2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
%%% -*- Mode: Prolog; -*-
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% ProbLog inference
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% assumes probabilistic facts as Prob::Fact and clauses in normal Prolog format
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% provides following inference modes (16/12/2008):
|
|
|
|
% - approximation with interval width Delta (IJCAI07): problog_delta(+Query,+Delta,-Low,-High,-Status)
|
|
|
|
% - bounds based on single probability threshold: problog_threshold(+Query,+Threshold,-Low,-High,-Status)
|
|
|
|
% - as above, but lower bound only: problog_low(+Query,+Threshold,-Low,-Status)
|
|
|
|
% - lower bound based on K most likely proofs: problog_kbest(+Query,+K,-Low,-Status)
|
|
|
|
% - explanation probability (ECML07): problog_max(+Query,-Prob,-FactsUsed)
|
|
|
|
% - exact probability: problog_exact(+Query,-Prob,-Status)
|
|
|
|
% - sampling: problog_montecarlo(+Query,+Delta,-Prob)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% angelika.kimmig@cs.kuleuven.be
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
:- module(problog, [problog_delta/5,
|
|
|
|
problog_threshold/5,
|
|
|
|
problog_low/4,
|
|
|
|
problog_kbest/4,
|
|
|
|
problog_kbest_save/6,
|
|
|
|
problog_max/3,
|
|
|
|
problog_exact/3,
|
|
|
|
problog_montecarlo/3,
|
|
|
|
get_fact_probability/2,
|
|
|
|
set_fact_probability/2,
|
|
|
|
get_fact/2,
|
|
|
|
tunable_fact/2,
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
non_ground_fact/1,
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
export_facts/1,
|
|
|
|
problog_help/0,
|
|
|
|
problog_dir/1,
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag/2,
|
|
|
|
problog_flag/2,
|
|
|
|
problog_flags/0]).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- style_check(all).
|
|
|
|
:- yap_flag(unknown,error).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% problog related modules
|
|
|
|
:- use_module('problog/flags',[set_problog_flag/2,
|
|
|
|
problog_flag/2,
|
|
|
|
problog_flags/0]).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- use_module('problog/print', [print_sep_line/0,
|
|
|
|
print_inference/2]).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- use_module('problog/tptree',[init_ptree/1,
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree/1,
|
|
|
|
insert_ptree/2,
|
|
|
|
count_ptree/2,
|
|
|
|
prune_check_ptree/2,
|
|
|
|
merge_ptree/3,
|
|
|
|
bdd_ptree_map/4,
|
|
|
|
bdd_ptree/3]).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% general yap modules
|
|
|
|
:- ensure_loaded(library(lists)).
|
|
|
|
:- ensure_loaded(library(terms)).
|
|
|
|
:- ensure_loaded(library(random)).
|
|
|
|
:- ensure_loaded(library(system)).
|
|
|
|
:- ensure_loaded(library(rbtrees)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% op attaching probabilities to facts
|
|
|
|
:- op( 550, yfx, :: ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% control predicates on various levels
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% global over all inference methods, internal use only
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic problog_predicate/2.
|
|
|
|
% global over all inference methods, exported
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic tunable_fact/2.
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
:- dynamic non_ground_fact/1.
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
:- dynamic problog_dir/1.
|
|
|
|
% global, manipulated via problog_control/2
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic up/0.
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic limit/0.
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic mc/0.
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic remember/0.
|
|
|
|
% local to problog_delta
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic low/2.
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic up/2.
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic stopDiff/1.
|
|
|
|
% local to problog_kbest
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic current_kbest/3.
|
|
|
|
% local to problog_max
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic max_probability/1.
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic max_proof/1.
|
|
|
|
% local to problog_montecarlo
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic mc_prob/1.
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
% to keep track of the groundings for non-ground facts
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic grounding_is_known/2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% for fact where the proabability is a variable
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic dynamic_probability_fact/1.
|
|
|
|
:- dynamic dynamic_probability_fact_extract/2.
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% directory where ProblogBDD executable is located
|
|
|
|
% automatically set during loading -- assumes it is in same place as this file (problog.yap)
|
2009-03-09 00:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
%:- getcwd(PD),retractall(problog_dir(_)),assert(problog_dir(PD)).
|
|
|
|
:- yap_flag(shared_object_search_path,PD),retractall(problog_dir(_)),assert(problog_dir(PD)).
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% help
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problog_help :-
|
|
|
|
format('~2nProbLog inference currently offers the following inference methods:~n',[]),
|
|
|
|
show_inference,
|
|
|
|
format('~2nThe following global parameters are available:~n',[]),
|
|
|
|
problog_flags,
|
|
|
|
print_sep_line,
|
|
|
|
format('~n use problog_help/0 to display this information~n',[]),
|
|
|
|
format('~n use problog_flags/0 to display current parameter values~2n',[]),
|
|
|
|
print_sep_line,
|
|
|
|
nl,
|
|
|
|
flush_output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
show_inference :-
|
|
|
|
format('~n',[]),
|
|
|
|
print_sep_line,
|
|
|
|
print_inference(call,description),
|
|
|
|
print_sep_line,
|
|
|
|
print_inference('problog_delta(+Query,+Delta,-Low,-High,-Status)','approximation with interval width Delta (IJCAI07)'),
|
|
|
|
print_inference('problog_threshold(+Query,+Threshold,-Low,-High,-Status)','bounds based on single probability threshold'),
|
|
|
|
print_inference('problog_low(+Query,+Threshold,-Low,-Status)','lower bound based on single probability threshold'),
|
|
|
|
print_inference('problog_kbest(+Query,+K,-Low,-Status)','lower bound based on K most likely proofs'),
|
|
|
|
print_inference('problog_max(+Query,-Prob,-FactsUsed)','explanation probability (ECML07)'),
|
|
|
|
print_inference('problog_exact(+Query,-Prob,-Status)','exact probability'),
|
|
|
|
print_inference('problog_montecarlo(+Query,+Delta,-Prob)','sampling with 95\%-confidence-interval-width Delta'),
|
|
|
|
print_sep_line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% initialization of global parameters
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
init_global_params :-
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(bdd_time,60),
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(first_threshold,0.1),
|
|
|
|
L is 10**(-30),
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(last_threshold,L),
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(id_stepsize,0.5),
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(prunecheck,off),
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(maxsteps,1000),
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(mc_batchsize,1000),
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(mc_logfile,'log.txt'),
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(bdd_file,example_bdd),
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(dir,output),
|
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(save_bdd,false),
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
set_problog_flag(verbose,true).
