2012-06-18 21:38:40 +01:00
|
|
|
Prolog Factor Language (PFL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prolog Factor Language (PFL) is a extension of the Prolog language that
|
|
|
|
allows a natural representation of this first-order probabilistic models
|
|
|
|
(either directed or undirected). PFL is also capable of solving probabilistic
|
|
|
|
queries on this models through the implementation of several inference
|
|
|
|
techniques: variable elimination, belief propagation, lifted variable
|
|
|
|
elimination and lifted belief propagation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Language
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
A graphical model in PFL is represented using parfactors. A PFL parfactor
|
|
|
|
has the following four components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type ; Formulas ; Phi ; Constraint .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Type refers the type of the network over which the parfactor is defined.
|
|
|
|
It can be bayes for directed networks, or markov for undirected ones.
|
|
|
|
- Formulas is a sequence of Prolog terms that define sets of random variables
|
|
|
|
under the constraint.
|
|
|
|
- Phi is either a list of parameters or a call to a Prolog goal that will
|
|
|
|
unify its last argument with a list of parameters.
|
|
|
|
- Constraint is a list (possible empty) of Prolog goals that will impose
|
|
|
|
bindings on the logical variables that appear in the formulas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "examples" directory contains some popular graphical models described
|
|
|
|
using PFL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Querying
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Now we show how to use PFL to solve probabilistic queries. We will
|
|
|
|
use the burlgary alarm network as an example. First, we load the model:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ yap -l examples/burglary-alarm.yap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now let's suppose that we want to estimate the probability of a earthquake
|
2012-06-18 23:08:37 +01:00
|
|
|
ocurred given that mary called. We can do it with the following query:
|
2012-06-18 21:38:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
?- earthquake(X), mary_calls(t).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppose now that we want the joint distribution for john_calls and
|
|
|
|
mary_calls. We can obtain this with the following query:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
?- john_calls(X), mary_calls(Y).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inference Options
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
PFL supports both ground and lifted inference. The inference algorithm
|
|
|
|
can be chosen using the set_solver/1 predicate. The following algorithms
|
|
|
|
are supported:
|
|
|
|
- fove: lifted variable elimination with arbitrary constraints (GC-FOVE)
|
|
|
|
- hve: (ground) variable elimination
|
|
|
|
- lbp: lifted first-order belief propagation
|
|
|
|
- cbp: counting belief propagation
|
|
|
|
- bp: (ground) belief propagation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, if we want to use ground variable elimination to solve some
|
2012-06-18 23:08:37 +01:00
|
|
|
query, we need to call first the following goal:
|
2012-06-18 21:38:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
?- set_solver(hve).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is possible to tweak several parameters of PFL through the
|
|
|
|
set_horus_flag/2 predicate. The first argument is a key that
|
|
|
|
identifies the parameter that we desire to tweak, while the second
|
|
|
|
is some possible value for this key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The verbosity key controls the level of log information that will be
|
|
|
|
printed by the corresponding solver. Its possible values are positive
|
|
|
|
integers. The bigger the number, more log information will be printed.
|
|
|
|
For example, to view some basic log information we need to call the
|
|
|
|
following goal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
?- set_horus_flag(verbosity, 1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use_logarithms key controls whether the calculations performed
|
|
|
|
during inference should be done in the log domain or not. Its values
|
|
|
|
can be true or false. By default is false.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are also keys specific to the inference algorithm. For example,
|
|
|
|
elim_heuristic key controls the elimination heuristic that will be
|
|
|
|
used by ground variable elimination. The following heuristics are
|
|
|
|
supported:
|
|
|
|
- sequential
|
|
|
|
- min_neighbors
|
|
|
|
- min_weight
|
|
|
|
- min_fill
|
|
|
|
- weighted_min_fill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An explanation of this heuristics can be found in Probabilistic Graphical
|
|
|
|
Models by Daphne Koller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The schedule, accuracy and max_iter keys are specific for inference
|
|
|
|
algorithms based on message passing, namely lbp, cbp and bp.
|
|
|
|
The key schedule can be used to specify the order in which the messages
|
|
|
|
are sent in belief propagation. The possible values are:
|
|
|
|
- seq_fixed: at each iteration, all messages are sent in the same order
|
|
|
|
- seq_random: at each iteration, the messages are sent with a random order
|
|
|
|
- parallel: at each iteration, the messages are all calculated using the
|
|
|
|
values of the previous iteration.
|
|
|
|
- max_residual: the next message to be sent is the one with maximum residual,
|
|
|
|
(Residual Belief Propagation:Informed Scheduling for Asynchronous Message
|
|
|
|
Passing)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The max_iter key sets the maximum number of iterations. One iteration
|
|
|
|
consists in sending all possible messages. The accuracy key indicate
|
|
|
|
when we should stop sending messages. If the largest difference between
|
|
|
|
a message sent in the current iteration and one message sent in the previous
|
|
|
|
iteration is less that accuracy value given, we terminate belief propagation.
|
|
|
|
|