In this example, we will illustrate the use of:
by defining a simple profiler that prints the starting and ending time for processing a message sent to an object.
In a pure object-oriented system, all computations start by sending messages to objects. We can thus define an event as the sending of a message to an object. An event can then be specified by the tuple (Object, Message, Sender)
. This definition can be refined by interpreting the sending of a message and the return of the control to the object that has sent the message as two distinct events. We call these events respectively before
and after
. Therefore, we end up by representing an event by the tuple (Event, Object, Message, Sender)
. For instance, if we send the message:
| ?- foo::bar(X). X = 1 yes
the two corresponding events will be:
(before, foo, bar(X), user) (after, foo, bar(1), user)
Note that the second event is only generated if the message succeeds. If the message as a goal have multiple solutions, then one after
event will be generated for each solution.
Events are automatically generated by the message sending mechanisms for each public message sent using the ::/2
operator.
A monitor is an object that reacts whenever a spied event occurs. The monitor actions are defined by two event handlers: before/3
for before
events and after/3
for after
events. These predicates are automatically called by the message sending mechanisms when an event registered for the monitor occurs. These event handlers are declared as public predicates in the monitoring
built-in protocol.
In our example, we need a way to get the current time before and after we process a message. We will assume that we have a time
object implementing a cpu_time/1
predicate that returns the current CPU time for the Prolog session:
:- object(time). :- public(cpu_time/1). :- mode(cpu_time(-number), one). ... :- end_object.
Our profiler will be named stop_watch
. It must define event handlers for the before
and after
events that will print the event description (object, message, and sender) and the current time:
:- object(stop_watch, implements(monitoring)). % event handler predicate declarations :- uses(time). before(Object, Message, Sender) :- write(Object), write(' <-- '), writeq(Message), write(' from '), write(Sender), nl, write('STARTING at '), time::cpu_time(Seconds), write(Seconds), write(' seconds'), nl. after(Object, Message, Sender) :- write(Object), write(' <-- '), writeq(Message), write(' from '), write(Sender), nl, write('ENDING at '), time::cpu_time(Seconds), write(Seconds), write(' seconds'), nl. :- end_object.
After compiling and loading the stop_watch
object (and the objects that we want to profile), we can use the define_events/5
built-in predicate to set up our profiler. For example, to profile all messages that are sent to the object foo
, we need to call the goal:
| ?- define_events(_, foo, _, _, stop_watch). yes
This call will register stop_watch
as a monitor to all messages sent to object foo
, for both before
and after
events. Note that we say "as a monitor", not "the monitor": we can have any number of monitors over the same events.
From now on, every time we sent a message to foo
, the stop_watch
monitor will print the starting and ending times for the message execution. For instance:
| ?- foo::bar(X). foo <-- bar(X) from user STARTING at 12.87415 seconds foo <-- bar(1) from user ENDING at 12.87419 seconds X = 1 yes
To stop profiling the messages sent to foo
we use the abolish_events/5
built-in predicate:
| ?- abolish_events(_, foo, _, _, stop_watch). yes
This call will abolish all events defined over the object foo
assigned to the stop_watch
monitor.
before
events, generated before a message is processed, and after
events, generated after the message processing completed successfully.monitoring
built-in protocol in the object opening directive.before/3
and after/3
, that are automatically called by the runtime engine when a spied event occurs.define_events/5
, current_event/5
, and abolish_events/5
, enables us define, query, and abolish both events and monitors.