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
% problog_flags,
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
% print_sep_line,
|
|
|
|
% format('~n use problog_help/0 for information~n',[]),
|
|
|
|
% format('~n use problog_flags/0 to display current parameter values~2n',[]),
|
|
|
|
% print_sep_line,
|
|
|
|
% nl,
|
|
|
|
% flush_output.
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% parameter initialization to be called after returning to user's directory:
|
|
|
|
:- initialization(init_global_params).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% internal control flags
|
|
|
|
% if on
|
|
|
|
% - up: collect stopped derivations to build upper bound
|
|
|
|
% - limit: iterative deepening reached limit -> should go to next level
|
|
|
|
% - mc: using problog_montecarlo, i.e. proving with current sample instead of full program
|
|
|
|
% - remember: save BDD files containing script, params and mapping
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
problog_control(on,X) :-
|
|
|
|
call(X),!.
|
|
|
|
problog_control(on,X) :-
|
|
|
|
assert(X).
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,X) :-
|
|
|
|
retractall(X).
|
|
|
|
problog_control(check,X) :-
|
|
|
|
call(X).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:- problog_control(off,up).
|
|
|
|
:- problog_control(off,mc).
|
|
|
|
:- problog_control(off,limit).
|
|
|
|
:- problog_control(off,remember).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% nice user syntax Prob::Fact
|
|
|
|
% automatic translation to internal hardware access format
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% probabilities =1 are dropped -> normal Prolog fact
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% internal fact representation
|
|
|
|
% - prefixes predicate name with problog_
|
|
|
|
% - adds unique ID as first argument
|
|
|
|
% - adds logarithm of probability as last argument
|
|
|
|
% - keeps original arguments in between
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% for each predicate appearing as probabilistic fact, wrapper clause is introduced:
|
|
|
|
% - head is most general instance of original fact
|
|
|
|
% - body is corresponding version of internal fact plus call to add_to_proof/2 to update current state during proving
|
|
|
|
% example: edge(A,B) :- problog_edge(ID,A,B,LogProb), add_to_proof(ID,LogProb).
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% dynamic predicate problog_predicate(Name,Arity) keeps track of predicates that already have wrapper clause
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
user:term_expansion(_P::( _Goal :- _Body ), _Error) :-
|
|
|
|
throw(error('we do not support this (yet?)!')).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
user:term_expansion(P::Goal,Goal) :-
|
|
|
|
P \= t(_),
|
|
|
|
P =:= 1,
|
|
|
|
!.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
user:term_expansion(P::Goal, problog:ProbFact) :-
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
copy_term((P,Goal),(P_Copy,Goal_Copy)),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
functor(Goal, Name, Arity),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([problog_,Name],ProblogName),
|
|
|
|
Goal =.. [Name|Args],
|
|
|
|
append(Args,[LProb],L1),
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
probclause_id(ID),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
ProbFact =.. [ProblogName,ID|L1],
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
(\+ var(P), P = t(TrueProb))
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
assert(tunable_fact(ID,TrueProb)),
|
|
|
|
LProb is log(0.5)
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
ground(P)
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
LProb is log(P);
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
% Probability is a variable... check wether it appears in the term
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
variable_in_term(Goal,P)
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
true;
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
format(user_error,'If you use probabilisitic facts with a variable as probabilility, the variable has to appear inside the fact.~n',[]),
|
|
|
|
format(user_error,'You used ~q in your program.~2n',[P::Goal]),
|
|
|
|
throw(non_ground_fact_error(P::Goal))
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
LProb=log(P),
|
|
|
|
assert(dynamic_probability_fact(ID)),
|
|
|
|
assert(dynamic_probability_fact_extract(Goal_Copy,P_Copy))
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
ground(Goal)
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
true;
|
|
|
|
assert(non_ground_fact(ID))
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
problog_predicate(Name, Arity, ProblogName).
|
|
|
|
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% introduce wrapper clause if predicate seen first time
|
|
|
|
problog_predicate(Name, Arity, _) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_predicate(Name, Arity), !.
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
problog_predicate(Name, Arity, ProblogName) :-
|
|
|
|
functor(OriginalGoal, Name, Arity),
|
|
|
|
OriginalGoal =.. [_|Args],
|
|
|
|
append(Args,[Prob],L1),
|
|
|
|
ProbFact =.. [ProblogName,ID|L1],
|
|
|
|
prolog_load_context(module,Mod),
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert( (Mod:OriginalGoal :- ProbFact,
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
non_ground_fact(ID)
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
(non_ground_fact_grounding_id(OriginalGoal,G_ID),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([ID,'_',G_ID],ID2));
|
|
|
|
ID2=ID
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
% take the log of the probability (for non ground facts with variable as probability
|
|
|
|
ProbEval is Prob,
|
|
|
|
add_to_proof(ID2,ProbEval)
|
|
|
|
)),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert( (Mod:problog_not(OriginalGoal) :- ProbFact,
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
non_ground_fact(ID)
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
( non_ground_fact_grounding_id(OriginalGoal,G_ID),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([ID,'_',G_ID],ID2));
|
|
|
|
ID2=ID
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
% take the log of the probability (for non ground facts with variable as probability
|
|
|
|
ProbEval is Prob,
|
|
|
|
add_to_proof_negated(ID2,ProbEval)
|
|
|
|
)),
|
|
|
|
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
assert(problog_predicate(Name, Arity)),
|
|
|
|
ArityPlus2 is Arity+2,
|
|
|
|
dynamic(problog:ProblogName/ArityPlus2).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% generate next global identifier
|
|
|
|
probclause_id(ID) :-
|
|
|
|
nb_getval(probclause_counter,ID), !,
|
|
|
|
C1 is ID+1,
|
|
|
|
nb_setval(probclause_counter,C1), !.
|
|
|
|
probclause_id(0) :-
|
|
|
|
nb_setval(probclause_counter,1).
