table header and body, lang attribute.
Removed type="text/css" that is the default with rel="stylesheet". Also no need for media="screen"!? Otherwise style does not apply when debugging with handheld device or when printing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/12 23:37:15 -0800
@Tobion: Can you squash your commit before I merge your PR? Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2011/12/13 03:14:51 -0800
@fabpot I would appreciate if you could do this.
I see two problems with pull requests on @github that occur again and again. It's pretty annoying compared to the otherwise very user-friendly Github.
1. Squashing commits of a pull request: If you've already pushed commits to GitHub, and then squash them locally, you will not be able to push that same branch to GitHub again. So you need to create a new branch and a new pull request.
So there should be a button on Github that simply squashes all commits and allows you to enter a new commit message.
2. Opening a pull request based on the master branch instead of the 2.0 branch where bug fixes should be made. So people must rebase their stuff and open a new pull request again. All this back and forth is taking time unnecessarily (both for admins and contributors) and cluttering Githubs news feed.
There should be the possibility to allow switching the pull request base branch. Or at least give the users a configurable hint about the best practice of contributing to a specific repo when they open a pull request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by henrikbjorn at 2011/12/13 03:16:10 -0800
@Tobion
1. Solved by doing a git push -f remote_name branch_name
2. Yes here you need to open a new PR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by fabpot at 2011/12/13 03:21:47 -0800
@Tobion: I'm more than aware of these issues but unfortunately, there is nothing I can do if we want to continue using the Github PRs (and automatic closing).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2011/12/13 03:51:47 -0800
That's why I hope that @github will provide a convenient solution to these issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/12/13 04:08:07 -0800
@Tobion send a feature request to github. Commenting here will not make them implement it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2011/12/13 04:18:31 -0800
@fabpot I squashed commits.
@stof I will do it. But there is no public issue tracker for the Github software, is there? So need to use the contact form I suppose.
fixed markup: <pre> not valid inside <p>
adjusted base html structure for HTML5
improved table markup in bag.html.twig
improved table markup in results.html.twig
update exception.html.twig
Commits
-------
fea74db Added information page with better messages for Profiler
Discussion
----------
[WebProfiler] Added information page with better messages
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stloyd at 2011/08/30 23:29:27 -0700
@fabpot Any decision about this ?
Commits
-------
132fbe3 [WebProfilerBundle] Merge position and css_position
defdb82 [WebProfilerBundle] Remove unused line
69a50ab [WebProfilerBundle] Add the posibility to specify position of toolbar
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] Add the posibility to specify position of toolbar
I'm facing a project where everything is at the bottom of the page, positioned with CSS.
This PR adds the possibility to specify the position of the toolbar, with configuration :
web_profiler:
toolbar: true
intercept_redirects: false
css_position: top
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/06 12:11:27 -0700
Looking at the code rendering the toolbar, there is already a ``position`` parameter used to display the toolbar on top in the profiler. Maybe we could look into reusing it instead of having a second one named ``css_position``.
But the phpdoc says ``bottom, normal, or null -- automatically guessed``. Using ``bottom`` will result in ``position: bottom`` in the CSS, which is broken. @fabpot is it simply a left-over of a previous version ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by alexandresalome at 2011/09/16 00:56:11 -0700
I merged parameters and changed the documentation for 3 values : ```bottom, top or normal```.
Commits
-------
c6b15b3 [WebProfilerBundle] Variables only used once
847c665 [WebProfilerBundle] Use panel URL for debugging toolbar
fe13a6c [WebProfilerBundle] Fix CS
fe76d74 [WebProfilerBundle] Propose to open debug toolbar request in an error occured.
Discussion
----------
[WebProfilerBundle] Propose to open debug toolbar request in an error occ
[WebProfilerBundle] Propose to open debug toolbar request in an error occured.
This is very useful when creating data collectors and an error occurs
when redering the toolbar via XHR.
The only problem is that the exception page renders the toolbar via JS, too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by stof at 2011/09/17 05:26:10 -0700
IMO, you should propose to open the link to the profiler (if the profiler is enabled) instead of opening the toolbar alone
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by alexandresalome at 2011/09/17 05:34:50 -0700
Thanks @stof
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by alexandresalome at 2011/09/17 05:50:11 -0700
4 commits for 2 lines... I should change my job. Thanks @stof, again
This commit also fixes exception pages when Twig is not enabled as a templating engine.
Instead of just displaying the raw Twig template as before, we now fallback to the default
exception handler introduced some time ago.
Commits
-------
abd60ac [WebProfilerBundle] Do not display toolbar loading result if it's not a valid toolbar
406c8d8 [WebProfilerBundle] Make toolbar loading non-blocking
Discussion
----------
Non-blocking WDT & prevents garbage to slip in the page
I made the loading non-blocking so that it's not preventing normal operation of the page when the WDT takes a bit long to come up (happens sometimes when the machine is busy).
The second commit also checks that the response looks correct, to prevent stack traces and such to appear in the page if there was a problem. The main issue is not really stack traces though it's mostly with security and intercept_redirect enabled, if you look at a fully secured site you get twice the redirect intercept message to the login page.
Tested in IE7/9/FF4/Opera11
* Seldaek/events:
[EventDispatcher] Removed temporary code
[FrameworkBundle] Improved code readability
[FrameworkBundle] Clarified code and fixed regression
Update Core and Security events to latest model
[EventDispatcher] Allow registration of arbitrary callbacks
[EventDispatcher] Remove useless code
[EventDispatcher] Minor memory optimization to getListeners()
[FrameworkBundle] Small optimization, remove some function calls
The main benefit is that in XML/YML files we have common syntax (i.e. core.controller, form.pre_bind) that properly namespaces event names (before: onCoreController was ok, preBind was not).
On the other hand in PHP land we also have namespaced events, CoreEvents::controller, FormEvents::preBind, before it was Events::onCoreController, Events::onPreBind, we now have more context.
This in effect removes the direct link between event name and the method name on the handler.
Any callback can be given as a handler and the event name becomes an arbitrary string. Allowing for easier namespacing (see next commit)
* vicb/wdtb_and_events:
[WebProfilerBundle] Event panel: details & links to the listener method when applicable
[WebProfilerBundle] Tweak html markup and css
[WebProfilerBundle] Update the event panel layout
[WebProfilerBundle] Style abbr elements
Controllers:
"BlogBundle:Post:show" is now "Blog:Post:show"
Templates:
"BlogBundle:Post:show.html.twig" is now "Blog:Post:show.html.twig"
Resources:
"@BlogBundle/Resources/config/blog.xml" is now "@Blog/Resources/config/blog.xml"
Doctrine:
"$em->find('BlogBundle:Post', $id)" is now "$em->find('Blog:Post', $id)"
