This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[PhpUnitBridge] Add the ability to expect a deprecation inside a test
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | todo
Replaces https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/25757
Proposed implementation uses a dedicated trait for a better DX. Using `$this->expectDeprecation()` feels natural.
Unfortunately it is not currently possible to test the cases that should produce errors or risky, so there are some things that are not testable here. I plan to propose another feature for the PhpUnitBridge to be able to test those kind of things. If it's accepted, we will then be able to strenghten the tests of this one.
Commits
-------
a3a928050d [PhpUnitBridge] Add the ability to expect a deprecation inside a test
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[Contracts] Split the global CHANGELOG in dedicated CHANGELOG per contract
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
---
This is more in sync with what we do with other components + bundles.
And when we contribute to a contact, it's easier to find the file (because with the substree, we don't get the global package)
Commits
-------
a05ee087a2 [Constracts] Split the global CHANGELOG in dedicated CHANGELOG per contract
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[Console] Moved estimated & remaining calculation logic to separate get method
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | -
| License | MIT
This way, we can use `getEstimated()`and `getRemaining()` to get easy access to the estimated / remaining number of seconds to be used in our placeholder definition set with `setPlaceholderFormatterDefinition` without having to redefine the calculation ourself.
Example before;
```php
ProgressBar::setPlaceholderFormatterDefinition(
'eta',
function (ProgressBar $progressBar) {
$estimated = round((time() - $progressBar->getStartTime()) / ($progressBar->getProgress() ?: 0.1) * $progressBar->getMaxSteps());
return date('H:i:s', strtotime('+' . $estimated . ' seconds'));
}
);
```
Example after;
```php
ProgressBar::setPlaceholderFormatterDefinition(
'eta',
function (ProgressBar $progressBar) {
return date('H:i:s', strtotime('+' . $this->getEstimated() . ' seconds'));
}
);
```
Commits
-------
19958fba5a [Console] Moved estimated & remaining calculation logic to separate get method
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 5.1-dev branch (closes#33968).
Discussion
----------
[Notifier] Add Firebase bridge
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | See #33687
| License | MIT
This would add [Firebase](https://firebase.google.com) integration for the Notifier component. With Firebase you can send push notifications to the users of you Android and iOS app and website (formerly known as Google Cloud messaging).
I'm not sure if it's possible to have this merged, like the other bridges. Or if I should create a stand-alone repository? That'd be fine too.
Also it's now using the `ChatMessage` as implementation of `Symfony\Component\Notifier\Message\MessageInterface`, but I feel like this component could use a `PushMessage` or something similar. Although I'm not sure if it would contain more than `subject` that the `ChatMessage` does.
Commits
-------
2776d2f811 [Notifier] Add Firebase bridge
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 5.1-dev branch (closes#34022).
Discussion
----------
[Notifier] add RocketChat bridge
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | See #33687
| License | MIT
This would add [RocketChat](https://rocket.chat/) integration for the Notifier component. RocketChat is a self hosted chat service.
Fully tested with a trial version of RocketChat.
@wirone I noticed you suggested this.
Commits
-------
4869ef61cd [Notifier] add RocketChat bridge
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[Messenger] Add SQS transport
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | N/A
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | TODO
This PR add the AWS SQS transport in messenger.
It also add a `DisconnectedReceiverInterface` that allows the worker to release not-proceeded message (which are not automatically released in SQS and have to wait a TTL). Tell me if you prefer to move it in a dedicated PR.
accepted DNS:
- `sqs://default/accountId/queueName`
- `sqs://default/queueName`
- `sqs://default/queueName?region=us-east-2`
- `sqs://my_custome_endpoint:12345/queueName?sslmode=disabled`
To reduce AWS costs, the implementation performs a long polling call and prefetch several messages.
TO get ~real time worker, one could use `./bin/console messenger:consume --sleep 0.001`
Commits
-------
c226479d5f [Messenger] Add SQS transport
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
Add Mattermost notifier bridge
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | See #33687
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Added a http://mattermost.org (open source Slack alternative) transport for the new Notifier component
Commits
-------
eaba6a507c Add Mattermost notifier bridge
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[RFC][DX][OptionsResolver] Allow setting info message per option
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | TODO
This is a DX proposal that will help in debugging/errors to better understand the meaning of one defined option.
This is how you'd use it:
```php
$resolver = new OptionsResolver();
$resolver->setDefined('date');
$resolver->setAllowedTypes('date', \DateTime::class);
$resolver->setInfo('date', 'A future date'); // <-- NEW
// ...
```
This information may be useful for those options where their name cannot be intuitive enough, or their purpose is too complex. Here is an example (based on the example above):
```php
// ...
$resolver->setAllowedValues('date', static function ($value): bool {
return $value >= new \DateTime('now');
});
```
So, if you introduce a date value that does not match the criteria, you will get this error message:
**Before:**
```
The option "date" with value DateTime is invalid.