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
non_ground_fact_grounding_id(Goal,ID) :-
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
ground(Goal)
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
true;
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
format(user_error,'The current program uses non-ground facts.~n', []),
|
|
|
|
format(user_error,'If you query those, you may only query fully-grounded versions of the fact.~n',[]),
|
|
|
|
format(user_error,'Within the current proof, you queried for ~q which is not ground.~n~n', [Goal]),
|
|
|
|
throw(error(non_ground_fact(Goal)))
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
grounding_is_known(Goal,ID)
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
true;
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
nb_getval(non_ground_fact_grounding_id_counter,ID),
|
|
|
|
ID2 is ID+1,
|
|
|
|
nb_setval(non_ground_fact_grounding_id_counter,ID2),
|
|
|
|
assert(grounding_is_known(Goal,ID))
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reset_non_ground_facts :-
|
|
|
|
nb_setval(non_ground_fact_grounding_id_counter,0),
|
|
|
|
retractall(grounding_is_known(_,_)).
|
|
|
|
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% access/update the probability of ID's fact
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
% hardware-access version: naively scan all problog-predicates,
|
|
|
|
% cut choice points if ID is ground (they'll all fail as ID is unique),
|
|
|
|
% but not if it isn't (used to iterate over all facts when writing out probabilities for learning)
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
get_fact_probability(ID,Prob) :-
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
ground(ID) ->
|
|
|
|
get_internal_fact(ID,ProblogTerm,_ProblogName,ProblogArity),!
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
get_internal_fact(ID,ProblogTerm,_ProblogName,ProblogArity)
|
|
|
|
),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
arg(ProblogArity,ProblogTerm,Log),
|
|
|
|
Prob is exp(Log).
|
|
|
|
set_fact_probability(ID,Prob) :-
|
|
|
|
get_internal_fact(ID,ProblogTerm,ProblogName,ProblogArity),
|
|
|
|
retract(ProblogTerm),
|
|
|
|
ProblogTerm =.. [ProblogName|ProblogTermArgs],
|
|
|
|
nth(ProblogArity,ProblogTermArgs,_,KeepArgs),
|
|
|
|
NewLogProb is log(Prob),
|
|
|
|
nth(ProblogArity,NewProblogTermArgs,NewLogProb,KeepArgs),
|
|
|
|
NewProblogTerm =.. [ProblogName|NewProblogTermArgs],
|
|
|
|
assert(NewProblogTerm).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_internal_fact(ID,ProblogTerm,ProblogName,ProblogArity) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_predicate(Name,Arity),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([problog_,Name],ProblogName),
|
|
|
|
ProblogArity is Arity+2,
|
|
|
|
functor(ProblogTerm,ProblogName,ProblogArity),
|
|
|
|
arg(1,ProblogTerm,ID),
|
|
|
|
call(ProblogTerm).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% writing those facts with learnable parameters to File
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
export_facts(File) :-
|
|
|
|
tell(File),
|
|
|
|
export_facts,
|
|
|
|
flush_output,
|
|
|
|
told.
|
|
|
|
export_facts :-
|
|
|
|
tunable_fact(ID,_),
|
|
|
|
once(write_tunable_fact(ID)),
|
|
|
|
fail.
|
|
|
|
export_facts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
write_tunable_fact(ID) :-
|
|
|
|
get_internal_fact(ID,ProblogTerm,ProblogName,ProblogArity),
|
|
|
|
ProblogTerm =.. [_Functor,ID|Args],
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat('problog_',OutsideFunctor,ProblogName),
|
|
|
|
Last is ProblogArity-1,
|
|
|
|
nth(Last,Args,LogProb,OutsideArgs),
|
|
|
|
OutsideTerm =.. [OutsideFunctor|OutsideArgs],
|
|
|
|
Prob is exp(LogProb),
|
|
|
|
format('~w :: ~q.~n',[Prob,OutsideTerm]).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% recover fact for given id
|
|
|
|
% list version not exported (yet?)
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
% ID of ground fact
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
get_fact(ID,OutsideTerm) :-
|
|
|
|
get_internal_fact(ID,ProblogTerm,ProblogName,ProblogArity),
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
!,
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
ProblogTerm =.. [_Functor,ID|Args],
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat('problog_',OutsideFunctor,ProblogName),
|
|
|
|
Last is ProblogArity-1,
|
|
|
|
nth(Last,Args,_LogProb,OutsideArgs),
|
|
|
|
OutsideTerm =.. [OutsideFunctor|OutsideArgs].
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
% ID of instance of non-ground fact: get fact from grounding table
|
|
|
|
get_fact(ID,OutsideTerm) :-
|
|
|
|
recover_grounding_id(ID,GID),
|
|
|
|
grounding_is_known(OutsideTerm,GID).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recover_grounding_id(Atom,ID) :-
|
|
|
|
name(Atom,List),
|
|
|
|
reverse(List,Rev),
|
|
|
|
recover_number(Rev,NumRev),
|
|
|
|
reverse(NumRev,Num),
|
|
|
|
name(ID,Num).
|
|
|
|
recover_number([95|_],[]) :- !. % name('_',[95])
|
|
|
|
recover_number([A|B],[A|C]) :-
|
|
|
|
recover_number(B,C).
|
|
|
|
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get_fact_list([],[]).
