Fix typos and fill todo

README.md

@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
 ---
-title: Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing
-subtitle: Assignment \#4
+title: "Security and Privacy - Assignment 4"
+subtitle: "Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing"
 author:
-  - Diogo Cordeiro (up201705417)
-  - Hugo Sales (up201704178)
+  - Diogo Cordeiro (201705417)
+  - Hugo Sales (201704178)
 date: 2022/06/02
+geometry: margin=2cm
+output: pdf_document
 ---
 
 # Attribute classification
@@ -33,13 +35,14 @@ Table: Attribute classifications
 
 ## Justifications
 
-The vast majority of attributes present extremely low values of distinction. We speculate this may
-be an TODO
+The vast majority of attributes present low values of distinction. This is consistent with the nature of
+the dataset, considering that `fnlwgt` should indicate the quantity of individuals that present the same
+set of attributes.
 
 ### `age`
 
-According to HIPPA recommendations, and together with it's very high separation value (99.87%), this
-attribute is classified as a QID.
+According to HIPPA recommendations, and together with it's very high separation value (99.87%), we classify
+this attribute as a QID.
 
 ### `workclass`
 
@@ -49,11 +52,11 @@ deemed Insensitive.
 ### `fnlwgt`
 
 Despite high values of distinction (66.48%) and separation (99.99%) the `fnlwgt` column is not a QID
-becuase it represents a weight, not a count of individuals in the same equivalence class in the
+because it represents a weight, not a count of individuals in the same equivalence class in the
 original dataset. This can be seen with the results below. Additionally, it's not easily connected
 to another auxiliary info dataset.
 
-```bash
+```sh
 $ tail -n '+2' adult_data.csv | awk -F',' '{count[$10] += $3;} \
     END {for(sex in count){print sex, count[sex]}}'
 ```
@@ -65,7 +68,7 @@ Sex    | Sum
 Female | 2000673518
 Male   | 4178699874
 
-Table: Sum of `fnlwgt` for each `sex` {#tbl:sex_weight}
+Table: Sum of `fnlwgt` for each `sex`
 
 The sum of these values is 6,179,373,392. This value is much larger than the population of the
 U.S.A., the origin of the dataset, which implies this attribute is not a count, as stated.
@@ -74,22 +77,21 @@ We also note there are substantially more Male than Female records (more than do
 
 ### `education`
 
-This attribute presents a separation of 80.96%, which is quite high, so this attribute is classified
-as a QID.
+This attribute presents a separation of 80.96%, which is quite high, thus we classified it as a QID.
 
 ### `education-num`
 
-We exported the anonymized dataset and used the following command to verify there weren't any discrepencies between the
-`education` and `education-num` columns:
+We exported the anonymized dataset and used the following command to verify there weren't any discrepencies
+between the `education` and `education-num` columns:
 
-```bash
+```sh
 $ cat anonymized.csv | sed -r 's/,([^ ])/\t\1/g' | awk -F';' '{print $5, $4}' | sort -un
 ```
 
-Since there was a one-to-one mapping, we concluded this was just a
+Since there was a one-to-one mapping, we confirmed this was just a
 representation of the `education` attribute. As such, this attribute
 recieves the same classification, which is backed by the equally high
-separation value of 80.96%, so it's qualified as a QID.
+separation value of 80.96%, so it's classified as a QID.
 
 ### `marital-status`
 
@@ -106,7 +108,7 @@ Given it's separation value of 73.21%, this attribute is classified as a QID.
 
 ### `race`
 
-This collumn presents some weirdly specified values (Amer-Indian-Eskimo), but has a separation of 25.98%; given the fact
+This collumn presents some weirdly specific values (Amer-Indian-Eskimo), but has a separation of 25.98%; given the fact
 that this attribute could be cross referenced with other datases, it is classified as a QID, so
 it may be transformed into more generic values.
 
@@ -115,7 +117,7 @@ it may be transformed into more generic values.
 Despite the low separation value of 44.27%, this attribute is canonically classified as a QID, since
 it can be easily cross referenced with other datasets.
 
-We noted this dataset seems to more males than females. See @tbl:sex_weight and the following table
+We noted this dataset seems to have more males than females. See Table 2 and the following table
 
 `education`  | Female | Male
 -------------+-------:+----:
@@ -136,7 +138,7 @@ Masters		 |	  536 | 1187
 Prof-school	 |	   92 |	 484
 Doctorate	 |	   86 |	 327
 
-Table: Number of records with each `education` for each `sex` {#tbl:education_sex}
+Table: Number of records with each `education` for each `sex`
 
 ### `capital-gain` & `capital-loss`
 
@@ -276,8 +278,10 @@ Privacy, they were split into only 2 categories.
 
 # Observations
 
-We noted that the contingency between `sex` and `relationship` maintained the same distribution after anonymization,
-meaning that these changes don't mean `relationship` can identify an individual's `sex` any more than in the original dataset.
+We noted that the contingency between `sex` and `relationship` maintained
+the same distribution after anonymization, meaning that these changes don't
+mean `relationship` can identify an individual's `sex` any more than in the
+original dataset.
 
 With the following commands, we noted some possible errors in the
 original dataset, where the `sex` and `relationship` attributes didn't
@@ -285,8 +289,9 @@ map entirely one to one: there was one occurence of (Husband, Female)
 and two of (Wife, Male). It's possible this is an error in the
 original dataset.
 
-```bash
-$ cat adult_data.csv | tail -n +2 | sed -r 's/,([^ ])/\t\1/g' | cut -d',' -f8,10 | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
+```sh
+$ cat adult_data.csv | tail -n +2 | sed -r 's/,([^ ])/\t\1/g' |
+cut -d',' -f8,10 | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
 
       1  Husband, Female
       2  Wife, Male
@@ -302,8 +307,9 @@ $ cat adult_data.csv | tail -n +2 | sed -r 's/,([^ ])/\t\1/g' | cut -d',' -f8,10
   13192  Husband, Male
 ```
 
-```bash
-$ cat anonymized.csv | tail -n +2 | sed -r 's/,([^ ])/\t\1/g' | cut -d';' -f8,10 | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | column -s ';' -t
+```sh
+$ cat anonymized.csv | tail -n +2 | sed -r 's/,([^ ])/\t\1/g' |
+cut -d';' -f8,10 | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | column -s ';' -t
 
    1295 {Husband, Wife}              Female
    2264 {Other-relative, Own-child}  Female
@@ -314,5 +320,5 @@ $ cat anonymized.csv | tail -n +2 | sed -r 's/,([^ ])/\t\1/g' | cut -d';' -f8,10
   12637 {Husband, Wife}              Male
 ```
 
-Since there were occurences of (Wide, Male), "({Husband, Wife}, Male)"
+Since there were occurences of (Wife, Male), "({Husband, Wife}, Male)"
 does not undo the transformation of the `relationship` attribute.

render.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+pandoc README.md --pdf-engine=xelatex -o report.pdf