```
Note that the allowed value is not printable in this case, hence the error message cannot be clear at all.
**After:**
```
The option "date" with value DateTime is invalid. Info: A future date.
```
Although a more accurate error message can be triggered within the `\Closure` if desired.
Also you'll see this info message on `debug:form` command (see tests), then you have in advance the informative description of any option.
What do you think?
Commits
-------
0477a06d8a Allow setting one info message per option
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.4 branch (closes#35657).
Discussion
----------
[Security] Fix exception name in doc comments
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
Commits
-------
f10098e9f1 [Security] Fix exception name in doc comments
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[FrameworkBundle][Routing] added Configurators to handle template and redirect controllers
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | let's see
| Fixed tickets | partially #24640, #25145
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | symfony/symfony-docs#11120
While working on https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs/pull/11085, I felt bad about the long notations required for simple [redirects](https://symfony.com/doc/current/routing/redirect_in_config.html) and [templates rendering](https://symfony.com/doc/current/templating/render_without_controller.html) template actions, but I love and use those features since always. Then I gave it a try yesterday night and now I realised I missed #24640 and that #25145 has been closed x).
So here we go, here's my WIP. WDYT of this implementation? ping @javiereguiluz?
I'm going to open the PR in the docs so we can discuss the DX changes there too, and keep focus on the code here.
Cheers!
EDIT
----
This PR now only update PHP-DSL configurators.
______________
TODO:
- [x] gather reviews
- ~[x] fix xml schema~
- [x] add some tests
- ~[ ] handle xsd auto discovery~
- [x] rebase on top of #30507
- [x] ~add shortcuts for #30514~
Commits
-------
de74794acf [FrameworkBundle][Routing] added Configurators to handle template and redirect controllers
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[Translation] Support name attribute on the xliff2 translator loader
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#32048
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | not done yet
Support using the `name` attribute on the `unit` element in xliff 2.0 to use as the "translation key" rather than always relying on the `<source>` content, as was done on the xliff 1.2.
Commits
-------
37b31149c6 Support name attribute on the xliff2 translator loader
* 5.0:
Add missing symfony/mime to require-dev
[Validator] Added the missing Mongolian translations
[ErrorHandler] Never throw on warnings triggered by assert() and set assert.exception=1 in Debug::enable()
refactor(Process): fromShellCommandLine
[Mailer] Do not ping the SMTP server before sending every message
* 4.4:
Add missing symfony/mime to require-dev
[Validator] Added the missing Mongolian translations
[ErrorHandler] Never throw on warnings triggered by assert() and set assert.exception=1 in Debug::enable()
refactor(Process): fromShellCommandLine
[Mailer] Do not ping the SMTP server before sending every message
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
Leverage trigger_deprecation() from symfony/deprecation-contracts
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
Here is what it could mean to use `deprecated()` from #35526 in the code base.
Commits
-------
3e35d8e9e3 Leverage trigger_deprecation() from symfony/deprecation-contracts
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[Contracts/Deprecation] don't use assert(), rename to trigger_deprecation()
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | -
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | -
This PR is a follow up the discussion that happened in #35526.
I applied all the suggestions I received so far on this previous PR so that we can discuss them all together.
Here are the changes:
- the most important change is to *not* use `assert()` anymore. This fixes the objection from @ostrolucky and @derrabus that deprecations and assert() should not be bound to each other. Instead, in order to still make the function a no-op when wanted, it is suggested that apps declare an empty function. This will be more flexible in practice I believe and keeps all the benefits we envisioned by using assert();
- as suggested by @fabpot, the function is renamed `trigger_deprecation()` instead of `deprecated()`. Because the implementation is now not conditional anymore (from the package pov, since assert() is not used), my arguments to keep the previous name don't stand as strong as before to me so I'm fine renaming.
- type hints are added back (requiring PHP 7.1 to use `void`). As mentioned in the 1st point, ppl that really want deprecations to be no-ops will redeclare the function as empty, thus not using any types, thus reclaiming all the perf diff. And for ppl that do want to catch deprecations, the overhead of types is negligible compared to any processing of the deprecations themselves.
WDYT?
All points can be discussed separately if needed of course. I'm personally fine with merging the PR as is, with all 3 changes.
Commits
-------
0032b2a289 [Contracts/Deprecation] don't use assert(), rename to trigger_deprecation()
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Added the missing Mongolian translations
https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/30175
Added the missing translations for the Mongolian ("mn") locale.
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#30175
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Commits
-------
365f4d76bd [Validator] Added the missing Mongolian translations
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[MonologBridge] Add Mailer handler
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 4.4
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes <!-- please update src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| BC breaks? | no <!-- see https://symfony.com/bc -->
| Deprecations? | no <!-- please update UPGRADE-*.md and src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| Tests pass? | yes <!-- please add some, will be required by reviewers -->
| Fixed tickets | #33209 <!-- #-prefixed issue number(s), if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | - <!-- required for new features -->
<!--
Replace this notice by a short README for your feature/bugfix. This will help people
understand your PR and can be used as a start for the documentation.