|
|
|
|
get_fact_list([ID|IDs],[Fact|Facts]) :-
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
(ID=not(X) -> Fact=not(Y); Fact=Y, ID=X),
|
|
|
|
get_fact(X,Y),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
get_fact_list(IDs,Facts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% ProbLog inference, core methods
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% state of proving saved in two backtrackable global variables
|
|
|
|
% - problog_current_proof holds list of IDs of clauses used
|
|
|
|
% - problog_probability holds the sum of their log probabilities
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
% called "inside" probabilistic facts to update current state of proving
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
% if number of steps exceeded, fail
|
|
|
|
% if fact used before, succeed and keep status as is
|
|
|
|
% if not prunable, calculate probability and
|
|
|
|
% if threshold exceeded, add stopped derivation to upper bound and fail
|
|
|
|
% else update state and succeed
|
|
|
|
add_to_proof(ID,Prob) :-
|
|
|
|
montecarlo_check(ID),
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_steps,MaxSteps),
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_probability, CurrentP),
|
|
|
|
nb_getval(problog_threshold, CurrentThreshold),
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_current_proof, IDs),
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%% Bernd, changes for negated ground facts
|
|
|
|
\+ memberchk(not(ID),IDs),
|
|
|
|
%%%% Bernd, changes for negated ground facts
|
|
|
|
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
( MaxSteps =< 0 ->
|
|
|
|
fail
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
( memberchk(ID, IDs) ->
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
\+ prune_check([ID|IDs],1),
|
|
|
|
multiply_probabilities(CurrentP, Prob, NProb),
|
|
|
|
( NProb < CurrentThreshold ->
|
|
|
|
upper_bound([ID|IDs]),
|
|
|
|
fail
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
b_setval(problog_probability, NProb),
|
|
|
|
b_setval(problog_current_proof, [ID|IDs])
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
Steps is MaxSteps-1,
|
|
|
|
b_setval(problog_steps,Steps)
|
|
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
%%%% Bernd, changes for negated ground facts
|
|
|
|
add_to_proof_negated(ID,Prob) :-
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
problog_control(check,mc)
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
% the sample has to fail if the fact is negated
|
|
|
|
\+ montecarlo_check(ID);
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_steps,MaxSteps),
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_probability, CurrentP),
|
|
|
|
nb_getval(problog_threshold, CurrentThreshold),
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_current_proof, IDs),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\+ memberchk(ID,IDs),
|
|
|
|
( MaxSteps =< 0 ->
|
|
|
|
fail
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
( memberchk(not(ID), IDs) ->
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
% \+ prune_check([ID|IDs],1),
|
|
|
|
InverseProb is log(1 - exp(Prob)),
|
|
|
|
multiply_probabilities(CurrentP, InverseProb, NProb),
|
|
|
|
( NProb < CurrentThreshold ->
|
|
|
|
upper_bound([not(ID)|IDs]), %% checkme
|
|
|
|
fail
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
b_setval(problog_probability, NProb),
|
|
|
|
b_setval(problog_current_proof, [not(ID)|IDs])
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
Steps is MaxSteps-1,
|
|
|
|
b_setval(problog_steps,Steps)
|
|
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
%%%% Bernd, changes for negated ground facts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
% if in monte carlo mode, check array to see if fact can be used
|
|
|
|
montecarlo_check(ID) :-
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
problog_control(check,mc)
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
array_element(mc_sample,ID,V),
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
V == 1 -> true
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
V == 2 -> fail
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
new_sample(ID)
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new_sample(ID) :-
|
|
|
|
get_fact_probability(ID,Prob),
|
|
|
|
random(R),
|
|
|
|
R<Prob,
|
|
|
|
!,
|
|
|
|
update_array(mc_sample,ID,1).
|
|
|
|
new_sample(ID) :-
|
|
|
|
update_array(mc_sample,ID,2),
|
|
|
|
fail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% if threshold reached, remember this by setting limit to on, then
|
|
|
|
% if up is on, store stopped derivation in second trie
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% List always length>=1 -> don't need []=true-case for tries
|
|
|
|
upper_bound(List) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_control(on,limit),
|
|
|
|
problog_control(check,up),
|
|
|
|
reverse(List,R),
|
|
|
|
(prune_check(R,2) -> true; insert_ptree(R,2)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
multiply_probabilities(CurrentLogP, LogProb, NLogProb) :-
|
|
|
|
NLogProb is CurrentLogP+LogProb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% this is called by all inference methods before the actual ProbLog goal
|
|
|
|
% to set up environment for proving
|
|
|
|
init_problog(Threshold) :-
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
reset_non_ground_facts,
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
LT is log(Threshold),
|
|
|
|
b_setval(problog_probability, 0.0),
|
|
|
|
b_setval(problog_current_proof, []),
|
|
|
|
nb_setval(problog_threshold, LT),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(maxsteps,MaxS),
|
|
|
|
b_setval(problog_steps, MaxS),
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,limit).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% idea: proofs that are refinements of known proof can be pruned as they don't add probability mass
|
|
|
|
% note that current ptree implementation doesn't provide the check as there's no efficient method known so far...
|
|
|
|
prune_check(Proof,TreeID) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(prunecheck,on),
|
|
|
|
prune_check_ptree(Proof,TreeID).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% to call a ProbLog goal, patch all subgoals with the user's module context
|
|
|
|
% (as logical part is there, but probabilistic part in problog)
|
|
|
|
problog_call(Goal) :-
|
|
|
|
yap_flag(typein_module,Module),
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
%%% if user provides init_db, call this before proving goal
|
|
|
|
(current_predicate(_,Module:init_db) -> call(Module:init_db); true),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
put_module(Goal,Module,ModGoal),
|
|
|
|
call(ModGoal).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put_module((Mod:Goal,Rest),Module,(Mod:Goal,Transformed)) :-
|
|
|
|
!,
|
|
|
|
put_module(Rest,Module,Transformed).
|
|
|
|
put_module((Goal,Rest),Module,(Module:Goal,Transformed)) :-
|
|
|
|
!,
|
|
|
|
put_module(Rest,Module,Transformed).
