Fixing minor portability issues
This commit is contained in:
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@
|
||||
problog_tabling_get_negated_from_id/2,
|
||||
op(1150, fx, problog_table)]).
|
||||
|
||||
:- ensure_loaded(library(lists)).
|
||||
:- use_module(library(lists)).
|
||||
|
||||
:- use_module(extlists, _, [open_end_memberchk/2,
|
||||
open_end_add/3,
|
||||
@@ -248,8 +248,8 @@
|
||||
empty_ptree/1]).
|
||||
|
||||
:- op( 1150, fx, problog_table ).
|
||||
:- meta_predicate problog_table(:).
|
||||
:- meta_predicate problog_neg(:).
|
||||
:- meta_predicate(problog_table(0)).
|
||||
:- meta_predicate(problog_neg(0)).
|
||||
:- dynamic problog_tabled/1, has_synonyms/0, problog_tabling_retain/1.
|
||||
:- problog_define_flag(max_depth, problog_flag_validate_integer, 'maximum proof depth', -1).
|
||||
:- problog_define_flag(retain_tables, problog_flag_validate_boolean, 'retain tables after query', false).
|
||||
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ clear_tabling:-
|
||||
clear_tabling.
|
||||
|
||||
retain_tabling:-
|
||||
forall(problog_chktabled(_, Trie), assert(problog_tabling_retain(Trie))).
|
||||
forall(problog_chktabled(_, Trie), assertz(problog_tabling_retain(Trie))).
|
||||
|
||||
clear_retained_tables:-
|
||||
forall(problog_tabling_retain(Trie), delete_ptree(Trie)),
|
||||
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ problog_table((P1, P2), M) :-
|
||||
problog_table(Name/Arity, Module) :-
|
||||
makeargs(Arity, Args),
|
||||
Head =.. [Name|Args],
|
||||
not(predicate_property(Module:Head, dynamic)), !,
|
||||
\+ predicate_property(Module:Head, dynamic), !,
|
||||
throw(error('problog_table: Problog tabling currently requires the predicate to be declared dynamic and compiles it to static.')).
|
||||
problog_table(Name/Arity, Module) :-
|
||||
makeargs(Arity, Args),
|
||||
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ problog_table(Name/Arity, Module) :-
|
||||
|
||||
% Monte carlo tabling
|
||||
table(Module:MCName/Arity),
|
||||
assert(problog_tabled(Module:Name/Arity)),
|
||||
assertz(problog_tabled(Module:Name/Arity)),
|
||||
|
||||
findall(_,(
|
||||
OriginalPred =.. [OriginalName|Args],
|
||||
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ problog_table(Name/Arity, Module) :-
|
||||
OriginalPred =.. [OriginalName|Args],
|
||||
MCPred =.. [MCName|Args],
|
||||
ExactPred =.. [ExactName|Args],
|
||||
assert(Module:(
|
||||
assertz(Module:(
|
||||
Head:-
|
||||
(problog:problog_control(check, exact) ->
|
||||
ExactPred
|
||||
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ problog_table(Name/Arity, Module) :-
|
||||
Finished
|
||||
),
|
||||
b_getval(problog_current_proof, IDs),
|
||||
not(open_end_memberchk(not(t(Hash)), IDs)),
|
||||
\+ open_end_memberchk(not(t(Hash)), IDs),
|
||||
open_end_add_unique(t(Hash), IDs, NIDs),
|
||||
b_setval(problog_current_proof, NIDs)
|
||||
;
|
||||
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ problog_table(Name/Arity, Module) :-
|
||||
delete_ptree(SuspTrie)
|
||||
),
|
||||
b_setval(CurrentControlTrie, OCurTrie),
|
||||
not(open_end_memberchk(not(t(Hash)), OIDs)),
|
||||
\+ open_end_memberchk(not(t(Hash)), OIDs),
|
||||
open_end_add_unique(t(Hash), OIDs, NOIDs),
|
||||
b_setval(problog_current_proof, NOIDs)
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -435,8 +435,8 @@ problog_abolish_table(M:P/A):-
|
||||
problog_neg(M:G):-
|
||||
problog:problog_control(check, exact),
|
||||
functor(G, Name, Arity),
|
||||
not(problog_tabled(M:Name/Arity)),
|
||||
not(problog:problog_predicate(Name, Arity)),
|
||||
\+ problog_tabled(M:Name/Arity),
|
||||
\+ problog:problog_predicate(Name, Arity),
|
||||
throw(problog_neg_error('Error: goal must be dynamic and tabled', M:G)).
|
||||
problog_neg(M:G):-
|
||||
% exact inference
|
||||
@@ -446,20 +446,20 @@ problog_neg(M:G):-
|
||||
M:G,
|
||||
b_getval(problog_current_proof, L),
|
||||
open_end_close_end(L, [Trie]),
|
||||
not(open_end_memberchk(Trie, IDs)),
|
||||
\+ open_end_memberchk(Trie, IDs),
|
||||
open_end_add_unique(not(Trie), IDs, NIDs),
|
||||
b_setval(problog_current_proof, NIDs).
|
||||
problog_neg(M:G):-
|
||||
% monte carlo sampling
|
||||
problog:problog_control(check, mc),
|
||||
not(M:G).
|
||||
\+ M:G.
|
||||
|
||||
% This predicate assigns a synonym for negation that means: NotName = problog_neg(Name)
|
||||
problog_tabling_negated_synonym(Name, NotName):-
|
||||
recorded(problog_table_synonyms, negated(Name, NotName), _), !.
|
||||
problog_tabling_negated_synonym(Name, NotName):-
|
||||
retractall(has_synonyms),
|
||||
assert(has_synonyms),
|
||||
assertz(has_synonyms),
|
||||
recordz(problog_table_synonyms, negated(Name, NotName), _).
|
||||
|
||||
problog_tabling_get_negated_from_pred(Pred, Ref):-
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user