Additionally (see https://symfony.com/roadmap):
- Bug fixes must be submitted against the lowest maintained branch where they apply
(lowest branches are regularly merged to upper ones so they get the fixes too).
- Features and deprecations must be submitted against branch 4.4.
- Legacy code removals go to the master branch.
-->
Commits
-------
5b7393b823 Add monolog mailer handler
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[Messenger] Add receiving of old pending messages (redis)
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs/pull/12976
This PR makes it possible for the redis transport to get abandoned messages from not running/idle consumers by using `XPENDING` and `XCLAIM`.
Usually it would be best to let the claiming of pending messages be handled by a separate command. Since the messenger component's commands are fixed, we do need to set a `claimTimeout`. The `claimTimeout` defines how long an idle message should be left alone until it will get claimed by the current consumer (Must be a value higher than the longest running handling time of a message or else the message will be handled twice).
Using this solution makes the remarks (https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs/pull/11869#pullrequestreview-257483666) regarding not being able to use the hostname as consumer name obsolete. I would even recommend the hostname as the consumer name.
**Questions**
- [x] Which value should we use as default `claimTimeout`?
- [x] How should the `claimTimeout` be configured?
- [x] Feature or Bugfix?
I will create a docs PR and a PR for the other branches as soon as the questions are resolved.
Commits
-------
9cb6fdfabb Implemted receiving of old pending messages
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Add a constraint to sequentially validate a set of constraints
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master <!-- see below -->
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes <!-- please update src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| Deprecations? | no <!-- please update UPGRADE-*.md and src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| Tickets | N/A <!-- prefix each issue number with "Fix #", if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | Todo
Follows https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/20017#issuecomment-331276007 given some feedbacks about the suggested feature.
```php
/**
* @var string
*
* @Assert\Sequentially({
* @Assert\Type("string"),
* @Assert\Length(min="4"),
* @Assert\Regex("[a-z]"),
* @SomeCustomConstraintWithHeavyExternalCalls(),
* })
*/
public $foo;
```
This new `Sequentially` constraint solves - with less power but better DX - some of the use-cases of the `GroupSequence` feature, allowing to interrupt the validation of some constraints if a previous one in the list failed before. Constraints are validated in given order, and the first violation raised will prevent other constraint validators to be executed.
It can either prevent unexpected type exceptions thrown by further constraints or heavy & unnecessary calls to a database or external services if the value to validate already doesn't match some of the basic requirements.
Commits
-------
dfd9038d28 [Validator] Add a constraint to sequentially validate a set of constraints
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 5.1-dev branch (closes#34334).
Discussion
----------
[Validator] Allow to define a reusable set of constraints
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 5.1 <!-- see below -->
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes <!-- please update src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| Deprecations? | no <!-- please update UPGRADE-*.md and src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| Tickets | N/A <!-- prefix each issue number with "Fix #", if any -->
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | TODO
The goal of this feature is to simplify writing a set of validation constraints to be reused consistently across the application. Which is especially useful with DTOs, as a same set of constraints can be used in different places.
For instance, given multiple DTOs containing the new user password in for different use-cases (register, forgot pwd, change pwd), the same rules apply on the property. Hence with this PR, you can write a single constraint class to be reused:
```php
/**
* @Annotation
*/
class MatchesPasswordRequirements extends Compound
{
protected function getConstraints(array $options): array
{
return [
new NotBlank(),
new Type('string'),
new Length(['min' => 12]),
new NotCompromisedPassword(),
];
}
}
```
I'm open to better naming and ways to expose the options to the `Compound::getConstraints` method, so options can be forwarded to the nested constraints for most specific use-cases.
Commits
-------
8f1b0dfdb7 [Validator] Allow to define a reusable set of constraints
This PR was merged into the 4.4 branch.
Discussion
----------
[Process] throw when PhpProcess::fromShellCommandLine() is used
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 4.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#35637
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | None
Close#35638
Final PR (rebased and tests added)
Commits
-------
7f6d71c2a3 refactor(Process): fromShellCommandLine
This PR was merged into the 5.1-dev branch.
Discussion
----------
[HttpFoundation] Make dependency on Mime component optional
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | master
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | yes
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets |
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
Make the Mime component dependency optional
/cc @nicolas-grekas
Commits
-------
11cef32ff7 [HttpFoundation] Make dependency on Mime component optional
Nicolas Grekas
Thomas Calvet
Matthias Meyer
Robin Chalas
Fabien Potencier
Grégoire Pineau
Oleg Andreyev
Peter Jaap Blaakmeer
Jeroeny
Emanuele Panzeri
Yonel Ceruto
Jules Pietri
Erkhembayar Gantulga
Maxime Steinhausser