|
|
|
|
put_module((Mod:Goal),_Module,(Mod:Goal)) :-
|
|
|
|
!.
|
|
|
|
put_module(Goal,Module,Module:Goal).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% end of core
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% evaluating a DNF given as trie using BDD
|
|
|
|
% input: ID of trie to be used
|
|
|
|
% output: probability and status (to catch potential failures/timeouts from outside)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% with internal BDD timeout (set using problog flag bdd_time)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% bdd_ptree/3 constructs files for ProblogBDD from the trie
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% if calling ProblogBDD doesn't exit successfully, status will be timeout
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% writes number of proofs in trie and BDD time to standard user output
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% if remember is on, input files for ProblogBDD will be saved
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eval_dnf(ID,Prob,Status) :-
|
|
|
|
((ID = 1, problog_flag(save_bdd,true)) -> problog_control(on,remember); problog_control(off,remember)),
|
|
|
|
count_ptree(ID,NX),
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(verbose,true)
|
|
|
|
->
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
NX=1
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
format(user,'1 proof~n',[]);
|
|
|
|
format(user,'~w proofs~n',[NX])
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
|
),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
problog_flag(dir,DirFlag),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(bdd_file,BDDFileFlag),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([DirFlag,BDDFileFlag],BDDFile),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(bdd_par_file,BDDParFileFlag),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([DirFlag,BDDParFileFlag],BDDParFile),
|
|
|
|
(problog_control(check,remember) ->
|
|
|
|
bdd_ptree_map(ID,BDDFile,BDDParFile,Mapping),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([DirFlag,'save_map'],MapFile),
|
|
|
|
tell(MapFile),
|
|
|
|
format('mapping(~q).~n',[Mapping]),
|
|
|
|
flush_output,
|
|
|
|
told
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
bdd_ptree(ID,BDDFile,BDDParFile)
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(bdd_time,BDDTime),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(bdd_result,ResultFileFlag),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([DirFlag,ResultFileFlag],ResultFile),
|
|
|
|
problog_dir(PD),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([PD,'/ProblogBDD -l ',BDDFile,' -i ',BDDParFile,' -m p -t ', BDDTime,' > ', ResultFile],Command),
|
|
|
|
statistics(walltime,_),
|
|
|
|
shell(Command,Return),
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
Return =\= 0
|
|
|
|
->
|
|
|
|
Status = timeout
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
statistics(walltime,[_,E3]),
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
(problog_flag(verbose,true) -> format(user,'~w ms BDD processing~n',[E3]);true),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
see(ResultFile),
|
|
|
|
read(probability(Prob)),
|
|
|
|
seen,
|
|
|
|
delete_file(ResultFile),
|
|
|
|
Status = ok
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
(problog_control(check,remember) ->
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([DirFlag,'save_script'],SaveBDDFile),
|
|
|
|
rename_file(BDDFile,SaveBDDFile),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([DirFlag,'save_params'],SaveBDDParFile),
|
|
|
|
rename_file(BDDParFile,SaveBDDParFile)
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,remember).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% different inference methods
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% approximate inference: bounds based on single probability threshold
|
|
|
|
% problog_threshold(+Goal,+Threshold,-LowerBound,-UpperBound,-Status)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% use backtracking over problog_call to get all solutions
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% trie 1 collects proofs, trie 2 collects stopped derivations, trie 3 is used to unit them for the upper bound
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problog_threshold(Goal, Threshold, _, _, _) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_control(on,up),
|
|
|
|
init_problog_threshold(Threshold),
|
|
|
|
problog_call(Goal),
|
|
|
|
add_solution,
|
|
|
|
fail.
|
|
|
|
problog_threshold(_, _, LP, UP, Status) :-
|
|
|
|
compute_bounds(LP, UP, Status).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
init_problog_threshold(Threshold) :-
|
|
|
|
init_ptree(1),
|
|
|
|
init_ptree(2),
|
|
|
|
init_problog(Threshold).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
add_solution :-
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_current_proof, IDs),
|
|
|
|
(IDs == [] -> R = true ; reverse(IDs,R)),
|
|
|
|
insert_ptree(R,1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compute_bounds(LP, UP, Status) :-
|
|
|
|
eval_dnf(1,LP,StatusLow),
|
|
|
|
(StatusLow \== ok ->
|
|
|
|
Status = StatusLow
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
merge_ptree(1,2,3),
|
|
|
|
eval_dnf(3,UP,Status)),
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree(1),
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree(2),
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree(3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% approximate inference: lower bound based on all proofs above probability threshold
|
|
|
|
% problog_low(+Goal,+Threshold,-LowerBound,-Status)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% same as problog_threshold/5, but lower bound only (no stopped derivations stored)
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problog_low(Goal, Threshold, _, _) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,up),
|
|
|
|
init_problog_low(Threshold),
|
|
|
|
problog_call(Goal),
|
|
|
|
add_solution,
|
|
|
|
fail.
|
|
|
|
problog_low(_, _, LP, Status) :-
|
|
|
|
eval_dnf(1,LP,Status),
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree(1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
init_problog_low(Threshold) :-
|
|
|
|
init_ptree(1),
|
|
|
|
init_problog(Threshold).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% approximate inference: bounds by iterative deepening up to interval width Delta
|
|
|
|
% problog_delta(+Goal,+Delta,-LowerBound,-UpperBound,-Status)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% wraps iterative deepening around problog_threshold, i.e.
|
|
|
|
% - starts with threshold given by first_threshold flag
|
|
|
|
% - if Up-Low >= Delta, multiply threshold by factor given in id_stepsize flag and iterate
|
|
|
|
% (does not use problog_threshold as trie 1 is kept over entire search)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% local dynamic predicates low/2, up/2, stopDiff/1
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problog_delta(Goal, Delta, Low, Up, Status) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_control(on,up),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(first_threshold,InitT),
|
|
|
|
init_problog_delta(InitT,Delta),
|
|
|
|
problog_delta_id(Goal,Status),
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree(1),
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree(2),
|
|
|
|
(retract(low(_,Low)) -> true; true),
|
|
|
|
(retract(up(_,Up)) -> true; true).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
init_problog_delta(Threshold,Delta) :-
|
|
|
|
retractall(low(_,_)),
|
|
|
|
retractall(up(_,_)),
|
|
|
|
retractall(stopDiff(_)),
|
|
|
|
init_ptree(1),
|
|
|
|
init_ptree(2),
|
|
|
|
assert(low(0,0.0)),
|
|
|
|
assert(up(0,1.0)),
|
|
|
|
assert(stopDiff(Delta)),
|
|
|
|
init_problog(Threshold).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problog_delta_id(Goal, _) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_call(Goal),
|
|
|
|
add_solution, % reused from problog_threshold
|
|
|
|
fail.
|
|
|
|
problog_delta_id(Goal, Status) :-
|
|
|
|
evaluateStep(Ans,StatusE),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(last_threshold_log,Stop),
|
|
|
|
nb_getval(problog_threshold,Min),
|
|
|
|
(StatusE \== ok ->
|
|
|
|
Status = StatusE
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
Ans = 1 ->
|
|
|
|
Status = ok
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
Min =< Stop ->
|
|
|
|
Status = stopreached
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
problog_control(check,limit) ->
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,limit),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(id_stepsize_log,Step),
|
|
|
|
New is Min+Step,
|
|
|
|
nb_setval(problog_threshold,New),
|
|
|
|
problog_delta_id(Goal, Status)
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
|
)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% call the dnf evaluation where needed
|
|
|
|
evaluateStep(Ans,Status) :- once(evalStep(Ans,Status)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evalStep(Ans,Status) :-
|
|
|
|
stopDiff(Delta),
|
|
|
|
count_ptree(1,NProofs),
|
|
|
|
count_ptree(2,NCands),
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
(problog_flag(verbose,true) -> format(user,'~w proofs, ~w stopped derivations~n',[NProofs,NCands]);true),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
flush_output(user),
|
|
|
|
eval_lower(NProofs,Low,StatusLow),
|
|
|
|
(StatusLow \== ok ->
|
|
|
|
Status = StatusLow
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
up(_,OUP),
|
|
|
|
IntDiff is OUP-Low,
|
|
|
|
((IntDiff < Delta; IntDiff =:= 0) ->
|
|
|
|
Up=OUP, StatusUp = ok
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
eval_upper(NCands,Up,StatusUp),
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree(2),
|
|
|
|
init_ptree(2),
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree(3)
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
(StatusUp \== ok ->
|
|
|
|
Status = StatusUp
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
Diff is Up-Low,
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
(problog_flag(verbose,true) -> format(user,'difference: ~6f~n',[Diff]);true),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
flush_output(user),
|
|
|
|
((Diff < Delta; Diff =:= 0) -> Ans = 1; Ans = 0),
|
|
|
|
Status = ok)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% no need to re-evaluate if no new proofs found on this level
|
|
|
|
eval_lower(N,P,ok) :-
|
|
|
|
low(N,P).
|
|
|
|
% evaluate if there are proofs
|
|
|
|
eval_lower(N,P,Status) :-
|
|
|
|
N > 0,
|
|
|
|
low(OldN,_),
|
|
|
|
N \= OldN,
|
|
|
|
eval_dnf(1,P,Status),
|
|
|
|
(Status = ok ->
|
|
|
|
retract(low(_,_)),
|
|
|
|
assert(low(N,P)),
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
(problog_flag(verbose,true) -> format(user,'lower bound: ~6f~n',[P]);true),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
flush_output(user)
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
true).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% if no stopped derivations, up=low
|
|
|
|
eval_upper(0,P,ok) :-
|
|
|
|
retractall(up(_,_)),
|
|
|
|
low(N,P),
|
|
|
|
assert(up(N,P)).
|
|
|
|
% else merge proofs and stopped derivations to get upper bound
|
|
|
|
% in case of timeout or other problems, skip and use bound from last level
|
|
|
|
eval_upper(N,UpP,ok) :-
|
|
|
|
N > 0,
|
|
|
|
merge_ptree(1,2,3),
|
|
|
|
eval_dnf(3,UpP,StatusUp),
|
|
|
|
(StatusUp = ok ->
|
|
|
|
retract(up(_,_)),
|
|
|
|
assert(up(N,UpP))
|
|
|
|
;
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
(problog_flag(verbose,true) -> format(user,'~w - continue using old up~n',[StatusUp]);true),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
flush_output(user),
|
|
|
|
up(_,UpP)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% explanation probability - returns list of facts used or constant 'unprovable' as third argument
|
|
|
|
% problog_max(+Goal,-Prob,-Facts)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% uses iterative deepening with samw parameters as bounding algorithm
|
|
|
|
% threshold gets adapted whenever better proof is found
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% uses local dynamic predicates max_probability/1 and max_proof/1
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problog_max(Goal, Prob, Facts) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,up),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(first_threshold,InitT),
|
|
|
|
init_problog_max(InitT),
|
|
|
|
problog_max_id(Goal, Prob, FactIDs),
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
( FactIDs = [_|_] -> get_fact_list(FactIDs,Facts);
|
|
|
|
Facts = FactIDs).
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
init_problog_max(Threshold) :-
|
|
|
|
retractall(max_probability(_)),
|
|
|
|
retractall(max_proof(_)),
|
|
|
|
assert(max_probability(-999999)),
|
|
|
|
assert(max_proof(unprovable)),
|
|
|
|
init_problog(Threshold).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
update_max :-
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_probability,CurrP),
|
|
|
|
max_probability(MaxP),
|
|
|
|
(CurrP =< MaxP ->
|
|
|
|
fail
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_current_proof, IDs),
|
|
|
|
reverse(IDs,R),
|
|
|
|
retractall(max_proof(_)),
|
|
|
|
assert(max_proof(R)),
|
|
|
|
nb_setval(problog_threshold, CurrP),
|
|
|
|
retractall(max_probability(_)),
|
|
|
|
assert(max_probability(CurrP))).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problog_max_id(Goal, _Prob, _Clauses) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_call(Goal),
|
|
|
|
update_max,
|
|
|
|
fail.
|
|
|
|
problog_max_id(Goal, Prob, Clauses) :-
|
|
|
|
max_probability(MaxP),
|
|
|
|
nb_getval(problog_threshold, LT),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(last_threshold_log,ToSmall),
|
|
|
|
((MaxP >= LT ; \+ problog_control(check,limit); LT < ToSmall) ->
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
((max_proof(unprovable), problog_control(check,limit), LT < ToSmall) ->
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(last_threshold,Stopping),
|
|
|
|
Clauses = unprovable(Stopping)
|
|
|
|
; max_proof(Clauses)),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Prob is exp(MaxP)
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(id_stepsize_log,Step),
|
|
|
|
NewLT is LT+Step,
|
|
|
|
nb_setval(problog_threshold, NewLT),
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,limit),
|
|
|
|
problog_max_id(Goal, Prob, Clauses)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% lower bound using k best proofs
|
|
|
|
% problog_kbest(+Goal,+K,-Prob,-Status)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% does iterative deepening search similar to problog_max, but for k(>=1) most likely proofs
|
|
|
|
% afterwards uses BDD evaluation to calculate probability (also for k=1 -> uniform treatment in learning)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% uses dynamic local predicate current_kbest/3 to collect proofs,
|
|
|
|
% only builds trie at the end (as probabilities of single proofs are important here)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% note: >k proofs will be used if the one at position k shares its probability with others,
|
|
|
|
% as all proofs with that probability will be included
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% version with _save at the end renames files for ProblogBDD to keep them
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
problog_kbest_save(Goal, K, Prob, Status, BDDFile, ParamFile) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_kbest(Goal, K, Prob, Status),
|
|
|
|
( Status=ok ->
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(bdd_file,InternBDDFlag),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(bdd_par_file,InternParFlag),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(dir,DirFlag),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([DirFlag,InternBDDFlag],InternBDD),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([DirFlag,InternParFlag],InternPar),
|
|
|
|
rename_file(InternBDD,BDDFile),
|
|
|
|
rename_file(InternPar,ParamFile)
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
true).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problog_kbest(Goal, K, Prob, Status) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,up),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(first_threshold,InitT),
|
|
|
|
init_problog_kbest(InitT),
|
|
|
|
problog_kbest_id(Goal, K),
|
|
|
|
retract(current_kbest(_,ListFound,_NumFound)),
|
|
|
|
build_prefixtree(ListFound),
|
|
|
|
eval_dnf(1,Prob,Status),
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree(1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
init_problog_kbest(Threshold) :-
|
|
|
|
retractall(current_kbest(_,_,_)),
|
|
|
|
assert(current_kbest(-999999,[],0)), %(log-threshold,proofs,num_proofs)
|
|
|
|
init_ptree(1),
|
|
|
|
init_problog(Threshold).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problog_kbest_id(Goal, K) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_call(Goal),
|
|
|
|
update_kbest(K),
|
|
|
|
fail.
|
|
|
|
problog_kbest_id(Goal, K) :-
|
|
|
|
current_kbest(CurrentBorder,_,Found),
|
|
|
|
nb_getval(problog_threshold, Min),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(last_threshold_log,ToSmall),
|
|
|
|
((Found>=K ; \+ problog_control(check,limit) ; Min < CurrentBorder ; Min < ToSmall) ->
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(id_stepsize_log,Step),
|
|
|
|
NewLT is Min+Step,
|
|
|
|
nb_setval(problog_threshold, NewLT),
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,limit),
|
|
|
|
problog_kbest_id(Goal, K)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
update_kbest(K) :-
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_probability,NewLogProb),
|
|
|
|
current_kbest(LogThreshold,_,_),
|
|
|
|
(NewLogProb>=LogThreshold ->
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_current_proof,RevProof),
|
|
|
|
reverse(RevProof,Proof),
|
|
|
|
update_current_kbest(K,NewLogProb,Proof)
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
fail).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
update_current_kbest(_,NewLogProb,Cl) :-
|
|
|
|
current_kbest(_,List,_),
|
|
|
|
memberchk(NewLogProb-Cl,List),
|
|
|
|
!.
|
|
|
|
update_current_kbest(K,NewLogProb,Cl) :-
|
|
|
|
retract(current_kbest(OldThres,List,Length)),
|
|
|
|
sorted_insert(NewLogProb-Cl,List,NewList),
|
|
|
|
NewLength is Length+1,
|
|
|
|
(NewLength < K ->
|
|
|
|
assert(current_kbest(OldThres,NewList,NewLength))
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
(NewLength>K ->
|
|
|
|
First is NewLength-K+1,
|
|
|
|
cutoff(NewList,NewLength,First,FinalList,FinalLength)
|
|
|
|
; FinalList=NewList, FinalLength=NewLength),
|
|
|
|
FinalList=[NewThres-_|_],
|
|
|
|
nb_setval(problog_threshold,NewThres),
|
|
|
|
assert(current_kbest(NewThres,FinalList,FinalLength))).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sorted_insert(A,[],[A]).
|
|
|
|
sorted_insert(A-LA,[B1-LB1|B], [A-LA,B1-LB1|B] ) :-
|
|
|
|
A =< B1.
|
|
|
|
sorted_insert(A-LA,[B1-LB1|B], [B1-LB1|C] ) :-
|
|
|
|
A > B1,
|
|
|
|
sorted_insert(A-LA,B,C).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% keeps all entries with lowest probability, even if implying a total of more than k
|
|
|
|
cutoff(List,Len,1,List,Len) :- !.
|
|
|
|
cutoff([P-L|List],Length,First,[P-L|List],Length) :-
|
|
|
|
nth(First,[P-L|List],PF-_),
|
|
|
|
PF=:=P,
|
|
|
|
!.
|
|
|
|
cutoff([_|List],Length,First,NewList,NewLength) :-
|
|
|
|
NextFirst is First-1,
|
|
|
|
NextLength is Length-1,
|
|
|
|
cutoff(List,NextLength,NextFirst,NewList,NewLength).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
build_prefixtree([]).
|
|
|
|
build_prefixtree([_-[]|_List]) :-
|
|
|
|
!,
|
|
|
|
insert_ptree(true,1).
|
|
|
|
build_prefixtree([_-L|List]) :-
|
|
|
|
insert_ptree(L,1),
|
|
|
|
build_prefixtree(List).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% exact probability
|
|
|
|
% problog_exact(+Goal,-Prob,-Status)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% using all proofs = using all proofs with probability > 0
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problog_exact(Goal,Prob,Status) :-
|
|
|
|
problog_low(Goal,0,Prob,Status).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
% probability by sampling:
|
|
|
|
% running another N samples until 95percentCI-width<Delta
|
|
|
|
% lazy sampling using three-valued array indexed by internal fact IDs
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
% still collects actual proofs found in samples in ptree, though this is no longer used
|
|
|
|
% by method itself, only to write number to log-file
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-06 09:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
problog_montecarlo(_,_,_) :-
|
|
|
|
non_ground_fact(_),
|
|
|
|
!,
|
|
|
|
format(user_error,'Current database contains non-ground facts.',[]),
|
|
|
|
format(user_error,'Monte Carlo inference is not possible in this case. Try k-best instead.',[]),
|
|
|
|
fail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
problog_montecarlo(Goal,Delta,Prob) :-
|
|
|
|
nb_getval(probclause_counter,ID), !,
|
|
|
|
C is ID+1,
|
|
|
|
static_array(mc_sample,C,char),
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,up),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(mc_batchsize,N),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(mc_logfile,File1),
|
|
|
|
problog_flag(dir,Dir),
|
|
|
|
atomic_concat([Dir,File1],File),
|
|
|
|
montecarlo(Goal,Delta,N,File),
|
|
|
|
retract(mc_prob(Prob)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
montecarlo(Goal,Delta,K,File) :-
|
|
|
|
reset_static_array(mc_sample),
|
|
|
|
problog_control(on,mc),
|
|
|
|
open(File,write,Log),
|
|
|
|
format(Log,'# goal: ~q~n#delta: ~w~n',[Goal,Delta]),
|
|
|
|
format(Log,'# num_programs prob low high diff time cache_size num_pos~2n',[]),
|
|
|
|
close(Log),
|
|
|
|
statistics(walltime,[T1,_]),
|
|
|
|
init_ptree(1),
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
(problog_flag(verbose,true) -> format('search for ~q~n',[Goal]);true),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
montecarlo(Goal,Delta,K,0,File,0,T1),
|
|
|
|
problog_control(off,mc),
|
|
|
|
delete_ptree(1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% calculate values after K samples
|
|
|
|
montecarlo(Goal,Delta,K,SamplesSoFar,File,PositiveSoFar,InitialTime) :-
|
|
|
|
SamplesNew is SamplesSoFar+1,
|
|
|
|
SamplesNew mod K =:= 0,
|
|
|
|
!,
|
|
|
|
copy_term(Goal,GoalC),
|
|
|
|
(mc_prove(GoalC) -> Next is PositiveSoFar+1; Next=PositiveSoFar),
|
|
|
|
Prob is Next/SamplesNew,
|
|
|
|
Epsilon is 2*sqrt(Prob*(1-Prob)/SamplesNew),
|
|
|
|
Low is Prob-Epsilon,
|
|
|
|
High is Prob+Epsilon,
|
|
|
|
Diff is 2*Epsilon,
|
|
|
|
statistics(walltime,[T2,_]),
|
|
|
|
Time is (T2-InitialTime)/1000,
|
|
|
|
count_ptree(1,CacheSize),
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
(problog_flag(verbose,true) -> format('~n~w samples~nestimated probability ~w~n95 percent confidence interval [~w,~w]~n',[SamplesNew,Prob,Low,High]);true),
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
open(File,append,Log),
|
|
|
|
format(Log,'~w ~8f ~8f ~8f ~8f ~3f ~w ~w~n',[SamplesNew,Prob,Low,High,Diff,Time,CacheSize,Next]),
|
|
|
|
close(Log),
|
2009-03-24 01:06:50 +00:00
|
|
|
((Diff<Delta; Diff =:= 0) -> (problog_flag(verbose,true) -> format('Runtime ~w sec~2n',[Time]);true),assert(mc_prob(Prob))
|
2009-02-16 12:23:29 +00:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
montecarlo(Goal,Delta,K,SamplesNew,File,Next,InitialTime)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% continue until next K samples done
|
|
|
|
montecarlo(Goal,Delta,K,SamplesSoFar,File,PositiveSoFar,InitialTime) :-
|
|
|
|
SamplesNew is SamplesSoFar+1,
|
|
|
|
copy_term(Goal,GoalC),
|
|
|
|
(mc_prove(GoalC) -> Next is PositiveSoFar+1; Next=PositiveSoFar),
|
|
|
|
montecarlo(Goal,Delta,K,SamplesNew,File,Next,InitialTime).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mc_prove(A) :- !,
|
|
|
|
(get_some_proof(A) ->
|
|
|
|
clean_sample
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
clean_sample,fail
|
|
|
|
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clean_sample :-
|
|
|
|
reset_static_array(mc_sample),
|
|
|
|
fail.
|
|
|
|
clean_sample.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% find new proof
|
|
|
|
get_some_proof(Goal) :-
|
|
|
|
init_problog(0),
|
|
|
|
problog_call(Goal),
|
|
|
|
b_getval(problog_current_proof,Used),
|
|
|
|
(Used == [] -> Proof=true; reverse(Used,Proof)),
|
|
|
|
insert_ptree(Proof,1).
|
|
|
|
|